Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease increases the risk of intensive care unit admittance and mechanical ventilation use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Association between reflux esophagitis and pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

A discernible correlation exists between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the precise nature of the association between reflux esophagitis (RE) and COPD remains inadequately understood. In this study, we investigated the link between RE and pulmonary function, with a specific emphasis on elucidating the interplay between RE and COPD regarding lung function.

Methods

The study cohort comprised patients who underwent both pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and endoscopic examinations within a one-year period preceding and following their PFTs at The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from April 2021 to October 2023. Key demographic variables including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), as well as results from PFTs and endoscopy, were systematically documented for each participant. Statistical evaluations were conducted utilizing SPSS Statistics version 29.0, with significance determined at a threshold of P<0.05.

Results

Among patients with COPD, there were notable distinctions between cohorts categorized into RE and non-RE groups concerning several pulmonary function parameters, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF75/25), and expiratory reserve volume (ERV). Furthermore, there were statistically significant disparities observed in peak expiratory flow (PEF). Overall, RE did not exhibit an association with COPD severity, and there was no notable correlation found between the COPD severity and RE.

Conclusions

RE has been identified as a factor contributing to diminished pulmonary function in both individuals without underlying respiratory conditions and those diagnosed with COPD. Nevertheless, an absence of interaction was observed between the severity of COPD and the presence of RE.

Multimorbidities in COPD are Associated With Increased Exacerbations and Health Care Resource Utilization in Real-World Patients from a U.S. Database

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often develop other morbidities, suggesting a systemic component to this disease. This retrospective noninterventional cohort study investigated relationships between multimorbidities in COPD and their impact on COPD exacerbations and COPD-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) using real-world evidence from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed. Overall comorbidity burden and proportion of individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes, or osteoporosis/osteopenia were compared in age-matched COPD versus non-COPD cohorts using descriptive statistics. COPD exacerbations and COPD-related HCRU (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) were compared between age-matched cohorts of COPD patients with and without specific common morbidities (GERD, diabetes, and osteoporosis/osteopenia). Additional weight-matching was performed for matched cohorts of COPD patients with and without diabetes, and with and without osteoporosis/osteopenia. The follow-up period was 5 years.

RESULTS

Age-matched cohorts with and without COPD each comprised 158,106 patients. Morbidities were more common in the COPD cohort than the cohort without COPD (GERD: 44.9% versus 27.8%; diabetes: 40.8% versus 31.1%; osteoporosis/osteopenia: 18.8% versus 14.1%, respectively). Compared with matched cohorts with COPD only, cohorts of COPD patients with either GERD, diabetes, or osteoporosis/osteopenia experienced increased risk of severe exacerbations (odds ratio [OR]=1.819, OR=1.119, and OR=1.373, respectively), moderate exacerbations (OR=1.699, OR=1.102, and OR=1.322, respectively), or any exacerbations (OR=1.848, OR=1.099, and OR=1.384, respectively, p<0.001 for all comparisons) and increased risk of COPD-related HCRU (emergency department visits: OR=1.983, OR=1.098, and OR=1.343, respectively; hospitalization visits: OR=2.222, OR=1.26, and OR=1.368, respectively; p<0.001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

These real-world data confirm that GERD, diabetes, and osteoporosis are common morbidities in patients with COPD and, moreover, that they affect frequency of exacerbation and HCRU. Determining and addressing the mechanisms behind the systemic effects of COPD may be beneficial for COPD patients and may also help reduce COPD exacerbations.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Decreased lower and upper esophageal sphincter pressures, esophageal dysmotility, high transdiaphragmatic pressure, and decreased saliva secretion have been implicated as mechanisms leading to the development of GERD in COPD. Clinically, comorbid GERD in COPD is reportedly associated with worse symptoms, quality of life, and lung function, as well as a high risk of exacerbations. Aspiration of regurgitation and the cholinergic-mediated esophagobronchial reflex play a significant role in the pathophysiology. Abnormal swallowing reflexes and discoordination of swallowing can worsen aspiration. The diagnosis of GERD is not based on a single criterion; however, various approaches, including questionnaires and endoscopic evaluations, can be widely applied in clinical settings. Due to the increased risk of esophageal and gastric cancers in patients with COPD, the threshold for endoscopic examination should be low. Acid inhibitory agents, such as proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists, and prokinetic agents, including mosapride and itopride, are clinically used to treat GERD. Endoscopic fundoplication can be performed in patients with GERD refractory to medical treatment. There is still insufficient evidence, but an increasing number of studies have suggested the clinical efficacy of treatment in patients with COPD and GERD. As GERD is an evaluative and treatable common disease, and access to evaluation and treatment is relatively easy, clinicians should provide adequate care for GERD in the management of COPD.

Linking the impact of aspiration to host variables using the BOLUS framework: support from a rapid review

Purpose

The purpose of this rapid review was to identify the level of evidence for a previously proposed theoretical framework to assess risks associated with prandial aspiration using the host as a central theme.

