1
|
Rao SSC, Ahuja NK, Bharucha AE, Brenner DM, Chey WD, Deutsch JK, Kunkel DC, Moshiree B, Neshatian L, Reveille RM, Sayuk GS, Shapiro JM, Shah ED, Staller K, Wexner SD, Baker JR. Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2727-2739.e1. [PMID: 37302444 PMCID: PMC10542660 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a comprehensive diagnostic tool for evaluating patients with constipation, fecal incontinence, or anorectal pain; however, it is not widely utilized for reasons that remain unclear. The aim of this roundtable discussion was to critically examine the current clinical practices of ARM and biofeedback therapy by physicians and surgeons in both academic and community settings. METHODS Leaders in medical and surgical gastroenterology and physical therapy with interest in anorectal disorders were surveyed regarding practice patterns and utilization of these technologies. Subsequently, a roundtable was held to discuss survey results, explore current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges with these technologies, review the literature, and generate consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS ARM identifies key pathophysiological abnormalities such as dyssynergic defecation, anal sphincter weakness, or rectal sensory dysfunction, and is a critical component of biofeedback therapy, an evidence-based treatment for patients with dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence. Additionally, ARM has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. However, it has significant barriers that include a lack of education and training of healthcare providers regarding the utility and availability of ARM and biofeedback procedures, as well as challenges with condition-specific testing protocols and interpretation. Additional barriers include understanding when to perform, where to refer, and how to use these technologies, and confusion over billing practices. CONCLUSIONS Overcoming these challenges with appropriate education, training, collaborative research, and evidence-based guidelines for ARM testing and biofeedback therapy could significantly enhance patient care of anorectal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
| | - Nitin K Ahuja
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Darren M Brenner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William D Chey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jill K Deutsch
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David C Kunkel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Baharak Moshiree
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Atrium Health, Wake Forest Medical University, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Leila Neshatian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Robert M Reveille
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Gregory S Sayuk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Eric D Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kyle Staller
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Jason R Baker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Atrium Health, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oblizajek NR, Deb B, Ramu S(SK, Chunawala Z, Feuerhak K, Bailey KR, Bharucha AE. Optimizing techniques for measuring anal resting and squeeze pressures with high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14383. [PMID: 35468247 PMCID: PMC9529769 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal methods for measuring and analyzing anal resting and squeeze pressure with high-resolution manometry (HRM) are unclear. METHODS Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured with HRM in 90 healthy women, 35 women with defecatory disorders (DD), and 85 with fecal incontinence (FI). Pressures were analyzed with Manoview™ software and a customized approach. Resting pressures measured for 20, 60, and 300 s were compared. During the squeeze period, (3 maneuvers, 20 s each), the squeeze increment, which was averaged over 5, 10, 15, and 20 s, and squeeze duration were evaluated. RESULTS Compared to healthy women, the anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure increment, and squeeze duration were lower in FI (p ≤ 0.04) but not in DD. The 20, 60, and 300 s resting pressures were strongly correlated (concordance correlation coefficients = 0.96-0.99) in healthy and DD women. The 5 s squeeze increment was the greatest; 10, 15, and 20 s values were progressively lower (p < 0.001). The squeeze pressure increment and duration differed (p < 0.01) among the three maneuvers in healthy and DD women but not in FI women. The upper 95th percentile limit for squeeze duration was 19.5 s in controls, 19.9 s in DD, and 19.3 s in FI. Adjusted for age, resting pressure, and squeeze duration, a greater squeeze increment was associated with a lower risk of FI versus health (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that anal resting and squeeze pressures can be accurately measured over 20 s. In most patients, one squeeze maneuver is probably sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brototo Deb
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| | | | - Zainali Chunawala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Kelly Feuerhak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Kent R. Bailey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Adil E. Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bharucha AE, Basilisco G, Malcolm A, Lee TH, Hoy MB, Scott SM, Rao SSC. Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14335. [PMID: 35220645 PMCID: PMC9418387 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anorectal manometry (ARM) comprehensively assesses anorectal sensorimotor functions. PURPOSE This review examines the indications, techniques, interpretation, strengths, and weaknesses of high-resolution ARM (HR-ARM), 3-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HR-ARM), and portable ARM, and other assessments (i.e., rectal sensation and rectal balloon expulsion test) that are performed alongside manometry. It is based on a literature search of articles related to ARM in adults. HR-ARM and 3D-HR-ARM are useful for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD), to identify anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction and guide management in patients with fecal incontinence (FI), constipation, megacolon, and megarectum; and to screen for anorectal structural (e.g., rectal intussusception) abnormalities. The rectal balloon expulsion test is a useful, low-cost, radiation-free, outpatient assessment tool for impaired evacuation that is performed and interpreted in conjunction with ARM. The anorectal function tests should be interpreted with reference to age- and sex-matched normal values, clinical features, and results of other tests. A larger database of technique-specific normal values and newer paradigms of analyzing anorectal pressure profiles will increase the precision and diagnostic utility of HR-ARM for identifying abnormal mechanisms of defecation and continence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Guido Basilisco
- UO Gastroenterologia, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Matthew B Hoy
- Mayo Medical Library, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - S Mark Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anorectal Manometry in Children: The Update on the Indications and the Protocol of the Procedure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2022; 74:440-445. [PMID: 35001039 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Anorectal disorders are common in children. They are related to structural and/or functional abnormalities of the anorectum or pelvic floor with a variety of symptoms. Therefore, diagnostic tests to evaluate anorectal function can help to better understand the underlying pathophysiology and aetiology as well as facilitate patient management. During the past decades, substantial efforts have been made to improve anorectal function testing; however, more advanced investigations might lead to difficulties in interpretation. Additionally, a great diversity of equipment and protocols are used among centres, which may lead to heterogeneous interpretation of results. More studies to standardize methods of testing and validate reference values are strongly recommended in children. This review updates on the current indications and the protocol of anorectal manometry.
Collapse
|