Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Insulin Regimes on Glycemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

The rise of weekly insulins: addressing the challenges of type 2 diabetes care in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a global health concern with a rising prevalence, particularly in Brazil. Insulin therapy plays a crucial role in managing T2D, helping to maintain glucose and energy homeostasis. Moreover, early initiation of insulin is crucial for hyperglycemic control and prevention of chronic complications. Clinical guidelines recommend initiating insulin when other treatments fail. However, several barriers may delay its initiation, contributing to therapeutic inertia and patients' non-adherence. These barriers include fear of hypoglycemia, lack of adherence, the need for glucose monitoring, the injection method of insulin administration, social rejection associated with the stigma of injections, fear of weight gain, a sense of therapeutic failure at initiation, and lack of experience among some healthcare professionals. : In this context, the development of once-weekly insulin formulations could improve initial acceptance, adherence, treatment satisfaction, and consequently, the quality of life for patients. Currently, two once-weekly insulin treatments, insulin icodec and efsitora alfa, have shown promise in clinical trials, demonstrating efficacy and safety profiles similar or better than those of daily insulin therapies.

SHORT CONCLUSION

These once-weekly insulins have the potential to emerge as landmark achievements in the evolution of insulin therapy. This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of weekly insulins in managing T2D, providing insights into the potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with a new weekly insulin therapy, specially within the Brazilian context.

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin versus once-daily insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

This meta-analysis was performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of the differences between once-weekly basal insulin (including icodec and basal insulin Fc) and once-daily basal insulin (including glargine and degludec) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 2 January 2024.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included, comprising 5,895 patients, with 3,104 (52.7%) using once-weekly insulin and 2,791 (47.3%) using once-daily insulin. In the pooled data, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline [mean difference (MD) -0.11%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.20 to -0.01%] and the odds of achieving an end-of-trial HbA1c <7% (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13, 1.77) demonstrated a significantly good glycemic control in the once-weekly insulin group, especially in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetics or patients using icodec. Body weight increase for once-weekly insulin was 0.43 kg compared to controls (95% CI 0.09 to 0.76 kg). In addition, once-weekly insulin was correlated with a higher risk of level 1 hypoglycemia (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.6). There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose (MD 2.46 mg/dL; 95% CI -2.60 to 7.52 mg/dL), time in range (MD 2.03%; 95% CI -0.50 to 4.56%), and level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.53).

Conclusions

Once-weekly basal insulin is safe and effective in modestly reducing HbA1c with similar level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events compared to once-daily insulin, although the risk of level 1 hypoglycemia and weight gain was slightly increased.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Identifier CRD42024496812.

What Is the Role of Basal Weekly Insulin in Clinical Practice? The State of the Art

Despite the advent of innovative therapies in the treatment of diabetes, ever-increasing awareness is still directed to the role of insulin since it has continued to be at the centre of diabetes therapy for decades, as a therapeutic integration of innovative agents in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as the only replacement therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and also in gestational diabetes. In this context, the study of molecules such as weekly basal insulins, both for their technological and pharmacodynamic innovation and their manageability and undoubted benefits in compliance with drug therapy, can only be a turning point in diabetes and for all its phenotypes. This review aims to provide insight into the knowledge of basal weekly insulins and their use in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus by examining their safety, efficacy, manageability and increased therapeutic compliance.

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec compared to once-daily insulin g U-100 in patients with type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND//OBJECTIVE

Diabetes affects millions of people globally, despite treatment options, adherence and other factors pose obstacles. Once-weekly Insulin Icodec, a novel basal Insulin analog with a week-long half-life, offers potential benefits, enhancing convenience, adherence, and quality of life for improved glycemic control. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly Insulin Icodec compared to once-daily Insulin Glargine U-100 in individuals with type II diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases before September 2023 to identify relevant Randomized control trials (RCTs) with no language restrictions following PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. All statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan (version 5.4; Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).

RESULT

Four RCTs published from 2020 to 2023 with a cumulative sample size of 1035 were included. The pooled mean difference (MD) revealed a 4.68% longer TIR (%) with Insulin Icodec compared to Insulin Glargine U-100 [{95% CI (0.69, 8.68), p = 0.02}], the estimated mean changes in HbA1c (%) and FPG (mg%) were found to be insignificant between the two groups [MD = - 0.12 {95% CI (- 0.26, 0.01), p = 0.07}] and [MD = - 2.59 {95% CI (- 6.95, 1.78), p = 0.25}], respectively. The overall OR for hypoglycemia was also nonsignificant between the two regimens 1.04 [{95% CI (0.71, 1.52), p = 0.84}]. Other safety parameters were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from daily Insulin Glargine U-100 to weekly Insulin Icodec showed longer TIR (%) as well as similar blood glycemic control and safety profile. Hence, it may be a good alternate option for management of longstanding T2D.