Ten areas for ICU clinicians to be aware of to help retain nurses in the ICU

Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission

Critical illness is an exquisitely time-sensitive condition and follows a disease continuum, which always starts before admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), in the majority of cases even before hospital admission. Reflecting the common practice in many healthcare systems that critical care is mainly provided in the confined areas of an ICU, any delay in ICU admission of critically ill patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, if appropriate critical care interventions are provided before ICU admission, this association is not observed. Emergency critical care refers to critical care provided outside of the ICU. It encompasses the delivery of critical care interventions to and monitoring of patients at the place and time closest to the onset of critical illness as well as during transfer to the ICU. Thus, emergency critical care covers the most time-sensitive phase of critical illness and constitutes one missing link in the chain of survival of the critically ill patient. Emergency critical care is delivered whenever and wherever critical illness occurs such as in the pre-hospital setting, before and during inter-hospital transfers of critically ill patients, in the emergency department, in the operating theatres, and on hospital wards. By closing the management gap between onset of critical illness and ICU admission, emergency critical care improves patient safety and can avoid early deaths, reverse mild-to-moderate critical illness, avoid ICU admission, attenuate the severity of organ dysfunction, shorten ICU length of stay, and reduce short- and long-term mortality of critically ill patients. Future research is needed to identify effective models to implement emergency critical care systems in different healthcare systems.

"We're sinking": a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system

BACKGROUND

Despite longstanding efforts and calls for reform, Canada's incremental approach to healthcare changes has left the country lagging behind other OECD nations. Reform to the Canadian healthcare system is essential to develop a higher performing system. This study sought to gain a deeper understanding of the views of Canadian stakeholders on structural and process deficiencies and strategies to improve the Canadian healthcare system substantially and meaningfully.

METHODS

We conducted individual, ~ 45-minute, semi-structured virtual interviews from May 2022 to August 2022. Using existing contacts and snowball sampling, we targeted one man and one woman from five regions in Canada across four stakeholder groups: (1) public citizens; (2) healthcare leaders; (3) academics; and (4) political decision makers. Interviews centered on participants' perceptions of the state of the current healthcare system, including areas where major improvements are required, and strategies to achieve suggested enhancements; Donabedian's Model (i.e., structure, process, outcomes) was the guiding conceptual framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified, and inductive thematic analysis was performed independently and in duplicate according to published methods.

RESULTS

The data from 31 interviews with 13 (41.9%) public citizens, 10 (32.3%) healthcare leaders, 4 (12.9%) academics, and 4 (12.9%) political decision makers resulted in three themes related to the structure of the healthcare system (1. system reactivity; 2. linkage with the Canadian identity; and 3. political and funding structures), three themes related to healthcare processes (1. staffing shortages; 2. inefficient care; and 3. inconsistent care), and three strategies to improve short- and long-term population health outcomes (1. delineating roles and revising incentives; 2. enhanced health literacy; 3. interdisciplinary and patient-centred care).

CONCLUSION

Canadians in our sample identified important structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system. Meaningful reforms are needed and will require addressing the link between the Canadian identity and our healthcare system to facilitate effective development and implementation of strategies to improve population health outcomes.

Impact of COVID-19-related restricted family presence policies on Canadian pediatric intensive care unit clinicians: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) worldwide restricted family presence in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to explore the experiences and impact of restricted family presence policies on Canadian PICU clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study that followed an interpretive phenomenological design. Participants were PICU clinicians providing direct patient care in Canada during periods of COVID-19-related restricted family presence. We purposively sampled for maximum variation among survey participants who consented to be contacted for further research on the same topic. In-depth interviews were conducted remotely via telephone or video-call, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Interviews were inductively coded and underwent thematic analysis. Proposed themes were member-checked by interviewees.

RESULTS

Sixteen PICU clinicians completed interviews. Interviewees practiced across Canada, represented a range of disciplines (eight nurses, two physicians, two respiratory therapists, two child life specialists, two social workers) and years in profession (0-34 years). We identified four themes representing the most meaningful aspects of restricted family presence for participants: 1) balancing infection control and family presence; 2) feeling disempowered by hospital and policy-making hierarchies; 3) empathizing with family trauma; and 4) navigating threats to the therapeutic relationship.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric intensive care unit clinicians were impacted by restricted family presence policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. These policies contributed to feelings of disempowerment and challenged clinicians' perceived ability to provide the best family-centred care possible. Frontline expertise should be incorporated into the design and implementation of policies to best support family-centred care in any context and minimize risks of moral distress for PICU clinicians.

Factors associated with healthcare providers' satisfaction with end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to synthesize published data on and identify factors associated with healthcare providers' satisfaction with end-of-life care for critically ill adults.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from inception to January 23, 2023. We included trials involving adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) or high-dependency units to evaluate palliative care interventions.

STUDY SELECTION

The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Adult patients (age ≥18 years) or their family members admitted to the ICU or a high-dependency unit; 2) ICU palliative care interventions; 3) Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials; and 4) Full-text, peer-reviewed articles published in English. Two reviewers screened and extracted the data and assessed bias risk. The primary outcome was an improvement in the healthcare providers' satisfaction based on the validated scales.

RESULTS

Out of 12 studies, 9 investigated combined dimension intervention. Healthcare providers' satisfaction improved in 6/7 (85.7%) of the studies testing educational intervention, 5/7 (71.4%) studies testing the effectiveness of palliative care team involvement, 4/5 (80%) of studies testing communication interventions, while 0/2 (0%) study testing ethic consultations.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the tested palliative care interventions were associated with improved healthcare provider satisfaction in intensive care units. The impacts of such intervention on mental health and burden remain to be investigated in this field.

