1
|
Dala Ali AHH, Harun SN, Othman N, Ibrahim B, Abdulbagi OE, Abdullah I, Ariffin IA. Determinants of Inadequate Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in ICU Sepsis Patients in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Regression Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1305. [PMID: 37627725 PMCID: PMC10451895 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
In the management of sepsis, providing adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy is one of the most important pillars of sepsis management. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the adequacy of empiric antimicrobial therapy (EAMT) in sepsis patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and to identify the determinants of inadequate EAMT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock, and the determinants of inadequate EAMT. The data of patients admitted to the ICU units due to sepsis or septic shock in two tertiary healthcare facilities in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah were retrospectively reviewed. The current study used logistic regression analysis and artificial neural network (ANN) analysis to identify determinants of inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy, and evaluated the performance of these two approaches in predicting the inadequacy of EAMT. The findings of this study showed that fifty-three per cent of patients received inadequate EAMT. Determinants for inadequate EAMT were APACHE II score, multidrug-resistance organism (MDRO) infections, surgical history (lower limb amputation), and comorbidity (coronary artery disease). ANN performed as well as or better than logistic regression in predicating inadequate EAMT, as the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of the ANN model was higher when compared with the logistic regression model (LRM): 0.895 vs. 0.854. In addition, the ANN model performed better than LRM in predicting inadequate EAMT in terms of classification accuracy. In addition, ANN analysis revealed that the most important determinants of EAMT adequacy were the APACHE II score and MDRO. In conclusion, more than half of the patients received inadequate EAMT. Determinants of inadequate EAMT were APACHE II score, MDRO infections, comorbidity, and surgical history. This provides valuable inputs to improve the prescription of empiric antimicrobials in Saudi Arabia going forward. In addition, our study demonstrated the potential utility of applying artificial neural network analysis in the prediction of outcomes in healthcare research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Habeeb Hattab Dala Ali
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Dariyah, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sabariah Noor Harun
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia
| | - Noordin Othman
- Department of Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah 42353, Saudi Arabia
- School of Pharmacy, Management and Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Shah Alam 40100, Malaysia
| | - Baharudin Ibrahim
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | | | - Ibrahim Abdullah
- School of Pharmacy, Management and Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Shah Alam 40100, Malaysia
| | - Indang Ariati Ariffin
- Research Management Centre, Management and Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, Shah Alam 40100, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rudnick W, Conly J, Thirion DJG, Choi K, Pelude L, Cayen J, Bautista J, Beique L, Comeau JL, Dalton B, Delport J, Dhami R, Embree J, Émond Y, Evans G, Frenette C, Fryters S, Happe J, Katz K, Kibsey P, Langley JM, Lee BE, Lefebvre MA, Leis JA, McGeer A, McKenna S, Neville HL, Slayter K, Suh KN, Tse-Chang A, Weiss K, Science M. Antimicrobial use among paediatric inpatients at hospital sites within the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program, 2017/2018. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023; 12:35. [PMID: 37072874 PMCID: PMC10111695 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01219-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance threatens the ability to successfully prevent and treat infections. While hospital benchmarks regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) have been well documented among adult populations, there is less information from among paediatric inpatients. This study presents benchmark rates of antimicrobial use (AMU) for paediatric inpatients in nine Canadian acute-care hospitals. METHODS Acute-care hospitals participating in the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program submitted annual AMU data from paediatric inpatients from 2017 and 2018. All systemic antimicrobials were included. Data were available for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), pediatric ICUs (PICUs), and non-ICU wards. Data were analyzed using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000pd). RESULTS Nine hospitals provided paediatric AMU data. Data from seven NICU and PICU wards were included. Overall AMU was 481 (95% CI 409-554) DOT/1000pd. There was high variability in AMU between hospitals. AMU was higher on PICU wards (784 DOT/1000pd) than on non-ICU (494 DOT/1000pd) or NICU wards (333 DOT/1000pd). On non-ICU wards, the antimicrobials with the highest use were cefazolin (66 DOT/1000pd), ceftriaxone (59 DOT/1000pd) and piperacillin-tazobactam (48 DOT/1000pd). On PICU wards, the antimicrobials with the highest use were ceftriaxone (115 DOT/1000pd), piperacillin-tazobactam (115 DOT/1000pd), and cefazolin (111 DOT/1000pd). On NICU wards, the antimicrobials with the highest use were ampicillin (102 DOT/1000pd), gentamicin/tobramycin (78 DOT/1000pd), and cefotaxime (38 DOT/1000pd). CONCLUSIONS This study represents the largest collection of antimicrobial use data among hospitalized paediatric inpatients in Canada to date. In 2017/2018, overall AMU was 481 DOT/1000pd. National surveillance of AMU among paediatric inpatients is necessary for establishing benchmarks and informing antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wallis Rudnick
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7L9, Canada
