Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Assessment of the condylar response of two differently anchored fixed functional appliances in class II malocclusion in young adult orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Measuring the condylar volume changes after treatment with skeletally anchored type IV Herbst appliance vs. Twin Force Bite Corrector (TFBC) in class II malocclusion in young adult patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty class II malocclusion participants were randomly involved in our randomized clinical study. They are divided equally into two groups: group I (10 patients with an age range of 16 to 18 years and a mean age of (17.15 ± 0.62) (five males and five females) with a mean Angle formed between (A) point and (Nasion) point and (B) point, to determine anteroposterior relation between maxilla and mandible (ANB) of 6.20 (1.03) and a mean mandibular length of 106.1 (1.7), who were treated by a skeletally anchored type IV Herbst appliance, supported at the mandible by two mini-plates fixed bilaterally at the mandibular symphysis; group II (10 patients with an age range of 15 to 18 years and a mean age of (16.85 ± 0.33) (six males and four females) with a mean ANB of 6.80 (0.89) and a mean mandibular length of 107.3 (2.36), who were treated by a TFBC that was installed just mesial to the tube of the maxillary first permanent molar and distal to the bracket of the lower canine for 4 months. According to the Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need (IOFTN) index, the participants in both groups have grade 4 (great need for treatment) as they have excessive overjet (6-9 mm). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken just before installing fixed functional appliances and after the removal. The condylar volume was measured using Dolphin software. Parametric measurements were performed by the independent t-test, while non-parametric variables (percent change) were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

On the right side, the Herbst group recorded a percent increase (median = 1.23%), while TFBC recorded a median percent decrease (-7.85%). This change is statistically significant (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the condylar volume was significantly higher with the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance than with the dentally anchored TFBC group.

The Use of TADs in the Mandibular Arch to Prevent Proclination of the Lower Incisors during the Use of the Mini Scope Herbst Appliance

Class II malocclusions are the most frequent within the Italian population. Normally, these malocclusions are caused by a reduction in a mandibular component whose functional stimulus is still very much cause for debate. The negative effect of all types of Class II functional appliances is in the proclination of the lower incisors, which, in subjects whose incisors are already labially inclined, must be checked at all times to avoid serious consequences to these elements. In this case study, a girl aged 14 years and 5 months presented with Class II malocclusion, 2^nd division with a convex profile and a visibly retruded chin. The lower incisors presented a marked proclination (-1/Go-Gn ini = 107.7°) in a brachyfacial patient. To avoid further inclination of the lower incisors a Herbst appliance was mounted in two separate sittings. The first part of the appliance including the tubes was mounted to the upper jaw allowing the vestibularisation of the upper incisors in order to increase the overjet. Once this was obtained the lower part of the appliance was mounted together with the telescopic arms associated with two temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in positions 36-37 and 46-47, and an anterior section 33-43 with distal loop to which two double metallic ligatures were anchored at the TADs to contrast the negative effect of the appliance. At the end of the first functional phase, the treatment was refined using MBK fixed therapy to finish the case. The orthodontic therapy led to a visible improvement of the profile and the achievement of a first-class dental-skeletal result on both sides. From the cephalometric evaluation carried out immediately after the Herbst appliance treatment at time T1 and at the end of the orthodontic therapy T2 it was possible to verify a slight increase in the inclination of the lower incisors (-1/Go-Gn fin = 108°). In conclusion, it can be said that the use of the skeletal anchorage avoided, in this case, the proclination effect in the lower incisors due to the use of a Herbst appliance.

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence regarding the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage devices (BMSADs) used in treating growing class II malocclusion patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and LILACS up to November 2021, which was augmented by a manual search. The studies included were clinical trials (RCTs) and/or follow-up observational studies (retrospective and prospective). The outcomes of interest were the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and occlusal treatment-induced changes obtained from pre- and post-cephalometric measurements. The risks of bias of the included studies were assessed using an assessment tool from previous publications.

