Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review

Association between the preoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and acute kidney injury in gastrointestinal surgery patients managed with enhanced recovery strategy: a retrospective cohort study

Importance Previous evidence has indicated that N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the association between preoperative NT-proBNP level and postoperative AKI in surgeries managed with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy requires further clarification.Objective To explore the association between preoperative NT-proBNP and the incidence of postoperative AKI in patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgeries and managed with ERAS strategy.Design A retrospective cohort study.Setting A review of documented cases of elective gastrointestinal surgeries managed with ERAS strategy occurred at Xijing Hospital from 01 May 2017 to 30 June 2022.Participants A total of 629 patients aged 18 years or older who were scheduled for elective gastrointestinal surgeries and subjected to the ERAS strategy with preoperative NT-proBNP and creatinine measurements were included in the analysis.Exposure Preoperative serum concentrations of NT-proBNP.Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative AKI. Preoperative NT-proBNP was divided into high- or low-level groups based on the median (165 pg/ml). Logistic regression was used to explore the association between increased preoperative NT-proBNP level and risk of AKI.Results After screening 1932 case records, 629 cases were included in the final analyses. The average age was 63.5 (15.3) years old and 197 (31.3%) of them were female. Among them, 112 (17.8%) developed postoperative AKI. The incidence of AKI was 21% in the high NT-proBNP group, and 14.6% in the low NT-proBNP group. Patients with higher preoperative NT-proBNP levels (≥ 165 pg/mL) have significant higher risk of postoperative AKI as compared to those in the lower group (adjusted OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.73).Conclusions and relevance Increased preoperative NT-proBNP is associated with an elevated risk of postoperative AKI in patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery and managed with ERAS strategy.Trial registry number Clinical trial registry number: NCT06145347.

Impact of a kidney-adjusted ERAS® protocol on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Evaluation of a kidney-adjusted enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) protocol (kERAS) in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (PN).

METHODS

The kERAS protocol is a multidimensional protocol focusing on optimized perioperative fluid and nutrition management as well as strict intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure limits. It was applied in a prospective cohort (n = 147) of patients undergoing open or robotic PN. Patients were analyzed for the development of acute postoperative renal failure (AKI), achievement of TRIFECTA criteria, upstaging or new onset of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and length of hospital stay (LOS) and compared to a retrospective cohort (n = 162) without application of the protocol.

RESULTS

Cox regression analyses could not confirm a protective effect of kERAS on the development of AKI post-surgery. A positive effect was observed on TRIFECTA achievement (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, p = 0.0374). Patients treated with the kERAS protocol showed less long-term CKD upstaging compared to those treated with the standard protocol (p = 0.0033). There was no significant effect on LOS and new onset of CKD.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a kERAS protocol can have a positive influence on long-term renal function in patients undergoing PN. It can be used safely without promoting AKI. Furthermore, it can be realized with a manageable amount of additional effort.

Improving Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation

Background

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have become the standard of care for patients undergoing elective small bowel surgeries but have not yet been adequately studied in community hospitals. In this study, a multidisciplinary ERP was developed and implemented at a community hospital to include minimal anesthesia, early ambulation and enteral alimentation, and multimodal analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the ERP on postoperative length of stay (LOS), readmission (RA) rates following bowel surgery, and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

The study design was a retrospective review of patients undergoing major bowel resection at Holy Cross Hospital (HCH) from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Patient charts for diagnostic-related group (DRG) 329, 330, and 331 were retrospectively reviewed at HCH in 2017 to compare outcomes in ERP versus non-ERP cases. The Medicare claims database (CMS) was also retrospectively reviewed to compare HCH data to the national average LOS and RA for the same DRG codes. Mean values for LOS and RA were statistically compared to determine significant differences between ERP versus non-ERP patients at HCH and national CMS data versus HCH patients.

Results

LOS was analyzed for each DRG at HCH. At HCH, for DRG 329, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 13.0833 days (n = 12) versus 3.375 days (n = 8) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 330, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 10.861 days (n = 36) versus 4.583 days (n = 24) (P ≤ 0.001) for ERP. For DRG 331, the mean LOS for non-ERP was 7.272 days (n = 11) versus 3.348 days (n = 23) (P = 0.004) for ERP. LOS was also compared to national CMS data. The LOS at HCH for DRG 329 improved from the 10th to 90th percentile (n = 238,907); DRG 330 improved from the 10th to the 72nd percentile (n = 285,423); DRG 331 improved from 10th to 54th percentile (n = 126,941) (P < 0.001). The RA at HCH in ERP and non-ERP cases was 3% at 30 and 90 days. CMS RA for DRG 329 was 25.1% at 90 days and 9.9% at 30 days; DRG 330 RA was 18.3% at 90 days and 6.6% at 30 days; DRG 331 RA was 11% at 90 days and 3.9% at 30 days.

