EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view

One-day dual-tracer examination in neuroendocrine neoplasms: a real advantage of low activity LAFOV PET imaging

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET is crucial for effective treatment stratification of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In highly proliferating or poorly differentiated NENs, dual-tracer approaches using additional [18F]FDG PET can effectively identify SSTR-negative disease, usually requiring separate imaging sessions. We evaluated the feasibility of a one-day dual-tracer imaging protocol with a low activity [18F]FDG PET followed by an SSTR-PET using the recently introduced [18F]SiFAlin-TATE tracer in a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanner and its implications in patient management.

METHODS

Twenty NEN patients were included in this study. Initially, a low activity [18F]FDG PET was performed (0.5 ± 0.01 MBq/kg; PET scan 60 min p.i.). After 4.2 ± 0.09 h after completion of the [18F]FDG PET, a standard activity of [18F]SiFAlin-TATE was administered (3.0 MBq/kg; PET scan 90 min p.i.). To ensure the quantification accuracy of the second scan, we evaluated the potential impact of residual [18F]FDG activity by segmenting organs with minimal physiological SSTR-tracer uptake, such as the brain and myocardium, and assessing the activity concentrations (ACTs) of tumor lesions. Residual tumor lesion ACTs of [18F]FDG were calculated by factoring fluorine-18 decay, identifying a maximum residual ACT of 15% (R15%). To account for increased [18F]FDG trapping over time, higher residual ACTs of 20% (R20%) were considered. These simulated [18F]FDG ACTs were compared with those measured in the second PET scan with [18F]SiFAlin-TATE. The influence of the dual-tracer PET/CT results on therapeutic strategies was evaluated.

RESULTS

[18F]FDG cerebral uptake significantly decreased in the subsequent SSTR-PET (mean uptake [18F]FDG: SUVmean 6.0 ± 0.4; mean uptake in [18F]SiFAlin-TATE PET: SUVmean 0.2 ± 0.01; p < 0.0001); with similar results recorded for the myocardium. Simulated residual [18F]FDG ACTs represented only a minimal percentage of ACTs measured in the tumor lesions from the second PET scan (R15%: mean 5.2 ± 0.9% and R20%: mean 6.8 ± 1.2%), indicating only minimal residual activity of [18F]FDG that might interfere with the second PET scan using [18F]SiFAlin-TATE and preserved semi-quantification of the latter. Dual-tracer PET/CT findings directly influenced changes in therapy plans in eleven (55%) of the examined patients.

CONCLUSION

LAFOV PET scanners enable a one-day dual-tracer protocol, providing diagnostic image quality while preserving the semi-quantification of two 18F-labeled radiotracers, potentially simplifying the assessment of tumor biology and improving the clinical patient management while reducing logistical challenges. Additionally, low-activity PET imaging facilitates one-day dual-tracer PET examinations.

Optimisation of low and ultra-low dose scanning protocols for ultra-extended field of view PET in a real-world clinical setting

True total-body and extended axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET/CT with 1m or more of body coverage are now commercially available and dramatically increase system sensitivity over conventional AFOV PET/CT. The Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra (Quadra), with an AFOV of 106cm, potentially allows use of significantly lower administered radiopharmaceuticals as well as reduced scan times. The aim of this study was to optimise acquisition protocols for routine clinical imaging with FDG on the Quadra the prioritisation of reduced activity given physical infrastructure constraints in our facility. Low-dose (1 MBq/kg) and ultra-low dose (0.5 MBq/g) cohorts, each of 20 patients were scanned in a single bed position for 10 and 15 min respectively with list-mode data acquisition. These data were then reconstructed simulating progressively shorter acquisition times down to 30 s and 1 min, respectively and then reviewed by 2 experienced PET readers who selected the shortest optimal and minimal acquisition durations based on personal preferences. Quantitative analysis was also performed of image noise to assess how this correlated with qualitative preferences. At the consensus minimum acquisition durations at both dosing levels, the coefficient of variance in the liver as a measure of image noise was 10% or less and there was minimal reduction in this measure between the optimal and longest acquisition durations. These data support the reduction in both administered activity and scan acquisition times for routine clinical FDG PET/CT on the Quadra providing efficient workflows and low radiation doses to staff and patients, while achieving high quality images.

