Disease features associated with a low disease impact in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of a cross-sectional multicenter study

Impact of disease, musculoskeletal symptoms and disease control in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

BACKGROUND

Early identification, diagnosis and symptom control of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis remain unmet medical needs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the impact of disease and other characteristics between patients with psoriasis who screened positive for PsA using the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) (screen-positive group) and patients who (i) have PsA (PsA group) or (ii) screened negative for PsA (screen-negative group). Also, to determine the proportion of patients at a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in the screen-positive and PsA groups.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry. We included a convenience sample of patients with psoriasis from the screen-positive and PsA groups who completed the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID12), and a comparator screen-negative group who did not complete the PsAID12. We report descriptive summaries of demographics, comorbidities, psoriasis characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures and the proportion of patients at PASS (i.e. PsAID12 ≤ 4).

RESULTS

The screen-positive, PsA and screen-negative groups included 369, 70 and 4724 patients, respectively. The screen-positive and PsA groups had a similar impact of disease, demographics, comorbidities and psoriasis characteristics (d < 0.337). Mean PsAID12 scores were 3.1 (SD 2.3) and 3.7 (SD 2.6) in the screen-positive and PsA groups, respectively. Compared with patients who screened negative for PsA, patients who screened positive exhibited higher rates of selected known predictors of PsA such as older age, longer psoriasis duration, nail disease and inverse psoriasis. The proportion of patients at PASS was 56% and 67% for the PsA and screen-positive groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar profiles between screen-positive and PsA groups, in comparison with the screen-negative group, support observations of possible underdiagnosis of PsA and the increased impact of disease, especially musculoskeletal disease, among patients who screen positive for PsA. The high percentage of patients not at an acceptable symptom state in the PsA and screen-positive groups highlights the need to optimize care in PsA.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Composite Indices of Remission in Male and Female Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Longitudinal Cohorts

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the sex differences in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio of the outcome indices minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) with respect to clinical remission, evaluated from both the physician and patient perspective, in a multicenter cohort of patients with PsA.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts, all patients with PsA consecutively attending our rheumatology units were considered potentially eligible for the study. In all patients, a complete clinical examination was carried out. The DAPSA was calculated for each patient (DAPSA values ≤ 4 were considered as remission) and MDA was also evaluated. Patient and physician global assessment values ≤ 1 were considered as a surrogate of remission from the patient and physician perspective, respectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two patients with PsA were enrolled (mean age 55.7 [SD 12.4]; 141 male, 131 female). In both sexes, MDA had good sensitivity and specificity toward remission as assessed by the rheumatologist. Remission according to DAPSA had excellent values of specificity but lacks sensitivity in both sexes. PsAID ≤ 4 had excellent values of sensitivity but lacked specificity in both sexes. Remission defined by DAPSA values was found to be more sensitive and specific in female patients (45.4% and 100%, respectively) than in male patients (33.3% and 84.2%, respectively) with respect to physician-judged remission.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that some differences between the 2 sexes on the different outcome indices are possible. This could be important in the clinical management of patients with PsA.

Characteristics associated with the perception of high-impact disease (PsAID ≥4) in patients with recent-onset psoriatic arthritis. Machine learning-based model

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate which patient and disease characteristics are associated with the perception of high-impact disease (PsAID ≥4) in recent-onset psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter observational prospective study (2-year follow-up, regular annual visits). The study population comprised patients aged ≥18 years who fulfilled the CASPAR criteria and less than 2 years since the onset of symptoms. The dataset was generated using data for each patient at the 3 visits (baseline, first year, and second year of follow-up) matched with the PsAID values at each of the 3 visits. PsAID was categorized into two groups (<4 and ≥4). We trained a logistic regression model and random forest-type and XGBoost machine learning algorithms to analyze the association between the outcome measure and the variables selected in the bivariate analysis. A k-fold cross-validation with k = 5 was performed.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 158 patients. Of the patients who attended the clinic, 45.8% scored PsAID ≥4 at baseline; 27.1%, at the first follow-up visit, and in 23.0%, at the second follow-up visit. The variables associated with PsAID ≥4 were, in decreasing order of importance: HAQ, pain, educational level, and physical activity. Higher HAQ (logistic regression coefficient 10.394; IC95% 7.777,13.011), higher pain (5.668; 4.016, 7.320), lower educational level (-2.064; -3.515, -0.613) and high level of physical activity (1.221; 0.158, 2.283) were associated with a higher frequency of PsAID ≥4. The mean values of the measures of validity of the algorithms were all ≥85%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the higher weight given to pain when scoring PsAID, we observed a greater influence of physical function on disease impact.

Telemedicine in the Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease during COVID-19 Pandemic: Incidence of Psychiatric Disorders and Fibromyalgia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis

The management of patients with immuno-rheumatological diseases has profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine has played an important role in the disease follow-up. In addition to monitoring disease activity and any adverse events, especially infectious events, assessing the psychological situation of the patient can be fundamental. Furthermore, COVID-19 has a serious impact on mental health and, since the beginning of the pandemic, a significantly higher incidence of anxiety disorders and depressive symptoms especially in younger people was observed. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of depressive disorders, anxiety, and fibromyalgia (FM) in our patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during the lockdown period due to the COVID-19 pandemic and we validate the use of telemedicine in the clinical management of these patients. Mental and physical stress during the COVID-19 pandemic can greatly worsen FM symptoms and intensify patients’ suffering without a clinical flare of the inflammatory disease for patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Telemedicine has allowed us to identify patients who needed a face-to-face approach for therapeutic reevaluation even if not related to a flare of the inflammatory disease. Even if our data does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine as greater than or equal to the standard face-to-face approach, we continue to work by modifying our approach to try to ensure the necessary care in compliance with safety and, optimistically, this tool will become an important part of rheumatic disease management.

A clinical and radiographic comparison of patients with psoriatic arthritis from different ethnic backgrounds

OBJECTIVES

There are few papers concerning ethnic differences in disease expression in PsA, which may be influenced by a number of genetic, lifestyle and cultural factors. This article aims to compare clinical and radiographic phenotypes in people of South Asian (SA) and North European (NE) origin with a diagnosis of PsA.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study recruiting patients of SA and NE origin from two hospitals in a well-defined area in the North of England.

RESULTS

A total of 58 SA and 48 NE patients were recruited. SA patients had a more severe clinical phenotype with more tender (median 5 vs 2) and swollen (median 1 vs 0) joints, more severe enthesitis (median 3 vs 1.5), more patients with dactylitis (24% vs 8%), more severe skin disease (median PASI 2.2 vs 1) and worse disease activity as measured by the composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (mean 4.5 vs 3.6). With regards to patient-completed measures, SA patients had worse impact with poorer quality of life and function (mean HAQ 0.9 vs 0.6; mean PsAQoL 10.8 vs 6.2; mean 36-item short form physical component score 33.5 vs 38.9). No significant differences in current MTX and biologics use were found.

CONCLUSIONS

SA patients had a worse clinical phenotype and worse impact of disease than NE patients. Further studies are needed to confirm and explore the reasons behind these differences.