Effect of external PEEP in patients under controlled mechanical ventilation with an auto-PEEP of 5 cmH2O or higher

Early and late effects of volatile sedation with sevoflurane on respiratory mechanics of critically ill COPD patients

BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare sevoflurane, a volatile sedation agent with potential bronchodilatory properties, with propofol on respiratory mechanics in critically ill patients with COPD exacerbation.

METHODS

Prospective study in an ICU enrolling critically ill intubated patients with severe COPD exacerbation and comparing propofol and sevoflurane after 1:1 randomisation. Respiratory system mechanics (airway resistance, PEEPi, trapped volume, ventilatory ratio and respiratory system compliance), gas exchange, vitals, safety and outcome were measured at inclusion and then until H48. Total airway resistance change from baseline to H48 in both sevoflurane and propofol groups was the main endpoint.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled and were sedated for 126 h(61-228) in the propofol group and 207 h(171-216) in the sevoflurane group. At baseline, airway resistance was 21.6cmH2O/l/s(19.8-21.6) in the propofol group and 20.4cmH2O/l/s(18.6-26.4) in the sevoflurane group, (p = 0.73); trapped volume was 260 ml(176-290) in the propofol group and 73 ml(35-126) in the sevoflurane group, p = 0.02. Intrinsic PEEP was 1.5cmH2O(1-3) in both groups after external PEEP optimization. There was neither early (H4) or late (H48) significant difference in airway resistance and respiratory mechanics parameters between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients intubated with COPD exacerbation, there was no significant difference in respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol from inclusion to H4 and H48.

Expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation: real-time detection and physiological subtypes

BACKGROUND

Tidal expiratory flow limitation (EFLT) complicates the delivery of mechanical ventilation but is only diagnosed by performing specific manoeuvres. Instantaneous analysis of expiratory resistance (Rex) can be an alternative way to detect EFLT without changing ventilatory settings. This study aimed to determine the agreement of EFLT detection by Rex analysis and the PEEP reduction manoeuvre using contingency table and agreement coefficient. The patterns of Rex were explored.

METHODS

Medical patients ≥ 15-year-old receiving mechanical ventilation underwent a PEEP reduction manoeuvre from 5 cmH2O to zero for EFLT detection. Waveforms were recorded and analyzed off-line. The instantaneous Rex was calculated and was plotted against the volume axis, overlapped by the flow-volume loop for inspection. Lung mechanics, characteristics of the patients, and clinical outcomes were collected. The result of the Rex method was validated using a separate independent dataset.

RESULTS

339 patients initially enrolled and underwent a PEEP reduction. The prevalence of EFLT was 16.5%. EFLT patients had higher adjusted hospital mortality than non-EFLT cases. The Rex method showed 20% prevalence of EFLT and the result was 90.3% in agreement with PEEP reduction manoeuvre. In the validation dataset, the Rex method had resulted in 91.4% agreement. Three patterns of Rex were identified: no EFLT, early EFLT, associated with airway disease, and late EFLT, associated with non-airway diseases, including obesity. In early EFLT, external PEEP was less likely to eliminate EFLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rex method shows an excellent agreement with the PEEP reduction manoeuvre and allows real-time detection of EFLT. Two subtypes of EFLT are identified by Rex analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registered with www.thaiclinicaltrials.org (TCTR20190318003). The registration date was on 18 March 2019, and the first subject enrollment was performed on 26 March 2019.

Effect of expiratory flow limitation on ventilation/perfusion mismatch and perioperative lung function during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery and Trendelenburg position may affect the respiratory function and alter the gas exchange. Further the reduction of the lung volumes may contribute to the development of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). The latter is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of EFL and to evaluate its effect on pulmonary function and intraoperative V/Q mismatch.

METHODS

This is a prospective study on patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. We evaluated respiratory mechanics, V/Q mismatch and presence of EFL after anesthesia induction, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and at the end of surgery. Intraoperative gas exchange and hemodynamic were also recorded. Clinical data were collected until seven days after surgery to evaluate the onset of pulmonary postoperative complications (PPCs).

RESULTS

Among the 66 patients enrolled, 25/66 (38%) exhibited EFL during surgery, of whom 10/66 (15%) after anesthesia induction, and the remaining 15 patients after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position. Median PEEP able to reverse flow limitation was 7 [7-10] cmH2O after anesthesia induction and 9 [8-15] cmH2O after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position. Patients with EFL had significantly higher shunt (17 [2-25] vs. 9 [1-19]; P=0.05), low V̇/Q̇ (27 [20-70] vs. 15 [10-22]; P=0.05) and high V̇/Q̇ (10 [7-14] vs. 6 [4-7]; P=0.024). At the end of surgery, only high V/Q was significantly higher in EFL patients. Further, they exhibited higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complication (48% (12/25) vs. 15% (6/41), P=0.005), hypoxemia and hypercapnia (80% [20/25] vs. 32% [13/41]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Expiratory flow limitation is a common phenomenon during gynecological laparoscopic surgery associated with worsen gas exchange, increased V/Q mismatch and altered lung mechanics. Our study showed that patients experiencing EFL during surgery showed a higher risk for PPCs.

