Therapeutic potential of ixmyelocel-T, an expanded autologous multicellular therapy for treatment of ischemic cardiovascular diseases

Mitochondrial-targeting antioxidant MitoQ modulates angiogenesis and promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

In traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), secondary injuries, including vascular injury, cellular death, mitochondrial dysfunction, and vascular injury, have been considered as important causes of impaired functional recovery after SCI. Postinjury angiogenesis has been considered to be a potential strategy for SCI treatment. New-born vessels may play a key role in nerve regeneration, which indicates the importance of angiogenesis in nerve regeneration. Recent studies have revealed the crosstalk between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and angiogenesis. As the main source of cellular ROS, mitochondria have been proven to be essential to the angiogenesis process.

METHODS

SCI was established in a T10 clip-compression animal model. Then, the animals received an intraperitoneal injection of MitoQ (1 mg/ml) on Days 0, 1, and 2 after surgery. The Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) score and footprint analysis (CatWalk analysis) were performed to evaluate functional recovery after SCI. Immunofluorescence assay (LEL-FITC/CD31/Iba-1/Neurofilament) was performed to evaluate angiogenesis, microglia activation and neural regeneration. RT-qPCR (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFA) was performed to evaluate angiogenesis-related factor in injured spinal cord. ATP production assay and western-blotting assay (Mfn-1 and Drp-1) were performed to evaluate mitochondrial function in the injured spinal cord. BV2 cells were used as in vitro cell models. After receiving TBHP or TBHP-MitoQ treatment, ELISA and immunofluorescence assays were used to evaluate the level of VEGFA secretion from BV2 cells. A coculture system of HUVECs and BV2 cells was established. Tube formation assays and immunofluorescence assays (CD31) were performed on HUVECs in a coculture system to evaluate angiogenesis promotion. ATP production assays were performed to evaluate mitochondrial function in BV2 cells. MitoSOX Red and DCFH-DA staining were performed to evaluate mitochondrial and cellular ROS.

RESULTS

In vitro MitoQ promoted the secretion of VEGFA from BV2 cells, which was verified through ELISA and immunofluorescence assays. The angiogenic promotion of MitoQ-treated BV2 cells was evaluated by tube formation and immunofluorescence assays (CD31) in a coculture system of BV2 cells and HUVECs. MitoQ inhibited cellular and mitochondrial-derived ROS in TBHP-treated BV2 cells. ATP production was increased in MitoQ-treated BV2 cells. To verify MitoQ's effect in vivo, a T10 clip-compression animal model was established successfully. MitoQ significantly promoted functional recovery, as shown by the BMS assay and gait analyser. The promotion of neural regeneration was identified through immunofluorescence assay of neurofilament. Immunofluorescence assay (LEL-FITC/CD31/Iba-1) and RT-qPCR (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFA) indicated that MitoQ could promote angiogenesis and inhibit macrophage/microglia activation in lesion-site after SCI. Enhanced ATP production and increased Mfn-1 with decreased Drp-1 protein expression showed MitoQ could promote mitochondrial function in SCI.

CONCLUSION

The mitochondrial-specific antioxidant MitoQ promotes functional recovery and tissue preservation through the enhancement of angiogenesis with the modification of mitochondrial function after SCI.

Cell Therapy: Types, Regulation, and Clinical Benefits

Cell therapy practices date back to the 19th century and continue to expand on investigational and investment grounds. Cell therapy includes stem cell- and non-stem cell-based, unicellular and multicellular therapies, with different immunophenotypic profiles, isolation techniques, mechanisms of action, and regulatory levels. Following the steps of their predecessor cell therapies that have become established or commercialized, investigational and premarket approval-exempt cell therapies continue to provide patients with promising therapeutic benefits in different disease areas. In this review article, we delineate the vast types of cell therapy, including stem cell-based and non-stem cell-based cell therapies, and create the first-in-literature compilation of the different "multicellular" therapies used in clinical settings. Besides providing the nuts and bolts of FDA policies regulating their use, we discuss the benefits of cell therapies reported in 3 therapeutic areas-regenerative medicine, immune diseases, and cancer. Finally, we contemplate the recent attention shift toward combined therapy approaches, highlighting the factors that render multicellular therapies a more attractive option than their unicellular counterparts.

[Problems and prospects of cell therapy for critical ischaemia of lower limbs]

BACKGROUND

Cell therapy was proposed as a procedure of indirect revascularization for patients with critical ischaemia of lower extremities for whom endovascular and surgical revascularization is impossible. We present herein a review of the state of the art of studies in the field of cell therapy of this cohort of patients.