Conclusion

Implementation of ERP following bowel surgery at HCH significantly improved outcomes, in comparison to non-ERP cases, national CMS data, and Humana data. Further research on ERP for other fields and its impact on outcomes in other community settings is recommended.

Acute Kidney Injury within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program for Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) within an ERAS program for colorectal surgery (CRS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study conducted from March 2016 to September 2018 at a single tertiary hospital in Singapore. All adult patients requiring CRS within our ERAS program were considered eligible. Exclusions were stage 5 chronic kidney disease or patients requiring a synchronous liver resection. The primary outcome was AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. Secondary outcomes included mortality, major complications, and hospital length of stay. Patient, surgical, and anaesthesia-related data were analysed to determine factors associated with AKI.

RESULTS

A total of 575 patients were eligible for the study. Twenty patients were excluded from the study leaving 555 patients for analysis. Mean age was 67.8 (SD 11.4) years. Seventy-four patients met the criteria for AKI (13.4%: stage 1-11.2%, stage 2-2.0%, stage 3-0.2%). One patient required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patients with AKI had a longer length of stay (median [IQR], 11.0 [5.0-17.0] days vs 6.0 [4.0-8.0] days; P < .001), more major complications (OR, 6.55; 95% CI, 3.00-14.35, P < .001), and a trend towards higher mortality at one year (OR, 1.44; 95% CI 0.48-4.30; p = 0.511. After multivariable regression analysis, factors associated with AKI were preoperative creatinine (OR, 1.01 per 10 µmol/l; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P = 0.01), robotic surgery vs open surgery (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.06-0.39; P < 0.001), anaesthesia duration (OR, 1.38 per hour; 95% CI, 1.22-1.55; P < 0.001), and major complications (OR, 5.55; 95% CI, 2.63-11.70; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the present cohort, the implementation of an ERAS program for CRS was associated with a low prevalence of moderate to severe AKI despite a balanced intravenous fluid regimen. Patients having open surgery, longer procedures, and major complications are at increased risk of AKI.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard of care on postoperative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication with an incidence of nearly 15%. Relatively balanced fluid management, flexible use of vasoactive drugs, multimodal analgesia containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are fundamental to ERAS protocols. However, these basic tenants may lead to an increased incidence of postoperative AKI.

METHODS

A search was done in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and reference lists to identify relevant studies from inception until May 2020 to be included in this study. Effects were summarized using pooled risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cls) with random effect model. Heterogeneity assessment, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were performed.

RESULTS

A systematic review of nineteen cohort studies covering 17,205 patients, comparing impact of ERAS with conventional care on postoperative AKI was performed. Notably, the ERAS regimen did not increase the incidence of postoperative AKI compared with standard care (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.52; I2 = 53%). Both goal-directed fluid therapy (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99-1.61; I2 = 55%) and restrictive fluid management (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.57-1.98; I2 = 60%) had no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. There was no significant statistical difference between different AKI diagnostic criteria (P = 0.43; I2 = 0%). ERAS group had significantly shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.54; 95% CI: -1.91 to -1.17; I2 = 66%). There was no statistical difference in 30-day readmission rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.20; I2 = 42%), 30-day reoperation rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.34; I2 = 42%) and mortality (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that ERAS protocols do not increase readmission or reoperation rates and mortality while significantly reducing LOS. Most importantly, the ERAS protocol was shown to have no promoting effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. Even GDFT and restrictive fluid management cannot avoid the occurrence of postoperative AKI, and the ERAS protocol is still worth recommending and its safety is further confirmed.

Association of plasma and urine NGAL with acute kidney injury after elective colorectal surgery: A cohort study

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in surgical patients. We aimed to investigate the validity of plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in the detection of AKI and prediction of outcomes in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.

Materials and methods

This was a pre-specified post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing oesophageal doppler and Lithium dilution cardiac output monitoring in high risk patients undergoing major colorectal surgery as part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol in a tertiary care hospital. Plasma and urine samples for NGAL measurement were taken before surgery (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and on postoperative day 1 (T3). AKI was defined according to the KDIGO criteria.

Results

A total of 89 patients were included of whom 12 (13.5%) developed AKI. Plasma NGAL significantly increased from T1 to T3 in both AKI (p < 0.001) and non-AKI (p = 0.048) patients, while urine NGAL did not change over time. There were no significant differences in plasma and urine NGAL in patients with and without AKI at all time points. Postoperative day 1 urine NGAL concentrations were significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (41.2 versus 25 ng/mL, p = 0.026). One-year mortality was significantly higher in AKI patients with a raised urine NGAL compared to AKI patients without elevated urine NGAL levels.

