1
|
Bensa A, Salerno M, Boffa A, de Girolamo L, Laver L, Magalon J, Sánchez M, Tischer T, Filardo G. Corticosteroid injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis present a wide spectrum of effects ranging from detrimental to disease-modifying: A systematic review of preclinical evidence by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024. [PMID: 38813889 DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this systematic review of preclinical evidence was to determine the effects of intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) injections in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS A systematic review was performed on animal studies evaluating intra-articular CS injections for OA joints. The search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating CS effects by evaluating studies comparing CS with control groups. Morphological, histological, immunohistochemistry evaluations, clinical outcomes, biomarkers and imaging results were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's tool. RESULTS Thirty-two articles analysing CS effects in OA animal models were included (1079 joints), 18 studies on small and 14 on large animals. CS injections showed overall positive effects in at least one of the outcomes in 68% of the studies, while 16% reported a deleterious effect. CS improved cartilage and synovial outcomes in 68% and 60% of the studies, but detrimental effects were documented in 11% and 20% of the studies, respectively. Clinical parameters evaluated in terms of pain, lameness or joint swelling improved in 63% of the studies but deteriorated in 13%. Evidence is limited on imaging and biomarkers results, as well as on the best CS type, dose, formulation and injection protocol. The risk of bias assessment revealed a 28% low and an 18% high risk of bias. CONCLUSION Intra-articular CS injections induced a wide range of results on OA joints in experimental animal models, from disease-modifying and positive effects on pain and joint function at short-term evaluation to the lack of benefit or even negative effects. This underlines the need to identify more specific indications and treatment modalities to avoid possible detrimental effects while maximising the anti-inflammatory properties and the benefits of intra-articular CS in OA joints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Bensa
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Salerno
- Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Boffa
- Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura de Girolamo
- Orthopaedic Biotechnology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Lior Laver
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (HYMC), Hadera, Israel
- Arthrosport Clinic, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University Hospital (Israel Institute of Technology), Haifa, Israel
| | - Jérémy Magalon
- Cell Therapy Laboratory, Hôpital De La Conception, AP-HM, Marseille, France
- INSERM, NRA, C2VN, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
- Regenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France
| | - Mikel Sánchez
- Arthroscopic Surgery Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
- Advanced Biological Therapy Unit, Hospital Vithas Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Thomas Tischer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Filardo
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
- Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang CW, Cheng HY, Lee YH, Liao CD, Huang SW. Efficacy and safety of collagen derivatives for osteoarthritis: A trial sequential meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2024; 32:574-584. [PMID: 38218227 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of collagen derivatives for osteoarthritis. DESIGN PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched till June 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating collagen derivatives for treating osteoarthritis. Data were independently extracted by two authors. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS A total of 35 RCTs involving 3165 patients were included. The main analysis of the primary outcome was based on 25 RCTs involving 2856 patients. Collagen derivatives exerted small-to-moderate effects on pain alleviation (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.48 to -0.22, moderate certainty) and function improvement (SMD -0.31, 95%CI -0.41 to -0.22, high certainty) compared with the control. Collagen derivatives were safe; they did not increase the risk of withdrawal or adverse events compared with the control. The trial sequential analyses indicated that this study had sufficient statistical power for deriving definitive conclusions, confirming the robustness of our findings. CONCLUSIONS Strong evidence supports the efficacy and safety of collagen derivatives for osteoarthritis treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Wei Liang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yi Cheng
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hao Lee
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-De Liao
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Master's Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Wei Huang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu R, Wu J, Zheng L, Zhao M. Undenatured type II collagen and its role in improving osteoarthritis. Ageing Res Rev 2023; 91:102080. [PMID: 37774932 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease, affecting 32.5 million US adults or 242 million people worldwide. There is no cure for OA. Many animal and clinical trials showed that oral administration of undenatured type II collagen could significantly reduce the incidence of OA or alleviate the symptoms of articular cartilage. Type II collagen is an important component of cartilage matrix. This article reviewed research progress of undenatured type II collagen including its methods of extraction and preparation, structure and characterization, solubility, thermal stability, gastrointestinal digestive stability, its role in improving OA, and the mechanism of its action in improving OA. Type II collagen has been extensively explored for its potential in improving arthritis. Methods of extraction of type II collagen are inefficient and tedious. The method of limited enzymatic hydrolysis is mainly used to prepare soluble undenatured type II collagen (SC II). The solubility, thermal and gastrointestinal digestive stability of SC II are affected by the sources of raw material, pH, salt ions, and temperature. Oral administration of undenatured type II collagen improves OA, whereas its activity is affected by the sources, degree of denaturalization, intervention methods and doses. However, the influence of the structure of undenatured type II collagen on its activity and the mechanism are unclear. The findings in this review support that undenatured type II collagen can be used in the intervention or auxiliary intervention of patients with OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Xu
- School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; Guangdong Food Green Processing and Nutrition Regulation Technologies Research Center, Guangzhou 510650, China
| | - Jianping Wu
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Ag/For Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Lin Zheng
- School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; Guangdong Food Green Processing and Nutrition Regulation Technologies Research Center, Guangzhou 510650, China.
| | - Mouming Zhao
- School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; Guangdong Food Green Processing and Nutrition Regulation Technologies Research Center, Guangzhou 510650, China.
| |
Collapse
|