Lung Ultrasound Guided Fluid Management Protocol for the Critically Ill Patient: study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial

Lung ultrasound in the evaluation of pulmonary edema in newborns with critical congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) with increased pulmonary blood flow (PBF) are at high risk for congestive heart failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence and degree of pulmonary edema in newborns with CCHD using lung ultrasound (LUS) during the perioperative period.

METHODS

Prospective clinical trial, 44 newborn patients with CCHD were evaluated in this prospective clinical trial. LUS was repeatedly performed to determine the course of pulmonary edema during the perioperative period. LUS was performed simultaneously with chest radiography (CXR), which was the main part of patient management. The primary outcome of this study was to identify whether a correlation existed between LUS and CXR findings. The secondary outcomes were to determine the relationship between LUS and the need for respiratory support, diuretic use, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), and pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) levels during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age of the patients was 38.3 ± 1.7 weeks, with a mean birth weight of 3026 ± 432 g. In the preoperative period, both LUS and CXR images were consistent with clinical signs of pulmonary edema. On the first postoperative day, pulmonary edema increased compared to the preoperative period but gradually decreased by the 6th day of surgery (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between the LUS and CXR findings at all study points (p < 0.05). The LUS findings exhibited trends parallel to those of VIS, serum pro-BNP levels, need for respiratory support, and diuretic requirements. As expected, these trends were more pronounced in CCHDs where PBF increased.

CONCLUSION

In CCHD, serial lung ultrasound (LUS) assessments, particularly in cases with increased PBF, can provide valuable guidance for managing patients during the perioperative period.

Serial Transthoracic Ultrasonography Studies in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients: A Tool for Early Lung Pathology Detection

Early detection of pulmonary complications can improve outcomes for patients with hematological malignancy (HM). For detecting lung injuries, lung ultrasound (LUS) images have been found to be of greater sensitivity than radiographic images. Our group performed a pilot study of LUS imaging to enhance early detection of pulmonary complications in HM patients. This prospective single-center feasibility study evaluated LUS for detecting pulmonary complications in 18 HM patients enrolled while hospitalized for a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (concurrent-HCT group) or re-hospitalized for complications (post-HCT group). Serial LUS exams were performed and assigned a score from 0 to 5 based on pleural line, B-line, consolidation and pleural effusion features. Correlations between patients' clinical characteristics and LUS features were analyzed. Comparisons between the LUS and radiographic images were evaluated. In the concurrent-HCT patients (79 LUS exams), non-significant fluctuating findings were commonly identified, but one-third of the patients presented pathologic findings (LUS scores ≥ 3). In the post-HCT patients (29 LUS exams), LUS images revealed severe pathologic findings (LUS score = 5) in every patient and, compared with radiographic images, were more sensitive for detecting pleural effusions (p < 0.05). LUS can be routinely performed on hospitalized HM patients, allowing point-of-care early detection of pulmonary complications.

Lung ultrasonography findings of coronavirus disease 2019 patients: Comparison between primary and secondary regions of China

BACKGROUND

An unexplained pneumonia occurred in Wuhan, China in December 2019, later identified and named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to compare the ultrasonographic features of the lung between patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan (the primary region) and those in Beijing (the secondary region) and to find the value of applying ultrasound in COVID-19.

METHODS

A total of 248 COVID-19 cases were collected, including long-term residents in Wuhan (138), those who had a short-term stay in Wuhan (72), and those who had never visited Wuhan (38). Ultrasound examination was performed daily; the highest lung ultrasound score (LUS) was the first comparison point, while the LUS of the fifth day thereafter was the second comparison point. The differences between overall treatment and ultrasonography of left and right lungs among groups were compared.

RESULTS

The severity decreased significantly after treatment. The scores of the groups with long-term residence and short-term stay in Wuhan were higher than those of the group that had never been to Wuhan.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography is effective for dynamic monitoring of COVID-19. The ultrasonographic features of patients in the Wuhan area indicated relatively severe disease. Thus, Wuhan was the main affected area of china.

The impact of lung ultrasound on clinical-decision making across departments: a systematic review

Background

Lung ultrasound has established itself as an accurate diagnostic tool in different clinical settings. However, its effects on clinical-decision making are insufficiently described. This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of lung ultrasound, exclusively or as part of an integrated thoracic ultrasound examination, on clinical-decision making in different departments, especially the emergency department (ED), intensive care unit (ICU), and general ward (GW).

