1
|
Early Negativization of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Nasal Spray of Seawater plus Additives: The RENAISSANCE Open-Label Controlled Clinical Trial. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14112502. [PMID: 36432693 PMCID: PMC9696981 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 is an asymptomatic condition in 40% of cases, and most symptomatic patients present with mild/moderate disease not requiring hospitalization or intensive care, especially during the Omicron wave, when the hospitalization rate was estimated to be 0.3%. The main port of entry for SARS-CoV-2 in the human body is the nasal cavity and the upper respiratory tract is affected since the early stages of the infection. Nasal irrigation or aerosol by isotonic or hypertonic saline solution is a traditional therapeutic approach for respiratory or nasal inflammation, also featured by prophylactic properties against upper respiratory infections. Methods: We conducted a prospective open-label controlled study to assess the superiority of an already existing medication (Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800)-a sterile hypertonic solution containing seawater, xylitol, panthenol and lactic acid-to reduce the viral shedding time in patients affected by asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. COVID-19 patients (N = 108) were split into two groups: a treatment arm (50 participants receiving standard of care plus nasal spray 3 times/day with Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800) and a control arm (58 participants receiving standard of care but nasal spray with Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800). The two groups, both testing initially positive for SARS-CoV-2 at real-time PCR (RT-PCR) on nasal swab, were followed up over time to assess the daily number of positive swab tests turning negative (study endpoint). Treatment effectiveness at various time lags since the first positive RT-PCR swab test was measured by rate of events in the experimental arm (EER) and in the control arm (CER), absolute risk increase (ARI) = (EER - CER), and number needed to treat (NNT) = (1/ARI). To investigate the endpoint, we used logistic and Cox regression models, expressing the result as odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI), respectively. The symptoms recorded with a modified COVID-Q questionnaire at both diagnosis and first negative antigenic swab test were compared in each group (treated versus controls) by exact symmetry test. Results: During the first five days of treatment, COVID-19 patients treated with Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800 were more likely to become negative two days before controls. According to NNT, four subjects had to be treated for five days to achieve the study endpoint in one individual. The negativization rate in patients treated with Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800 was significantly higher than patients' treated with standard of care alone (OR = 7.39, 95%CI: 1.83-29.8; HR = 6.12, 95%CI: 1.76-21.32). There was no evidence of side effects. Conclusions: Nasal spray with Tonimer Lab Panthexyl 800 was effective against SARS-CoV-2, stopping viral shedding in the treatment arm two days before the control group. This treatment should be continued for at least five days after the first positive swab test for SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chuaypen N, Siripongsakun S, Hiranrat P, Tanpowpong N, Avihingsanon A, Tangkijvanich P. Improvement of liver fibrosis, but not steatosis, after HCV eradication as assessment by MR-based imaging: Role of metabolic derangement and host genetic variants. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269641. [PMID: 35696400 PMCID: PMC9191717 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant liver fibrosis regression occurs after hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy. However, the impact of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on steatosis is less clear. This study was aimed at evaluating serial fibrosis and steatosis alterations in patients with HCV genotype 1, who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). We enrolled 55 HCV mono-infected and 28 HCV/HIV co-infected patients receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir from a clinical trial. Fibrosis and steatosis were assessed at baseline, follow-up week-24 (FUw24) and week-72 (FUw72) by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and proton density fat fraction (PDFF), respectively. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) rs738409, transmembrane six superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) rs58542926 and membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain-containing 7 (MBOAT7) rs641738 polymorphisms were determined by allelic discrimination. Overall, mean MRE decreased significantly from baseline to FUw24 and FUw72. At FUw72, patients with baseline F2-F4 had higher rate of ≥30% MRE decline compared with individuals with baseline F0-F1 (30.2%vs.3.3%, P = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, significant fibrosis was associated with MRE reduction. The prevalence of steatosis (PDFF≥5.2%) at baseline was 21.7%. Compared to baseline, there were 17 (20.5%) patients with decreased PDFF values at FUw72 (<30%), while 23 (27.7%) patients had increased PDFF values (≥30%). Regarding the overall cohort, mean PDFF significantly increased from baseline to FUw72, and displayed positive correlation with body mass index (BMI) alteration. In multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes, PNPLA3 CG+GG genotypes and increased BMI at FUw72 were significantly associated with progressive steatosis after SVR. Other genetic variants were not related to fibrosis and steatosis alteration. This study concluded that HCV eradication was associated with fibrosis improvement. However, progressive steatosis was observed in a proportion of patients, particularly among individuals with metabolic derangement and PNPLA3 variants. The combined clinical parameters and host genetic factors might allow a better individualized strategy in this sub-group of patients to alleviate progressive steatosis after HCV cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natthaya Chuaypen