Methods

Covidence software was used to search two databases (PubMed and Web of Science). PEDro scale was utilized to determine the quality of individual studies. Data points were evaluated for level of support and determined to be either conclusive, suggestive, unclear, or not supportive. Within each component of the framework, data points were clustered to determine the level of evidence as strong, moderate, insufficient, or negative.

Results

The rapid review process resulted in a limited number of publications investigating host variables impact on outcomes for patients with swallowing disorders. Overall, it yielded 937 articles, of which, upon review, 16 articles were selected for data extraction. There was a strong level of evidence to support that (a) as viscosity and density of aspirate increased, so did the likelihood of general medical complications, (b) poor oral care and oral health increase the risk of a pulmonary or general medical complication, and (c) the presence of oropharyngeal or laryngeal tubes increases the risk of a pulmonary consequence. There was moderate evidence to support the impact of amount and frequency of aspiration on outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to determine relationships for all other aspects of the BOLUS framework.

Conclusion

Additional evidence to support the BOLUS framework was obtained; however, the number of studies was limited. A more thorough review such as a systematic review should be employed.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and the risk of respiratory diseases: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have suggested a suspected association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory diseases, but the causality remains equivocal. The goal of this study was to evaluate the causal role of GERD in respiratory diseases by employing Mendelian randomization (MR) studies.

METHODS

We conducted Mendelian randomization analysis based on summary data of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and three MR statistical techniques (inverse variance weighted, weighted median and MR-Egger) were employed to assess the probable causal relationship between GERD and the risk of respiratory diseases. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out to ensure more trustworthy results, which involves examining the heterogeneity, pleiotropy and leave-one-SNP-out method. We also identified 33 relevant genes and explored their distribution in 26 normal tissues.

RESULTS

In the analysis, for every unit increase in developing GERD, the odds ratio for developing COPD, bronchitis, pneumonia, lung cancer and pulmonary embolism rose by 72% (ORIVW = 1.72, 95% CI 1.50; 1.99), 19% (ORIVW = 1.19, 95% CI 1.11; 1.28), 16% (ORIVW = 1.16, 95% CI 1.07; 1.26), 0. 3% (ORIVW = 1.003, 95% CI 1.0012; 1.0043) and 33% (ORIVW = 1.33, 95% CI 1.12; 1.58), respectively, in comparison with non-GERD cases. In addition, neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was found in the study. This study also found that gene expression was higher in the central nervous system and brain tissue than in other normal tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided evidence that people who developed GERD had a higher risk of developing COPD, bronchitis, pneumonia, lung cancer and pulmonary embolism. Our research suggests physicians to give effective treatments for GERD on respiratory diseases. By exploring the gene expression, our study may also help to reveal the role played by the central nervous system and brain tissue in developing respiratory diseases caused by GERD.

The Causal Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) often coexist and have been associated in observational studies. However, the real potential causal relationship between GERD and COPD is unknown and not well established.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization(MR) to estimate whether GERD and COPD are causal. The GERD genetic data is from summary level data of a genome-wide association (GWAS) meta-analysis (Ncases = 71,522, Ncontrol=26,079). The COPD GWAS are available from the FinnGen (Ncases=16,410, Ncontrol=283,589). MR-Egger regression, Weighted Median, and Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) were used for MR analysis from the R package "TwoSampleMR", and IVW was the dominant estimation method. Additionally, the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), Cochran Q statistic, and leave-one-out analysis were used to detect and correct for the effect of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy.

Results

MR analysis indicated that GERD was causally associated with an increased risk of COPD (IVW odds ratio (OR): 1.3760, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1565-1.6371, P=0.0003), and vice versa (IVW OR: 1.1728, 95% CI:1.0613-1.2961, P=0.0018). The analyses did not reveal any pleiotropy or heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Our study revealed possible evidence for a bidirectional causal relationship between GERD and COPD. Implementing screening and preventive strategies for GERD in individuals with COPD, and vice versa, will be crucial in future healthcare management. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the causal relationship between GERD and COPD.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was suggested to be associated with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in recent years. The aim of this study was to examine the association between GERD and COPD exacerbation through a meta-analysis.

Methods

Databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched with a systematic searching strategy for original articles, published until Jan 2019, without language restriction.

Results

A total of 13,245 patients from 10 observational articles were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that GERD is associated with increased risk of COPD exacerbation (OR: 5.37; 95% CI 2.71–10.64). Patients with COPD and GERD had increased number of exacerbation (WMD: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.65).

Conclusions

The meta-analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between GERD and COPD exacerbation.

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experiences among COPD patients with comorbid gastrooesophageal reflux disease

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore perceptions of experience exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with comorbid gastrooesophageal reflux disease by focusing on unravelling how patients differentiate and react to symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastrooesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND

While gastrooesophageal reflux disease has been suggested to be a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, no study has explored perceptions of the symptoms leading up to severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease events among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with comorbid gastrooesophageal reflux disease.

DESIGN

Qualitative design.