| | - John Conly
- University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada
- Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Daniel J G Thirion
- Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Kelly Choi
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7L9, Canada
| | - Linda Pelude
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7L9, Canada
| | - Joelle Cayen
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7L9, Canada
| | - John Bautista
- Central Newfoundland Regional Health Centre, 50 Union, Grand Falls-Windsor, NL, A2A 2E1, Canada
| | - Lizanne Beique
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7L9, Canada
| | | | - Bruce Dalton
- Alberta Health Services, 1620 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4L7, Canada
| | - Johan Delport
- London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Rita Dhami
- London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
- University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
- University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Joanne Embree
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
- Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
- Children's Hospital Winnipeg, 840 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0Z3, Canada
| | - Yannick Émond
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415 Boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada
| | - Gerald Evans
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada
| | - Charles Frenette
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Susan Fryters
- Alberta Health Services, 10240 Kingsway Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - Jennifer Happe
- Infection Prevention and Control Canada, Red Deer, AB, T4N 6R2, Canada
| | - Kevin Katz
- North York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie St, North York, ON, M2K 1E1, Canada
| | - Pamela Kibsey
- Royal Jubilee Hospital, 1952 Bay St, Victoria, BC, V8R 1J8, Canada
| | - Joanne M Langley
- IWK Health Centre, 5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
- Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Bonita E Lee
- Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Marie-Astrid Lefebvre
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jerome A Leis
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Allison McGeer
- Sinai Health System, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Susan McKenna
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada
| | - Heather L Neville
- Nova Scotia Health, 1276 South Park St, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - Kathryn Slayter
- IWK Health Centre, 5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Kathryn N Suh
- The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Alena Tse-Chang
- Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Karl Weiss
- SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiotos K, Blumenthal J, Boguniewicz J, Palazzi DL, Stalets EL, Rubens JH, Tamma PD, Cabler SS, Newland J, Crandall H, Berkman E, Kavanagh RP, Stinson HR, Gerber JS. Antibiotic Indications and Appropriateness in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A 10-Center Point Prevalence Study. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e1021-e1030. [PMID: 36048543 PMCID: PMC10169439 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics are prescribed to most pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, but data describing indications and appropriateness of antibiotic orders in this population are lacking. METHODS We performed a multicenter point prevalence study that included children admitted to 10 geographically diverse PICUs over 4 study days in 2019. Antibiotic orders were reviewed for indication, and appropriateness was assessed using a standardized rubric. RESULTS Of 1462 patients admitted to participating PICUs, 843 (58%) had at least 1 antibiotic order. A total of 1277 antibiotic orders were reviewed. Common indications were empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infections without sepsis or septic shock (260 orders, 21%), nonoperative prophylaxis (164 orders, 13%), empiric therapy for sepsis or septic shock (155 orders, 12%), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP; 118 orders, 9%), and post-operative prophylaxis (94 orders, 8%). Appropriateness was assessed for 985 orders for which an evidence-based rubric for appropriateness could be created. Of these, 331 (34%) were classified as inappropriate. Indications with the most orders classified as inappropriate were empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infection without sepsis or septic shock (78 orders, 24%), sepsis or septic shock (55 orders, 17%), CAP (51 orders, 15%), ventilator-associated infections (47 orders, 14%), and post-operative prophylaxis (44 orders, 14%). The proportion of antibiotics classified as inappropriate varied across institutions (range, 19%-43%). CONCLUSIONS Most PICU patients receive antibiotics. Based on our study, we estimate that one-third of antibiotic orders are inappropriate. Improved antibiotic stewardship and research focused on strategies to optimize antibiotic use in critically ill children are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Chiotos
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Blumenthal
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juri Boguniewicz
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Debra L Palazzi
- Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erika L Stalets
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jessica H Rubens
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pranita D Tamma
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie S Cabler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jason Newland
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Hillary Crandall
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Emily Berkman
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert P Kavanagh
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hannah R Stinson
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Gerber