Conclusions

Plasma and urine NGAL poorly predicted AKI post-colorectal surgery. Non-survivors had higher urine NGAL results. More research is required to explore the association between NGAL and long-term outcomes.

•

Acute kidney injury occurred in 13.5% of patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery.

•

Plasma and urine NGAL poorly predicted AKI after major elective colorectal surgery.

•

The association of NGAL and AKI appears to be confounded by malignancy and chronic kidney disease.

•

1-year mortality in AKI patients with a raised urine NGAL was higher than in patients with AKI and a normal urine NGAL value.

Enhanced Recovery Programs for Colorectal Surgery and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) for colorectal surgery bundle evidence-based measures to reduce complications, accelerate postoperative recovery, and improve the value of perioperative health care. Despite these successes, several recent studies have identified an association between ERPs and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between ERPs for colorectal surgery and postoperative AKI.

METHODOLOGY

After conducting a search of major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect), we conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies that reported on the association between ERPs and postoperative AKI.

RESULTS

Six observational studies (n = 4765 patients) comparing ERP (n = 2140) to conventional care (n = 2625) were included. Overall, ERP patients had a significantly greater odds of developing postoperative AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.00, P = .001) than those who received conventional care. There was no evidence of publication bias (Begg's test P = 1.0, Egger's P value = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon pooled results from observational studies, ERPs are associated with increased odds of developing postoperative AKI compared to conventional perioperative care. The mechanism for this effect is likely multifactorial. Additional research targeting high risk patient populations should evaluate the role of restrictive fluid administration, hemodynamic goals, and scheduled nephrotoxic agents in ERP protocols.

Impact of intraoperative zero-balance fluid therapy on the occurrence of acute kidney injury in patients who had undergone colorectal cancer resection within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer resection encourages perioperative euvolemic status, and zero-balance fluid therapy is recommended for low-risk patients. Recently, several studies have reported concerns of increased acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients within an ERAS protocol. In the present study, we investigated the impact of intraoperative zero-balance fluid therapy within an ERAS protocol on postoperative AKI.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective surgery for primary colorectal cancer were divided into zero-balance and non-zero-balance fluid therapy groups according to intraoperative fluid amount and balance. After propensity score (PS) matching, 210 patients from each group were selected. Incidences of AKI were compared between the two groups according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Postoperative kidney functions and surgical outcomes were also compared.

RESULTS

AKI was significantly higher in the zero-balance fluid therapy group compared to the non-zero-balance fluid therapy group (21.4% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.040) in PS-matched patients. The decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate on the day of surgery was significantly higher in the zero-balance fluid therapy group (- 5.9 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. - 1.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.005). There were no differences in general morbidity or mortality rate, although surgery-related complications were more common in the zero-balance group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the proven benefits of zero-balance fluid therapy in colorectal ERAS protocols, care should be taken to monitor for postoperative AKI. Further studies regarding the clinical significance of postoperative AKI occurrence and optimised intraoperative fluid therapy are needed in a colorectal ERAS setting.

Strategies to Reduce Perioperative Nephrotoxicity

Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of surgery that is associated with significant adverse outcomes, including increased morbidity and mortality. The perioperative burden of AKI risk factors is complex and potentially large, including high-risk nephrotoxic medications, hypotension, hypovolemia, radiologic contrast, anemia, and surgery-specific factors. Understanding the pathogenesis, risk factors, and potential cumulative impact of perioperative nephrotoxic exposures is particularly important in the prevention and reduction of perioperative AKI. This review outlines the possible strategies to reduce perioperative nephrotoxicity and the development of postoperative AKI.

Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Where Are We in the Era of Enhanced Recovery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Individual elements in enhanced recovery pathways may be associated with specific complication risks. In this review, we highlight three areas of controversy surrounding complications in enhanced recovery: (1) whether enhanced recovery is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury, (2) whether NSAID use is associated with anastomotic leaks, and (3) whether early urinary catheter removal is justified following colorectal surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute kidney injury has been reported at several institutions following implementation of enhanced recovery pathways highlighting the importance of institutional data tracking. NSAID use has been implicated in anastomotic leak rates for non-elective colorectal procedures, and criteria for its use should be implemented. Early urinary catheter removal has been supported despite increased urinary retention rates in order to decrease urinary tract infections. Enhanced recovery protocols will continue to evolve, and risk profiles associated with individual elements should continue to be evaluated.