Clinical Performance Comparison of a Long Versus a Short Axial Field-of-View PET/CT Using EARL-Compliant Reconstructions

PURPOSE

To ensure comparable PET/CT image quality between or within centres, clinical inter-system performance comparisons following European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. (EARL) guidelines is required. In this work the performance of the long axial field-of-view Biograph Vision Quadra is compared to its predecessor, the short axial field-of-view Biograph Vision.

PROCEDURES

To this aim, patients with suspected tumour lesions received a single weight-based (3 MBq/kg) 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose injection and underwent routine clinical ( ∼ 15 min) scans on the Vision and 3-min scans on the Quadra in listmode in balanced order. Image quality (IQ), image noise (IN), and tumour demarcation (TD) were assessed visually by four nuclear medicine physicians using a 5-point Likert scale and semiquantitative analysis was performed using standardised uptake values (SUVs). Inter-reader agreement was tested using Wilcoxon's signed rank test and the SUVs were statistically compared using a paired t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (mean age, 60 years ± 8.8 [standard deviation], 16 male) were enrolled. Inter-reader agreement ranged from good to very good for IQ and IN (0.62 ≤ W ≤ 0.81), and fair for TD (0.29 ≤ W ≤ 0.39). Furthermore, a significant difference was found for TD (p = 0.015) between the systems, showing improved TD for the Quadra.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the Quadra can be used in routine clinical practice with multiple PET/CT systems or in multicentre studies. This system provides comparable diagnostic image quality and semiquantitative accuracy, improved TD, and has the advantage of shorter scan durations.

FDG imaging with long-axial field-of-view PET/CT in patients with high blood glucose-a matched pair analysis

PURPOSE

High blood glucose (hBG) in patients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT scans often results in rescheduling the examination, which may lead to clinical delay for the patient and decrease productivity for the department. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT can minimize the effect of altered bio-distribution in hBG patients and is able to provide diagnostic image quality in hBG situations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oncologic patients with elevated blood glucose (≥ 8.0 mmol/l) and normal blood glucose (< 8.0 mmol/l, nBG) levels were matched for tumor entity, gender, age, and BMI. hBG patients were further subdivided into two groups (BG 8-11 mmol/l and BG > 11 mmol/l). Tracer uptake in the liver, muscle, and tumor was evaluated. Furthermore, image quality was compared between long acquisitions (ultra-high sensitivity mode, 360 s) on a LAFOV PET/CT and routine acquisitions equivalent to a short-axial field-of-view scanner (simulated (sSAFOV), obtained with high sensitivity mode, 120 s). Tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used as the main image quality criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-one hBG patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 31 nBG patients. Overall, liver uptake was significantly higher in hBG patients (SUVmean, 3.07 ± 0.41 vs. 2.37 ± 0.33; p = 0.03), and brain uptake was significantly lower (SUVmax, 7.58 ± 0.74 vs. 13.38 ± 3.94; p < 0.001), whereas muscle (shoulder/gluteal) uptake showed no statistically significant difference. Tumor uptake was lower in hBG patients, resulting in a significantly lower TBR in the hBG cohort (3.48 ± 0.74 vs. 5.29 ± 1.48, p < 0.001). CNR was higher in nBG compared to hBG patients (12.17 ± 4.86 vs. 23.31 ± 12.22, p < 0.001). However, subgroup analysis of nBG 8-11 mmol/l on sSAFOV PET/CT compared to hBG (> 11 mmol/l) patients examined with LAFOV PET/CT showed no statistical significant difference in CNR (19.84 ± 8.40 vs. 17.79 ± 9.3, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

While elevated blood glucose (> 11 mmol) negatively affected TBR and CNR in our cohort, the images from a LAFOV PET-scanner had comparable CNR to PET-images acquired from nBG patients using sSAFOV PET/CT. Therefore, we argue that oncologic patients with increased blood sugar levels might be imaged safely with LAFOV PET/CT when rescheduling is not feasible.