- Center of Excellence in Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surachate Siripongsakun
- Sonographer School, Faculty of Health Science Technology, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pantajaree Hiranrat
- Sonographer School, Faculty of Health Science Technology, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natthaporn Tanpowpong
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anchalee Avihingsanon
- The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration (HIV NAT), Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pisit Tangkijvanich
- Center of Excellence in Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Effects of Individualized Nursing Based on Zero-Defect Theory on Perioperative Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. DISEASE MARKERS 2022; 2022:5086350. [PMID: 35607441 PMCID: PMC9124088 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5086350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study is aimed at analyzing the effects of individualized nursing based on the zero-defect theory on perioperative patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods 174 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 1st November 2019 to 30th November 2020 were enrolled as the research subjects and randomly divided into control and observation groups. The patients in the control group received conventional perioperative nursing care, and the patients in the observation group were treated with individualized nursing based on the zero-defect theory. Results The heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and systolic blood pressure level of patients in two groups after nursing decreased significantly, and the reduction in the observation group was more significant than that in the control group. The depression and anxiety scores of the two groups after nursing were decreased, and the decrease in the observation group was significantly greater than that in the control group. The time to first postoperative exhaust, return to normal intake, out-of-bed activity, and hospital stay in the observation group was less than that in the control group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was substantially lower than that in the control group. The satisfaction degree of nursing care in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Conclusion Individualized nursing care based on zero-defect theory can effectively reduce the perioperative psychological stress response of patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It helps to improve the negative emotions of depression and anxiety, promotes the recovery of disease, reduces postoperative complications, and improves nursing satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
|
4
|
Latenstein CSS, Hannink G, van der Bilt JDW, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schreinemakers JMJ, Wiering B, Boermeester MA, Drenth JPH, van Laarhoven CJHM, Dijkgraaf MGW, de Reuver PR. A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e213706. [PMID: 34379080 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance There is currently no consensus on the indication for cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease. Objective To report on the development and validation of a multivariable prediction model to better select patients for surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This study evaluates data from 2 multicenter prospective trials (the previously published Scrutinizing (In)efficient Use of Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Trial Concerning Variation in Practice [SECURE] and the Standardized Work-up for Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis [Success] trial) collected from the outpatient clinics of 25 Dutch hospitals between April 2014 and June 2019 and including 1561 patients with symptomatic uncomplicated cholelithiasis, defined as gallstone disease without signs of complicated cholelithiasis (ie, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones or cholecystitis). Data were analyzed from January 2020 to June 2020. Exposures Patient characteristics, comorbidity, surgical outcomes, pain, and symptoms measured at baseline and at 6 months' follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures A multivariable regression model to predict a pain-free state or a clinically relevant reduction in pain after surgery. Model performance was evaluated using calibration and discrimination. Results A total of 1561 patients were included (494 patients in 7 hospitals in the development cohort and 1067 patients in 24 hospitals in the validation cohort; 6 hospitals included patients in both cohorts). In the development cohort, 395 patients (80.0%) underwent cholecystectomy. After surgery, 225 patients (57.0%) reported that they were pain free and 295 (74.7%) reported a clinically relevant reduction in pain. A multivariable prediction model showed that