1
|
Heirman AN, Arends CR, de Jel DVC, Dirven R, van der Molen L, Halmos GB, van den Brekel MWM, Stuiver MM. Decisional Conflict and Decision Regret in Head and Neck Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 150:393-404. [PMID: 38512270 PMCID: PMC10958390 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Importance Head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires treatment with a major impact on quality of life. Treatment decision-making is often challenging, as it involves balancing survival against the preservation of quality of life and choosing among treatments with comparable outcomes but variation in morbidity and adverse events; consequently, the potential for decisional conflict (DC) and decision regret (DR) is high. Objectives To summarize the literature on DC and DR in HNC, to give an overview of its prevalence and extent, and to advise on clinical practice and future research. Data Sources Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched up to February 24, 2023, including all years of publication. Study Selection Eligible studies addressed DC and/or DR as primary or secondary outcomes with any instrument in HNC, except cutaneous tumors. Two mutually blinded researchers conducted screening and inclusion with support of an artificial intelligence assistant and conducted risk of bias (ROB) assessment. Data Extraction and Synthesis The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for data extraction. ROB assessments were done using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (qualitative) and CLARITY (quantitative). Meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to obtain pooled prevalence estimates for DC and DR when at least 4 sufficiently clinically homogeneous studies were available. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of DC (qualitative, Decisional Conflict Scale, SURE questionnaire) and DR (qualitative, study-specific questionnaires, Decision Regret Scale, Shame and Stigma Scale). Results Overall, 28 studies were included, with 16 included in meta-analyses for DR prevalence. The pooled prevalence of clinically relevant DR above the cutoff score for validated questionnaires (11 studies; 2053 participants) was 71% (95% CI, 58%-82%; I2 = 94%), while for study-specific questionnaires (5 studies; 674 participants) it was 11% (95% CI, 5%-22%; I2 = 92%). Only 4 studies investigated DC, showing a prevalence of 22.6% to 47.5% above cutoff values. Derived overarching themes found in qualitative studies were preparation, shared decision-making roles, information, time pressure, stress of diagnosis, and consequences. Conclusions and Relevance Although limited data on DC and DR were available, the studies performed indicated that DC and DR are highly prevalent issues in HNC. Results suggest that study-specific questionnaires underestimated DR. The findings underscore the rationale to improve counseling and shared decision-making for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Nadine Heirman
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Coralie Romé Arends
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Richard Dirven
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisette van der Molen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gyorgy Bela Halmos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel Wilhelmus Maria van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center of Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Matthias Stuiver
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology and Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sinclair C, Yeoh L, Karusoo‐Musumeci A, Auret KA, Clayton JM, Hilgeman M, Halcomb E, Sinclair R, Martini A, Meller A, Walton R, Wei L, Dao‐Tran T, Kurrle S, Comans T. Validating care and treatment scenarios for measuring decisional conflict regarding future care preferences among older adults. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14010. [PMID: 38450803 PMCID: PMC10918722 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decisional conflict is used increasingly as an outcome measure in advance care planning (ACP) studies. When the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is used in anticipatory decision-making contexts, the scale is typically tethered to hypothetical scenarios. This study reports preliminary validation data for hypothetical scenarios relating to life-sustaining treatments and care utilisation to inform their broader use in ACP studies. METHODS Three hypothetical scenarios were developed by a panel of multidisciplinary researchers, clinicians and community representatives. A convenience sample of 262 older adults were surveyed. Analyses investigated comprehensibility, missing data properties, sample norms, structural, convergent and discriminant validity. RESULTS Response characteristics suggested that two of the scenarios had adequate comprehensibility and response spread. Missing response rates were unrelated to demographic characteristics. Predicted associations between DCS scores and anxiety (r's = .31-.37, p < .001), and ACP engagement (r's = -.41 to -.37, p < .001) indicated convergent validity. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of older adults reported clinically significant levels of decisional conflict when responding to a range of hypothetical scenarios about care or treatment. Two scenarios showed acceptable comprehensibility and response characteristics. A third scenario may be suitable following further refinement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The scenarios tested here were designed in collaboration with a community representative and were further piloted with two groups of community members with relevant lived experiences; four people with life-limiting conditions and five current or former care partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Sinclair
- School of PsychologyUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA)SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ling Yeoh
- School of PsychologyUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Kirsten A. Auret
- Rural Clinical School of Western AustraliaUniversity of Western AustraliaAlbanyWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Josephine M. Clayton
- The Palliative Centre, HammondCareSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michelle Hilgeman
- Tuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical CenterTuscaloosaAlabamaUSA
- Department of PsychologyThe University of AlabamaTuscaloosaAlabamaUSA
| | - Elizabeth Halcomb
- School of NursingUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ron Sinclair
- University of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Angelita Martini
- Brightwater GroupPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
- University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Anne Meller
- Prince of Wales Hospital, South Eastern Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Li Wei
- College of Science, Health, Engineering and EducationMurdoch UniversityPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Tiet‐Hanh Dao‐Tran
- Centre for Health Services ResearchUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tracy Comans
- Centre for Health Services ResearchUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heirman AN, de Kort DP, Petersen JF, Al-Mamgani A, Eerenstein SEJ, de Kleijn BJ, Hoebers F, Tijink BM, Stuiver MM, van der Molen L, Dirven R, Halmos GB, van den Brekel MWM. Decisional Conflict in Patients with Advanced Laryngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study. Laryngoscope 2024. [PMID: 38366759 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision-making for patients with a locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma (T3 and T4) is challenging due to the treatment choice between organ preservation and laryngectomy, both with different and high impact on function and quality of life (QoL). The complexity of these treatment decisions and their possible consequences might lead to decisional conflict (DC). This study aimed to explore the level of DC in locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma patients facing curative decision-making, and to identify possible associated factors. METHODS In this multicenter prospective cohort study, participants completed questionnaires on DC, level of shared decision-making (SDM), and a knowledge test directly after counseling and 6 months after treatment. Descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Directly after counseling, almost all participants (44/45; 98%) experienced Clinically Significant DC score (CSDC >25, scale 0-100). On average, patients scored 47% (SD 20%) correct on the knowledge test. Questions related to radiotherapy were answered best (69%, SD 29%), whilst only 35% (SD 29%) of the questions related to laryngectomy were answered correctly. Patients' perceived level of SDM (scale 0-100) was 70 (mean, SD 16.2), and for physicians this was 70 (SD 1.7). CONCLUSION Most patients with advanced larynx cancer experience high levels of DC. Low knowledge levels regarding treatment aspects indicate a need for better patient counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV Laryngoscope, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne N Heirman
