Association of genetic ancestry with colorectal tumor location in Puerto Rican Latinos

Cancer Epidemiology in Hispanic Populations: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Need to Make Progress?

The Hispanic/Latino(x) population (H/L) in the United States of America is heterogeneous and fast growing. Cancer is the number one cause of death among H/Ls, accounting for 21% of deaths. Whereas for the most common cancers, incidence rates are lower in H/Ls compared with non-H/L White (NHW) individuals, H/Ls have a higher incidence of liver, stomach, cervical, penile, and gallbladder cancers. H/L patients tend to be diagnosed at more advanced stages for breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers, and melanoma compared with NHW individuals. Etiologic and cancer outcomes research among H/Ls lags other populations. In this review, we provide a summary of challenges, opportunities, and research priorities related to cancer etiology, cancer outcomes, and survivorship to make progress in addressing scientific gaps. Briefly, we prioritize the need for more research on determinants of obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its progression to liver cancer, stomach and gallbladder cancers, and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We emphasize the need to improve cancer screening, early detection of cancer, and survivorship care. We highlight critical resources needed to make progress in cancer epidemiologic studies among H/L populations, including the importance of training the next generation of cancer epidemiologists conducting research in H/Ls.

Maternal ancestry and hematological cancer risk: case-control study in an Argentinean population

Aim: We investigated the role of maternal ancestry in neoplastic hematological malignancies (HMs) risk in a population from Central Argentina. Materials & methods: We analyzed 125 cases with HMs and 310 controls from a public hospital, and a set of 202 colorectal, breast, lung, and hematologic cancer patients from a private hospital. Results: A decreased risk for HMs was associated with the Native American haplogroup B2 (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.25-0.92; p = 0.02). The sub-Saharan African parahaplogroup L was associated with higher susceptibility for disease (odds ratio = 3.10; 95% CI: 1.04-9.31; p = 0.043). Although the mean ancestral proportions in the total studied population was as published (61.7% Native American, 34.6% European and 3.7% African), an unequal distribution was observed between hospitals. Conclusion: We confirmed the tri-hybrid nature of the Argentinean population, with proportions varying within the country. Our finding supports the notion that associated haplogroup is population and cancer specific.

HLA-A29 and Birdshot Uveitis: Further Down the Rabbit Hole

HLA class I alleles constitute established risk factors for non-infectious uveitis and preemptive genotyping of HLA class I alleles is standard practice in the diagnostic work-up. The HLA-A29 serotype is indispensable to Birdshot Uveitis (BU) and renders this enigmatic eye condition a unique model to better understand how the antigen processing and presentation machinery contributes to non-infectious uveitis or chronic inflammatory conditions in general. This review will discuss salient points regarding the protein structure of HLA-A29 and how key amino acid positions impact the peptide binding preference and interaction with T cells. We discuss to what extent the risk genes ERAP1 and ERAP2 uniquely affect HLA-A29 and how the discovery of a HLA-A29-specific submotif may impact autoantigen discovery. We further provide a compelling argument to solve the long-standing question why BU only affects HLA-A29-positive individuals from Western-European ancestry by exploiting data from the 1000 Genomes Project. We combine novel insights from structural and immunopeptidomic studies and discuss the functional implications of genetic associations across the HLA class I antigen presentation pathway to refine the etiological basis of Birdshot Uveitis.

Polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing and transporter genes, and the risk of gastric and colorectal cancer in an admixed population from the Brazilian Amazon

Colorectal (CRC) and gastric (GC) cancers are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of xenobiotic metabolism and transporter genes may play a role in the individual responses to exposure to substances implicated in susceptibility to cancer. The investigation of the genetic variation related to the activation and detoxification of xenobiotics may thus help to clarify the prevalence of neoplasms. We analyzed the role of 30 SNPs in xenobiotic-metabolizing and transporter genes in susceptibility to CRC and GC. The study included individuals diagnosed with CRC (n = 121) and GC (n = 95), and 141 controls (non-cancer patients) from the population of Belém, in the Brazilian Amazon. The results indicated an association between the polymorphisms rs2231142 (P = 0.013; OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.26-7.13), in the ABCG2 gene, and rs1801159 (P = 0.03; OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.14-5.05), in DPYD gene, with the risk of developing GC. The polymorphism rs17116806 of the DPYD gene was found to be associated with a lower risk of developing gastric (P≤0.0001; OR = 0.043; 95% CI = 0.015-0.12) or colorectal (P≤0.0001; OR = 0.076; 95% CI = 0.33-0.18) cancers, indicating that the same variant may play a similar role in different types of cancer tissue. Additionally, the carriers of the TT genotype of the polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene (rs1128503) presented a reduced probability of developing CRC (P = 0.0001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.06-0.41) as well as GC (P = 0.007; OR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.1-0.7). Our findings indicate that polymorphisms in xenobiotic-metabolizing and transporter genes may modulate susceptibility to colorectal and gastric cancers.

Community and Research Perspectives on Cancer Disparities in Wisconsin

Introduction

Significant disparities are apparent in geographic areas and among racial/ethnic minority groups in Wisconsin. Cancer disparities are complex and multifactorial and require collaborative, multilevel efforts to reduce their impact. Our objective was to understand cancer disparities and identify opportunities to collaborate across community and research sectors to address them.

Methods

From May 2017 through October 2018, we assembled groups of community members and researchers and conducted 10 listening sessions and 29 interviews with a total of 205 participants from diverse backgrounds. Listening sessions and interviews were scheduled on the basis of participant preference and consisted of a brief review of maps illustrating the breast and lung cancer burden across Wisconsin, and a semistructured set of questions regarding causes, solutions, and opportunities. Interviews followed the same structure as listening sessions, but were conducted between a facilitator and 1 or 2 individuals. Major themes were summarized from all sessions and coded. We used the Model for Analysis of Population Health and Health Disparities to identify areas for collaboration and to highlight differences in emphasis between community participants and researchers.

Results

Participants identified the need to address individual behavioral risks and medical mistrust and to build equitable multilevel partnerships. Communities provided insights on the impact of environment and location on cancer disparities. Researchers shared thoughts about societal poverty and policy issues, biologic responses, genetic predisposition, and the mechanistic influence of lifestyle factors on cancer incidence and mortality.

Conclusion

Listening sessions and interviews provided insight into contributors to cancer disparities, barriers to improving outcomes, and opportunities to improve health. The unique perspectives of each group underscored the need for multisector teams to tackle the complex issue of cancer disparities.

Genetic ancestry, skin color and social attainment: The four cities study

Introduction

The Black population in the US is heterogeneous but is often treated as monolithic in research, with skin pigmentation being the primary indicator of racial classification. Objective: This paper examines the differences among Blacks by comparing genetic ancestry, skin color and social attainment of 259 residents across four US cities—Norman, Oklahoma; Cincinnati, Ohio; Harlem, New York; and Washington, District of Columbia.

Methods

Participants were recruited between 2004 and 2006 at community-based forums. Cross-sectional data were analyzed using chi-square tests, correlation analyses and logistic regression.

Results

There were variations in ancestry, melanin index and social attainment across some cities. Overall, men with darker skin color, and women with lighter skin color were significantly more likely to be married. Darker skin individuals with significantly more West African ancestry reported attainment of graduate degrees, and professional occupations than lighter skin individuals.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest differences in skin pigmentation by geography and support regional variations in ancestry of US Blacks. Biomedical research should consider genetic ancestry and local historical/social context rather than relying solely on skin pigmentation as a proxy for race.