Mitigating SUV uncertainties using total body PET imaging

PURPOSE

Standardised uptake values (SUV) are commonly used to quantify 18F-FDG lesion uptake. However, SUVs may suffer from several uncertainties and errors. Long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems might enable image-based quality control (QC) by deriving 18F-FDG activity and weight from total body (TB) 18F-FDG PET images. In this study, we aimed to develop these image-based QC to reduce errors and mitigate SUV uncertainties.

METHODS

Twenty-five out of 81 patient scans from a LAFOV PET/CT system were used to determine regression fits for deriving of image-derived activity and weight. Thereafter, the regression fits were applied to 56 independent 18F-FDG PET scans from the same scanner to determine if injected activity and weight could be obtained accurately from TB and half-body (HB) scans. Additionally, we studied the impact of image-based values on the precision of liver SUVmean and lesion SUVpeak. Finally, 20 scans were acquired from a short-axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET/CT system to determine if the regression fits also applied to HB scans from a SAFOV system.

RESULTS

Both TB and HB 18F-FDG activity and weight significantly predicted reported injected activity (r = 0.999; r = 0.984) and weight (r = 0.999; r = 0.987), respectively. After applying the regression fits, 18F-FDG activity and weight were accurately derived within 4.8% and 3.2% from TB scans and within 4.9% and 3.1% from HB, respectively. Image-derived values also mitigated liver and lesion SUV variability compared with reported values. Moreover, 18F-FDG activity and weight obtained from a SAFOV scanner were derived within 6.7% and 4.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG activity and weight can be derived accurately from TB and HB scans, and image-derived values improved SUV precision and corrected for lesion SUV errors. Therefore, image-derived values should be included as QC to generate a more reliable and reproducible quantitative uptake measurement.

A simulation study of the system characteristics for a long axial FOV PET design based on monolithic BGO flat panels compared with a pixelated LSO cylindrical design

BACKGROUND

Although a new generation of tomographs with a longer axial field-of-view called total-body PET have been developed, they are not widely utilized due to their high cost compared to conventional scanners. The newly designed walk-through total-body PET scanner is introduced as a high-throughput and cost-efficient alternative to total-body PET scanners, by making use of a flat panel geometry and lower cost, depth-of-interaction capable, monolithic BGO detectors. The main aim of the presented study is to evaluate through Monte Carlo simulation the system characteristics of the walk-through total-body PET scanner by comparing it with a Quadra-like total-body PET of similar attributes to the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra.

METHODS

The walk-through total-body PET is comprised of two flat detector panels, spaced 50 cm apart. Each panel, 70 [Formula: see text] 106 cm[Formula: see text] in size, consists of 280 BGO-based monolithic detectors. The Quadra-like TB-PET has been simulated based on the characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra, one of the most common total-body PET scanners with 106 cm of axial field-of-view, which is constructed with pixelated LSO scintillation crystals. The spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, scatter fractions, and image quality of both scanners are simulated in the GATE simulation toolkit for comparison.

RESULTS

Due to the DOI-capable detectors used in the walk-through total-body PET, the values of the spatial resolution of this scanner were all below 2 mm along directions parallel to the panels, and reached a maximum of 3.36 mm in the direction perpendicular to the panels. This resolution is a large improvement compared to the values of the Quadra-like TB-PET. The walk-through total-body PET uses its maximum sensitivity (154 cps/kBq) for data acquisition and image reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Based on the combination of very good spatial resolution and high sensitivity of the walk-through total-body PET, along with a 2.2 times lower scintillation crystal volume and 1.8 times lower SiPM surface, this scanner can be a very cost-efficient alternative for total-body PET scanners in cases where concomitant CT is not required.

