User-centred participatory design of visual cues for isolation precautions

[Design Thinking and its use to promote patient safety: A scoping review]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Design Thinking is a user centered methodology used to address problems through innovation. Patient safety is a complex issue within healthcare and remains a global priority. International organizations urge the development of joint strategies to tackle this challenge. The objective was to map the current use of Design Thinking as a methodology to promote patient safety in healthcare settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, using indexed databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, WOS, EMBASE, Scopus, Science Direct, PsycINFO, SciELO, and ERIC, as well as grey literature from CAPES and ProQuest journals. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework. Data were analyzed and summarized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 55 publications applying Design Thinking in the context of patient safety were included. The six international patient safety goals were addressed, with a focus on effective communication (45%) and medication safety (35%). The study design was not reported in 65% of the cases, and 30% lacked data procedures and analysis. The healthcare team participated in 93% of the studies, while patients were involved in 44%. The most common solutions were mobile applications, software, and dashboards.

CONCLUSIONS

Design Thinking is contributing to improvements in patient safety by developing co-designed solutions, particularly in the international patient safety goals of communication and medication safety. However, the lack of a rigorous methodological approach limits the validity and replicability of the results.

WHO global research agenda for hand hygiene improvement in health care: a Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVE

To identify global research priorities for improving hand hygiene in healthcare settings and develop a 2023-2030 research agenda to guide funding, coordinate research, promote investment, and inform policy for enhanced healthcare quality and safety.

DESIGN

Expert consensus study using a modified Delphi process.

PARTICIPANTS

A 105-member panel of international hand hygiene experts including the World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare representing all WHO regions and World Bank income levels.

METHODS

The research priorities were identified through a multiphase approach including a meta-review to establish knowledge gaps and inform initial priorities, followed by expert consultations using a modified Delphi process. 192 preliminary priorities were included in a two-round Delphi survey. Experts rated each priority in the first round, and then reviewed and adjusted responses based on the panel's aggregated, anonymous responses in the second round. Ratings were collected on a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a combined "strongly agree" and "agree" frequency of at least 70%.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for 178 of 192 priorities (92.7%), categorized into six domains: system change; training and education; evaluation and feedback; reminders and communications; institutional safety climate; and hand hygiene improvement impact on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Of these, 121 priorities reached >80% consensus. The Delphi process, maintained a 92% response rate over two rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured consensus process yielded a research agenda to address gaps in hand hygiene improvement, supporting enhanced healthcare quality and safety globally.

Mpox in sports: A comprehensive framework for anticipatory planning and risk mitigation in football based on lessons from COVID-19

The World Health Organization's declaration of mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) in July 2022, followed by its resurgence in 2024, has sparked concerns about its potential impact on sports, especially contact sports such as football. Although mpox is not a pandemic (as of late September 2024), the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience offers valuable lessons for proactive planning in sports. Our conceptual framework has been designed to draw insightful lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic to assist sports organizations in planning for and preventing similar situations. We aimed to draw lessons from COVID-19 to help sports organizations enhance practical preparedness through effective planning and mitigation strategies. Accordingly, we sought to assess the potential impact of mpox on sports, with a focus on football (soccer), and to develop strategies for prevention, management, and preparedness based on epidemiological insights and lessons from COVID-19 pandemic experience. Here we review mpox's pathophysiology and possibility of transmission in sports settings and discuss tailored strategies, including risk assessments, testing protocols, hygiene measures, and return-to-play policies. This review highlights key differences between mpox and COVID-19 in transmission, incubation, and management, emphasizing the need for customized prevention and control measures in sports. We propose innovative risk assessment methods using global positioning system tracking and machine learning for contact analysis, alongside tailored testing and hygiene protocols. We emphasize the importance of proactive planning, noting improved preparedness in the sports community compared to the early days of COVID-19. In conclusion, our proposed framework provides sports organizations with practical tools to manage potential risks associated with mpox, ensuring the continuity of activities while prioritizing public health.