How I Teach Auto-PEEP: Applying the Physiology of Expiration

Teaching complex topics in mechanical ventilation can prove challenging for clinical educators, both at the bedside and in the classroom setting. Some of these topics, such as the topic of auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP), consist of complicated physiological principles that can be difficult to convey in an organized and intuitive manner. In this entry of "How I Teach," we provide an approach to teaching the concept of auto-PEEP to senior residents and fellows working in the intensive care unit. We offer a framework for educators to effectively present the concepts of auto-PEEP to learners, either at the bedside or in the classroom setting, by summarizing key concepts and including concrete examples of the educational techniques we use. This framework includes specific content we emphasize, how to present this content using a variety of educational resources, assessing learner understanding, and how to modify the topic on the basis of location, time, or resource constraints.

Expiratory flow limitation in intensive care: prevalence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) is characterised by a markedly reduced expiratory flow insensitive to the expiratory driving pressure. The presence of EFL can influence the respiratory and cardiovascular function and damage the small airways; its occurrence has been demonstrated in different diseases, such as COPD, asthma, obesity, cardiac failure, ARDS, and cystic fibrosis. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of EFL in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure and to determine the main clinical characteristics, the risk factors and clinical outcome associated with the presence of EFL.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an expected length of mechanical ventilation of 72 h were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Patients were evaluated, within 24 h from ICU admission and for at least 72 h, in terms of respiratory mechanics, presence of EFL through the PEEP test, daily fluid balance and followed for outcome measurements.

RESULTS

Among the 121 patients enrolled, 37 (31%) exhibited EFL upon admission. Flow-limited patients had higher BMI, history of pulmonary or heart disease, worse respiratory dyspnoea score, higher intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, flow and additional resistance. Over the course of the initial 72 h of mechanical ventilation, additional 21 patients (17%) developed EFL. New onset EFL was associated with a more positive cumulative fluid balance at day 3 (103.3 ml/kg) compared to that of patients without EFL (65.8 ml/kg). Flow-limited patients had longer duration of mechanical ventilation, longer ICU length of stay and higher in-ICU mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

EFL is common among ICU patients and correlates with adverse outcomes. The major determinant for developing EFL in patients during the first 3 days of their ICU stay is a positive fluid balance. Further studies are needed to assess if a restrictive fluid therapy might be associated with a lower incidence of EFL.

Regional air trapping in acute exacerbation of obstructive lung diseases measured with electrical impedance tomography: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Since bronchial abnormalities often exhibit spatial non-uniformity which may be not correctly assessed by conventional global lung function measures, regional information may help to characterize the disease progress. We hypothesized that regional air trapping during mechanical ventilation could be characterized by regional end-expiratory flow (EEF) derived from electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD grade 3 or 4) or severe asthma with acute exacerbation were examined prospectively. Patients were ventilated under assist-control mode. EIT measurements were conducted before and one hour after inhaled combined corticosteroid and long-acting β2 agonist, on two consecutive days. Regional EEF was calculated as derivative of relative impedance for every image pixel in the lung regions. The results were normalized to global flow values measured by the ventilator.

RESULTS

Regional and global EEF were highly correlated (P<0.00001) and regional effects of medication and disease progression were visible in the regional EEF maps. The sums of regional EEF in lung regions were 3.8 [2.0, 5.1] and 3.6 [1.9, 4.5] L/min in COPD patients before and after medication (median [lower, upper quartiles]; P=0.37). The corresponding values in asthma patients were 3.0 [2.5, 4.2] and 2.2 [1.7, 3.2] L/min (P<0.05). Histograms of regional EEF showed high spatial heterogeneity of EEF before medication. After one day of treatment, the histograms exhibited less heterogeneous and a decrease in EEF level.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional EEF characterizes air trapping and intrinsic PEEP, which could provide diagnostic information for monitoring the disease progress during treatment.

Dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in ARDS patients

Background

In ARDS patients, changes in respiratory mechanical properties and ventilatory settings can cause incomplete lung deflation at end-expiration. Both can promote dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The aim of this study was to investigate, in a large population of ARDS patients, the presence of intrinsic PEEP, possible associated factors (patients’ characteristics and ventilator settings), and the effects of two different external PEEP levels on the intrinsic PEEP.

Methods

We made a secondary analysis of published data. Patients were ventilated with a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, sedated, and paralyzed. After a recruitment maneuver, a PEEP trial was run at 5 and 15 cmH₂O, and partitioned mechanics measurements were collected after 20 min of stabilization. Lung computed tomography scans were taken at 5 and 45 cmH₂O. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether or not they had intrinsic PEEP at the end of an expiratory pause.