RESULTS

Out of 742 screened articles, only 4 were eligible and thus included in the qualitative synthesis. They showed a moderate overall risk of bias. The results are presented as mean changes in both the study and control groups. All studies reported retrusion of the maxillary base and advancement of the mandible (meaning reduced ANB angle). Three of the included studies reported an increase in the vertical jaw relation, which was contrary to what the fourth study reported. Three studies reported an increase in the maxillary incisors' inclination or position, while one study reported their retroclination. Proclination of the mandibular incisors happened in two studies, whereas the other two studies reported retroclination. The overjet was reduced in all included studies.

CONCLUSION

Apart from the protrusive effects on the mandible, retrusive effects on the maxilla, and the consequent reduction of the overjet, BMSADs results in inconsistent skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. However, the current evidence is limited due to the variability in the biomechanics of the intermaxillary components, type of anchorage, and comparable groups in the included studies. Further RCTs with more standardized methodologies are highly encouraged.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BMSADs (using miniscrews or miniplates on both jaws) induces more skeletal than dentoalveolar effects. However, this must be practiced with caution, based on the benefit to risk (surgical insertion) ratio, and the limited evidence available in hand so far. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, No.: CRD42020199601).

Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of fixed functional appliances (FFAs) in conjunction with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) has been proposed to enhance skeletal changes and reduce proclination of the lower incisors.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of FFAs with TADs on Class II malocclusion in adolescents.

METHODS

Electronic searches of databases and manual searches of references were performed up to August 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) focusing on adolescent patients treated with FFAs combining TADs were included. The modified Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (R.O.B 2.0) and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions) Tool were used to assess the risk of bias in RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Meta-analyses of SNA, SNB, ANB, Co-Gn, SN-MP, the lower and upper incisor inclination changes were performed. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted based on TAD types, FFA types, record types and types of study designs.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included with a sample size of 281. Meta-analyses revealed significant differences in the changes in SNB (mean difference [MD] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-1.29), ANB (MD -1.22, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.39), Co-Gn (MD 1.57; 95% CI 0.22-2.92), inclination of the lower incisors (MD -5.64, 95% CI -7.78 to -3.50)] and inclination of the upper incisors (MD -1.91; 95% CI -3.69 to -0.13). TAD types and FFA types seem to affect the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with FFAs alone, FFAs with TADs exhibit superior skeletal effects and reduce the inclination of the lower incisors in the short term; however, the evidence showed moderate to high risk of bias. Registration number CRD42020177611.

Treatment efficiency of activator and skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device appliances

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the treatment efficiency of miniplate anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (MAF) as compared with the activator appliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mandibular retrognathia was treated with two methods, the MAF group (8 girls, 11 boys, mean age 13.03 ± 0.69 years) and the activator group (7 girls, 12 boys, mean age 12.68 ± 0.73 years). An untreated control group (9 girls, 10 boys, mean age 12.95 ± 0.73 years) was constructed to eliminate growth-related changes through the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Legacy Collection. Data of 114 lateral cephalograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The inhibition of the maxillary growth was greater in the MAF group, whereas forward displacement of the mandible was higher in the activator group (P < 0.05). Sagittal maxillomandibular relation was improved similarly in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). Mandibular length was increased in both treatment groups with the highest increase in the activator group (P < 0.05). Retroclination of the incisors was observed in the MAF group (P < 0.05). The upper lip was retruded in the MAF group and lower lip was protruded in the activator group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The activator created greater mandibular changes, whereas the MAF provides somewhat smaller mandibular changes due to the restriction caused by retroclined maxillary incisors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although both MAF and activator treatments caused favorable maxillomandibular changes, new treatment alternatives that reduce dentoalveolar side effects and eliminate patient cooperation are still required to achieve skeletal correction in class II malocclusion treatment in growing patients.

Four TADs supported Herbst mechanics: A case report

The Herbst appliance (HA) is considered an efficient method to treat class II malocclusion characterized by mandibular retrusion. Nevertheless, HA is although hampered by side effects reducing its therapeutic potentialities. The association between HA and TADs in the lower arch has proved to be very effective in controlling lower incisor flaring. This case report shows that the insertion of TADs in both arches offers a satisfactory control of the vertical dimension, by avoiding a maxillary clockwise inclination.