increased age, no history of abdominal surgery, increased visual analog scale pain score at baseline, pain radiation to the back, pain reduction with simple analgesics, nausea, and no heartburn were independent predictors of clinically relevant pain reduction after cholecystectomy. After internal validation, good discrimination was found (C statistic, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84) between patients with and without clinically relevant pain reduction. The model had very good overall calibration and minimal underestimation of the probability. External validation indicated a good discrimination between patients with and without clinically relevant pain reduction (C statistic, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.78) and fair calibration with some overestimation of probability by the model. Conclusions and Relevance The model validated in this study may help predict the probability of pain reduction after cholecystectomy and thus aid surgeons in deciding whether patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis will benefit from cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bastiaan Wiering
- Department of Surgery, Slingeland Ziekenhuis, Doetinchem, the Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Latenstein CSS, van Dijk AH, Wennmacker SZ, Drenth JPH, Westert GP, van Laarhoven CJHM, Boermeester MA, Dijkgraaf MGW, de Reuver PR. Budget Impact of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy (SECURE-trial). J Surg Res 2021; 268:59-70. [PMID: 34284321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing restrictive strategy versus usual care in patients with gallstones showed that savings by restrictive strategy could not compensate for the lower proportion of pain-free patients. However, four subgroups based on combined stratification factors resulted in less cholecystectomies and more pain-free patients in restrictive strategy (female-low volume-BMI > 30, female-low volume-BMI25-30, female-high volume-BMI25-30, and male-low volume-BMI < 25). The aim of this study was to explore the budget impact from a hospital healthcare perspective of implementation of restrictive strategy in these subgroups. METHODS Data of the SECURE-trial were used to calculate the hospital budget impact with a time horizon of four years. Based on a study into practice variation, about 19% of hospitals treat patients according restrictive strategy. This represents the proportion of patients treated according restrictive strategy at the start of budget period. Three subanalyses were performed: a scenario analysis in which 30% of patients fall under a restrictive strategy in clinical practice, a sensitivity analysis in which we calculated the budget impact with the low and high 95% confidence limits of the expected future number of patients, a subgroup analysis in which restrictive strategy was also implemented in two additional subgroups (male-high volume-BMI < 25 and female-high volume-BMI >30). RESULTS Budget impact analysis showed savings of €6.7-€15.6 million (2.2%-5.6%) for the period 2021-2024/2025 by implementing the restrictive strategy in the four subgroups and provision of usual care in other patients. Sensitivity analysis with 30% of patients already in the restrictive strategy at the start of the budget period, resulted in savings between €5.4 million and €14.0 million (1.7%-5.0%). CONCLUSION Performing a restrictive strategy for selection of cholecystectomy in subgroups of patients and provision of usual care in other patients will result in a lower overall hospital budget needed to treat patients with abdominal pain and gallstones. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022. Registered on June 5, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen S S Latenstein
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Aafke H van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Z Wennmacker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gert P Westert
- IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Abdominal Pain (SECURE-Trial). Ann Surg 2020; 276:e93-e101. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
Lee LS, Tsai MC, Brooks D, Oh PI. Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2019; 5:e000589. [PMID: 31749981 PMCID: PMC6830457 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on aerobic exercise capacity (V̇O2peak), in women only, with coronary artery disease (CAD) and who were referred to a large, 24-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. Secondary objectives included comparing the effects of AIT versus MICE on cognition, cardiovascular risk profile, adherence and quality of life before and after the 24-week CR programme. Methods Thirty-one postmenopausal women with CAD (left ventricular ejection fraction >35%; 68.2±9.2 years of age; V̇O2peak: 19.1±3.5 mL kg-1 min-1) were randomised to 24 weeks of usual care MICE (60%–80% of V̇O2peak, five times per week) or AIT (four 4-min intervals at 90%–95% of peak heart rate, three times per week+two times per week usual care MICE). Differences between and within groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests and paired samples t-tests, respectively. Treatment effect analysis of AIT on V̇O2peak and secondary outcomes was determined using analysis of covariance with baseline values as covariates. Results A randomised controlled trial study design was unfeasible in this female CAD population. Unanticipated challenges in recruitment availability and eligibility, in combination with a 59% and 50% attrition rate in the AIT and MICE group, respectively, rendered this study underpowered to detect differences between groups. The per protocol treatment effect analysis, however, unveiled a 0.95 mL kg-1 min-1 improvement in V̇O2peak in response to AIT over MICE (p<0.001). Conclusions Further research is necessary to elucidate the patient profile and circumstances under which the potential for the implementation of AIT may be individualised, and offered in clinical practice. Trial registration NCT02966158.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanna S Lee