BASIC PROVISIONS

Cell therapy has proved safe, however, the results of studies of efficacy are relatively ambiguous and unconvincing. The number of patients in separately taken clinical trials is minimal. The reviewed studies differed not only by heterogeneity of the cell types used but by the routes of administration of cells (cells were delivered either intramuscularly (predominantly) or intraarterially) and the duration of follow up (time of assessment and duration of follow up varied from 1 month to 2 years). One of the problems became the lack of the routine study of the angiogenic potential of stem cells prior to their clinical application. It is known that the angiogenic activity of multipotent cells of apparently healthy patients may differ from that of patients suffering from atherosclerosis, chronic renal failure, diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

It is supposed that treatment with stem cells or precursor cells is more efficient as compared to protein or gene therapy not only owing to direct vasculogenic properties but a paracrine action through excretion of proangiogenic biologically active substances. More studies with larger cohorts are necessary to provide stronger safety and efficacy data on cell therapy. Besides, a promising trend in the field of cellular approaches is modulation of regenerative capability of stem cells, which may help overcome difficulties in understanding the place of cell therapy in therapeutic angiogenesis.

Cell therapy of critical limb ischemia-problems and prospects

Cell therapy is proposed for indirect revascularization for the patient's incurable by endovascular or surgical revascularization. The therapy with stem cells (SCs) or progenitor cells is assumed to be more efficient as compared with protein or gene therapy not only because of their direct vasculogenic properties, but also thanks to their paracrine effect via secretion of manifold biologically active substances. This review gives an overview of the potential of SC-based therapy for critical limb ischemia (CLI), putative mechanism underlying cell therapy, and comparison of cell therapy to angiogenesis gene therapy in CLI treatment. Human trial data and meta-analysis, as well as some problems of clinical trials and considerations for future SC-based therapy in CLI are also discussed.

Common Injuries and Repair Mechanisms in the Endothelial Lining

Objective:

Endothelial cells (ECs) are important metabolic and endocrinal organs which play a significant role in regulating vascular function. Vascular ECs, located between the blood and vascular tissues, can not only complete the metabolism of blood and interstitial fluid but also synthesize and secrete a variety of biologically active substances to maintain vascular tension and keep a normal flow of blood and long-term patency. Therefore, this article presents a systematic review of common injuries and healing mechanisms for the vascular endothelium.

Data Sources:

An extensive search in the PubMed database was undertaken, focusing on research published after 2003 with keywords including endothelium, vascular, wounds and injuries, and wound healing.

Study Selection:

Several types of articles, including original studies and literature reviews, were identified and reviewed to summarize common injury and repair processes of the endothelial lining.

Results:

Endothelial injury is closely related to the development of multiple cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, the mechanism of vascular endothelial injury is not fully understood. Numerous studies have shown that the mechanisms of EC injury mainly involve inflammatory reactions, physical stimulation, chemical poisons, concurrency of related diseases, and molecular changes. Endothelial progenitor cells play an important role during the process of endothelial repair after such injuries. What's more, a variety of restorative cells, changes in cytokines and molecules, chemical drugs, certain RNAs, regulation of blood pressure, and physical fitness training protect the endothelial lining by reducing the inducing factors, inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress reactions, and delaying endothelial caducity.

Conclusions:

ECs are always in the process of being damaged. Several therapeutic targets and drugs were seeked to protect the endothelium and promote repair.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: Progress and Challenges

Administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to diseased hearts improves cardiac function and reduces scar size. These effects occur via the stimulation of endogenous repair mechanisms, including regulation of immune responses, tissue perfusion, inhibition of fibrosis, and proliferation of resident cardiac cells, although rare events of transdifferentiation into cardiomyocytes and vascular components are also described in animal models. While these improvements demonstrate the potential of stem cell therapy, the goal of full cardiac recovery has yet to be realized in either preclinical or clinical studies. To reach this goal, novel cell-based therapeutic approaches are needed. Ongoing studies include cell combinations, incorporation of MSCs into biomaterials, or pre-conditioning or genetic manipulation of MSCs to boost their release of paracrine factors, such as exosomes, growth factors, microRNAs, etc. All of these approaches can augment therapeutic efficacy. Further study of the optimal route of administration, the correct dose, the best cell population(s), and timing for treatment are parameters that still need to be addressed in order to achieve the goal of complete cardiac regeneration. Despite significant progress, many challenges remain.

