Imatinib-induced fulminant liver failure in chronic myeloid leukemia: role of liver transplant and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a case report

The prevalence of hepatic and thyroid toxicity associated with imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Imatinib, a potent inhibitor of targeted protein tyrosine kinases, treats chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Data on imatinib-associated changes in hepatic and thyroid functions are limited and conflicting.

AIM

To report the prevalence of hepatic and thyroid toxicity associated with the use of imatinib in CML patients.

METHOD

Articles for the systematic review were selected from electronic databases (PubMed, CINALH, Web of Science). Readily accessible peer-reviewed full articles in English published 1st January 2000 to 18th July 2023 were included. The search terms included combinations of: imatinib, CML, liver toxicity, hepatic toxicity, thyroid toxicity. Screening of titles, abstracts, full text articles was conducted independently by two reviewers. Inclusions and exclusions were recorded following PRISMA guidelines. Detailed reasons for exclusion were recorded. Included articles were critically appraised.

RESULTS

Ten thousand one hundred and twenty-three CML patients were reported in the 82 included studies corresponding to 21 case reports, 2 case series, 39 clinical trials and 20 observational studies were selected. Excluding case studies/reports, 1268 (12.6%; n = 1268/10046) hepatotoxicity adverse events were reported, of which 64.7% were rated as mild grade I & II adverse events, 363 (28.6%) as severe, grade III and IV adverse events; some led to treatment discontinuation, liver transplantation and fatal consequences. Twenty (35.1%) studies reported discontinuation of imatinib treatment due to the severity of hepatic toxicity. Fourteen (8.4%, n = 14/167) thyroid dysfunction adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

High frequency of mild and severe hepatotoxicity, associated with imatinib in CML patients, was reported in the published literature. Low numbers of mild and manageable thyroid toxicity events were reported.

Toxicity of targeted anticancer treatments on the liver in myeloproliferative neoplasms

The liver has a central role in metabolism, therefore, it is susceptible to harmful effects of ingested medications (drugs, herbs, and nutritional supplements). Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) comprises a range of unexpected reactions that occur after exposure to various classes of medication. Even though most cases consist of mild, temporary elevations in liver enzyme markers, DILI can also manifest as acute liver failure in some patients and can be associated with mortality. Herein, we briefly review available data on DILI induced by targeted anticancer agents in managing classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: Chronic myeloid leukemia, polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis.

Life threatening hepatotoxicity induced by Nilotinib

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor had changed the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the overall survival had reached 95%. Unfortunately, adverse events (AEs) remain an obstacle to following successful treatment in CML impairing the quality of life and sometimes endangering the lives of patients. To this end, we show this clinical case to discuss strategies to deal with rare AEs in a way to preserve the patient's life and to maintain not only a good response to treatment but also confidence and compliance of the patient.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 57-year-old woman diagnosed with CML at the chronic phase who developed rare life-threatening hepatotoxicity (major cytolysis and prothrombin time fall) secondary to Nilotinib used as second-line treatment. This complication settled despite an optimal molecular response.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

We discuss below the follow-up and management in our center and according to the literature with more sophisticated pharmacological methods.

DISCUSSION

Although we used to monitor disease molecular response to treatment, we need solutions and manuscripts for monitoring drug dose parameters to avoid unusual dangerous effects risking the patient life. We conclude that monitoring the disease as well as the treatment pharmacokinetics is mandatory to better carry on CML patients.

A Review of Cancer Immunotherapy Toxicity II: Adoptive Cellular Therapies, Kinase Inhibitors, Monoclonal Antibodies, and Oncolytic Viruses

Immunotherapy for cancer has undergone a rapid expansion in classes, agents, and indications. By utilizing aspects of the body's innate immune system, immunotherapy has improved life expectancy and quality of life for patients with several types of cancer. Adoptive cellular therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy, involve the genetic engineering of patient T cells to allow for targeting of neoplastic cells. Monitoring of patients during the lymphodepletion prior to therapy and following CAR T cell infusion is necessary to detect toxicity of therapy. Specific toxicities include cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity, both of which may be life-threatening. Tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids should be considered for moderate to severe toxicity. Kinase inhibitor toxicity can occur as "on target" effects or "off target" effects to multiple organ systems due to shared protein epitopes. Treatments are organ-specific. Infusion reactions are common during treatment with monoclonal antibodies and treatment is largely supportive. Clinical experience with oncolytic viruses is limited, but local reactions including cellulitis as well as systemic influenza-like syndromes have been seen but are typically mild. Although clinical experience with adverse effects due to newer immunotherapy agents is growing, an up-to-date understanding of their mechanisms and potential toxicities is critical.

