Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation

A Simplified Protocol for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Patients Weaned off Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Introduction  The criteria for the removal of the tracheostomy tube (decannulation) vary from center to center. Some perform an endoscopic evaluation under anesthesia or computed tomography, which adds to the cost and discomfort. We use a simple two-part protocol to determine the eligibility and carry out the decannulation: part I consists of airway and swallowing assessment through an office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy, and part II involves a tracheostomy capping trial. Objective  The primary objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of the simplified decannulation protocol followed at our center among the patients who were weaned off the mechanical ventilator and exhibited good swallowing function clinically. Methods  Of the patients considered for decannulation between November 1st, 2018, and October 31st, 2020, those who had undergone tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation were included. The efficacy to predict successful decannulation was calculated by the decannulation rate among patients who had been deemed eligible for decannulation in part I of the protocol, and the safety profile was defined by the protocol's ability to correctly predict the chances of risk-free decannulation among those submitted to part II of the protocol. Results  Among the 48 patients included (mean age: 46.5 years; male-to-female ratio: 3:1), the efficacy of our protocol in predicting the successful decannulation was of 87.5%, and it was was safe or reliable in 95.45%. Also, in our cohort, the decannulation success and the duration of tracheotomy dependence were significantly affected by the neurological status of the patients. Conclusion  The decannulation protocol consisting of office-based flexible laryngotracheoscopy and capping trial of the tracheostomy tube can safely and effectively aid the decannulation process.

Cough flows as a criterion for decannulation of autonomously breathing patients with tracheostomy tubes

BACKGROUND

Adequate cough or exsufflation flow can indicate an option for safe tracheostomy decannulation to noninvasive management. Cough peak flow via the upper airways with the tube capped is an outcome predictor for decannulation readiness in patients with neuromuscular impairment. However, this threshold value is typically measured with tracheotomy tube removed, which is not acceptable culturally in China. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of using cough flow measured with tracheostomy tube and speaking valve (CFSV) > 100 L/min as a cutoff value for decannulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study conducted between January 2019 and September 2022 in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital.

METHODS

Patients with prolonged tracheostomy tube placement were referred for screening. Each patient was assessed using a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol, in which CFSV greater than 100 L/min indicated that the patients' cough ability was sufficient for decannulation. Patients whose CFSV matched the threshold value and other protocol criteria were decannulated, and the reintubation and mortality rates were followed-up for 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were screened and 193 patients were included. A total of 105 patients underwent decannulation, 103 patients were decannulated successfully, and 2 patients decannulated failure, required reinsertion of the tracheostomy tube within 48 h (failure rate 1.9%). Three patients required reinsertion or translaryngeal intubation within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CFSV greater than 100 L/min could be a reliable threshold value for successful decannulation in patients with various primary diseases with a tracheostomy tube.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This observational study was not registered online.

Development and validation of an online nomogram for predicting the outcome of open tracheotomy decannulation: a two-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Tracheotomy decannulation is critical for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) to recover. In this study, we developed and validated an intuitive nomogram to predict the success rate of tracheotomy decannulation.

METHODS

We collected the data of 627 ICU patients before open tracheotomy decannulation from two medical institutions, including 466 patients (135 success and 331 failure) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University as a training cohort, and 161 patients (57 success and 104 failure) from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University as an external validation cohort. A least absolute shrinkage and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the independent risk factors and construct the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess discrimination and the calibration plots were used to assess consistency. The clinical application was assessed using decision curve analysis and the clinical impact curve.

RESULTS

7 independent risk factors were eventually included in the prediction model. The AUC of the training cohort, internal validation and external validation were 0.932, 0.926, and 0.915, showing good discrimination. The model performed well in terms of calibration, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves. The superior performance of the model was also confirmed by external validation.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram can help ICU physicians identify high-risk patients for decannulation and plan their pre-decannulation treatment accordingly.

Incidence, causes, and predictors of unsuccessful decannulation following prolonged weaning

Background

Liberation from prolonged tracheostomy ventilation involves ventilator weaning and removal of the tracheal cannula (referred to as decannulation). This study evaluated the incidence, causes, and predictors of unsuccessful decannulation following prolonged weaning.

Methods

Observational retrospective cohort study of 532 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients treated at a specialized weaning center between June 2013 and January 2021. We summarized the causes for unsuccessful decannulations and used a binary logistic regression analysis to derive and validate associated predictors.

