López L, Valencia B, Alvarez F, Ramos AP, Llanos-Cuentas A, Echevarria J, Vélez I, Boni M, Rode J, Quintero J, Jiménez A, Tabares Y, Méndez C, Arana B. A phase II multicenter randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining thermotherapy and a short course of miltefosine for the treatment of uncomplicated cutaneous leishmaniasis in the New World.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022;
16:e0010238. [PMID:
35255096 PMCID:
PMC9560618 DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0010238]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Systemic pentavalent antimonials, mainly meglumine antimoniate, continue to be the first-choice drugs for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) despite their toxicity, difficulty of administration and high cost. In the search for therapeutic alternatives, combining two treatment interventions has emerged as a potential alternative to either reduce the use of antimonials with the associated toxicities, or to increase efficacy. Here, we report the results of a recently completed trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a combination of thermotherapy (TT) plus a short course of miltefosine (MLT) for the treatment of uncomplicated CL in Colombia and Peru.
Methods
A multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, phase II, controled clinical trial was conducted. Adult volunteers with a parasitologically confirmed diagnosis of uncomplicated CL were randomly allocated to receive either a single session of TT or a combination of TT plus a short course of MLT (3 weeks). Therapeutic response outcomes and safety were assessed.
Results
130 subjects were included in the study, of whom 64 were randomly assigned to the TT arm and 66 to the TT + MLT arm. Cure at 3 months’ follow-up was achieved in 57.8% (n = 37) and 80.3% (n = 53) in the TT and TT + MLT groups, respectively, in the intention to treat analysis. The TT + MLT regimen was better that TT alone (p = 0.0055). The presence of vesicles at the site of heat application was the most common adverse event reported associated with the use of TT; while vomiting (31.8%) and elevation of liver enzymes (28.8%) were the most frequent adverse events reported associated with the use of MLT.
Conclusion
The combination of TT plus a short course of MLT was shown to be significantly better than TT alone for the treatment of uncomplicated CL in the New World.
Trial registration
Registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT02687971.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a disease caused by Leishmania parasites transmitted by sandflies. It is a complex and neglected disease. Generally, it manifests as ulcers, nodules, or other lesions, mainly on the face and extremities. An estimated 0.7–1 million new cases occur annually in around 88 countries in South and Central America, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, with the appearance of new outbreaks in different regions of the world.
For more than 70 years, pentavalent antimonials have been the first line treatment, despite their toxicity, varying efficacy and need of administration of painful injections for 20 days or more.
There is limited availability of effective and safe treatment alternatives and the strength of scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of the different schemes is variable, limiting the control of the disease from a therapeutic approach. Hence the need for effective, safe, low-cost treatment alternatives with non-invasive routes of administration.
This article reports the results of a clinical trial aiming to evaluate a combined therapy with two therapeutic alternatives (miltefosine and thermotherapy) approved for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, comparing it with thermotherapy alone. In this study, the combined therapy was significantly better than the monotherapy in managing cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Collapse