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan P de Kort
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Japke F Petersen
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone E J Eerenstein
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bertram J de Kleijn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard M Tijink
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Center for Quality of Life, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette van der Molen
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Dirven
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gyorgy B Halmos
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel W M van den Brekel
- Department of Head-and-Neck Oncology and Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center of Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lodhia C, Jufas N, Patel N. Patterns of online information use prior to middle-ear surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Laryngol Otol 2024; 138:33-37. [PMID: 36938814 PMCID: PMC10772020 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215123000440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify what proportion of middle-ear surgery patients utilise the internet for information and to characterise which resources and media formats are used and for what durations. METHOD A single-arm, retrospective cohort study was performed using an online survey of English-speaking patients who underwent middle-ear surgery over a three-year period across two otology practices. RESULTS Of 260 invitees, 165 responded. A total of 122 used online resources: 9.8 per cent used online resources for less than 15 minutes, 27.0 per cent used them for 15 to 29 minutes, 27.0 per cent used them for 30 to 59 minutes and 36.1 per cent used them for 60 minutes or more. Of online users with complete responses (108 of 122), the most used resources (used for 12 minutes or more) were: written information (73.1 per cent); surgeons' websites (55.6 per cent); pictures, diagrams or photos (42.6 per cent); videos (37.0 per cent); and social media (10.2 per cent). CONCLUSION At least 46.9 per cent of patients undergoing elective ear surgery use online resources. Most time is spent using written information, pictures, diagrams, photos and videos. Therefore, it is increasingly essential that accurate and informative resources in these formats are readily available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lodhia
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Jufas
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Kolling Deafness Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Macquarie University and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Kolling Deafness Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Macquarie University and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Wamkpah NS, Ballamudi A, Spataro E, Branham G, Nguyen D, Chen C, Weber A, Chi J. Shared Decision-Making in Patients Seeking Surgery for Facial Trauma: The Role of Decisional Conflict and Perceived Discrimination. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023. [PMID: 37862565 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) may facilitate challenging discussions between patients with facial trauma and reconstructive surgeons. Objective: To determine among patients seeking surgical evaluation for facial trauma, whether patient demographics, decisional conflict (DC), or experiences of discrimination in health care are associated with patient perceptions of SDM, as measured by scored responses on the CollaboRATE-10 questionnaire. Methods: English-speaking adults who presented to the offices of five facial trauma surgeons were contacted by telephone after their visit to complete a cross-sectional survey. Results: After screening 247 patients, 131 patients were recruited (53.0%). DC and history of discrimination were associated with lower perceived SDM (p < 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, initial emergency department presentation, DC, and past discrimination, patients of older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.09) and non-White race (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.4) had higher perceptions of SDM; patients with DC (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01-0.20) reported less SDM. Conclusions: Patients who present to clinic for surgical evaluation after facial trauma feel that their physicians involve them less when deciding on a treatment plan if they have experienced discrimination in health care settings in the past, or if they have significant difficulty deciding between treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Liu
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nneoma S Wamkpah
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Apurupa Ballamudi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Emily Spataro
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gregory Branham
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Dennis Nguyen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Collin Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alizabeth Weber
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - John Chi
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee YH, Chou XY, Lai YH, Liang YH, Hung CT, Hsaio CC, Gao ZX. Decisional conflict and its determinants among patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12715. [PMID: 37543690 PMCID: PMC10404258 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39280-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Decisional conflict might occur during shared decision-making (SDM) because immunotherapy is a rather novel treatment option for patients with cancer. To explore the prevalence and severity of physical and psychological symptoms and the effort invested in SDM in relation to decisional conflict among patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy. This was a cross-sectional survey study. The SURE version of the Decisional Conflict Scale was used to screen cancer patients' decisional conflict status. Demographic or clinical characteristics, physical symptoms and psychological distress; efforts invested in the SDM process were also assessed as potential factors related to decisional conflict. One hundred seventeen patients surveyed, the prevalence of fatigue (79.5%), sleep disturbance (78.6%), poor appetite (67.5%), and pain (58.1%) symptoms were high and the severity was at moderate levels. The prevalence of pruritus (40.2%), rash (34.2%), dry skin (41.9%), and diarrhea (17.1%) symptoms were low and the severity was at mild levels. 65.8% of patients reported uncertainty, with mild to moderate levels. Furthermore, 97.4% of the patients made some effort in SDM, and the effort level was moderate (mean: 5.56 ± 2.02). 64.1% of patients were certain that immunotherapy was the best option. Age, uncertainty, and effort in the SDM process were major factors related to decisional conflict. We observed that older patients (age: ≥ 65) and those with higher uncertainty levels and less effort in SDM reported higher levels of decisional conflict. Future studies should explore older patients' decisional related needs of immunotherapy. Interventions should be designed to reduce the uncertainty experienced by patients with cancer and enhance their understanding of immunotherapy to enable them to take more effort in the SDM process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Hsiang Lee
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Xiao-Yin Chou
- Department of Nursing, Deh Yu College of Nursing and Health, Keelung City, Taiwan
| | - Yeur-Hur Lai
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsin Liang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tai Hung
- Department of Nursing, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chu-Chi Hsaio
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Zi-Xuan Gao