Results

Failure to decannulate occurred in 216 patients (41%). The main causes were severe intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired dysphagia (64%), long-term ventilator dependence following weaning failure (41%), excessive respiratory secretions (12%), unconsciousness (4%), and airway obstruction (3%). Predictors of unsuccessful decannulation from any cause were age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04 year^-1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.06; p < 0.01], body mass index [0.96 kg/m² (0.93-1.00); p = 0.027], Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score [1.05 (1.00-1.10); p = 0.036], pre-existing non-invasive home ventilation [3.57 (1.51-8.45); p < 0.01], percutaneous tracheostomies [0.49 (0.30-0.80); p < 0.01], neuromuscular diseases [4.28 (1.21-15.1); p = 0.024], and total mechanical ventilation duration [1.02 day^-1 (1.01-1.02); p < 0.01]. Regression models examined in subsets of patients with severe dysphagia and long-term ventilator dependence as the main reason for failure revealed little overlapping among predictors, which even showed opposite effects on the outcome. The application of non-invasive ventilation as a weaning technique contributed to successful decannulation in 96 of 221 (43%) long-term ventilator-dependent patients following weaning failure.

Conclusion

Failure to decannulate after prolonged weaning occurred in 41%, mainly resulting from persistent ICU-acquired dysphagia and long-term ventilator dependence following weaning failure, each associated with its own set of predictors.

Tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital: a prospective cohort study

Background

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital.

Methods

This prospective cohort study recruited conscious patients with prolonged tracheostomy who were referred to the pulmonary rehabilitation department of a tertiary rehabilitation hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. A pulmonary rehabilitation team used a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol developed by the authors. The primary outcome was the success rate of decannulation. Secondary outcomes included decannulation time from referral and reintubation rate after a follow-up of 3 months.

Results

Of the 115 patients referred for weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy decannulation over the study period, 80.0% (92/115) were finally evaluated for tracheostomy decannulation. The mean time of tracheostomy in patients transferred to our department was 70.6 days. After assessment by a multidisciplinary team, 57 patients met all the decannulation indications and underwent decannulation. Fifty-six cases were successful, and 1 case was intubated again. The median time to decannulation after referral was 42.7 days. Reintubation after a follow-up of 3 months did not occur in any patients.

Conclusions

A standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol implemented by a pulmonary rehabilitation team is associated with successful tracheostomy decannulation in patients with prolonged tracheostomy. Not every tracheostomy patient must undergo upper airway endoscopy before decannulation. Tolerance of speaking valve continuously for 4 h can be used as an alternative means for tube occlusion. A swallow assessment was used to evaluate the feeding mode and did not affect the final decision to decannulate.

Trial registration: 2018bkky-121.

Gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms were dominant in neurorehabilitation ward patients in a general hospital in southwest China

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection in the rehabilitation ward of a general hospital in Southwest China. We analyzed rehabilitation patients with nosocomial infections caused by MDROs from June 2016 to June 2020. MDRO infection pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance were calculated. Possible risk factors for MDRO-related infection in the neurorehabilitation ward were analyzed using chi-square, and logistic regression. A total of 112 strains of MDRO were found positive from 96 patients. The MDRO test-positive rate was 16.70% (96/575). Ninety-five MDRO strains were detected in sputum, of which 84.82% (95/112) were gram-negative bacteria. Acinetobacter baumannii (A. Baumannii), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia) were the most frequently isolated MDRO strains. The logistic regression model and multifactorial analysis showed that long-term (≥ 7 days) antibiotic use (OR 6.901), history of tracheotomy (OR 4.458), and a low albumin level (< 40 g/L) (OR 2.749) were independent risk factors for the development of MDRO infection in patients in the rehabilitation ward (all P < 0.05). Gram-negative MRDOs were dominant in rehabilitation ward patients. Low albumin, history of a tracheostomy, and long-term use of antibiotics were independent risk factors for MRDO infection and are worthy of attention.

Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society

The Korean Bronchoesophagological Society appointed a task force to develop a clinical practice guideline for tracheostomy. The task force conducted a systematic search of the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to key questions. Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. An external expert review and a Delphi questionnaire were conducted to reach a consensus regarding the recommendations. Accordingly, the committee developed 18 evidence-based recommendations, which are grouped into seven categories. These recommendations are intended to assist clinicians in performing tracheostomy and in the management of tracheostomized patients.

Improving Tracheostomy Decannulation Rate In Trauma Patients

Objectives:

Identify the effect of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy decannulation protocol in the trauma population.

Design:

Single-center retrospective review.

Setting:

American College of Surgeons level 1 trauma center; large academic associated community hospital.

Patients:

Adult trauma patients who required a tracheostomy.

Interventions:

A tracheostomy decannulation protocol empowering respiratory therapists to move patients toward tracheostomy decannulation.