The Association of Enhanced Recovery Pathway and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is associated with increased postoperative length of hospital stay and increases the risk of postoperative mortality. The association between the development of postoperative acute kidney injury and the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway and the development of postoperative acute kidney injury.

DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery pathway were compared to a hospital historical National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colorectal registry of patients.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 1052 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2012 through 2016 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The development of postoperative acute kidney injury was the primary outcome measured.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway had significantly greater rates of postoperative acute kidney injury than patients not undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Our adjusted model indicated that patients who underwent an enhanced recovery pathway (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) had an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Patients who developed acute kidney injury in the enhanced recovery cohort had a significantly longer median length of stay than those who did not (median 4 (interquartile range, 4-9) vs 3 (interquartile range, 2-5) days; p=0.04).

LIMITATIONS

This study did not utilize urine output as a modality for detecting acute kidney injury. Data are limited to a sample of patients from a large academic medical center participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Interventions or programs in place at our institution that aimed at infection reduction or other initiatives with the goal of improving quality were not accounted for in this study.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is independently associated with the development of postoperative acute kidney injury.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. LA ASOCIACIÓN DE VÍA DE RECUPERACIÓN MEJORADA Y LESIÓN RENAL AGUDA EN PACIENTES DE CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL: La lesión renal aguda se asocia con una mayor duración en la estancia hospitalaria y aumenta el riesgo de la mortalidad postoperatoria. La asociación entre el desarrollo de la lesión renal aguda postoperatoria y la implementación de un protocolo de Recuperación Mejorada después de la cirugía, sigue sin ser clara.Examinar la relación entre la implementación de una vía de Recuperación Mejorada y el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente, de pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva, en una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, se comparó con el registro histórico de los pacientes colorrectales del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica.Universidad de Alabama en Birmingham, un centro de referencia terciario.Un total de 1052 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva desde 2012 hasta 2016.Desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Los pacientes sometidos a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron tasas significativamente mayores de lesiones renales agudas postoperatorias, en comparación con los pacientes de Recuperación no Mejorada (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Nuestro modelo ajustado indicó que los pacientes que se sometieron a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada (OR, 2.31; IC, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) tuvieron un mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda. Los pacientes que desarrollaron daño renal agudo en la cohorte de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron una estadía mediana significativamente más larga en comparación con aquellos que no [mediana 4 (rango intercuartil (RIC) 4-9) versus 3 (RIC 2-5) días; p = 0.04].Este estudio no utilizó la producción de orina como una modalidad para detectar daño renal agudo. Los datos se limitan a una muestra de pacientes de un gran centro médico académico, que participa en el Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica. Las intervenciones o programas implementados en nuestra institución, destinados a la reducción de infecciones u otras iniciativas, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad, no se tomaron en cuenta para este estudio.La implementación de una Recuperación Mejorada después del protocolo de cirugía, se asocia independientemente con el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz-Healy).

Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have historically been associated with high morbidity given the physiologic insult of an extensive operation. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes for many procedures but have not been well studied in these cases. We examined the feasibility and effect of ERAS pathway implementation for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC between October 2015 to September 2018 were identified. Patient characteristics, disease pathology, and perioperative outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-d readmissions, renal dysfunction, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients who were included, 11 (35.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC prior to the implementation of the ERAS pathway, and 20 (64.5%) patients underwent CRS/HIPEC according to the ERAS guidelines. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical or pathologic characteristics between groups. There was a significant decrease in LOS with ERAS pathway management from 9 d to 6 d (P = 0.002). No patients from either cohort experienced acute kidney injury. There was no significant difference in 30-d readmission rates or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this feasibility study, ERAS pathway utilization significantly decreased postoperative LOS for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, without evidence of increased complications or readmissions. ERAS programs should be considered for integration into future CRS/HIPEC protocols.

Impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes in open gynecologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate if varying levels of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted post-operative outcomes (length of stay, complications, readmissions, and re-operations) in gynecologic surgery at a tertiary center.

METHODS

We included 584 patients who had open gynecologic surgery between November 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. Patients were categorized into subgroups according to their date of surgery from the time of the ERAS protocol implementation. Patients were categorized by their per cent compliance into two groups:<80% versus ≥80%. We analyzed compliance with the elements of the protocol over time and its relation with post-operative outcomes, length of stay, post-operative complications, readmission, and re-operations rates. We modeled the probability of having a post-operative complication within 30 days of surgery as a function of overall compliance.