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Porta-Etessam J, Santos-Lasaosa S, Rodríguez-Vico J, Núñez M, Ciudad A, Díaz-Cerezo S, Comellas M, Pérez-Sádaba FJ, Lizán L, Guerrero-Peral AL. Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1319-1334. [PMID: 37310593 PMCID: PMC10310651 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00495-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine symptoms vary significantly between patients and within the same patient. Currently, an increasing number of therapeutic options are available for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Guidelines encourage physicians to use shared decision-making (SDM) in their practice, listening to patients' treatment preferences in order to select the most suitable and effective therapy. Although training for healthcare professionals could increase their awareness of SDM, results concerning its effectiveness are inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the impact of a training activity to promote SDM in the context of migraine care. This was addressed by evaluating the impact on patients' decisional conflict (main objective), patient-physician relationship, neurologists' perceptions of the training and patient's perception of SDM. METHODS A multicenter observational study was conducted in four highly specialized headache units. The participating neurologists received SDM training targeting people with migraine in clinical practice to provide techniques and tools to optimize physician-patient interactions and encourage patient involvement in SDM. The study was set up in three consecutive phases: control phase, in which neurologists were blind to the training activity and performed the consultation with the control group under routine clinical practice; training phase, when the same neurologists participated in the SDM training; and SDM phase, in which these neurologists performed the consultation with the intervention group after the training. Patients in both groups with a change of treatment assessment during the visit completed the Decisional conflict scale (DCS) after the consultation to measure the patient's decisional conflict. Also, patients answered the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (CREM-P) and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The mean ± SD scores obtained from the study questionnaires were calculated for both groups and compared to determine whether there were significant differences (p < 0.05). RESULTS A total of 180 migraine patients (86.7% female, mean age of 38.5 ± 12.3 years) were included, of which 128 required a migraine treatment change assessment during the consultation (control group, n = 68; intervention group, n = 60). A low decisional conflict was found without significant differences between the intervention (25.6 ± 23.4) and control group (22.1 ± 17.9; p = 0.5597). No significant differences in the CREM-P and SDM-Q-9 scores were observed between groups. Physicians were satisfied with the training and showed greater agreement with the clarity, quality and selection of the contents. Moreover, physicians felt confident communicating with patients after the training, and they applied the techniques and SDM strategies learned. CONCLUSION SDM is a model currently being actively used in clinical practice for headache consultation, with high patient involvement in the process. This SDM training, while useful from the physician's perspective, may be more effective at other levels of care where there is still room for optimization of patient involvement in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Porta-Etessam
- Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Santos-Lasaosa
- Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - L Lizán
- Outcomes'10, Castellón, Spain.
- Department of Medicine, Jaume I University, Av. Sos Baynat s/n, 12071, Castellón, Spain.
| | - A L Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Colombo F, Maye H, Rutherford S, King A, Hammerbeck-Ward C, Whitfield GA, McBain C, Colaco R, Entwistle H, Wadeson A, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Pathmanaban ON. Surgery versus radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Shared decision making in a multidisciplinary clinic. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad089. [PMID: 37547267 PMCID: PMC10403749 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Our neurosurgical unit adopted a model of shared decision-making (SDM) based on multidisciplinary clinics for vestibular schwannoma (VS). A unique feature of this clinic is the interdisciplinary counseling process with a surgeon presenting the option of surgery, an oncologist radiosurgery or radiotherapy, and a specialist nurse advocating for the patient. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study. All new patients seen in the combined VS clinic and referred from the skull base multidisciplinary team (MDT) from beginning of June 2013 to end of January 2019 were included. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis were carried out for the full cohort. Results Three hundred and fifty-four patients presenting with new or previously untreated VS were included in the analysis. In our cohort, roughly one-third of patients fall into each of the treatment strategies with slightly smaller numbers of patients undergoing surgery than watch, wait and rescan (WWR) ,and SRS (26.6% vs. 32.8% and 37.9%, respectively). Conclusion In our experience, the combined surgery/oncology/specialist nurse clinic streamlines the patient experience for those with a VS suitable for either microsurgical or SRS/radiotherapy treatment. Decision-making in this population of patients is complex and when presented with all treatment options patients do not necessarily choose the least invasive option as a treatment. The unique feature of our clinic is the multidisciplinary counseling process with a specialist nurse advocating and guiding the patient. Treatment options are likely to become more rather than less complex in future years making combined clinics more valuable than ever in the SDM process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Colombo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Maye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Scott Rutherford
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew King
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Charlotte Hammerbeck-Ward
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Catherine McBain
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rovel Colaco
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Entwistle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrea Wadeson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Lloyd
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Freeman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Omar N Pathmanaban
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Borsetto D, Sethi M, Clarkson K, Obholzer R, Thomas N, Maratos E, Barazi SA, Baig Mirza A, Okasha M, Danesi G, Pusateri A, Bivona R, Ferri GG, El Alouani J, Castellucci A, Rutherford S, Lloyd S, Anwar B, Polesel J, Buttimore J, Gamazo N, Mannion R, Tysome JR, Bance M, Axon P, Donnelly N. Evidence-based surveillance protocol for vestibular schwannomas: a long-term analysis of tumor growth using conditional probability. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:1026-1033. [PMID: 35180698 DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.jns211544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The growth characteristics of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) under surveillance can be studied using a Bayesian method of growth risk stratification by time after surveillance onset, allowing dynamic evaluations of growth risks. There is no consensus on the optimum surveillance strategy in terms of frequency and duration, particularly for long-term growth risks. In this study, the long-term conditional probability of new VS growth was reported for patients after 5 years of demonstrated nongrowth. This allowed modeling of long-term VS growth risks, the creation of an evidence-based surveillance protocol, and the proposal of a cost-benefit analysis decision aid. METHODS The authors performed an international multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected databases from five tertiary care referral skull base units. Patients diagnosed with sporadic unilateral VS between 1990 and 2010 who had a minimum of 10 years of surveillance MRI showing VS nongrowth in the first 5 years of follow-up were included in the analysis. Conditional probabilities of growth were calculated according to Bayes' theorem, and nonlinear regression analyses allowed modeling of growth. A cost-benefit analysis was also performed. RESULTS A total of 354 patients were included in the study. Across the surveillance period from 6 to 10 years postdiagnosis, a total of 12 tumors were seen to grow (3.4%). There was no significant difference in long-term growth risk for intracanalicular versus extracanalicular VSs (p = 0.41). At 6 years, the residual conditional probability of growth from this point onward was seen to be 2.28% (95% CI 0.70%-5.44%); at 7 years, 1.35% (95% CI 0.25%-4.10%); at 8 years, 0.80% (95% CI 0.07%-3.25%); at 9 years, 0.47% (95% CI 0.01%-2.71%); and at 10 years, 0.28% (95% CI 0.00%-2.37%). Modeling determined that the remaining lifetime risk of growth would be less than 1% at 7 years 7 months, less than 0.5% at 8 years 11 months, and less than 0.25% at 10 years 4 months. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter study evaluates the conditional probability of VS growth in patients with long-term VS surveillance (6-10 years). On the basis of these growth risks, the authors posited a surveillance protocol with imaging at 6 months (t = 0.5), annually for 3 years (t = 1.5, 2.5, 3.5), twice at 2-year intervals (t = 5.5, 7.5), and a final scan after 3 years (t = 10.5). This can be used to better inform patients of their risk of growth at particular points along their surveillance timeline, balancing the risk of missing late growth with the costs of repeated imaging. A cost-benefit analysis decision aid was also proposed to allow units to make their own decisions regarding the cessation of surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Borsetto
