Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis

Stress Distribution and Tooth Displacement Analysis of Maxillary Molar Distalization by Different Designs of Jig in a Finite Element Study

Statement of the Problem

Despite the prevalence of CLII malocclusion, still the best mechanotherapy for non-extraction treatment is not verified.

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stress distribution and tooth displacement during maxillary molar distalization with the aid of two different constructions of jigs in three different lever arm heights.

Materials and Method

In this finite element study, models were meticulously constructed to represent the maxillary arch teeth (excluding the third molar), periodontal ligament, alveolar bone, maxillary brackets, main archwire, molar bands, jigs, and mini screws. These models were imported into Ansys software for simulation and analysis. Two different jig configurations with three different lever arm height were created. A 150-gram force was applied to simulate tooth movement, facilitate observation, and analyze its effects on oral components.

Results

In various experimental configurations involving tow jigs with differing lever arm heights, the central incisor exhibited displacement characterized by lingual and distal crown tipping, along with evidence of intrusion. Concurrently, the first molar displayed lingual and distal tipping, as well as extrusion, across six distinct modalities.

Conclusion

In the main, posterior teeth showed distal and lingual tipping and extrusion and anterior teeth demonstrated intrusion mesial and lingual tipping in all models. It seems the differences were due to different lever arm heights. Two types of jig had no significant effect on stress distribution and tooth movement.

Comparative biomechanical analysis of four different tooth- and bone-borne frog appliances for molar distalization : A three-dimensional finite element study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of four different designs of frog appliances for molar distalization using finite element analysis.

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element model including complete dentition, periodontal ligament, palatine, and alveolar bone was established. Four types of frog appliances were designed to simulate maxillary molar distalization: tooth-button-borne (Type A), bone-borne (Type B), bone-button-borne (Type C), and tooth-bone-borne (Type D) frog appliances. A force of 10 N was applied simulating a screw in the anteroposterior direction. To assess the von Mises stress distribution and the resultant displacements in the teeth and periodontal tissues, geometric nonlinear theory was utilized.

RESULTS

Compared to the conventional tooth-borne frog appliance (Type A), the bone-borne frog appliances showed increased first molar distalization with enhanced mesiolingual rotation and distal tipping, but the labial inclination and intrusion of the incisors were insignificant. When replacing the palatal acrylic button with miniscrews (Types B and D), more anchorage forces were transmitted from the first premolar to palatine bone, which was further dispersed by the assistance of a palatal acrylic button (Type C).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to tooth-borne frog appliances, the bone-borne variants demonstrated a clear advantage for en masse molar distalization. The combined anchorage system utilizing palatal acrylic buttons and miniscrews (Type C) offers the most efficient stress distribution, minimizing force concentration on the palatine bone.

Finite element analysis of sagittal screw expander appliance in the treatment of anterior maxillary hypoplasia

The skeletal anterior crossbite is a common malocclusion in clinic. However, there have been no reports on the maxillary sagittal expansion to correct the premaxillary hypoplasia, which greatly influences the facial morphology and masticatory function, using finite element analysis. In the present study, a three-dimensional finite element model of craniomaxillofacial complex with maxillary sagittal hypoplasia is constructed and the treatment for premaxillary hypoplasia by the sagittal screw expander appliance is simulated. The hypoplasia of the left premaxilla is more serious than that of the right and thus the size of the left part of premaxillary expander baseplate is designed to be larger than that of the right part and the loading is applied at 10° leftward to the sagittal plane and 30° forward and downward to the maxillary occlusal plane. The displacements or equivalent stress distributions of the maxilla, teeth and their periodontal ligaments, are analyzed under the loads of 5.0 N, 10.0 N, 15.0 N, and 20.0 N. Consequently, as the load increases, the displacements or equivalent stresses of the maxilla, teeth and their periodontal ligaments all increase. Almost the whole premaxilla markedly move forward, downward, and leftward while other areas in the craniomaxillofacial complex remain almost static or have little displacement. The equivalent stress concentration zone of the maxilla mainly occurs around and in front of the incisive foramina. The displacements of left premaxilla are generally greater than those of the right under the loading forces. The maximum equivalent stress on the teeth and their periodontal ligaments are 2.34E-02 MPa and 2.98E-03 MPa, respectively. Taken together, the sagittal screw expander appliance can effectively open the premaxillary suture to promote the growth of the premaxilla. An asymmetrical design of sagittal screw expander appliance achieves the asymmetric expansion of the premaxilla to correct the uneven hypoplasia and obtains the more symmetrical aesthetic presentation. This study might provide a solid basis and theoretical guidance for the clinical application of sagittal screw expander appliance in the efficient, accurate, and personalized treatment of premaxillary hypoplasia.

Effective contribution ratio of the molar during sequential distalization using clear aligners and micro-implant anchorage: a finite element study

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the biomechanical effects of anchorage reinforcement using clear aligners (CAs) with microimplants during molar distalization. And also explores potential clinical strategies for enhancing anchorage in the sequential distalization process.

METHODS

Finite element models were established to simulate the CAs, microimplants, upper dentition, periodontal ligament (PDL), and alveolar bone. In group set I, the 2nd molars underwent a distal movement of 0.25 mm in group set II, the 1st molars were distalized by 0.25 mm after the 2nd molars had been placed to a target position. Each group set consisted of three models: Model A served as the control model, Model B simulated the use of microimplants attached to the aligner through precision cuts, and Model C simulated the use of microimplants attached by buttons. Models B and C were subjected to a series of traction forces. We analyzed the effective contribution ratios of molar distalization, PDL hydrostatic stress, and von Mises stress of alveolar bone.