Methods

This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021242977). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for original studies reporting changes in clinical-decision making (e.g. diagnosis, management, or therapy) after using lung ultrasound. Inclusion criteria were a recorded change of management (in percentage of cases) and with a clinical presentation to the ED, ICU, or GW. Studies were excluded if examinations were beyond the scope of thoracic ultrasound or to guide procedures. Mean changes with range (%) in clinical-decision making were reported. Methodological data on lung ultrasound were also collected. Study quality was scored using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included: five studies on the ED (546 patients), five studies on the ICU (504 patients), two studies on the GW (1150 patients), and one study across all three wards (41 patients). Lung ultrasound changed the diagnosis in mean 33% (15–44%) and 44% (34–58%) of patients in the ED and ICU, respectively. Lung ultrasound changed the management in mean 48% (20–80%), 42% (30–68%) and 48% (48–48%) of patients in the ED, in the ICU and in the GW, respectively. Changes in management were non-invasive in 92% and 51% of patients in the ED and ICU, respectively. Lung ultrasound methodology was heterogeneous across studies. Risk of bias was moderate to high in all studies.

Conclusions

Lung ultrasound, exclusively or as a part of thoracic ultrasound, has substantial impact on clinical-decision making by changing diagnosis and management in the EDs, ICUs, and GWs. The current evidence level and methodological heterogeneity underline the necessity for well-designed trials and standardization of methodology.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-021-00253-3.

Lung Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management versus Standard Care in Surgical ICU Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The value of lung ultrasound (LU) in assessing extravascular lung water (EVLW) was demonstrated by comparing LU with gold-standard methods for EVLW assessment. However, few studies have analysed the value of B-Line score (BLS) in guiding fluid management during critical illness. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate if a BLS-guided fluid management strategy could improve fluid balance and short-term mortality in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We conducted a randomised, controlled trial within the ICUs of two university hospitals. Critically ill patients were randomised upon ICU admission in a 1:1 ratio to BLS-guided fluid management (active group) or standard care (control group). In the active group, BLS was monitored daily until ICU discharge or day 28 (whichever came first). On the basis of BLS, different targets for daily fluid balance were set with the aim of avoiding or correcting moderate/severe EVLW increase. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Over 24 months, 166 ICU patients were enrolled in the trial and included in the final analysis. Trial results showed that daily BLS monitoring did not lead to a different cumulative fluid balance in surgical ICU patients as compared to standard care. Consecutively, no difference in 28-day mortality between groups was found (10.5% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.34). However, at least 400 patients would have been necessary for conclusive results.

Assessment of Volume Status and Fluid Responsiveness in Small Animals

Intravenous fluids are an essential component of shock management in human and veterinary emergency and critical care to increase cardiac output and improve tissue perfusion. Unfortunately, there are very few evidence-based guidelines to help direct fluid therapy in the clinical setting. Giving insufficient fluids and/or administering fluids too slowly to hypotensive patients with hypovolemia can contribute to continued hypoperfusion and increased morbidity and mortality. Similarly, giving excessive fluids to a volume unresponsive patient can contribute to volume overload and can equally increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, assessing a patient's volume status and fluid responsiveness, and monitoring patient's response to fluid administration is critical in maintaining the balance between meeting a patient's fluid needs vs. contributing to complications of volume overload. This article will focus on the physiology behind fluid responsiveness and the methodologies used to estimate volume status and fluid responsiveness in the clinical setting.

Effects of Lung Ultrasonography-Guided Management on Cumulative Fluid Balance and Other Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Lung ultrasonography is accurate in detecting pulmonary edema and overcomes most limitations of traditional diagnostic modalities. Whether use of lung ultrasonography-guided management has an effect on cumulative fluid balances and other clinical outcomes remains unclear. In this systematic review, we included 12 studies using ultrasonography guided-management with a total of 2290 patients. Four in-patient studies found a reduced cumulative fluid balance (ranging from -0.3 L to -2.4 L), whereas three out-patient studies found reduction in dialysis dry weight (ranging from -2.6 kg to -0.2 kg) compared with conventionally managed patients. None of the studies found adverse effects related to hypoperfusion. The use of lung ultrasonography-guided management was not associated with other clinical outcomes. This systematic review shows that lung ultrasonography-guided management, exclusively or in concert with other diagnostic modalities, is associated with a reduced cumulative fluid balance. Studies thus far have not shown a consistent effect on clinical outcomes.

Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Respiratory Failure

For critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as an indispensable tool to facilitate diagnosis and rapid therapeutic management. In ARF, there is now evidence to support the use of LUS to diagnose pneumothorax, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, and acute pulmonary embolism. In addition, the utility of LUS has expanded in recent years to aid in the ongoing management of critically ill patients with ARF, providing guidance in volume status and fluid administration, titration of positive end-expiratory pressure, and ventilator liberation. The aims of this review are to examine the basic foundational concepts regarding the performance and interpretation of LUS, and to appraise the current literature supporting the use of this technique in the diagnosis and continued management of patients with ARF.