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Mantegh Sethi
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | | | - Rupert Obholzer
- 3Department of Otolaryngology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - Nicholas Thomas
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eleni Maratos
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sinan A Barazi
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asfand Baig Mirza
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Okasha
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giovanni Danesi
- 5Division of ENT and Skull Base Microsurgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo
| | | | - Rachele Bivona
- 5Division of ENT and Skull Base Microsurgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo
| | - Gian Gaetano Ferri
- 6ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Experimental and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna
| | - Janan El Alouani
- 6ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Experimental and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna
| | - Andrea Castellucci
- 6ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Experimental and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna
- 7ENT Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Scott Rutherford
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - Simon Lloyd
- 9Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom; and
| | - Bilal Anwar
- 9Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom; and
| | - Jerry Polesel
- 10Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Juliette Buttimore
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Nicola Gamazo
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Richard Mannion
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - James R Tysome
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Manhoar Bance
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Patrick Axon
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| | - Neil Donnelly
- 1Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koyama T, Nawa N, Itsui Y, Okada E, Fujiwara T. Facilitators and barriers to implementing shared decision making: A cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2546-2556. [PMID: 35184910 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare providers jointly make a medical decision. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to self-reported implementation of SDM in Japan, and to explore if there is effect modification by hospital types. METHODS A total of 129 physicians in Japan completed a questionnaire that asked about their perception of SDM based on SDM-Q-Doc and its facilitators and barriers, which corresponded to each construct of the integrated behavioral model (IBM). The association between facilitators and barriers and SDM-Q-doc score was assessed using linear regression analysis. Stratified analysis by hospital types was also performed. RESULTS Significant facilitators included physicians' attitude, injunctive norm, intention and habit. Significant barriers included physicians' unfavorable attitude, lack of self-efficacy, knowledge, salience and experience. Moreover, experiential attitude (concerning patient characteristics), injunctive norm (concerning patient preferences), and physician's habit were significant facilitators for physicians working in university hospitals when compared to those working in municipal hospitals. CONCLUSION The facilitators and barriers to implementing SDM in Japan were identified. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS More opportunities for training on SDM are needed to provide knowledge and skills, which will enhance salience and contribute their habitual practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teruchika Koyama
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobutoshi Nawa
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Itsui
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Okada
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Fujiwara
- Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guerrero-Peral ÁL, Porta-Etessam J, Rodríguez-Vico J, Núñez M, Ciudad A, Díaz-Cerezo S, Garí-Peris C, Pérez-Sádaba FJ, Lizán L, Santos-Lasaosa S. Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Version of Decisional Conflict Scale in People with Migraine in Spain. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:3291-3302. [PMID: 36545540 PMCID: PMC9762408 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s384333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to validate the Spanish version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and analyze its psychometric properties in people with migraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS The DCS validation comprised two phases. First, a translation and cross-cultural adaptation following the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Practices: 1-preparation, 2-independent forward translation, 3-reconciliation, 4-back-translation, 5-harmonization, 6-clinical review, and 7-content validation in a group of migraine patients. Second, the analysis of the psychometric properties. The reliability or internal consistency of the DCS scale and subscales was assessed using Cronbach's α value. The item-subscale correlation was also evaluated. A floor and ceiling effects for DCS score was considered when at least 15% of respondents obtained DCS >90 (ceiling) or <10 (floor). The construct validity was studied through the correlation between the DCS subscales and by the correlation between the DCS and other questionnaires (Decision Self-Efficacy Scale [DSES] and 9-item Shared Decision-Making [SDM-Q-9]). Spearman's coefficients were estimated for the correlations. RESULTS The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted on 17 patients who completed the questionnaire in a mean of 2.4 ±1.1 minutes. Generally, more than 75% of them considered that DCS items were adequate, easy to understand, and relevant. The psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of n=128 patients. Accordingly, the internal consistency of DCS was high, with a Cronbach's α of 0.97 for the scale and between 0.87 to 0.96 for subscales. Also, a slight floor effect was observed, with 24.2% of patients having DCS scores <10. The correlation between subscales exceeded Spearman's coefficient of 0.7. Whereas the correlation between the DCS and the other questionnaires was generally moderate (Spearman's coefficient >0.4). CONCLUSION The Spanish version (Spain) of the DCS has very acceptable psychometric properties (reliability and construct validity) and good potential for assessing decisional conflicts among migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | | | - Mercedes Núñez
- Medical Department, Eli Lilly, Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence: Mercedes Núñez, Eli Lilly, Av. de la Industria, 30, Alcobendas, Madrid, 28108, Spain, Tel +34 647447827, Email
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Rossenberg LX, Ring D, Jacobs X, Sulkers G, van Heijl M, van Hoorn BT. Patient Perceived Involvement in Their Treatment is Influenced by Factors Other Than Independently Rated Clinician Communication Effectiveness. J Patient Exp 2021; 8:23743735211065261. [PMID: 34901411 PMCID: PMC8664301 DOI: 10.1177/23743735211065261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We analyzed (1) the correspondence of patient and clinician perceived patient involvement in decision making and ratings made by independent observer's independent ratings, as well as (2), factors associated with patient-perceived involvement, among patients seeking hand specialty care. During 63 visits, the patient, their hand specialist, and 2 independent observers each rated patient involvement in decision making using the 9-item shared decision-making questionnaire for patients and clinicians, and the 5-item observing patient involvement scale (OPTION-5). We also measured health literacy (Newest Vital Sign), patient and visit characteristics (gender, age, race, years of education, occupation, marital status, and family present). There was no correlation (ρ = 0.17; P = .17) between patient (median 42, IQR 36-44.5) and clinician (38, IQR 35-43) ratings of patient involvement in decision making. Independently rated patient involvement correlated moderately with a specialist (ρ = 0.35, P <.01), but not patient (ρ = 0.22, P = .08) ratings. The finding that patient perception of their involvement in decision making has little or no relationship to independently rated clinician communication effectiveness and effort, suggests that other aspects of the encounter-such as empathy and trust-may merit investigation as mediators of the patient agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke X van Rossenberg