Image Quality and Quantitative PET Parameters of Low-Dose [18F]FDG PET in a Long Axial Field-of-View PET/CT Scanner

PET/CT scanners with a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) provide increased sensitivity, enabling the adjustment of imaging parameters by reducing the injected activity or shortening the acquisition time. This study aimed to evaluate the limitations of reduced [18F]FDG activity doses on image quality, lesion detectability, and the quantification of lesion uptake in the Biograph Vision Quadra, as well as to assess the benefits of the recently introduced ultra-high sensitivity mode in a clinical setting. A number of 26 patients who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT (3.0 MBq/kg, 5 min scan time) were included in this analysis. The PET raw data was rebinned for shorter frame durations to simulate 5 min scans with lower activities in the high sensitivity (HS) and ultra-high sensitivity (UHS) modes. Image quality, noise, and lesion detectability (n = 82) were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The coefficient of variation (CoV), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and standardized uptake values (SUV) including SUVmean, SUVmax, and SUVpeak were evaluated. Subjective image ratings were generally superior in UHS compared to the HS mode. At 0.5 MBq/kg, lesion detectability decreased to 95% (HS) and to 98% (UHS). SNR was comparable at 1.0 MBq/kg in HS (5.7 ± 0.6) and 0.5 MBq/kg in UHS (5.5 ± 0.5). With lower doses, there were negligible reductions in SUVmean and SUVpeak, whereas SUVmax increased steadily. Reducing the [18F]FDG activity to 1.0 MBq/kg (HS/UHS) in a LAFOV PET/CT provides diagnostic image quality without statistically significant changes in the uptake parameters. The UHS mode improves image quality, noise, and lesion detectability compared to the HS mode.

Impact of the new ultra-high sensitivity mode in a long axial field-of-view PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT showed improved performance resulting from higher sensitivity. The aim was to quantify the impact of using the full acceptance angle (UHS) in image reconstructions with the Biograph Vision Quadra LAFOV PET/CT (Siemens Healthineers) compared to the limited acceptance angle (high sensitivity mode, HS).

METHODS

38 oncological patients examined on a LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT were analysed. 15 patients underwent [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT, 15 patients underwent [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT, and 8 patients underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and standardised uptake values (SUV_{mean/max/peak}) were used to compare UHS and HS with different acquisition times.

RESULTS

The SNR was significantly higher for UHS compared to HS over all acquisition times (SNR UHS/HS [¹⁸F]FDG: 1.35 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007: 1.25 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC: 1.29 ± 0.02, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

UHS showed significantly higher SNR opening the possibility of halving short acquisition times. This is of advantage in further reduction of whole-body PET/CT acquisition.

Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [18F]FDG in melanoma

AIM

The recent introduction of long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners has yielded very promising results regarding image quality and sensitivity in oncological patients. We, herein, aim to determine an appropriate acquisition time range for the new long axial field of view Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT (Siemens Healthcare) using low dose [¹⁸F]FDG activity in a group of melanoma patients.

METHODOLOGY

Forty-nine melanoma patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent total body PET/CT from the top of the head through the feet in two bed positions (field-of-view 106 cm) after i.v. injection of 2.0 MBq/kg [¹⁸F]FDG. The PET images of the first bed position (head to upper thigh; PET-10) were reconstructed and further split into 8-min (PET-8), 6-min (PET-6), 5-min (PET-5), 4-min (PET-4), and 2-min (PET-2) duration groups. Comparisons were performed between the different reconstructed scan times with regard to the visual evaluation of the PET/CT scans using the PET-10 images as reference and by calculating the 95%-CI for the differences between different time acquisitions. Moreover, objective evaluation of PET/CT image quality was performed based on SUV calculations of tumor lesions and background, leading to calculation of liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR).