Unresectable GIST liver metastases and liver transplantation: A review and theoretical basis for a new indication

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) can be found synchronously to a primary tumor and in the medium/long term after resection of a high-risk GIST. In these cases, treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors like imatinib has provided good results, but drug resistance is common after two years of treatment. Liver resection of potentially resectable metastases can improve the results of medical treatment. In cases of unresectability, the role of liver transplantation (LT) has not been well-studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature was undertaken from January 1995 to December 2020 following the PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifteen cases were identified. In eight cases, the LT was carried out before 2002. Mutational status was only studied in seven cases. LT was performed in 12 cases with a deceased donor and in three cases with a living donor. After a mean follow-up of 52.4 months, overall survival was 86.6% with disease-free survival of 53.3% CONCLUSION: LT in the management of unresectable GIST metastases has rarely been performed. Although its application has a solid theoretical basis, its use understood as a radical extension of a standard resection can only be recommended within prospective studies by groups with considerable experience in both GIST and transplantation care.

Acute appendicitis revealing a diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia

Gastrointestinal manifestations of leukemias have been well recognized. Typically, acute leukemias cause typhlitis or appendicitis more commonly than chronic leukemias. Our case points to appendicitis as possible manifestation of chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Novel Score-based Decision Approach in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Acute Toxic Imatinib-induced Liver Injury

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib in rare cases can cause acute toxic hepatitis, hepatic failure, and death. Currently, the choice of further chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy in patients after acute hepatotoxicity is still a difficult question, which requires a complex individual approach based on the clinical guidelines of adverse event management. Data about the further follow-up strategy approach in patients with CML after acute toxic imatinib-induced liver injury are of concern, and at times controversial. In addition, one of the questions is about the necessity and safety of the imatinib therapy resumption after acute hepatotoxicity. In some publications, imatinib resumption without the recurrence of hepatotoxicity has been discussed; in others, imatinib resumption with the recurrence of imatinib hepatotoxicity has been mentioned. There are a few publications about the experience of administration of the second-line TKIs after acute imatinib hepatotoxicity. There are no clear data on which factors the physician's decision should be based on in patients with CML after acute toxic imatinib-induced liver injury. Imatinib should be restarted or withdrawn, when and for whom second-line therapy should be started. The physician's decision is usually based on the published data of similar cases, personal experience, and the severity of hepatotoxicity. We have discussed the clinical guidelines devoted to the peculiarities of the patient's management after acute toxic imatinib-induced hepatitis and main strategy approaches. A complex score-based decision algorithm for choosing the further strategy approach after acute toxic imatinib-induced hepatitis in patients with CML has been presented. The following parameters should be assessed: the grade of hepatotoxicity reaction, the presence of liver transplantation or imatinib-induced liver cirrhosis and its possible pathogenetic mechanism, the presence of early molecular response (EMR) to imatinib therapy defined as three-month BCR-ABL1 ≤10% according to the international scale (BCR-ABL1^IS ) or/and six-month BCR-ABL1 ^IS <1%; and the presence of the offender concomitant drug that probably caused the drug interaction with imatinib and the presence of viral hepatitis reactivation identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

A Case of Severe, Nilotinib-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is a leading reason for the discontinuation or dose modification of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications in the United States. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia who developed acute cholestatic hepatitis in response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib. Nilotinib was discontinued, and the patient's liver function tests normalized over the next 3 months. We conclude that nilotinib may cause life-threatening hepatotoxicity and recommend that patients on the medication undergo regular monitoring of their liver tests.

Сase Report of Acute Toxic Imatinib-induced Hepatitis in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Sulfa Allergy, and Rheumatoid Arthritis

The introduction of imatinib has substantially changed the approaches to the therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia. However, this drug can cause hepatic failure and death in rare cases. This report describes a clinical case of acute, toxic imatinib-induced hepatitis in a 56-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia and concomitant sulfa allergy and rheumatoid arthritis. The patient developed acute imatinib-induced hepatitis after three months of treatment with imatinib and three days after increasing the imatinib dosage from 400 mg per day to 600 mg per day, resolving within three months after imatinib discontinuation and prednisolone administration. This confirms the necessity of great caution during imatinib therapy and the monitoring of liver tests. Approximately 25 reports about clinical cases of imatinib-induced hepatitis have been published up to the present.