Macrophage-based therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine

Mounting evidence suggests that therapeutic cell and drug delivery strategies designed to actively harness the regenerative potential of the inflammatory response have great potential in regenerative medicine. In particular, macrophages have emerged as a primary target because of their critical roles in regulating multiple phases of tissue repair through their unique ability to rapidly shift phenotypes. Herein, we review macrophage-based therapies, focusing on the translational potential for cell delivery of ex vivo-activated macrophages and delivery of molecules and biomaterials to modulate accumulation and phenotype of endogenous macrophages. We also review current obstacles to progress in translating basic findings to therapeutic applications, including the need for improved understanding of context-dependent macrophage functions and the myriad factors that regulate macrophage phenotype; potential species-specific differences (e.g. humans versus mice); quality control issues; and the lack of standardized procedures and nomenclature for characterizing macrophages. Looking forward, the inherent plasticity of macrophages represents a daunting challenge for harnessing these cells in regenerative medicine therapies but also great opportunity for improving patient outcomes in a variety of pathological conditions.

Concise Review: Mending a Broken Heart: The Evolution of Biological Therapeutics

Heart failure (HF), a common sequela of cardiovascular diseases, remains a staggering clinical problem, associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Advances in pharmacological, interventional, and operative management have improved patient care, but these interventions are insufficient to halt the progression of HF, particularly the end-stage irreversible loss of functional cardiomyocytes. Innovative therapies that could prevent HF progression and improve the function of the failing heart are urgently needed. Following successful preclinical studies, two main strategies have emerged as potential solutions: cardiac gene therapy and cardiac regeneration through stem and precursor cell transplantation. Many potential gene- and cell-based therapies have entered into clinical studies, intending to ameliorate cardiac dysfunction in patients with advanced HF. In this review, we focus on the recent advances in cell- and gene-based therapies in the context of cardiovascular disease, emphasizing the most advanced therapies. The principles and mechanisms of action of gene and cell therapies for HF are discussed along with the limitations of current approaches. Finally, we highlight the emerging technologies that hold promise to revolutionize the biological therapies for cardiovascular diseases. Stem Cells 2017;35:1131-1140.

Ixmyelocel-T for patients with ischaemic heart failure: a prospective randomised double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Ixmyelocel-T is an expanded, multicellular therapy produced from a patient's own bone marrow by selectively expanding two key types of bone marrow mononuclear cells: CD90+ mesenchymal stem cells and CD45+ CD14+ auto-fluorescent+ activated macrophages. Early phase clinical trials suggest that intramyocardial delivery of ixmyelocel-T might improve clinical, functional, symptomatic, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with heart failure due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of catheter-based transendocardial injection of ixmyelocel-T cell therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2B trial (ixCELL-DCM), patients from 31 sites in North America with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptomatic heart failure due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, who had left ventricular ejection fraction 35% or less, an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and who were ineligible for revascularisation procedures were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ixmyelocel-T or placebo at the time of bone marrow aspiration and followed for 12 months. Randomisation was done through an interactive (voice/web) response system. The pharmacist, treating physician, and coordinator at each site were unblinded, but the the follow-up team was completely blinded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, cardiovascular admission to hospital, and unplanned clinic visits to treat acute decompensated heart failure based on the blinded adjudication of an independent clinical endpoint committee. Primary efficacy endpoint analyses and safety analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01670981.

FINDINGS

Between April 2, 2013, and Jan 28, 2015, 126 participants were randomly assigned to receive either ixmyelocel-T (n=66) or placebo (n=60). 114 (90%) patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population and 109 (87%) patients were included in the per-protocol primary efficacy analysis (58 in the ixmyelocel-T group and 51 in the placebo group). The primary efficacy endpoint was observed in 47 patients: 50 events in 25 (49%) of 51 patients in the placebo group and 38 events in 22 (38%) of 58 patients in the ixmyelocel-T group, which represents a 37% reduction in cardiac events compared with placebo (risk ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·42-0·97]; p=0·0344). 41 (75%) of 51 participants in the placebo group had serious adverse events versus 31 (53%) of 58 in the ixmyelocel-T group (p=0·0197).

INTERPRETATION

To the best of our knowledge, ixCELL-DCM is the largest cell therapy study done in patients with heart failure so far. The transendocardial delivery of ixmyelocel-T in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy resulted in a significant reduction in adjudicated clinical cardiac events compared with placebo leading to improved patient outcomes.

FUNDING

Vericel Corporation.