RESULTS

A total of 60 scans were evaluated. Concerning visual analysis, 49/60 (81.7%) PET-10 scans were pathological, while the respective frequencies were 49/60 (81.7%) for PET-8 (95%-CI: - 0.0602-0.0602), 49/60 (81.7%) for PET-6 (95%-CI: - 0.0602-0.0602), 48/60 (80%) for PET-5 (95%-CI: - 0.0445-0.0886), 46/60 (76.7%) for PET-4 (95%-CI: - 0.0132-0.1370), and 45/60 (75%) for PET-2 (95%-CI: 0.0025-0.1593). In 18 PET-10 scans, the extent of metastatic involvement was very large, rendering the accurate calculation of [¹⁸F]FDG-avid tumor lesions very complicated. In the remaining 42 PET-10 scans, for which the exact calculation of tumor lesions was feasible, a total of 119 tumor lesions were counted, and the respective lesion detection rates for shorter acquisitions were as follows: 97.5% (116/119) for PET-8 (95%-CI: 0-1), 95.0% (113/119) for PET-6 (95%-CI: 0-1), 89.9% (107/119) for PET-5 (95%-CI: 0-2), 83.2% (99/119) for PET-4 (95%-CI: 1-2), and 73.9% (88/119) for PET-2 (95%-CI: 2-4). With regard to objective image quality evaluations, as a general trend, the reduction of acquisition time was associated with a decrease of liver SNR and a decrease of TBR, although in lesion-based analysis the change in TBR and tumor SUV_mean values was non-significant up to 6 and 5 min acquisitions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In melanoma, low-dose LAFOV PET/CT imaging is feasible and can reduce the total scan time from head to upper thigh up to 5 min providing comparable diagnostic data to standard lengths of acquisition. This may have significant implications for the diagnostic work-up of patients with melanoma, given the need for true whole-body imaging in this type of cancer.

A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET

PET can reveal in vivo biological processes at the molecular level. PET-derived quantitative values have been used as a surrogate marker for clinical decision-making in numerous clinical studies and trials. However, quantitative values in PET are variable depending on technical, biological, and physical factors. The variability may have a significant impact on a study outcome. Appropriate scanner calibration and quality control, standardization of imaging protocols, and any necessary harmonization strategies are essential to make use of PET as a biomarker with low bias and variability. This review summarizes benefits, limitations, and remaining challenges for harmonization of quantitative PET, including whole-body PET in oncology, brain PET in neurology, PET/MR, and non-¹⁸F PET imaging. This review is expected to facilitate harmonization of quantitative PET and to promote the contribution of PET-derived biomarkers to research and development in medicine.

Expert consensus on oncological [18F]FDG total-body PET/CT imaging (version 1)

BACKGROUND

[¹⁸F]FDG imaging on total-body PET/CT (TB PET/CT) scanners, with improved sensitivity, offers new potentials for cancer diagnosis, staging, and radiation treatment planning. This consensus provides the protocols for clinical practices with a goal of paving the way for future studies with the total-body scanners in oncological [¹⁸F]FDG TB PET/CT imaging.

METHODS

The consensus was summarized based on the published guidelines and peer-reviewed articles of TB PET/CT in the literature, along with the opinions of the experts from major research institutions with a total of 40,000 cases performed on the TB PET/CT scanners.

RESULTS

This consensus describes the protocols for routine and dynamic [¹⁸F]FDG TB PET/CT scanning focusing on the reduction of imaging acquisition time and FDG injected activity, which may serve as a reference for research and clinic oncological PET/CT studies.

CONCLUSION

This expert consensus focuses on the reduction of acquisition time and FDG injected activity with a TB PET/CT scanner, which may improve the patient throughput or reduce the radiation exposure in daily clinical oncologic imaging.

KEY POINTS

• [¹⁸F]FDG-imaging protocols for oncological total-body PET/CT with reduced acquisition time or with different FDG activity levels have been summarized from multicenter studies. • Total-body PET/CT provides better image quality and improved diagnostic insights. • Clinical workflow and patient management have been improved.