Cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with FreeStyle Libre® in Brazilian insulin-treated patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance

OBJECTIVE

Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Medicaid must demonstrate they have self-monitored their blood glucose level at least four times daily to receive continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). New California Medicaid policies eliminated this requirement and, thus, CGM access has increased. This study examines whether infrequent baseline self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) checks result in suboptimal outcomes or nonadherence with CGM use.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study included youth with T1D and Medicaid who started CGM after January 2019, when newer models no longer needed calibration, at two large health care systems. Patients were stratified by data on baseline SMBG frequency (<4 vs. ≥4 checks daily) collected at the clinic visit prior to starting CGM. Differences between SMBG groups in CGM adherence and HbA1c over time were assessed by a mixed-effects linear regression model and fixed-effect interaction term. Patients were surveyed to explore individual impact of CGM on diabetes management.

RESULTS

We followed 78 youth for 6 months. CGM adherence was similar between SMBG frequency groups at 3 months (68.7% vs. 68.4%; P = 0.97) and sustained at 6 months. HbA1c values improved in both groups at 3 months, with a larger improvement in those with SMBG <4 daily checks (1.3% vs. 0.4%), and sustained at 6 months. Patient surveys (n = 35) reported high engagement with CGM and increased insulin boluses after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using CGM demonstrated improvement in HbA1c regardless of prior SMBG. Increased engagement with CGM likely promoted increased insulin boluses. Therefore, restriction of CGM to those with SMBG ≥4 daily checks is an unnecessary barrier, excluding those who could potentially benefit the most.

Disparities in Diabetes Technology Uptake in Youth and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Global Perspective

Globally, nearly 9 million people are living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although the incidence of T1D is not affected by socioeconomic status, the development of complications and limited access to modern therapy is overrepresented in vulnerable populations. Diabetes technology, specifically continuous glucose monitoring and automated insulin delivery systems, are considered the gold standard for management of T1D, yet access to these technologies varies widely across countries and regions, and varies widely even within high-income countries. This review focuses on disparities in diabetes technology use among adolescents and young adults with T1D, barriers to access and use, and summarizes common themes emerging across countries and regions. We conducted a survey among medical technology manufacturers and physicians in various countries across diverse geographical regions and performed extensive literature searches. Across all countries and regions, economic barriers stand out as the largest and most common barriers, either preventing market penetrance of technology into a country or limiting its access to the individual with diabetes due to high out of pocket costs. Other common barriers include structural or accessibility barriers, such as stringent eligibility requirements by insurance providers, regardless of whether the insurance was private or government-based, and provider/individual level barriers. Based on the evidence presented, we suggest the need for a joint effort involving governments, private health insurers, technology manufacturers, and healthcare providers to address the global disparities of diabetic technology utilization and ensure equitable access for all individuals living with T1D worldwide.

Expanding the horizon of continuous glucose monitoring into the future of pediatric medicine

Glucose monitoring has rapidly evolved with the development of minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using interstitial fluid. It is recommended as standard of care in the ambulatory setting, nearly replacing capillary glucose testing in those with access to CGM. The newest CGM devices continue to be smaller and more accurate, and integration with automated insulin delivery systems has further revolutionized the management of diabetes, leading to successful improvements in care and quality of life. Many studies confirm accuracy and application of CGM in various adult inpatient settings. Studies in adult patients increased during the COVID 19 Pandemic, but despite reassuring results, inpatient CGM use is not yet approved by the FDA. There is a lack of studies in inpatient pediatric settings, although data from the NICU and PICU have started to emerge. Given the exponential increase in the use of CGM, it is imperative that hospitals develop protocols for CGM use, with a need for ongoing implementation research. In this review we describe how CGM systems work, discuss benefits and barriers, summarize research in inpatient pediatric CGM use, explore gaps in research design along with emerging recommendations for inpatient use, and discuss overall CGM utility beyond outpatient diabetes management. IMPACT: Current CGM systems allow for uninterrupted monitoring of interstitial glucose excursions, and have triggered multiple innovations including automated insulin delivery. CGM technology has become part of standard of care for outpatient diabetes management, endorsed by many international medical societies, now with significant uptake, replacing capillary glucose testing for daily management in patients with access to CGM technology. Although CGM is not approved by the FDA for inpatient hospital use, studies in adult settings support its use in hospitals. More studies are needed for pediatrics. Implementation research is paramount to expand the role of CGM in the inpatient setting and beyond.

Impact of the FreeStyle Libre 2® System on Glycaemic Outcomes in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes-Preliminary Study

We aimed to evaluate glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes during the first three months of use of the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system.

METHODS

We conducted a study of a cohort of 81 people with type 1 diabetes mellitus who used the FreeStyle Libre 2 (FSL2) sensor continuously for 3 months. Patients had not used a CGM before. The effectiveness of using the FSL2 system was assessed using AGP reports at two time points (3-4 weeks and 11-12 weeks of system use).