Nurses' Professional Quality of Life and Self-Care: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Improving retention of nurses working in critical care is an urgent priority. Ideas on how to do this abound, but actual data are inconclusive. One common theory is that simply increasing nurse resiliency will minimize turnover.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether knowledge and application of compassionate self-care practices can significantly improve nurses' professional quality of life and thereby promote their retention.

METHODS

This pilot study had a mixed-methods design. A training program in self-care techniques was implemented in a level IV trauma care secondary hospital, with data collected before and after the intervention by means of written surveys. Study participants were 40 nursing professionals working in an intensive care unit and a medical/surgical unit. The underlying theory was Jean Watson's framework of human caring.

RESULTS

The study results showed that, although the participants evaluated the training program positively and reported improved work-life balance, they did not experience a statistically significant change in professional quality of life from before the intervention to after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings are consistent with current literature indicating that prevention of compassion fatigue and burnout cannot be achieved by the efforts of individuals alone but requires collaboration between professionals and their institutions, with special attention to 3 elements: (1) a healthy work environment, (2) organizational support, and (3) nurse resiliency.

Critical care and pandemic preparedness and response

Critical care was established partially in response to a polio epidemic in the 1950s. In the intervening 70 yr, several epidemics and pandemics have placed critical care and allied services under extreme pressure. Pandemics cause wholesale changes to accepted standards of practice, require reallocation and retargeting of resources and goals of care. In addition to clinical acumen, mounting an effective critical care response to a pandemic requires local, national, and international coordination in a diverse array of fields from research collaboration and governance to organisation of critical care networks and applied biomedical ethics in the eventuality of triage situations. This review provides an introduction to an array of topics that pertain to different states of pandemic acuity: interpandemic preparedness, alert, surge activity, recovery and relapse through the literature and experience of recent pandemics including COVID-19, H1N1, Ebola, and SARS.

Prolonged use of intravenous administration sets on central line associated bloodstream infection, nursing workload and material use: A before-after study

OBJECTIVES

One of the interventions to reduce risk of central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is routine replacement of the intravenous administration sets. Guidelines advises a time interval that ranges between four and seven days. However many hospitals replace intravenous administration sets every four days to prevent CLABSI.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

In this single centre retrospective study we analysed whether the extension of the time interval from four to seven days for routine replacement of intravenous administration sets had impact on the incidence of CLABSI and colonization of the central venous catheter. Secondary outcomes were the effects on nursing workload, material use and costs.

RESULTS

In total, 1,409 patients with 1,679 central lines were included. During the pre-intervention period 2.8 CLABSI cases per 1,000 catheter days were found in comparison with 1.3 CLABSI cases per 1,000 catheter days during the post-intervention period. The rate difference between the groups was 1.52 CLABSI cases per 1,000 catheter days (95% CI: -0.50 to +4.13, p = 0.138). The intervention resulted in a saving of 345 intravenous single use plastic administration sets and 260 hours nursing time, and reduced cost with an estimate of at least 17.250 Euros.

CONCLUSION

Extension of the time interval from four to seven days for routine replacement of intravenous administration sets did not negatively affect the incidence of CLABSI.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Additional benefits of the prolonged time interval were saving of nursing time by avoiding unnecessary routine procedures, the reducing of waste because of reducing the use of disposable materials and healthcare costs.

The early impact of COVID-19 on intensive care nurses' personal and professional well-being: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intensive care nurses personal and professional well-being.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

A descriptive, qualitative design was used. Two nurse researchers conducted one-on-one interviews via Zoom or TEAMS using a semi-structured interview guide.

SETTING

Thirteen nurses who were working in an intensive care unit in the United States participated in the study. A convenience sample of nurses who completed a survey in the larger parent study provided an email and were contacted by the research team to participate in interviews to discuss their experiences.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

An inductive approach to content analysis was used to develop categories.

FINDINGS

Five major categories emerged from the interviews: (1) We are not heroes, (2) inadequate support, (3) helplessness, (4) exhaustion, and (5) Nurses the second victim.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a physical and mental health toll on intensive care nurses. The impact of the pandemic on personal and professional well-being has serious implications for retaining and expanding the nursing workforce.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This work highlights the importance for bedside nurses to advocate for systemic change to improve the work environment. It is imperative for nurses to have effective training including evidence-based practice and clinical skills. There needs to be systems in place to monitor and support nurses' mental health and encourage bedside nurses to use self-care methods and practices to prevent anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and burnout.

Burnout in Nurses of an Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19: A Pilot Study in Portugal

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate burnout in intensive care unit nurses and describe the relationship between burnout dimensions and sociodemographic and professional variables.

METHODS

A pilot study was carried out with 29 intensive care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data were collected using an online questionnaire consisting of a sociodemographic characterization and the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey. In the comparative statistical analysis, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The Emotional Exhaustion dimension represented an average of 27.9 ± 10.4, and the Personal Fulfillment of 30.8 ± 7.0 was considered high. Regarding Depersonalization, medium-level results (8.1 ± 6.0) were found. There was a prevalence of 41.3% of high levels of burnout. There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison between the three dimensions and sociodemographic and professional variables (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The global results point to high levels of burnout in nurses, with greater expression in the Emotional Exhaustion and Professional Fulfillment domains. There were no differences between groups, demonstrating homogeneity in the team's level of burnout. The incidence of burnout in this study was higher than that identified in other studies carried out in Portugal with health professionals. This pilot study will allow the defining of strategies for reducing burnout and, consequently, a proposed extension of the study to other organization wards.