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Utrecht Medical Center, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Xander Jacobs
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - George Sulkers
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Utrecht Medical Center, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan T van Hoorn
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Utrecht Medical Center, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen CH, Chuang HY, Lee Y, Elwyn G, Hou WH, Kuo KN. Relationships among Antecedents, Processes, and Outcomes for Shared Decision Making: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Med Decis Making 2021; 42:352-363. [PMID: 34634947 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211024980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among musculoskeletal disorders, lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is the leading cause of total disability-adjusted life years globally. Clinical guidelines for LDD describe multiple treatment options in which shared decision making becomes appropriate. OBJECTIVES To explore the relationships among measures of decision antecedents, process, and outcomes in patients with LDD. METHODS Patients with LDD were recruited from outpatient clinics in a teaching hospital in Taiwan and administered surveys to collect measures of decision antecedents, processes, and outcomes. Multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the association between decision antecedents and the decision making process. Hierarchical linear regression was conducted to assess the relationships among decision antecedents, the decision making process, and decision outcomes. RESULTS A total of 132 patients (mean age, 61 years) completed the survey. After adjustment for personal factors, 2 decision antecedents (namely, decision making self-efficacy and readiness) significantly predicted patients' experiences of engaging in shared decision making (SDM). Decision making readiness and process were associated with fewer decisional conflicts and greater decision satisfaction. LIMITATIONS Models derived from cross-sectional surveys cannot establish causal relationships among decision antecedents, decision making processes, and decision outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our results support the SDM framework, which proposes relationships among decision antecedents, the decision making process, and decision outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hsien Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University, Shuang Ho Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City
| | - Hsin-Yi Chuang
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City
| | - Yen Lee
- Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,School of Education, Edgewood College, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.,Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Cochrane Institute for Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Wen-Hsuan Hou
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City.,School of Gerontology Health Management and Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City.,Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei City
| | - Ken N Kuo
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei City.,Taipei Medical University, Taipei City.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wamkpah NS, Gerndt SP, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF, Chi JJ. Patients' Views of Shared Decision-making and Decisional Conflict in Otolaryngologic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:879-886. [PMID: 34499093 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance A patient's decision to undergo surgery may be fraught with uncertainty and decisional conflict. The unpredictable nature of the COVID-19 pandemic warrants further study into factors associated with patient decision-making. Objective To assess decisional conflict and patient-specific concerns for people undergoing otolaryngologic surgery during the pandemic. Design, Setting, Participants This prospective cross-sectional survey study was conducted via telephone from April 22 to August 31, 2020. English-speaking adults scheduled for surgery from a single academic surgical center were invited to participate. Individuals who were non-English speaking, lacked autonomous medical decision-making capacity, scheduled for emergent surgery, or had a communication disability were excluded. For race and ethnicity reporting, participants were classified dichotomously as White according to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or non-White as a collective term including Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity. Exposures The SURE Questionnaire (sure of myself, understand information, risks/benefits ratio, and encouragement) was used to screen for decisional conflict, with a total score greater than or equal to 3 indicating clinically significant decisional conflict. Participants were asked to share their specific concerns about having surgery. Main Outcome and Measures Decisional conflict and patient demographic data were assessed via bivariate analyses, multivariable logistic regression and conjunctive consolidation. Patient-specific concerns were qualitatively analyzed for summative themes. Results Of 444 patients screened for eligibility, 182 (40.9%) respondents participated. The median age was 60.5 years (interquartile range, 48-70 years). The racial and ethnic identity of the participants was classified as binary White (84% [153 of 182]) and non-White (16% [29 of 182]). The overall prevalence of decisional conflict was 19% (34 of 182). Decisional conflict was more prevalent among non-White than White participants (proportion difference 18.8%, 95% CI, 0.6%-37.0% and adjusted odds ratio 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4). Combining information from multiple variables through conjunctive consolidation, the group with the highest rate of decisional conflict was non-White patients with no college education receiving urgent surgery (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% CI, 2.6-45.0). Intraoperative and postoperative concerns were the most common themes expressed by participants. There was a clinically significant difference in the proportion of participants who screened positive for decisional conflict (30%) and expressed postoperative concerns than those who screened negative for decisional conflict (17%) (proportion difference, 13%; 95% CI, 1%-25%). Among patients reporting concerns about COVID-19, most screened positive for decisional conflict. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this cross-sectional survey study suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decisional conflict in patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Consistent discussion of risks and benefits is essential. The role of race and ethnicity in decisional conflict warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nneoma S Wamkpah
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Sophie P Gerndt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Statistics Editor, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
| | - Jay F Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Editor, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
| | - John J Chi
- Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ankolekar A, De Ruysscher D, Reymen B, Houben R, Dekker A, Roumen C, Fijten R. Shared decision-making for prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an exploratory study. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:3120-3131. [PMID: 34430352 PMCID: PMC8350106 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) offers extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients a lower chance of brain metastasis and slightly longer survival but is associated with a short-term decline in quality of life due to side-effects. This tradeoff between survival and quality of life makes PCI suitable for shared decision-making (SDM), where patients and clinicians make treatment decisions together based on clinical evidence and patient preferences. Despite recent clinical practice guidelines recommending SDM for PCI in ES-SCLC, as well as the heavy disease burden, research into SDM for lung cancer has been scarce. This exploratory study presents patients’ experiences of the SDM process and decisional conflict for PCI. Methods Radiation oncologists (n=7) trained in SDM applied it in making the PCI decision with ES-SCLC patients (n=25). We measured patients’ preferred level of participation (Control Preferences Scale), the level of SDM according to both groups (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc), and patients’ decisional conflict [decisional conflict scale (DCS)]. Results Seventy-nine percent of patients preferred a collaborative role in decision-making, and median SDM scores given by patients and clinicians were 80 (IQR: 75.6–91.1) and 85.2 (IQR: 78.7–88.9) respectively, indicating satisfaction with the process. However, patients experienced considerable decisional conflict. Over 50% lacked clarity about which choice was suitable for them and were unsure what to choose. Sixty-four percent felt they did not know enough about the harms and benefits of PCI, and 60% felt unable to judge the importance of the harms/benefits in their life. Conclusions ES-SCLC patients prefer to be involved in their treatment choice for PCI but a substantial portion experiences decisional conflict. Better information provision and values clarification may support patients in making a choice that reflects their preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anshu Ankolekar