RESULTS

The distalization of the 2nd molars accounted for a mere 52.86% of the 0.25-mm step distance without any reinforcement of anchorage. The remaining percentage was attributed to the mesial movement of anchorage teeth and other undesired movements. Models B and C exhibited an increased effective contribution ratio of molar distalization and a decreased loss of anchorage. However, there was a slight increase in the undesired movement of molar tipping and rotation. In group set II, the 2nd molar displayed a phenomenon of mesial relapse due to the reciprocal force produced by the 1st molar distalization. Moreover, the efficacy of molar distalization in terms of contribution ratio was found to be positively correlated with the magnitude of force applied. In cases where stronger anchorage reinforcement is required, precision cuts is the superior method.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of microimplants in conjunction with CAs can facilitate the effective contribution ratio of molar distalization. However, it is important to note that complete elimination of anchorage loss is not achievable. To mitigate undesired movement, careful planning of anchorage preparation and overcorrection is recommended.

Actual contribution ratio of maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction during maxillary molar sequential distalization using clear aligners with Class II elastics: A finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Class II elastics, in combination with clear aligners (CA), are efficient for molar distalization. However, the effects of this combination on intermaxillary molar relationship correction have yet to be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the actual contribution ratio of the maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction during maxillary molar distalization using Class II elastics with CA and further explore therapeutic recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

Finite element models (FEMs) were established, including the distalization of the second molars (Set I), followed by the distalization of the first molars (Set II). Model A simulated elastics attached by precision cutting, whereas Model B simulated elastics attached to buttons. Force magnitudes of 100 g, 150 g, and 200 g of force were applied. We recorded the contribution ratio of the maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction, effective distalizing distance in 0.25 mm step distance, tipping and rotation angles, and the hydrostatic stress in the periodontal ligament.

RESULTS

During maxillary molar distalization, mesialization of the mandibular molar had a notable contribution ratio for molar relationship correction. The mandibular first molar was mesialized with mesiolingual rotation tendency. Approximately half of the 0.25 mm step distance was occupied by maxillary molar distalization; the remainder was occupied by anchorage teeth mesialization and tipping or rotation. When traction forces increased, the total molar relationship correction and effective distalization increased; the mandibular molars mesialization contribution ratio also increased, as did rotation and inclination tendency. Precision cutting had a higher total molar relationship correction and more effective distalization than a button but also had a larger contribution ratio of mandibular molar mesialization and inclination or rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular molar mesialization should be considered when correcting the molar relationship using CA with intermaxillary elastics during maxillary molar distalization. It is also important to consider the anchorage teeth mesialization and undesired tipping or rotation.

Biomechanical analysis of effective mandibular en-masse retraction using Class II elastics with a clear aligner: a finite element study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the displacement and stress distribution of mandibular dentition by various positions of the Class II elastics during en-masse retraction in clear aligner therapy.

Methods

Models including a mandibular dentition (without first premolars), periodontal ligament (PDL), mandible, as well as attachments, aligners and buttons were constructed and imported into Ansys Workbench 2019 (ANSYS, USA) to generate the three-dimensional (3D) finite element model. Six combinations were created: (1) aligner alone (control), (2)-(5) Class II elastics with buttons placed on the mesiobuccal (MB), distobuccal (DB), mesiolingual (ML) and distolingual (DL) surface of the mandibular first molar, and (6) Class II elastics with a button on the aligner corresponding to the mesiobuccal surface of the mandibular first molar (AMB). The elastic force was set to 2 N for simulations.

Results

The central incisors appeared lingual tipping in the six models. The lingual crown movement of the central incisors was 0.039 mm, 0.034 mm, 0.034 mm, 0.042 mm, 0.041 mm, and 0.034 mm for control model, MB model, DB model, ML model, DL model, and AMB model, respectively. The first molars showed mesial tipping in the six models. The mesial movement of the mesiobuccal cusps of the first molars was 0.045 mm, 0.060 mm, 0.063 mm, 0.048 mm, 0.051 mm, and 0.055 mm for control model, MB model, DB model, ML model, DL model, and AMB model, respectively.

Conclusions

Class II elastics reduced lingual tipping of anterior teeth but aggravated mesial tipping of posterior teeth. Mesiolingual elastics developed minimum mesial tipping of the posterior teeth. When Class II elastics are required, attaching elastics on the mesiolingual surface of the mandibular first molar is recommended to prevent mandibular anchorage loss.

Influence of Mouthwash Rinsing on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Ligature Ties Used for Dental Applications

Mouthwashes are used during dental treatments to mitigate the complications caused by poor oral hygiene. However, these solutions also affect the properties of dental appliances, including those used in orthodontics. This point has been investigated in this study focusing on the changes in mechanical properties of polymeric orthodontic ligature ties. Commercial ties from four brands were characterized in terms of their maximum forces and displacement, delivery forces, molecular structures, and microscopic morphology. These properties were compared against the ties, which were rinsed with commercial mouthwashes from three manufacturers. The results showed that mouthwash rinsing significantly reduced the maximum bearable forces of ligature ties by up to 73.1%, whereas the reduction in their maximum displacement was up to 74.5% across all tested brands. Significant changes in microscopic morphology of ligature ties were observed after mouthwash rinsing, but not their molecular structure. Furthermore, mouthwash rinsing also reduced the delivery forces from ligature ties by between 20.9 and 32.9% at their first deformation cycle. It can be concluded from this study that mouthwashes have significant impact on the mechanical properties of polymeric orthodontic ligature ties and could also potentially affect the overall efficacy of orthodontic and other dental treatments.