RESULTS

Eight weeks after using FSL2, compared with results from 3-4 weeks of use, there were no differences in the glucose management indicator, time spent in range, above range and below range, or glucose variability. In the first month of FGM use, patients scanned the sensor significantly more often than in the following two months (p = 0.021). No significant differences were found in the change of the evaluated parameters when comparing patients by duration of diabetes and treatment method.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term use of FSL2 promotes a significant reduction in GMI in patients with more time spent in hyperglycaemia (especially > 250 mg/dL). In this short period of use, no other changes in glycaemic control parameters are observed.

Greek School Nurses' Confidence With Diabetes Devices

Aim School nurses often use diabetes mellitus devices as part of the care provided to students with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Diabetes Devices Confidence Scale (DDCS). Methods In this cross-sectional, descriptive study, 143 school nurses completed the DDCS. This is a self-administered questionnaire exploring the nurses' confidence in the use of diabetes devices. The scale was translated and culturally adapted according to the WHO guidelines. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha Index were used to explore the reliability and internal consistency, respectively. The construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA). Data were analyzed via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Significant correlations were observed between the two administrations (p<0.001) indicating the good reliability of the scale (ICC = 0525, p<0.001) while Cronbach's Alpha was 0.966 suggesting excellent internal consistency. The EFA resulted in a unidimensional solution explaining 53.7% of the total variance. The CFA showed that the model presents good fit to the data. Conclusions The DDCS is a reliable and valid tool to test the nurses' confidence in diabetes devices.

Continuous glucose monitoring for the routine care of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are now considered the standard of care for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus, the uptake among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been slower and is focused on those receiving intensive insulin therapy. However, increasing evidence now supports the inclusion of CGM in the routine care of people with T2DM who are on basal insulin-only regimens or are managed with other medications. Expanding CGM to these groups could minimize hypoglycaemia while allowing efficient adaptation and escalation of therapies. Increasing evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicates that CGM is of clinical value in people with T2DM on non-intensive treatment regimens. If further studies confirm this finding, CGM could soon become a part of routine care for T2DM. In this Perspective we explore the potential benefits of widening the application of CGM in T2DM, along with the challenges that must be overcome for the evidence-based benefits of this technology to be delivered for all people with T2DM.

Biobanks in chronic disease management: A comprehensive review of strategies, challenges, and future directions

Biobanks, through the collection and storage of patient blood, tissue, genomic, and other biological samples, provide unique and rich resources for the research and management of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. These samples contain valuable cellular and molecular level information that can be utilized to decipher the pathogenesis of diseases, guide the development of novel diagnostic technologies, treatment methods, and personalized medical strategies. This article first outlines the historical evolution of biobanks, their classification, and the impact of technological advancements. Subsequently, it elaborates on the significant role of biobanks in revealing molecular biomarkers of chronic diseases, promoting the translation of basic research to clinical applications, and achieving individualized treatment and management. Additionally, challenges such as standardization of sample processing, information privacy, and security are discussed. Finally, from the perspectives of policy support, regulatory improvement, and public participation, this article provides a forecast on the future development directions of biobanks and strategies to address challenges, aiming to safeguard and enhance their unique advantages in supporting chronic disease prevention and treatment.

Cost-Effectiveness of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Introduction Our department conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring devices versus capillary blood glucose in the glycemic control of inpatient type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy in a Portuguese hospital. The use of continuous glucose monitoring devices was associated with improved glycemic control, including an increased number of glucose readings within target range and reduced hyperglycemic events, being safe concerning hypoglycemias. This is the cost-effectiveness analysis associated with these results. Aim The primary objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of achieving glycemic control, defined as the number of patients within glycemic goals, between groups. Secondary endpoints included cost-effectiveness analyses of each time in range goal, and each percentual increment in time in range. Methods We defined each glycemic goal as: "readings within range (70-180 mg/dL) >70%", "readings below range (below 70 mg/dL) <4%", "severe hypoglycemia (below 54 mg/dL) <1%", "readings above range (above 180 mg/dL) <25%", "very high glycemic readings (above 250 mg/dL) <5%". Results Continuous glucose monitoring showed lower median cost per effect for the primary outcome (€11.1 vs. €34.9/patient), with lower cost for readings in range (€7.8 vs. €11.6/patient) and for both readings above range goals ("above 180mg/dL": €7.4 vs. €9.9/patient, and "above 250mg/dL": €6.9 vs. €17.4/patient). Conclusions There are no published data regarding the cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring devices in inpatient settings. Our results show that continuous glucose monitoring devices were associated with an improved glycemic control, at a lower cost, and endorse the feasibility of incorporating these devices into hospital settings, presenting a favorable cost-effective option compared to capillary blood glucose.