1
|
Vicentini C, Libero G, Cugudda E, Gardois P, Zotti CM, Bert F. Barriers to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities: a scoping review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024; 79:1748-1761. [PMID: 38870077 PMCID: PMC11290887 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) present specific challenges for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. A growing body of literature is dedicated to AMS in LTCFs. OBJECTIVES We aimed to summarize barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes, i.e. a set of clinical practices, accompanied by recommended change strategies. METHODS A scoping review was conducted through Ovid-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane Central. Studies addressing barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes in LTCFs were included. Implementation barriers described in qualitative studies were identified and coded, and main themes were identified using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS The electronic search revealed 3904 citations overall. Of these, 57 met the inclusion criteria. All selected studies were published after 2012, and the number of references per year progressively increased, reaching a peak in 2020. Thematic analysis of 13 qualitative studies identified three main themes: (A) LTCF organizational culture, comprising (A1) interprofessional tensions, (A2) education provided in silos, (A3) lack of motivation and (A4) resistance to change; (B) resources, comprising (B1) workload and staffing levels, (B2) diagnostics, (B3) information technology resources and (B4) funding; and (C) availability of and access to knowledge and skills, including (C1) surveillance data, (C2) infectious disease/AMS expertise and (C3) data analysis skills. CONCLUSIONS Addressing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in LTCFs through AMS programmes is an area of growing interest. Hopefully, this review could be helpful for intervention developers and implementers who want to build on the most recent evidence from the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Vicentini
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Giulia Libero
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cugudda
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gardois
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Medical Library ‘Ferdinando Rossi’, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Carla Maria Zotti
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Bert
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh S, Degeling C, Fernandez D, Montgomery A, Caputi P, Deane FP. How do aged-care staff feel about antimicrobial stewardship? A systematic review of staff attitudes in long-term residential aged-care. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022; 11:92. [PMID: 35765093 PMCID: PMC9238058 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01128-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a problem in residential aged care facilities (RACF). There is a gap in our understanding of how psychosocial barriers such as risk perceptions shape staff attitudes towards antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). We sought to ascertain the attitudinal domains that have been identified to be of importance to AMS in RACF and comment on how they have been measured empirically. Our aim was to consolidate what is known regarding staff attitudes and perceptions in order to inform future stewardship.
Method
We searched PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for primary studies of healthcare workers attitudes to AMS in RACF (1990-February 2021).
Results
14 Studies were included in the review, within which 10 domains were identified: attitudes towards antimicrobial prescribing; guidelines; educational interventions; self-confidence regarding clinical assessment and prescribing; awareness of AMR as a problem and stewardship as a priority; self-efficacy; perception of role; perception of risk; team culture and resident/family members expectations. 46 measures were developed across the 14 studies to measure the 10 domains. The variability in the attitudinal domains and how these domains were measured was large. Only 13% included psychometric data regarding reliability and/or internal consistency.
Conclusions
Attitudes are generally defined as having three evaluative bases: cognitive, behavioural, and affective. Findings from the current review suggest that the measures commonly used to capture healthcare staff attitudes to AMS do not sufficiently capture affect; particularly with respect to staff’s risk perceptions, perceptions of their role, and family members’ expectations. Given that affective processes have been postulated to influence medical decision making, these findings highlight the importance of understanding how staff, especially nurses feel about implementing AMS strategies and other peoples’ (e.g. residents and their families) perceptions of stewardship. It is expected that a more nuanced understanding of RACF nurses affective experiences when applying AMS, and their perceptions of the risks entailed, will help in reducing barriers to overprescribing antibiotics.
Collapse
|
3
|
Belan M, Agrinier N, Gonthier D, Boivin JM, Charmillon A, Chopard V, Dif C, Hansmann V, Pereira O, Thilly N, Pulcini C. Antibiotic stewardship in French nursing homes: a 2019 regional survey. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2021; 3:dlab105. [PMID: 34647021 PMCID: PMC8499689 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibiotic resistance is a growing issue in nursing homes (NHs). Antibiotic
stewardship (ABS) programmes can reduce antibiotic use in NHs, but few
studies have assessed to what extent they are implemented in NHs. Objectives To describe ABS current practices and describe the opinion of NH stakeholders
regarding ABS and opportunities for improvement in one French region. Methods We invited by e-mail the medical and nurse coordinators of all NHs of the
Grand Est region, France, to participate in our survey in 2019. The online
questionnaire included 35 questions covering four topics: NH
characteristics, current ABS practices, attitudes towards ABS and opinions
on strategies to promote ABS. A score evaluating implementation of core ABS
elements was calculated using the current ABS practice responses. Results Out of 417 NHs, 75 (18%) participated in our survey. The three most
implemented ABS activities were antibiotic consumption monitoring
(65%), antibiotic plan documentation (56%) and antibiotic
prescription guide distribution (54%). Audit and feedback, training
sessions or identification of a local ABS leader ranged from 13% to
29%. Participants positively perceived ABS and most suggestions to
improve ABS programmes in NH, with maximal interest in training, audit and
feedback interventions. The median score for implementation of core ABS
elements was 3.3 (IQR = 2.3–5.4; theoretical
range 0–11), and the score distribution was not associated with any
NH characteristic. Conclusions While there is still room for improvement, NHs had a positive attitude
towards ABS strategies. Some regional and national initiatives to promote
ABS in NHs exist and should be actively promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Belan
- Infectious Diseases Department, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Nelly Agrinier
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.,CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Boivin
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.,CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Alexandre Charmillon
- CHRU-Nancy, Infectious Diseases Department, in Charge of Mobile Infectiologie Team, F-54000, Nancy, France.,Grand Est Antibiotic Stewardship Network Coordinator, AntibioEst, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Virginie Chopard
- Observatoire du Médicament, des Dispositifs médicaux et de l'Innovation Thérapeutique Grand Est, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Claudine Dif
- Direction Régionale du Service Médicale Grand Est, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Ouarda Pereira
- Direction Régionale du Service Médicale Grand Est, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nathalie Thilly
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.,Methodology-Promotion-Investigation Department, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Céline Pulcini
- Infectious Diseases Department, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France.,Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|