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alsaedi AA, El-Saed A, Althaqafi A, Bhutta MJ, Abukhzam B, Alshamrani M. Antimicrobial therapy, resistance, and appropriateness in healthcare-associated and community-associated infections; a point prevalence survey. J Infect Chemother 2022; 28:1358-1363. [PMID: 35760663 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data examining differences in antimicrobial therapy and its appropriateness between healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and community-associated infections (CAIs) are limited. The objective was to compare antimicrobial therapy, resistance, and appropriateness between CAIs and HAIs. METHODS One-day point prevalence survey targeting admitted patients with active infections was conducted in six tertiary care hospitals. Antimicrobial appropriateness was decided based on hospital antimicrobial guidelines, clinical assessment, culture results, and other relevant investigations. RESULTS Out of 1666 patient records reviewed, 240 (14.4%) infection events were identified. Prevalence of infections treated with antimicrobials were 6.5% for HAIs and 7.1% for CAIs. The most commonly prescribed antimicrobials were carbapenems (19.6%), cephalosporins (14.8%), and vancomycin (13.2%), with some differences between HAIs and CAIs. The overall contribution of MDR pathogens to both HAIs and CAIs was similar (34.0% versus 34.3%, p = 0.969). ESBL was significantly associated with CAIs while other gram-negative MDR pathogens significantly associated with HAIs. Overall appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was similar in HAI and CAI events (64.2% versus 64.7%, p = 0.934). However, it was highest in aminoglycosides (78.6%) and lowest in vancomycin (40.8%). It was lowest in bloodstream infections than other infections (48.5% versus 61% to 78%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION Although the overall burden of MDR pathogens and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy were similar in HAI and CAI events, there were some differences related to the type of MDR, type of antimicrobials, and type of infection. The current finding can guide training and educational activities of local antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aiming to improve antimicrobial therapy in hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asim A Alsaedi
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aiman El-Saed
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Muhammad Javid Bhutta
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bassem Abukhzam
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majid Alshamrani
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kazzaz YM, Alharbi M, Nöel KC, Quach C, Willson DF, Gilfoyle E, McNally JD, O'Donnell S, Papenburg J, Lacroix J, Fontela PS. Evaluation of antibiotic treatment decisions in pediatric intensive care units in Saudi Arabia: A national survey. J Infect Public Health 2021; 14:1254-1262. [PMID: 34479076 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe variables used by Saudi pediatric intensivists to make antibiotic-related decisions for children with suspected severe bacterial infections. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey, which was developed using a multi-step methodological approach. The survey included 4 clinical scenarios of the most relevant bacterial infections in pediatric critical care (pneumonia, sepsis, meningitis and intra-abdominal infection). The potential determinants of antibiotic treatment duration addressed in all scenarios included clinical variables (patient characteristics, disease severity), laboratory infection markers, radiologic findings, and pathogens. RESULTS The response rate was 65% (55/85). Eight variables (immunodeficiency, 3 months of age, 2 or more organ dysfunctions, Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score >10, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein [CRP], elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and elevated procalcitonin [PCT]) were associated with prolonging antibiotic treatment duration for all 4 clinical scenarios, with a median increase ranging from 3.0 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5, 3.5, leukocytosis) to 8.8 days (95% CI 5.5, 10.5, immunodeficiency). There were no variables that were consistently associated with shortening antibiotic duration across all scenarios. Lastly, the proportion of physicians who would continue antibiotics for ≥5 days despite a positive viral polymerase chain reaction test result was 67% for pneumonia, 85% for sepsis, 63% for meningitis, and 95% for intra-abdominal infections. CONCLUSION Antibiotic-related decisions for critically ill patients are complex and depend on several factors. Saudi pediatric intensivists will use prolonged courses of antibiotics for younger patients, patients with severe clinical picture, and patients with persistently elevated laboratory markers and hospital acquired infections, even when current literature and guidelines do not suggest such practices. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should include interventions to address these misconceptions to ensure the rational use of antibiotics in pediatric intensive care units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser M Kazzaz
- Department of Pediatrics, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University-Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Musaed Alharbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University-Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kim C Nöel
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Caroline Quach
- Department of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Douglas F Willson
- Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Elaine Gilfoyle
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - James D McNally
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Shauna O'Donnell
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jesse Papenburg
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Microbiology, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jacques Lacroix
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Patricia S Fontela
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|