Bridging treatment prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization or transarterial chemoembolization?

Arterial Complications in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation After Previous TACE Treatment

Introduction: Curative treatment of HCC can be achieved by liver transplantation. In the framework of transplantation, add-on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can be performed as bridging therapy for local tumor control. The association between TACE and an increased incidence of hepatic arterial complications after transplantation has been investigated in multiple research items; however, the exact association remains unclear. The aim of this report was to explore the role of pre-transplantation TACE and pre-existing vascular celiac pathologies on the occurrence of postoperative hepatic arterial complications. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2008 and 2020. Arterial complication was defined as any postoperative occlusion, stenosis >50%, dissection or aneurysm on cross-sectional imaging. Results: This study encompasses 109 patients after transplantation, of which 80 underwent TACE prior to transplantation. The overall incidence of postoperative arterial complications did not differ between the groups (TACE 8/80 vs. control 6/29, p = 0.19). Further analysis showed no significant differences in the occurrence of specific complications (Occlusion: TACE 9/80 vs. control 3/29, p = 0.56; Stenosis: TACE 4/80 vs. control 5/29, p = 0.05; Dissection: TACE 1/80 vs. control 1/29; p = 0.46). Furthermore, linear regression analysis for preoperative TACE therapy, anatomic variants and pre-existing pathologies of the hepatic vasculature showed no association with postoperative arterial complications. Conclusions: Preoperative TACE therapy showed no influence on the incidence of post-transplant arterial complications in patients after liver transplantation. Furthermore, preoperative TACE therapy as well as anatomic variants and pre-existing arterial pathologies of the celiac axis could not be identified as risk factors for complications at the arterial anastomotic site after transplantation.

Resin-Based Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as a Bridging or Downstaging Treatment to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of resin-based yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a bridging or downstaging therapy to liver transplantation (LT) in terms of safety, tumor response, recurrence, and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with HCC treated with resin-based TARE as bridging or downstaging treatment to LT between January 2006 and April 2021 was performed. TARE-related liver toxicity was assessed. Imaging data were analyzed to assess tumor response. Histopathological analysis of explant livers was performed to assess HCC necrosis. Survival and bridging/downstaging success predictor analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent resin-based TARE with the intention to bridge (33%) or downstage (67%) to LT. Overall, 44% had ≥3 HCC lesions, and 53% had bilobar disease. Median largest tumor diameter was 3.4 cm. TARE was segmental, lobar, and bilobar in 20%, 36%, and 44% of cases, respectively. In total, 17% had Grade 3 bilirubin toxicities. The objective response rate per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours was 72%. Patients meeting the United Network for Organ Sharing Downstaging criteria had higher chances of successful bridging/downstaging. Twenty-three patients were transplanted. Complete pathological response was noted in 30% of explant livers. Posttransplant tumor recurrence occurred in 26% within a median follow-up period of 1,710 days. Estimated 5-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates after LT were 89%, 69%, and 89%, respectively. For the entire patient cohort, these survival rates were 87%, 53%, and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Resin-based 90Y TARE can be considered a valuable treatment option for bridging or downstaging patients with HCC to LT, including patients requiring lobar or bilobar TARE for extensive tumoral disease.

Chinese Expert Consensus on the Whole-Course Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2023 Edition)

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. Most HCC patients have the complications of chronic liver disease and need overall consideration and whole-course management, including diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. To develop a reasonable, long-term, and complete management plan, multiple factors need to be considered, including the patient’s general condition, basic liver diseases, tumor stage, tumor biological characteristics, treatment requirements, and economic cost. Summary: To better guide the whole-course management of HCC patients, the Chinese Association of Liver Cancer and the Chinese Medical Doctor Association has gathered multidisciplinary experts and scholars in relevant fields to formulate the “Chinese Expert Consensus on The Whole-Course Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2023).” Key Messages: This expert consensus, based on the current clinical evidence and experience, proposes surgical and nonsurgical HCC management pathways and involves 18 recommendations, including perioperative treatment, systematic treatment combined with local treatment, conversion treatment, special population management, symptomatic support treatment, and follow-up management.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.

AIM

To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS.

RESULTS

The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.

AIM

To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS.

RESULTS

The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are common liver-directed therapies (LDTs) for unresectable HCC. While both deliver intra-arterial treatment directly to the site of the tumor, they differ in mechanisms of action and side effects. Several studies have compared their side effect profile, time to progression, and overall survival data, but often these lack practical considerations when choosing which treatment modality to use. Many factors can impact operator's choice for treatment, and the choice depends on treatment availability, cost, insurance coverage, operator's comfort level, patient-specific factors, tumor location, tumor biology, and disease stage. This review discusses survival data, time to progression data, as well as more practical patient and tumor characteristics for personalized LDT with TACE or TARE.

