Ultrasound halo count in the differential diagnosis of atherosclerosis and large vessel giant cell arteritis

The Common Carotid Artery in the Ultrasound Evaluation of Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVES

Vascular ultrasound is commonly used to diagnose giant cell arteritis (GCA). Most protocols include the temporal arteries and axillary arteries, but it is unclear which other arteries should be included. This study investigated whether inclusion of intima media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA) in the ultrasound evaluation of GCA improves the accuracy of the examination.

METHODS

We formed a fast-track clinic to use ultrasound to rapidly evaluate patients with suspected GCA. In this cohort study, patients referred for new concern for GCA received a vascular ultrasound for GCA with the temporal arteries and branches, the axillary artery, and CCA.

RESULTS

We compared 57 patients with GCA and 86 patients without GCA. Three patients with GCA had isolated positive CCA between 1 and 1.49 mm, and 21 patients without GCA had isolated positive CCA IMT. At the 1.5-mm CCA cutoff, 4 patients without GCA had positive isolated CCA, and 1 patient with GCA had a positive isolated CCA. The sensitivity of ultrasound when adding carotid arteries to temporal and axillary arteries was 84.21% and specificity 65.12% at an intima media thickness (IMT) cutoff of ≥1 mm and 80.70% and 87.21%, respectively, at a cutoff of ≥1.5 mm.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of the CCA IMT rarely contributed to the diagnosis of GCA and increased the rate of false-positive results. Our data suggest that the CCA should be excluded in the initial vascular artery ultrasound protocol for diagnosing GCA. If included, an IMT cutoff of higher than 1.0 mm should be used.

Prevalence and characteristics of subclinical giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence and characteristics of subclinical GCA in patients with PMR.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional multicentre international study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PMR without symptoms or signs suggestive of GCA. All patients underwent US of the temporal superficial, common carotid, subclavian and axillary arteries. Patients with halo signs in at least one examined artery were considered to have subclinical GCA. The clinical, demographic and laboratory characteristics of the PMR group without subclinical vasculitis were compared with subclinical GCA, and the pattern of vessel involvement was compared with that of a classical single-centre GCA cohort.

RESULTS

We included 346 PMR patients, 267 (77.2%) without subclinical GCA and 79 (22.8%) with subclinical GCA. The PMR patients with subclinical GCA were significantly older, had a longer duration of morning stiffness and more frequently reported hip pain than PMR without subclinical GCA. PMR with subclinical GCA showed a predominant extracranial large vessel pattern of vasculitic involvement compared with classical GCA, where the cranial phenotype predominated. The patients with PMR in the classical GCA group showed a pattern of vessel involvement similar to classical GCA without PMR but different from PMR with subclinical involvement.

CONCLUSION

More than a fifth of the pure PMR patients had US findings consistent with subclinical GCA. This specific subset of patients showed a predilection for extracranial artery involvement. The optimal screening strategy to assess the presence of vasculitis in PMR remains to be determined.