1
|
Bousquet J, Akdis CA, Grattan C, Eigenmann PA, Hoffmann‐Sommergruber K, Agache I, Jutel M. Highlights and recent developments in airway diseases in EAACI journals (2018). Allergy 2019; 74:2329-2341. [PMID: 31573676 DOI: 10.1111/all.14068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) supports three journals: Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, and Clinical and Translational Allergy. EAACI's major goals include supporting the promotion of health, in which the prevention of allergy and asthma plays a critical role, and disseminating the knowledge of allergic disease to all stakeholders. In 2018, the remarkable progress in the identification of basic mechanisms of allergic and respiratory diseases as well as the translation of these findings into clinical practice were observed. Last year's highlights include publication of EAACI guidelines for allergen immunotherapy, many EAACI Position Papers covering important aspects for the specialty, better understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms, identification of biomarkers for disease prediction and progress monitoring, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multimorbidities, introduction of new drugs to the clinics, recently completed phase three clinical studies, and publication of a large number of allergen immunotherapy studies and meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
- INSERM U 1168 VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches Villejuif France
- UMR‐S 1168 Université Versailles St‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines Montigny le Bretonneux France
- EUFOREA Brussels Belgium
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| | - Clive Grattan
- St John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's Hospital London UK
| | | | | | - Ioana Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology ALL‐MED Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Medical University Wrocław Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zielen S, Kuna P, Aberer W, Lassmann S, Pfaar O, Klimek L, Wade A, Kluehr K, Raab J, Wessiepe D, Lee D, Kramer M, Gunawardena K, Higenbottam T, Heath M, Skinner M, de Kam P. Strong dose response after immunotherapy with PQ grass using conjunctival provocation testing. World Allergy Organ J 2019; 12:100075. [PMID: 31709029 PMCID: PMC6831906 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pollinex Quattro Grass (PQ Grass) is an effective, well-tolerated, short pre-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen. In this Phase II study, 4 cumulative doses of PQ Grass and placebo were evaluated to determine its optimal cumulative dose. Methods Patients with grass pollen-induced SAR were randomised to either a cumulative dose of PQ Grass (5100, 14400, 27600 and 35600 SU) or placebo, administered as 6 weekly subcutaneous injections over 31-41 days (EudraCT number 2017-000333-31). Standardized conjunctival provocation tests (CPT) using grass pollen allergen extract were performed at screening, baseline and post-treatment to determine the total symptom score (TSS) assessed approximately 4 weeks after dosing. Three models were pre-defined (Emax, logistic, and linear in log-dose model) to evaluate a dose response relationship. Results In total, 95.5% of the 447 randomized patients received all 6 injections. A highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001), monotonic dose response was observed for all three pre-specified models. All treatment groups showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline in TSS compared to placebo, with the largest decrease observed after 27600 SU (p < 0.0001). The full course of 6 injections was completed by 95.5% of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across PQ Grass groups, and mostly mild and transient in nature. Conclusions PQ Grass demonstrated a strong curvilinear dose response in TSS following CPT without compromising its safety profile.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADRs, adverse drug reactions
- AE, adverse events
- AIT, allergen immunotherapy
- ANCOVA, analysis of covariance
- ARC, adverse reaction complexes
- Allergen immunotherapy
- Allergoid
- CIA-CPT, Culture – Independent Assessment of the Conjunctival Provocation Test
- CPT, conjunctival provocation test
- Cumulative dose
- Curvilinear dose response
- EAACI, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- EMA, European Medicine Agency
- FAS, Full Analysis Set
- FEV, forced expiratory volume
- FVC, forced vital capacity
- Grass pollen
- HEP, Histamine Equivalent Potency
- LPS, lipopolysaccharide
- MCP-Mod, Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modelling
- MCT, microcrystalline tyrosine
- MPL, Monophosphoryl Lipid A
- MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
- PPS, Per Protocol Set
- SAEs, serious adverse events
- SAF, safety set
- SAR, seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
- SD, standard deviation
- SU, standardized units
- TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events
- TLR, Toll-like receptor
- TSS, Total Symptom Score
- mFAS, Modified Full Analysis Set
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Zielen
- Department for Children and Adolescents, Division of Allergology, Pulmonology and Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - P. Kuna
- Poradnia Alergologii i Chorób Płuc Lodz, Poland
| | - W. Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S. Lassmann
- Specialist in Otolaryngology, Saalfeld, Germany
| | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
| | - L. Klimek
- Centre for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - A. Wade
- Allergy Therapeutics Ltd., Worthing, UK
| | - K. Kluehr
- Allergy Therapeutics Ltd., Worthing, UK
| | - J. Raab
- Allergy Therapeutics Ltd., Worthing, UK
| | - D. Wessiepe
- Metronomia Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - D. Lee
- Allergy Therapeutics Ltd., Worthing, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - P.J. de Kam
- Allergy Therapeutics Ltd., Worthing, UK
- Corresponding author. Allergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd, Dominion Way Worthing, West Sussex BN14 8SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The conjunctival provocation test (CPT) is often used to clearly identify the specific allergen causing the symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis but also to assess the clinical efficacy of an allergen immunotherapy (AIT). As there is no consensus about its predictive value, the aim of this publication is to evaluate under which conditions the CPT can predict the symptom severity during the allergy season after previous AIT. RECENT FINDINGS Three out of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed a correlation between CPT reactivity and symptoms occurring under natural allergen exposure after previous AIT. Furthermore, one RCT found that performing the CPT 4 weeks after initiating AIT can identify early responders who also show a benefit during the season. Another RCT suggested that conducting the CPT prior to starting AIT can be used to identify patients who may benefit more from treatment than others. SUMMARY The assessment of the reviewed literature led us to the conclusion that the CPT has a predictive value and can consequently be used to assess the efficacy of an administered AIT if performed according to a standardized challenge protocol with high-quality allergen extracts.
Collapse
|