Clinical course of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who experienced radiologic complete response after radioembolization

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the patterns of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and to analyze factors that can predict recurrence after complete response to radioembolization.

Materials and methods

A total of 289 consecutive patients who underwent radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma at a single tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics were collected and compared between the group showing complete response and the group showing noncomplete response. Data on recurrence status, time to recurrence, and the patterns of recurrence among the patients who showed radiologic complete response were collected. The group that maintained complete response and the group that experienced recurrence were compared, and the risk factors affecting recurrence were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

Results

The complete response rate was 24.9% (73/289). Age, sex, tumor markers, maximum tumor diameter, multiplicity, presence of vascular invasion, and target radiation dose were significantly different between the complete response and noncomplete response groups. The recurrence rate after complete response was 38.4% (28/73), and 67.9% (19/28) of recurrences occurred by 8 months after complete response. Eight patients who underwent resection/transplantation after complete response experienced no recurrence. Multiple tumors and a lower target radiation dose were independent risk factors of recurrence after complete response in the multivariate logistic regression.

Conclusion

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following complete response after radioembolization is not uncommon and frequently occurs within 1 year after complete response. Multiple tumors and a lower target radiation dose may be risk factors for recurrence.

Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparison of Palliative with Bridging-to-Transplant Concepts

We investigated transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as a palliative measure and bridging-to-transplant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A total of 167 patients (50 bridging, 117 palliative) with 245 TARE procedures were assessed. Fourteen patients underwent subsequent liver transplantation (LT). Patients undergoing LT exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with bridging-without-transplant (p = 0.033). No significant differences were observed between patients with bridging-without-transplant and palliative cases (p = 0.116). Median overall survival (OS) post-TARE was 16.6 months, with estimated OS rates at 6/12 months of 82.0%/60.5%, respectively. Patients who underwent LT demonstrated statistically significantly longer OS compared to those with bridging-without-transplant (p = 0.001). No marked outcome distinctions were found between bridging-without-transplant and palliative groups. The findings underscored the superiority of LT over alternative treatments. TARE served as an important component in non-LT scenarios, allowing for subsequent therapeutic options. The study reflected the highly variable and complex situations of patients with HCC, emphasizing the need for further investigations to define an optimal multimodal approach.

Benefit and harm of waiting time in liver transplantation for HCC

Liver transplantation is the most successful treatment for limited-stage HCC. The waiting time for liver transplantation (LT) can be a critical factor affecting the oncological prognosis and outcome of patients with HCC. Efficient strategies to optimize waiting time are essential to maximize the benefits of LT and to reduce the harm of delay in transplantation. The ever-increasing demand for donor livers emphasizes the need to improve the organization of the waiting list for transplantation and to optimize organ availability for patients with and without HCC. Current progress in innovations to expand the donor pool includes the implementation of living donor LT and the use of grafts from extended donors. By expanding selection criteria, an increased number of patients are eligible for transplantation, which necessitates criteria to prevent futile transplantations. Thus, the selection criteria for LT have evolved to include not only tumor characteristics but biomarkers as well. Enhancing our understanding of HCC tumor biology through the analysis of subtypes and molecular genetics holds significant promise in advancing the personalized approach for patients. In this review, the effect of waiting time duration on outcome in patients with HCC enlisted for LT is discussed.

Emerging treatment strategies in hepatobiliary cancer

INTRODUCTION

There have been significant advances in the treatment of hepatobiliary cancers, especially for advanced-stage disease. However, data is limited for optimal therapy selection in the first line and sequencing of available options.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the systemic treatment of hepatobiliary cancers with an emphasis on the advanced stage. The previously published and ongoing trials will be discussed to create an algorithm for the current practice and to give future perspectives on how the field could go forward.

EXPERT OPINION

While there is no standard-of-care option in the adjuvant treatment of hepatocellular cancer, capecitabine is the standard of care for biliary tract cancer. The efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin and the added benefit of radiotherapy to chemotherapy are yet to be defined. For the advanced stage, immunotherapy-based combinations became the standard of care for both hepatocellular and biliary tract cancers. The molecularly targeted therapy has profoundly changed the second-line and later treatment for biliary tract cancers, while the optimal second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular cancer is yet to be defined due to rapid advances in the first-line setting.