Endoscope-assisted versus conventional neck dissection in patients with oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robot-assisted versus conventional neck dissection in head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Advances in technology have enabled neck dissection techniques that reduce aesthetic impact while maintaining oncological safety. This study compares perioperative outcomes between robotic neck dissection via retroauricular/modified facelift incision (RNDRM) and conventional neck dissection via anterolateral cervical incision (CND).

METHODS

Studies were selected from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Data from studies comparing RNDRM and CND were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included eight studies with 421 cases. The RNDRM group had a longer operative time (mean difference [MD], 69.11; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 37.92 to 100.30) and higher cosmetic satisfaction (MD, 2.03; 95 % CI, 1.48 to 2.57), along with a higher risk of marginal mandibular nerve injury (risk difference [RD], 0.08; 95 % CI 0.01 to 0.15). No significant differences were found in operative blood loss (MD, 15.35; 95 % CI - 7.39 to 38.10), days of drain placement (MD, 0.49; 95 % CI, -0.02 to 1.00), drainage volume (MD, 15.29; 95 % CI, -45.22 to 75.79), overall lymph node yield (MD, -1.09; 95 % CI, -3.18 to 1.00), positive lymph node yield (MD, -0.61; 95 % CI, -2.20 to 0.98), length of hospital stay (MD, 1.07; 95 % CI -0.06 to 2.20), or regional recurrence (RD, 0.00; 95 % CI -0.05 to 0.05), with similar rates of other complications.

CONCLUSION

RNDRM offers better cosmetic outcomes but requires longer operative time and has a higher risk of marginal mandibular nerve injury than CND. It may be an alternative for selected patients, with surgery choice needing discussion between patient and surgeon.

Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients who undergone conventional or endoscopic/robotic retroauricular neck dissection: a case-control study

Background

Neck dissection performed via retroauricular approach emerged as an alternative to the conventional approach, aiming to maintain therapeutic efficacy with lower postoperative morbidity. Differences among these modalities in terms of functional aspects and quality of life (QOL) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the anatomical and functional aspects and the QOL in patients undergoing unilateral neck dissection via conventional or retroauricular (endoscopic or robotic) access.

Methods

This study involved consecutively 35 patients who underwent unilateral neck dissection for head and neck cancer, 25 submitted to the conventional surgery [conventional group (CG)] and 10 to the retroauricular approach [retroauricular group (RG)]. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and on the 30th postoperative day (POD) regarding range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine and shoulder, trapezius muscle strength and QOL.

Results

The CG and RG were similar in terms of anthropometric, clinical and surgical variables. The mean age of both groups was between 52 and 55 years old. There was a predominance of females in the CG (52%) and males in the RG (70%); P=0.08. The most affected site was the oropharynx followed by the thyroid in the two groups and the most frequently dissected levels were I-III in both groups. There was a difference in the length of hospital stay {CG: 5 [1-22] days and RG: 2 [1-6] days; P=0.02} and pain scores at the 30th POD was higher in CG group (P=0.002). Regarding the cervical spine ROM, it was better in RG in the 30th POD for neck extension, ipsilateral lateroflexion, contralateral lateroflexion and contralateral rotation (P<0.05). No significant differences were found regarding shoulder ROM. Trapezius muscle strength, was also higher at the 30th POD in RG group (P<0.05). QOL was most impacted in the CG in the Chewing and Shoulder domains and Physical Function dimension at the 30th POD (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Postoperative functional morbidity was lower in patients undergoing retroauricular neck dissection. The cervical spine ROM and trapezius muscle strength were better in patients undergoing retroauricular approach and postoperative QOL was worse in patients undergoing conventional neck dissection.

Comparison between a novel salivary marker and several clinical prognosticators in oral cavity cancer

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the association between salivary matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and clinicopathological parameters of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and compare the prognostic efficacy of salivary MMP-1 and other established circulating markers for OSCC.

Methods

Saliva specimens from 479 OSCC subjects were examined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The area under the curve (AUC) values of salivary MMP-1 and other markers were calculated, and survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression methods.

Results

Salivary MMP-1 showed good discrimination in predicting overall survival, with an AUC of 0.638, which was significantly higher than that of albumin (0.530, p = .021) and Charlson comorbidity index (0.568, p = .048) and comparable with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.620, p = .987), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.575, p = .125), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (0.609, p = .605). Elevated levels of salivary MMP-1 were significantly associated with higher pT classification, pN classification, overall pathological stage, positive extranodal extension, tumor differentiation, positive lymphovascular invasion, positive perineural invasion, and tumor depth (p all <.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that a higher level of salivary MMP-1 (≥2060.0 pg/mL) was an independent predictive factor of poorer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.421 [95% confidential interval: 1.014-1.989], p = .041).

Conclusion

The study found that the salivary MMP-1 level was significantly associated with many adverse clinicopathological parameters of OSCC. In OSCC, it was found to have superior efficacy in predicting prognosis and was an independent prognostic factor of post-treatment outcome.

Level of evidence

3.