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Reymen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Houben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Roumen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sethi M, Borsetto D, Bance M, Cho Y, Gair J, Gamazo N, Joannides A, Jefferies S, Mannion R, Macfarlane R, Donnelly N, Tysome JR, Axon P. Determinants of Vestibular Schwannoma Growth. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:746-754. [PMID: 33273313 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) involves surgery, radiotherapy, or surveillance, based on patient and tumor factors. We recently described conditional probability as a more accurate method for stratifying VS growth risk. Building on this, we now describe determinants of VS growth, allowing clinicians to move toward a more personalized approach to growth-risk profiling. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database in a tertiary referral skull base unit between 2005 and 2014. Inclusion of patients with unilateral VS managed on surveillance protocol for a minimum of 5 years. Analysis of patient age, sex, tumor location, tumor size, and symptomology using conditional probability. RESULTS A total of 340 patients met inclusion criteria. The conditional probability of growth of extracanalicular VS was significantly higher versus intracanalicular (IC) VS (30% versus 13%, p < 0.001) as was small-sized VS versus IC VS (28 versus 13%, p = 0.002), but only in the first year after diagnosis. Sex, age, and presenting symptoms did not significantly affect VS growth. CONCLUSION In our series, extracanalicular VS were more likely to grow than IC VS and small-sized VS more likely to grow than IC VS, but only in the first year after diagnosis. Conversely, sex, age, and presenting symptoms did not affect the conditional probability of VS growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mantegh Sethi
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| | - Daniele Borsetto
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| | - Manohar Bance
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| | - Yeajoon Cho
- Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge University
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Jefferies
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Neil Donnelly
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| | - James R Tysome
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| | - Patrick Axon
- Department of Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the current epidemiology and management trends for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry. PATIENTS The SEER database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with VS from 1973 to 2015. Demographics, patient and tumor characteristics, and treatment methods were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 14,507 patients with VS were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 55 ± 14.9 years. Age-adjusted incidence from 2006 to 2015 was 1.4 per 100,000 per year and remained relatively stable. Incidence across age varied with sex, as younger women and older men had increased incidences comparatively. A higher percentage of patients underwent surgery alone (43%), followed by observation (32%), radiation alone (23%), and combined radiation and surgery (2%). Age 65 and older was associated with observation (odds ratio [OR] 1.417; p = 0.029) whereas age 20 to 39 and 40 to 49 were associated with surgery (OR 2.013 and 1.935; p < 0.001). Older age was associated with radiation. Larger tumor size was associated with surgery and combined treatment. African American patients and American Indian or Alaskan Native patients were more likely to undergo observation than surgery. CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of VS is 1.4 per 100,000 per year and has remained relatively stable. There is a trend toward more conservative management with observation, which may be secondary to earlier diagnosis given widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging. Further studies are necessary to investigate differences in disease patterns and disparities in management.
Collapse
|
18
|
Paduca A, Arnaut O, Beschieru E, Lundmark PO, Bruenech JR. Shared decision making and patients satisfaction with strabismus care-a pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:109. [PMID: 33771137 PMCID: PMC7995717 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01469-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strabismus is a complex disease that has various treatment approaches each with its own advantages and drawbacks. In this context, shared decisions making (SDM) is a communication process with the provider sharing all the relevant treatment alternatives, all the benefits, and risks of each procedure, while the patient shares all the preferences and values regarding his/her choices. In that way, SDM is a bidirectional process that goes beyond the typical informed consent. Therefore, it is known a little of the extent to which SDM influences the satisfaction with the treatment outcome along with strabismus patients. To study this correlation, an SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was provided within surgical consultations where treatment decisions were made; the SDM-Q-9 aims to assess the relationship between the post-operative patient's satisfaction and their SMD score. METHODS The study is considered a prospective observational pilot study. Eligible patients were adult patients diagnosed with strabismus, who had multiple treatment options, were given at the right of choice without being driven into a physician's preference. Ninety-three strabismus patients were asked to fill out the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire related to their perception of SDM during the entire period of strabismus treatment. After the treatment, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction level with the surgical outcome as excellent, good, fair, and poor. Descriptive statistics and the linear regression statistical tests (Spearman, Mann Whitney U, and Kriskal-Wallis) were used as analysis tools. RESULTS The average age of the participants was 24, where 50.6% were women. The mean SDM-Q-9 score among patients was 32 (IQR = 3). The postoperative patient satisfaction was rated as being excellent by 16 (17.2%) patients, good by 38 (40.9%), fair by 32 (34.4%), and poor by 7 patients (7.5%). Data analysis by linear regression statistical tests showed a positive correlation between the SDM-Q-9 score and the patient satisfaction related to the surgery outcome (B = 0.005, p < 0.001). Criteria in assessing patients' satisfaction were age, gender, and strabismus type. A positive correlation between SDM and real satisfaction (r = 0.834, p < 0.01) was found with age, and no significant relationship was found while taking into consideration the responder's gender and the strabismus type. CONCLUSIONS Assessing patient satisfaction after choosing a treatment for strabismus method helped us evaluate the gaps in constructive dialogue that would lead to a positive outcome for both patient and clinician. The correlation between the SDM process and the patients' satisfaction with surgery outcome, adjusted by age, has been established. These findings can serve as a springboard to further communicative improvements related to the SDM process and between patients and physicians, thereby consequently leading to patients' satisfaction raise in strabismus care. The study underlines the importance of further analysis and validation of on-ground interactions among the adolescent and adult patients and the clinicians across the strabismus management trajectory. A multicentral study and its validation will follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Paduca
- Faculty of Health and Social Science, South Eastern University Norway, Kongsberg, Norway. .,Ophthalmology Department, Universitatea de Stat de Medicina si Farmacie "Nicolae Testemitanu″, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova.
