Budesonide inhalation suspension versus methylprednisolone for treatment of moderate bronchial asthma attacks

Comparison of the Effects of Beclomethasone Dipropionate and Budesonide in the Treatment of Children with Mild, Persistent Asthma

Objective

To compare the mean change in peak expiratory flow values in children receiving inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate versus inhaled budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma.

Method

The medical records of 60 patients from the outpatient department (OPD)/emergency room (ER), National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, who received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 200 µg one puff and budesonide (BUD) 200 µg one puff twice a day for treatment of mild persistent asthma from March 10, 2020, to August 10, 2020, were explored.

Results

The mean age of children was 10.56 ± 3.01 years in the BUD group and 10.05 ± 3.54 years in the BDP group. The mean change in peak expiratory flow % in the BUD group was 15.69 ± 3.59%, and in the BDP group, it was 13.59 ± 4.26% (P-value=0.04)

Conclusion

BDP and budesonide (BUD) were both found to be effective for the treatment of mild persistent asthma in children. However, we found that BUD had better efficacy compared to BDP.

Role of Inhaled Corticosteroids for Asthma Exacerbation in Children: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background:

Several studies showed that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may be a potential treatment in acute asthma exacerbation in children. This study was an update meta-analysis on the roles of ICS in the management of acute asthma exacerbation in children presenting to the hospital.

Materials and Methods:

Published articles with key words of ICS for asthma exacerbation, asthma attacks, and acute asthma in children aged under 18 years in the hospital setting with outcome of hospital admission between 2009 and 2018 were enrolled. The databases used in this study were Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Odds ratio of comparison between ICS and other treatments on hospital admissions was calculated.

Results:

There were 311 eligible studies met the searching criteria; seven eligible studies for the analysis; comprised of three meta-analysis and four added studies. The ICS had a significant reduction in hospital admission compared with placebo in overall with odds ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.96) and in moderate-to-severe group with odds ratio of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.05–0.51). Comparing with systemic corticosteroid (SC), ICS had significantly lower hospital admissions overall and in mild-to-moderate group with odds ratios of 0.63 and 0.26, respectively. The combination of ICS and SC had odds ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57–0.99) over SC in moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation.

Conclusions:

ICS significantly reduced hospital admission in asthma exacerbation in children. It may be used alone for mild-to-moderate asthma exacerbation and combination with SC for moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation.

Real-life effectiveness and safety of the inhalation suspension budesonide comparator vs the originator product for the treatment of patients with asthma: a historical cohort study using a US health claims database

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine whether the effectiveness of budesonide comparator is non-inferior to budesonide reference in the prevention of asthma exacerbations. Asthma-related hospitalizations and safety were also examined.

Methods

This study used a matched, historic cohort design. Data were drawn from the Clinformatics™ Data Mart US claims database and included a 1-year baseline, starting 1 year before the index prescription date, and a 1-year outcome period. Patients received budesonide comparator or reference treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of asthma exacerbations. Non-inferiority for budesonide comparator vs budesonide reference was established if the 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit of mean difference in proportions between treatments was <15%. Secondary outcomes examined rate of asthma-related hospitalizations and adverse events (AEs).

Results

The budesonide comparator and reference-matched cohorts each included 3109 patients. The adjusted upper 95% CI for the difference in proportions of patients experiencing asthma exacerbations was 0.035 (3.5%), demonstrating non-inferiority. Cohorts did not significantly differ in the rate of asthma exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio [RR]=1.04, 95% CI: 0.95–1.14) or rate of asthma-related hospitalizations (adjusted RR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.99–1.24) after adjusting for baseline confounders. No asthma exacerbations occurred during the outcome period in 72.9% of budesonide comparator patients and 71.8% of budesonide reference patients. No asthma-related hospitalizations occurred in 77.9% of patients in the budesonide comparator cohort and 79.0% of patients in the budesonide reference cohort. The most frequent AEs were throat irritation (≤0.4% of patients) and hoarseness/dysphonia (0.02% of patients). AEs did not significantly differ between treatment cohorts.

Conclusion

In this real-life study, non-inferiority of the budesonide comparator vs reference was met for the primary end point of asthma exacerbation rates. Asthma-related hospitalization and AE rates did not differ between the two treatment cohorts. The budesonide comparator is an effective and safe treatment alternative for asthma exacerbations.