METHODS

The analysis was performed in accordance with principles of Grounded Theory methodology. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews from 12 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with endoscopy-diagnosed gastrooesophageal reflux disease who had experienced a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation with hospitalisation. Appraisal and analysis using consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist were undertaken.

RESULTS

The core category of this study was the ineffective management of exacerbation symptoms, which was associated with perceived symptoms pre-exacerbation which contained three overlapping categories of symptom presentation experienced, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related coping strategies, high anxiety and a sense of helplessness in disease management.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with comorbid gastrooesophageal reflux disease presented with some distinctly different atypical symptoms yet used common respiratory symptom management strategies. Patients and practitioners alike need to be more aware of the possibility of other symptoms such as nonspecific symptoms being clues of exacerbation onset for a more effective intervention.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The medical community needs to educate patients to understand and manage not only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but also gastrooesophageal reflux disease symptoms so that they are better able to identify the cause of their symptoms, treat them appropriately and seek out medical assistance when necessary.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

When gastro-oesophageal reflux is causing symptoms or lesions in the oesophagus, this is referred to as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD can manifest itself through typical symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) or may lead to extra-oesophageal symptoms. Extra-oesophageal manifestations of GERD gained increasing attention over the last decade, especially respiratory disorders, because of the prevalent co-occurrence with GERD. The role of GERD in the pathogenesis of respiratory disorders has become a topic of intense discussion.

AIM

To provide an overview of the current knowledge on the role of GERD in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

PubMed was searched for relevant articles using the keywords: GERD, asthma, COPD, prevalence, treatment. Case reports were excluded, only English language articles were considered.

RESULTS

Estimates for the prevalence of GERD in asthma range from 30% to 90%, compared to an average of 24% in controls. In COPD patients, the prevalence of GERD ranges from 19% to 78% compared to an average of 18% in controls. These data indicate an increased prevalence of GERD in patients with asthma and COPD, although causality is not established and GERD treatment yielded inconsistent effects. Literature supports GERD as a risk factor for COPD-exacerbations and a predictor of the 'frequent-exacerbator'-phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high prevalence of GERD in asthma and COPD, a causal link is lacking. The results of anti-reflux therapy on pulmonary outcome are inconsistent and contradictory. Future studies will need to identify subgroups of asthmatics and COPD patients that may benefit from anti-reflux therapy (nocturnal or silent reflux).

Gastroesophageal Reflux in the Intensive Care Unit Patient

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the critically ill patient in the intensive care unit is unknown. Interventions used in critically ill patients, such as sedation, tracheal tubes, mechanical ventilation, enteral feedings, positioning, and medications, along with specific patient characteristics and comorbid conditions contribute to an increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in this population. Critical care nurses have an integral role in helping identify critically ill patients at risk for GER or with known GERD, in preventing complications associated with these conditions.

Acute lung injury induced by whole gastric fluid: hepatic acute phase response contributes to increase lung antiprotease protection

Background

Gastric contents aspiration in humans is a risk factor for severe respiratory failure with elevated mortality. Although aspiration-induced local lung inflammation has been studied in animal models, little is known about extrapulmonary effects of aspiration. We investigated whether a single orotracheal instillation of whole gastric fluid elicits a liver acute phase response and if this response contributes to enrich the alveolar spaces with proteins having antiprotease activity.

Methods

In anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats receiving whole gastric fluid, we studied at different times after instillation (4 h −7 days): changes in blood cytokines and acute phase proteins (fibrinogen and the antiproteases alpha1-antitrypsin and alpha2-macroglobulin) as well as liver mRNA expression of the two antiproteases. The impact of the systemic changes on lung antiprotease defense was evaluated by measuring levels and bioactivity of antiproteases in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Markers of alveolar-capillary barrier derangement were also studied. Non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskall-Wallis) and linear regression analysis were used.

Results

Severe peribronchiolar injury involving edema, intra-alveolar proteinaceous debris, hemorrhage and PMNn cell infiltration was seen in the first 24 h and later resolved. Despite a large increase in several lung cytokines, only IL-6 was found elevated in blood, preceding increased liver expression and blood concentration of both antiproteases. These changes, with an acute phase response profile, were significantly larger for alpha2-macroglobulin (40-fold increment in expression with 12-fold elevation in blood protein concentration) than for alpha1-antitrypsin (2–3 fold increment in expression with 0.5-fold elevation in blood protein concentration). Both the increment in capillary-alveolar antiprotease concentration gradient due to increased antiprotease liver synthesis and a timely-associated derangement of the alveolar-capillary barrier induced by aspiration, contributed a 58-fold and a 190-fold increase in BALF alpha1-antitrypsin and alpha2-macroglobulin levels respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Gastric contents-induced acute lung injury elicits a liver acute phase response characterized by increased mRNA expression of antiproteases and elevation of blood antiprotease concentrations. Hepatic changes act in concert with derangement of the alveolar capillary barrier to enrich alveolar spaces with antiproteases. These findings may have significant implications decreasing protease burden, limiting injury in this and other models of acute lung injury and likely, in recurrent aspiration.