A seesaw of equilibrium, midwives' experiences of infection prevention and control guideline adherence: A qualitative descriptive study

Background

Infection prevention and control guidelines play a key role in preventing infections which can impact mothers and their newborn's quality of life. Despite the presence of evidenced-based infection prevention and control guidelines, midwives' adherence can be suboptimal internationally. The identification of facilitators and barriers to infection prevention and control guidelines can support practice and facilitate midwifery care.

Aim

To understand midwives' experiences of the barriers and facilitators when adhering to infection prevention and control guidelines.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 10 midwives from February to March 2022. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed utilising Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework involving the six steps of becoming familiar with the data, generating initial codes, generating themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming the themes, and presenting themes.

Findings

Two themes developed; seesaw for equilibrium and back to basics: learning on your feet. Midwives experienced conflicting emotional motivators in the need for professional integrity towards infection prevention and control guideline adherence. The work environment impacts on midwives' ability to adhere to guidelines and communication and education have a vital role to play in infection prevention and control guideline adherence.

Conclusions

While midwives have a strong sense of protection of professional integrity, work conditions such as environment, organisational structures, and management systems affect midwives' adherence to infection prevention and control guidelines. Effective education, training, and communication are required to promote infection prevention and control guideline adherence.

How did COVID-19 affect logistics and supply chain processes? Immediate, short and medium-term evidence from some industrial fields of Italy

This paper provides empirical evidence on the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on logistics and supply chain processes of five industrial sectors of Italy, namely food & beverage, machine manufacturing, metal mechanical industry, logistics & transport, and textile & fashion. A questionnaire survey, with 82 useful responses, was conducted to investigate various effects of Covid-19 on these businesses, such as the volumes handled and the service performance in the immediate-, short- and medium-term, the countermeasures implemented by companies and the future decision-making strategies. The period of analysis spans from January 2020 to June 2021. Results show that the impact of Covid-19 on volumes and service performance varied across the sectors: the food & beverage and logistics & transport were poorly affected by the pandemic and experienced a general increase in the demand and volumes, while mechanical or textile & fashion industries were mostly affected by a decrease in demand. The positive/negative impacts were particularly evident at the beginning of the pandemics, but, depending on the sector, the effects could cease quite quickly or last in the short-term. The countermeasures adopted against the Covid-19 emergency differ again across sectors; in general, industry fields that were particularly impacted by the pandemic emergency have applied more countermeasures. Typical strategies for risk management (e.g., the diversification in transport modes or the stock increase) turned out to be applied as immediate countermeasures or in plan for the future in few industries only. Differences across sectors were also observed about the sourcing strategies already in use, implemented to counteract the pandemics or expected to be maintained in time. Empirical outcomes offered are expected to help researchers gain a deep understanding of Covid-19 related phenomena, thus inspiring further research activities.

Fostering Engagement With Health and Housing Innovation: Development of Participant Personas in a Social Housing Cohort

BACKGROUND

Personas, based on customer or population data, are widely used to inform design decisions in the commercial sector. The variety of methods available means that personas can be produced from projects of different types and scale.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to experiment with the use of personas that bring together data from a survey, household air measurements and electricity usage sensors, and an interview within a research and innovation project, with the aim of supporting eHealth and eWell-being product, process, and service development through broadening the engagement with and understanding of the data about the local community.

METHODS

The project participants were social housing residents (adults only) living in central Cornwall, a rural unitary authority in the United Kingdom. A total of 329 households were recruited between September 2017 and November 2018, with 235 (71.4%) providing complete baseline survey data on demographics, socioeconomic position, household composition, home environment, technology ownership, pet ownership, smoking, social cohesion, volunteering, caring, mental well-being, physical and mental health-related quality of life, and activity. K-prototype cluster analysis was used to identify 8 clusters among the baseline survey responses. The sensor and interview data were subsequently analyzed by cluster and the insights from all 3 data sources were brought together to produce the personas, known as the Smartline Archetypes.

RESULTS

The Smartline Archetypes proved to be an engaging way of presenting data, accessible to a broader group of stakeholders than those who accessed the raw anonymized data, thereby providing a vehicle for greater research engagement, innovation, and impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the adoption of a tool widely used in practice, research projects could generate greater policy and practical impact, while also becoming more transparent and open to the public.