| | - Oleg Arnaut
- Department of Human Physiology and Biophysics, Universitatea de Stat de Medicina si Farmacie "Nicolae Testemitanu", Chişinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - Eugeniu Beschieru
- Department of Surgery No.1 "N. Anestiadi", Universitatea de Stat de Medicina si Farmacie "Nicolae Testemitanu", Chişinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - Per Olof Lundmark
- Faculty of Health and Social Science, South Eastern University Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
| | - Jan Richard Bruenech
- Faculty of Health and Social Science, South Eastern University Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Forner D, Noel CW, Shuman AG, Hong P, Corsten M, Rac VE, Pieterse AH, Goldstein D. Shared Decision-making in Head and Neck Surgery: A Review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 146:839-844. [PMID: 32701131 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance Shared decision-making is a partnership between physicians and patients whereby patient values and preferences are incorporated with the best medical evidence. Shared decision-making may reduce decisional conflict, improve value-choice congruence, and increase patient involvement. Despite potential benefit in many key areas of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, both clinical and research focuses on shared decision-making are scarce. Head and neck surgical oncology is of particular interest owing to the frequency by which preference-sensitive decisions must be made. Information used in this review was obtained between January 1 and February 1, 2020. Observations Various conceptual models have been developed in an attempt to define the concept of shared decision-making. More than 40 instruments have endeavored to measure the construct of shared decision-making. However, in head and neck surgery, few studies to date have explicitly done so. Situations of clinical equipoise, such as in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules and in the treatment of laryngeal cancer, are frequent. In contrast, value-option incongruence may occur when patient values do not align with the most oncologically sound treatment choice, such as when the resection and reconstruction of oral cancer may leave patients with significant sequelae. Several patient decision aids have been developed to improve shared decision-making in specific clinical scenarios, for example, in considering total laryngectomy or primary chemoradiotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance Despite its potential benefit, there is a dearth of research and clinical applications of shared decision-making in head and neck surgery. Shared decision-making represents an area of substantial need in this regard, and additional efforts should be put forth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Forner
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Christopher W Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew G Shuman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Paul Hong
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Martin Corsten
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Valeria E Rac
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hadizadeh-Talasaz F, Ghoreyshi F, Mohammadzadeh F, Rahmani R. Effect of shared decision making on mode of delivery and decisional conflict and regret in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:144. [PMID: 33596854 PMCID: PMC7890798 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03615-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The promotion of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is the best method for the reduction of repeated cesarean sections. Nonetheless, the decisional conflict which often results from inadequate patient involvement in decision making, may lead to delayed decision making and regret about the choices that were made. The present study aimed to determine the effect of shared decision making on the mode of delivery and decisional conflict and regret in pregnant women with previous cesarean section. METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 78 pregnant women with a previous cesarean section referring to community health centers in Torbat-e Jam, Iran, in 2019. They were randomly assigned to two groups of intervention and control. During weeks 24-30 of pregnancy, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was completed by pregnant mothers. Apart from the routine care, the experimental group received a counseling session which was held based on the three-talk model of shared decision making. This session was moderated by a midwife; moreover, a complementary counseling session was administered by a gynecologist. During weeks 35-37 of pregnancy, DCS was completed, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was filled out for both groups at the 8th weeks postpartum and they were asked about the mode of delivery. Data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 19) using the Mann-Whitney, Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS After the intervention, the decisional conflict score was significantly lower in the shared decision making (SDM) group, compared to that in the control group (14.90 ± 9.65 vs. 25.41 ± 13.38; P < 0.001). Moreover, in the SDM group, the rate of vaginal birth was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001). Two month after the delivery, the mean score of decision regret was lower in the SDM group, in comparison to that in the control group (15.67 ± 23.37 vs. 27. 30± 26.75; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the study, shared counseling can be effective in the reduction of decisional conflict and regret, as well as rate enhancement of VBAC. Therefore, it can be concluded that this counseling method can be used in prenatal care to reduce the rate of repeated cesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION IRCT20190506043499N1; Name of the registry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; Registered 10. August 2019. URL of registry: https://en.irct.ir/trial/39538. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: August 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Hadizadeh-Talasaz
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Faezeh Ghoreyshi
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Mohammadzadeh
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Health, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Roghaieh Rahmani
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lin AN, Lin WC, Cheng KL, Luo SD, Chiang PL, Chen WC, Chen YS, Wang CK, Kan NN, Su YY. Radiofrequency Ablation a Safe and Effective Treatment for Pediatric Benign Nodular Thyroid Goiter. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:753343. [PMID: 34900863 PMCID: PMC8662624 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.753343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Twelve pediatric patients (11 female, 1 male; mean age 15.54 ± 2.8 years, range 10-19 years) with benign thyroid nodules (mean longest diameter 4.1 ± 1.4 cm, range 1.5-5.9 cm) treated by RFA from 2017 to 2020 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria for RFA therapy were (i) age < 20 years; (ii) benign cytological confirmation by 2 separate ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core needle biopsies; (iii) pressure symptoms or cosmetic problems caused by thyroid nodules; (iv) absence of any sonographic suspicious feature; and (v) follow-up for >6 months. Under local anesthesia, RFA was performed with the use of an RF generator and an 18-gauge internally cooled electrode. Volume changes in nodules on follow-up ultrasonography (US), changes in symptomatic and cosmetic scores, and complications arising during or after RFA were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up period was 24.9 ± 13.9 months (range 6-43 months). At the last follow-up visits, volume of the nodule had decreased significantly (15.34 ± 11.52 mL vs. 4.07 ± 4.99 mL; P < 0.05), whereas volume reduction rate was 74.31% ± 19.59%. Both cosmetic and compressive symptoms were also significantly improved (2.91 ± 0.79 vs. 0.92 ± 0.67 and 1.5 ± 1.93 vs. 0.17 ± 0.39; P < 0.05). The mean number of ablation sessions was 1.4 ± 0.6 (range 1-3 sessions), and one of the patients suffered from transient vocal cord palsy which was spontaneously resolved 53 days later. Conclusions: RFA is a safe and effective treatment for benign thyroid nodules in pediatric patients, and can thus serve as an alternative treatment for thyroidectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An-Ni Lin
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Lin
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Lun Cheng
- Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Dean Luo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Ling Chiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yueh-Sheng Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kang Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Na-Ning Kan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Ye Su
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2371-2382. [PMID: 33942189 PMCID: PMC8357744 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04867-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In modern neurosurgery, there are often several treatment alternatives, with different risks and benefits. Shared decision-making (SDM) has gained interest during the last decade, although SDM in the neurosurgical field is not widely studied. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to present the current landscape of SDM in neurosurgery. METHODS A literature review was carried out in PubMed and Scopus. We used a search strategy based on keywords used in existing literature on SDM in neurosurgery. Full-text, peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 up to the search date February 16, 2021, with patients 18 years and older were included if articles evaluated SDM in neurosurgery from the patient's perspective. RESULTS We identified 22 articles whereof 7 covered vestibular schwannomas, 7 covered spinal surgery, and 4 covered gliomas. The other topics were brain metastases, benign brain lesions, Parkinson's disease and evaluation of neurosurgical care. Different methods were used, with majority using forms, questionnaires, or interviews. Effects of SDM interventions were studied in 6 articles; the remaining articles explored factors influencing patients' decisions or discussed SDM aids. CONCLUSION SDM is a tool to involve patients in the decision-making process and considers patients' preferences and what the patients find important. This scoping review illustrates the relative lack of SDM in the neurosurgical literature. Even though results indicate potential benefit of SDM, the extent of influence on treatment, outcome, and patient's satisfaction is still unknown. Finally, the use of decision aids may be a meaningful contribution to the SDM process.