RESULTS

Overall compliance was 72.3%. Patients with compliance ≥80% had significantly less complications (P<0.001) and shorter length of stay (P<0.001). Readmission and re-operation rates were not impacted by compliance (P=0.182, P=0.078, respectively). Avoidance of salt water overload, early mobilization, early oral nutrition, and early removal of Foley catheter were significantly associated with less post-operative complications within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with an ERAS pathway exceeding 80% was associated with lower complication rates and shorter length of stay without impacting on re-operations or readmissions.

Early Acute Kidney Injury Within an Established Enhanced Recovery Pathway: Uncommon and Transitory

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to assess the impact of perioperative fluid management on early acute kidney injury (AKI) rate and long-term sequelae in patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients from a prospectively maintained ERP database (2011-2015) is performed. Pre- and postoperative creatinine levels (within 24 h) were compared according to risk (preoperative creatinine rise ×1.5), injury (×2), failure (×3), loss of kidney function and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria. Risk factors for early AKI were identified through logistic regression analysis, and long-term outcome in patients with AKI was assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 7103 patients, 4096 patients (58%) with pre- and postoperative creatinine levels were included. Of these, 104 patients (2.5%) presented postoperative AKI. AKI patients received higher amounts of POD 0 fluids (3.8 ± 2.4 vs. 3.2 ± 2 L, p = 0.01) and had increased postoperative weight gain at POD 2 (6 ± 4.9 vs. 3 ± 2.7 kg, p = 0.007). Independent risk factors for AKI were high ASA score (ASA ≥ 3: OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.5), prolonged operating time (>180 min: OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.9) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4), while minimally invasive surgery was a protective factor (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.9). Five patients (0.1%) developed chronic kidney disease, and two of them needed dialysis after a mean follow-up of 33.7 ± 22.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Early AKI was very uncommon in the present cohort of colorectal surgery patients treated within an ERP, and long-term sequelae were exceptionally low.

Metabolic and the Surgical Stress Response Considerations to Improve Postoperative Recovery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced recovery pathways are a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach to patient care that aims to reduce the surgical stress response and maintain organ function resulting in faster recovery and improved outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A PubMed literature search was performed for articles that included the terms of metabolic surgical stress response considerations to improve postoperative recovery. The surgical stress response occurs due to direct and indirect injuries during surgery. Direct surgical injury can result from the dissection, retraction, resection, and/or manipulation of tissues, while indirect injury is secondary to events including hypotension, blood loss, and microvascular changes. Greater degrees of tissue injury will lead to higher levels of inflammatory mediator and cytokine release, which ultimately drives immunologic, metabolic, and hormonal processes in the body resulting in the stress response. These processes lead to altered glucose metabolism, protein catabolism, and hormonal dysregulation among other things, all which can impede recovery and increase morbidity. Fluid therapy has a direct effect on intravascular volume and cardiac output with a resultant effect on oxygen and nutrient delivery, so a balance must be maintained without excessively loading the patient with water and salt. All in all, attenuation of the surgical stress response and maintaining organ and thus whole-body homeostasis through enhanced recovery protocols can speed recovery and reduce complications. The present investigation summarizes the clinical application of enhanced recovery pathways, and we will highlight the key elements that characterize the metabolic surgical stress response and improved postoperative recovery.

Caution: Increased Acute Kidney Injury in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols

Minimizing perioperative fluid administration is a key component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (ERAS). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Our aim was to assess the association of ERAS with the incidence and severity of AKI in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. In this single-study retrospective review, patients undergoing colorectal surgery from 2013 to 2017 were included. Primary endpoint was postoperative AKI. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. Baseline demographics and procedure types were similar between both groups. AKI was higher in the ERAS versus non-ERAS group (23 vs 9%; P = 0.002). Factors associated with increased risk of AKI on univariate regression included presence of preoperative cardiovascular risk factors (hazard ratio (HR) 3.5; 95% CI 1.3–9.7; P < 0.01), more complex colorectal operations (HR 5.1; 95% CI 1.6–16.1; P < 0.01), and management with an ERAS pathway (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5–5.8; P < 0.01). On multi-variable analysis, ERAS remained a significant risk factor for developing AKI (HR 3.44; 95% CI 1.5–7.7; P < 0.01). ERAS patients had a shorter hospital LOS (3.9 vs 5.9 days, P < 00.1) compared with non-ERAS patients, with no difference in 30-day readmission rates (11.5 vs 10.7%; P = 0.98). Although the incidence of AKI is higher in patients treated with ERAS protocols, the majority represent minor elevations in baseline serum creatinine and did not affect the reduction in hospital LOS associated with ERAS. Given the potential association of AKI, however, with increased long-term morbidity and mortality, ERAS protocols should be optimized to prevent postoperative AKI.