Sclerotherapy and prolotherapy for chronic patellar tendinopathies - a promising therapy with limited available evidence, a systematic review

Rapid Decrease in Dextrose Concentration After Intra-Articular Knee Injection: Implications for Mechanism of Action of Dextrose Prolotherapy

BACKGROUND

D-glucose (dextrose) is used as a 5000-25,000 mg% solution in the injection-based pain therapy known as dextrose prolotherapy (DPT). The number of peer-reviewed clinical trials supporting its use is growing. However, the mechanism of action is unknown, limiting further research. A commonly expressed theory is that hyperosmotic dextrose injection induces inflammation, initiating a healing-specific inflammatory cascade. In vitro study models have used continuous exposure to high concentration dextrose. But the rate of dextrose clearance after intra-articular injection, and, therefore, the duration of exposure of tissues to any particular dextrose concentration, remains unknown. We therefore determined the rate of dextrose concentration diminution in one human participant's knees after intra-articular dextrose knee injection.

METHOD

In this pre-post N-of-1 study, the first author (KDR), a well 70-year-old male without knee-related pathology, injected his own knees with 30 mL of 12,500 mg% dextrose on three occasions; performed serial aspirations of 1.2 mL of intra-articular fluid from 7 to 360 min post-injection; and assessed synovial dextrose concentration. Dextrose clearance kinetics were determined using Minitab and GraphPad Prism software.

RESULTS

Dextrose concentration dropped rapidly in all three trials, approximating an exponential or steep S curve. A third order chemical reaction pattern was found, suggesting factors other than dilution or glucose transporter activity, such as rapid diffusion of dextrose across the synovial membrane, may have contributed to the rapid drop in dextrose concentration.

CONCLUSION

This pre-post N-of-1 study shows that, after intraarticular injection of 30 mL of 12,500 mg% dextrose injection into a well knee, the concentration of dextrose diminished rapidly, suggesting that intra-articular cells, tissue, and anatomic structures are exposed to an initially high dextrose concentration for a very short time. This likely affects the mechanism of action of DPT and should inform in vitro study methods.

Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on anterior knee pain: Patellofemoral pain and patellar tendinopathy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary guideline for patellofemoral pain (PFP) and patellar tendinopathy (PT) to facilitate clinical decision-making in primary and secondary care.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel identified questions in clinical decision-making. Based on a systematic literature search, the strength of the scientific evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method and the weight assigned to the considerations by the expert panel together determined the strength of the recommendations.

RESULTS

After confirming PFP or PT as a clinical diagnosis, patients should start with exercise therapy. Additional conservative treatments are indicated only when exercise therapy does not result in clinically relevant changes after six (PFP) or 12 (PT) weeks. Pain medications should be reserved for cases of severe pain. The additional value of imaging assessments for PT is limited. Open surgery is reserved for very specific cases of nonresponders to exercise therapy and those requiring additional conservative treatments. Although the certainty of evidence regarding exercise therapy for PFP and PT had to be downgraded ('very low GRADE' and 'low GRADE'), the expert panel advocates its use as the primary treatment strategy. The panel further formulated weaker recommendations regarding additional conservative treatments, pain medications, imaging assessments and open surgery ('very low GRADE' to 'low GRADE' assessment or absence of scientific evidence).

CONCLUSION

This guideline recommends starting with exercise therapy for PFP and PT. The recommendations facilitate clinical decision-making, and thereby optimizing treatment and preventing unnecessary burdens, risks and costs to patients and society.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, clinical practice guideline.

Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy (With Gap >3 mm) in Patients: 12-Month Follow-up Results of a Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial

Background

In a previous study, the authors found that at 6 months after treatment with a 20 × 106 dose of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), patients showed improved tendon structure and regeneration of the gap area when compared with treatment using leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (Lp-PRP). The Lp-PRP group (n = 10), which had not seen tendon regeneration at the 6-month follow-up, was subsequently offered treatment with BM-MSCs to see if structural changes would occur. In addition, the 12-month follow-up outcomes of the original BM-MSC group (n = 10) were evaluated.

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of all patients (n = 20) at 12 months after BM-MSC treatment and observe if the Lp-PRP pretreated group experienced any type of advantage.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Both the BM-MSC and original Lp-PRP groups were assessed at 12 months after BM-MSC treatment with clinical examination, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during daily activities and sports activities, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella score for patellar tendinopathy, dynamometry, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Differences between the 2 groups were compared with the Student t test.

Results

The 10 patients originally treated with BM-MSCs continued to show improvement in tendon structure in their MRI scans (P < .0001), as well as in the clinical assessment of their pain by means of scales (P < .05). Ten patients who were originally treated with Lp-PRP and then with BM-MSCs exhibited an improvement in tendon structure in their MRI scans, as well as a clinical pain improvement, but this was not significant on the VAS for sports (P = .139). Thus, applying Lp-PRP before BM-MScs did not yield any type of advantage.

Conclusion

The 12-month follow-up outcomes after both groups of patients (n = 20) received BM-MSC treatment indicated that biological treatment was safe, there were no adverse effects, and the participants showed a highly statistically significant clinical improvement (P < .0002), as well as an improvement in tendon structure on MRI (P < .0001). Preinjection of Lp-PRP yielded no advantages.

Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid (500-730 Kda) Injections in Tendinopathies-A Narrative Review

Tendinopathies are common causes of pain and disability in general population and athletes. Conservative treatment is largely preferred, and eccentric exercise or other modalities of therapeutic exercises are recommended. However, this approach requests several weeks of consecutive treatment and could be discouraging. In the last years, injections of different formulations were evaluated to accelerate functional recovery in combination with usual therapy. Hyaluronic acid (HA) preparations were proposed, in particular LMW-HA (500-730 kDa) for its unique molecular characteristics in favored extracellular matrix homeostasis and tenocyte viability. The purpose of our review is to evaluate the state-of-the-art about the role of 500-730 kDa in tendinopathies considering both preclinical and clinical findings and encourage further research on this emerging topic.