Results

We enrolled 217 sedated, paralyzed patients: 87 (40%) had intrinsic PEEP with a median of 1.1 [1.0–2.3] cmH₂O at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP. The intrinsic PEEP significantly decreased with higher PEEP (1.1 [1.0–2.3] vs 0.6 [0.0–1.0] cmH₂O; p < 0.001). The applied tidal volume was significantly lower (480 [430–540] vs 520 [445–600] mL at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP; 480 [430–540] vs 510 [430–590] mL at 15 cmH₂O) in patients with intrinsic PEEP, while the respiratory rate was significantly higher (18 [15–20] vs 15 [13–19] bpm at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP; 18 [15–20] vs 15 [13–19] bpm at 15 cmH₂O). At both PEEP levels, the total airway resistance and compliance of the respiratory system were not different in patients with and without intrinsic PEEP. The total lung gas volume and lung recruitability were also not different between patients with and without intrinsic PEEP (respectively 961 [701–1535] vs 973 [659–1433] mL and 15 [0–32] % vs 22 [0–36] %).

Conclusions

In sedated, paralyzed ARDS patients without a known obstructive disease, the amount of intrinsic PEEP during lung-protective ventilation is negligible and does not influence respiratory mechanical properties.

Expiratory flow-limitation in mechanically ventilated patients: A risk for ventilator-induced lung injury?

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL), that is the inability of expiratory flow to increase in spite of an increase of the driving pressure, is a common and unrecognized occurrence during mechanical ventilation in a variety of intensive care unit conditions. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of EFL is associated with an increase in mortality, at least in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, and in pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery. EFL is a major cause of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), which in ARDS patients is heterogeneously distributed, with a consequent increase of ventilation/perfusion mismatch and reduction of arterial oxygenation. Airway collapse is frequently concomitant to the presence of EFL. When airways close and reopen during tidal ventilation, abnormally high stresses are generated that can damage the bronchiolar epithelium and uncouple small airways from the alveolar septa, possibly generating the small airways abnormalities detected at autopsy in ARDS. Finally, the high stresses and airway distortion generated downstream the choke points may contribute to parenchymal injury, but this possibility is still unproven. PEEP application can abolish EFL, decrease PEEPi heterogeneity, and limit recruitment/derecruitment. Whether increasing PEEP up to EFL disappearance is a useful criterion for PEEP titration can only be determined by future studies.

Expiratory Flow Limitation During Mechanical Ventilation

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) is present when the flow cannot rise despite an increase in the expiratory driving pressure. The mechanisms of EFL are debated but are believed to be related to the collapsibility of small airways. In patients who are mechanically ventilated, EFL can exist during tidal ventilation, representing an extreme situation in which lung volume cannot decrease, regardless of the expiratory driving forces. It is a key factor for the generation of auto- or intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and requires specific management such as positioning and adjustment of external PEEP. EFL can be responsible for causing dyspnea and patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, and it is influenced by the fluid status of the patient. EFL frequently affects patients with COPD, obesity, and heart failure, as well as patients with ARDS, especially at low PEEP. EFL is, however, most often unrecognized in the clinical setting despite being associated with complications of mechanical ventilation and poor outcomes such as postoperative pulmonary complications, extubation failure, and possibly airway injury in ARDS. Therefore, prompt recognition might help the management of patients being mechanically ventilated who have EFL and could potentially influence outcome. EFL can be suspected by using different means, and this review summarizes the methods to specifically detect EFL during mechanical ventilation.

48 h cessation of mechanical ventilation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe trauma: a case report

A 32-year-old motorcyclist who was hit by a tram subsequently presented with blunt force thoracic trauma, a pelvic fracture and a penetrating injury to the left lower extremity. Coagulopathy persisted following surgery of the leg and pelvic vascular intervention. Bedside thoracotomy was performed to treat pneumothorax and pneumopericardium. Severe hypoxemia secondary to lung failure ensued, which required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support. On the third day after the trauma, ultra-protective mechanical ventilation was not possible due to non-existent lung compliance; thus, the ventilator was disconnected, and the T-piece was connected to the blocked tracheal tube left in the airway. Gas exchange occurred via VV ECMO separately. After 48 h of cessation of ventilator support, the patient was weaned from sedation. At this time, respiratory effort was observed, and assisted ventilation was initiated. The patient ultimately recovered and experienced an excellent outcome. The clinical significance of zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and the complete cessation of open lung strategy during ECMO remains controversial. In cases of reduced lung compliance, if VV ECMO can facilitate adequate gas exchange, the discontinuation of ventilation is an option that can be used to prevent ventilator-induced lung damage and to allow the lungs to rest. VV ECMO is feasible as lung support with no mechanical ventilation in case of severe lung failure after major trauma.