Collapse
|
23
|
Patient-reported factors that influence the vestibular schwannoma treatment decision: a qualitative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:3237-3244. [PMID: 33026499 PMCID: PMC8328891 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In cases of small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannomas, three management strategies can be opted for: active surveillance, surgery or radiotherapy. In these cases, the patient’s preference is pivotal in decision-making. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence a patient’s decision for a particular management strategy. Methods A qualitative inductive thematic analysis was performed based on semi-structured interviews. Eighteen patients with small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannomas were interviewed. All patients were diagnosed or treated at one of the two participating university medical centers in the Netherlands.
Results Ten themes were identified that influenced the decision, classified as either medical or patient-related. The medical themes that emerged were: tumor characteristics, the physician’s recommendation, treatment outcomes and the perceived center’s experience. The patient-related themes were: personal characteristics, anxiety, experiences, cognitions, logistics and trust in the physician.
Conclusion Knowledge of the factors that influence decision-making helps physicians to tailor their consultations to arrive at a true shared decision on vestibular schwannoma management.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hong CS, Moliterno J. The Patient-Centered Approach: A Review of the Literature and Its Application for Acoustic Neuromas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81:280-286. [PMID: 32500003 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-centered care is defined as "care that is consistent with and respects the values, needs, and wishes of patients" and is best achieved when clinicians involve patients and their support system in health care discussions and decisions. While this approach has been well established and supported in more general medical specialties, such as primary care, that may encompass a more holistic approach, it has rarely been described in surgical disciplines. Acoustic neuromas (ANs) can be unique among other skull base and intracranial pathologies, in that the management of these tumors can vary from patient to patient depending on various factors. Moreover, typical options, including observation, radiation, and surgery, may often have equipoise for some patients and their tumors. Therefore, a patient-centered approach, strongly guided by the expertise of experienced skull base surgeons, may likely be the most appropriate type of care for patients with ANs. Herein, we review the documented use of patient-centered care in other aspects of medicine, propose the benefits of this approach for patients with ANs, and provide ways this can be better implemented in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.,Yale Brain Tumor Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Jennifer Moliterno
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.,Yale Brain Tumor Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The Conditional Probability of Vestibular Schwannoma Growth at Different Time Points After Initial Stability on an Observational Protocol. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:250-257. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
26
|
Wang X, Sun N, Meng X, Chen M, Jiang C, Cai J. Review of clinical nerve repair strategies for neurorestoration of central nervous system tumor damage. JOURNAL OF NEURORESTORATOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.26599/jnr.2020.9040018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are common. In recent years, with the continuous development and popularization of neurosurgery and the advancement of diagnostic and therapeutic instruments, the diagnosis and treatment of diseases have made great progress, but the prognosis of patients depends on multiple clinical factors. In this study, we selected various literatures in the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines using the keywords "nerve repair strategies" , "central nervous system tumor" as well as searched scientifically reviewed historical perspectives and recent advancements and achievements in Neurorestoratology of the CNS. Therefore, this study focuses on the Neurorestoratology of the CNS and its prospects, aiming to provide scientific guidance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CNS tumors in the future, and improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2019; 22:727-735. [PMID: 31822848 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER (www.genomicsadviser.com) decision aid (DA) for selection of secondary findings (SF), compared with genetic counseling alone. METHODS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate whether the Genomics ADvISER is superior to genetic counseling when hypothetically selecting SF. Participants were randomized to use the DA followed by discussion with a genetic counselor, or to genetic counseling alone. Surveys were administered at baseline and post-intervention. Primary outcome was decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes were knowledge, preparation for, and satisfaction with decision-making, anxiety, and length of counseling session. RESULTS Participants (n = 133) were predominantly White/European (74%), female (90%), and ≥50 years old (60%). Decisional conflict (mean difference 0.05; P = 0.60), preparation for decision-making (0.17; P = 0.95), satisfaction with decision (-2.18; P = 0.06), anxiety (0.72; P = 0.56), and knowledge of sequencing limitations (0.14; P = 0.70) did not significantly differ between groups. However, intervention participants had significantly higher knowledge of SF (0.39; P < 0.001) and sequencing benefits (0.97; P = 0.01), and significantly shorter counseling time (24.40 minutes less; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The Genomics ADvISER did not decrease decisional conflict but reduced counseling time and improved knowledge. This decision aid could serve as an educational tool, reducing in-clinic time and potentially health care costs.
Collapse
|