Measurements Main Results:

Tracheostomy decannulation rate, time to tracheostomy decannulation, length of stay, and reintubation and recannulation rates. A total of 252 patients met inclusion criteria during the study period with 134 presenting after the tracheostomy decannulation protocol was available. Since the tracheostomy decannulation protocol was implemented, patients managed by the tracheostomy decannulation protocol had a 50% higher chance of tracheostomy decannulation during the hospital stay (p < 0.001). The time to tracheostomy decannulation was 1 day shorter with the tracheostomy decannulation protocol (p = 0.54). There was no difference in time to discharge after ventilator liberation (p = 0.91) or in discharge disposition (p = 0.66). When comparing all patients, the development of a tracheostomy decannulation protocol, regardless if a patient was managed by the tracheostomy decannulation protocol, resulted in an 18% higher chance of tracheostomy decannulation (p = 0.003). Time to tracheostomy decannulation was 5 days shorter in the postintervention period (p = 0.07). There was no difference in discharge disposition (p = 0.88) but the time to discharge after ventilator liberation was shorter post protocol initiation (p = 0.04).

Conclusions:

In a trauma population, implementation of a tracheostomy decannulation protocol significantly improves tracheostomy decannulation rates during the same hospital stay. A larger population will be required to identify patient predictive factors for earlier successful tracheostomy decannulation.

Tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures for assessing readiness for decannulation in adults: a systematic scoping review

Despite the undisputable benefits of tracheostomy, it has been reported to have links with impaired communication, reduced quality of life and a risk of health complications such as bleeding, tracheal stenosis and in some cases resulting in mortality. There is a paucity of literature on tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures, leaving the decision to expert opinion and institutional guidelines. This study aimed to map evidence on methods and procedures of tracheostomy decannulation in adults and assessment of readiness for decannulation, to reveal knowledge gaps and inform further research. We conducted a systematic search of peer reviewed and grey literature on PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations via SABINET Online, World Cat Dissertations and Theses via OCLC, WHO library and governmental websites from 1985 to present. Following title screening, abstract and full article screening was performed by two independent reviewers guided by the eligibility criteria. Data from included studies were extracted, collated, summarized and synthesized into the following themes: assessment, removal, monitoring and definition of failure of decannulation. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2011. Twenty-five out of 51 screened articles were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variation in the assessment methods employed across and within similar patient groups. The common themes that emerged in the assessment for readiness for decannulation are informed consent, clinical stability, airway patency, physiological decannulation, swallowing assessment, level of consciousness, effectiveness of cough and clearance of secretions. In conclusion, the current body of evidence is inadequate and requires further research, particularly validation of different parameters used. A protocol approach to decannulation may be inappropriate but rather an algorithmic approach using validated parameters.

Critérios para decanulação da traqueostomia: revisão de literatura

RESUMO Objetivo Realizar um levantamento bibliográfico a respeito da decanulação da traqueostomia para verificar os fatores e protocolos utilizados em estudos internacionais. Estratégia de pesquisa Estudo de revisão de literatura utilizando a base de dados PubMed com os descritores em língua inglesa “Tracheostomy”, “Weaning”, “Decannulation”, “Removal tube”, “Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences”, “Intensive Care Units”, “Dysphagia”, “Swallowing”, “Deglutition” e “Deglutition Disorders”. Critérios de seleção Estudos publicados nos últimos cinco anos (2012 a 2017), com população acima de 18 anos de idade; pesquisas realizadas somente com seres humanos; artigos publicados em língua inglesa; artigos com acesso completo irrestrito; pesquisas relacionadas aos objetivos do estudo. Análise dos dados foram analisados quanto aos seguintes itens: caracterização da amostra; profissionais envolvidos no processo da decanulação; etapas do processo de decanulação; tempo total em dias de uso da traqueostomia; tempo total em dias para concluir processo de decanulação; fatores de insucesso para conclusão do processo de decanulação. Resultados A maior parte da população estudada foi do gênero masculino e com alterações neurológicas. Dos profissionais envolvidos no processo de decanulação, participaram em ordem decrescente médicos, fonoaudiólogos, fisioterapeutas e enfermeiros. As etapas da decanulação mais citadas foram: avaliação da deglutição; treino de oclusão; avaliação da permeabilidade de passagem do ar; habilidade de manipulação de secreção e troca de cânula; desinsuflação do cuff e treino de tosse; uso de válvula de fala. Além disso, obtiveram-se dados a respeito do tempo total de traqueostomia e de decanulação. Conclusão A presença do fonoaudiólogo é extremamente importante no processo de decanulação, visto que a avaliação da deglutição foi a etapa mais citada nos estudos, sendo esse trabalho realizado em conjunto com médicos e fisioterapeutas.

The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review

Decannulation is an essential step towards liberating tracheostomized patients from mechanical ventilation. However, despite its perceived importance, there is no universally accepted protocol for this vital transition. Presence of an intact sensorium coordinated swallowing and protective coughing are often the minimum requirements for a successful decannulation. Objective criteria for each of these may help better the clinical judgement of decannulation. In this systematic review on decannulation, we focus attention to this important aspect of tracheostomy care.