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Cardiac Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ming-Chang Tsai
- Department of Biomechanics and Performance Analysis, Canadian Sport Institute Pacific, Victoria, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Dina Brooks
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Cardiac Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul I Oh
- Cardiac Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Dijk AH, Wennmacker SZ, de Reuver PR, Latenstein CSS, Buyne O, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, Hof KI', Janssen J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schaap HM, Steenvoorde P, Stockmann HBAC, Boerma D, Westert GP, Drenth JPH, Dijkgraaf MGW, Boermeester MA, van Laarhoven CJHM. Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019; 393:2322-2330. [PMID: 31036336 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30941-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines advise laparoscopic cholecystectomy to treat symptomatic, uncomplicated gallstones. Usual care regarding cholecystectomy is associated with practice variation and persistent post-cholecystectomy pain in 10-41% of patients. We aimed to compare the non-inferiority of a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection with usual care to assess (in)efficient use of cholecystectomy. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority study in 24 academic and non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. We enrolled patients aged 18-95 years with abdominal pain and ultrasound-proven gallstones or sludge. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either usual care in which selection for cholecystectomy was left to the discretion of the surgeon, or a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy. For the restrictive strategy, cholecystectomy was advised for patients who fulfilled all five pre-specified criteria of the triage instrument: 1) severe pain attacks, 2) pain lasting 15-30 min or longer, 3) pain located in epigastrium or right upper quadrant, 4) pain radiating to the back, and 5) a positive pain response to simple analgesics. Randomisation was done with an online program, implemented into a web-based application using blocks of variable sizes, and stratified for centre (academic versus non-academic and a high vs low number of patients), sex, and body-mass index. Physicians and patients were masked for study-arm allocation until after completion of the triage instrument. The primary, non-inferiority, patient-reported endpoint was the proportion of patients who were pain-free at 12 months' follow-up, analysed by intention to treat and per protocol. A 5% non-inferiority margin was chosen, based on the estimated clinically relevant difference. Safety analyses were also done in the intention-to treat population. This trial is registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4022. FINDINGS Between Feb 5, 2014, and April 25, 2017, we included 1067 patients for analysis: 537 assigned to usual care and 530 to the restrictive strategy. At 12 months' follow-up 298 patients (56%; 95% CI, 52·0-60·4) were pain-free in the restrictive strategy group, compared with 321 patients (60%, 55·6-63·8) in usual care. Non-inferiority was not shown (difference 3·6%; one-sided 95% lower CI -8·6%; pnon-inferiority=0·316). According to a secondary endpoint analysis, the restrictive strategy resulted in significantly fewer cholecystectomies than usual care (358 [68%] of 529 vs 404 [75%] of 536; p=0·01). There were no between-group differences in trial-related gallstone complications (40 patients [8%] of 529 in usual care vs 38 [7%] of 536 in restrictive strategy; p=0·16) and surgical complications (74 [21%] of 358 vs 88 [22%] of 404, p=0·77), or in non-trial-related serious adverse events (27 [5%] of 529 vs 29 [5%] of 526). INTERPRETATION Suboptimal pain reduction in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain was noted with both usual care and following a restrictive strategy for selection for cholecystectomy. However, the restrictive strategy was associated with fewer cholecystectomies. The findings should encourage physicians involved in the care of patients with gallstones to rethink cholecystectomy, and to be more careful in advising a surgical approach in patients with gallstones and abdominal symptoms. FUNDING The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and CZ healthcare insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aafke H van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Z Wennmacker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | | | - Otmar Buyne
- Department of Surgery, Maas Hospital Pantein, Boxmeer, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Klaas In 't Hof
- Department of Surgery, FlevoHospital Almere, Almere, Netherlands
| | - Jan Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk M Schaap
- Department of Surgery, Treant Zorggroep, Emmen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwengein, Netherlands
| | - Gert P Westert
- Department of IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|