CD4+ T cells in aged or thymectomized recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantations

Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimerism analysis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation serves to confirm engraftment, indicate relapse of hematologic malignancy, and attribute graft failure to either immune rejection or poor graft function. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the prevailing method, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), with detection limits of 1-5% and 0.1%, respectively. Chimerism assays using digital PCR or next-generation sequencing, both of which are more sensitive than STR-PCR, are increasingly used. Stable mixed chimerism is usually not associated with poor outcomes in non-malignant diseases, but recipient chimerism may foretell relapse of hematologic malignancies, so higher detection sensitivity may be beneficial in such cases. Thus, the need for and the type of intervention, e.g., immunosuppression regimen, donor lymphocyte infusion, and/or salvage second transplantation, should be guided by donor chimerism in the context of the feature and/or residual malignant cells of the disease to be treated.

Evaluation of a quantitative PCR-based method for chimerism analysis of Japanese donor/recipient pairs

Chimerism analysis is a surrogate indicator of graft rejection or relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the usual method, limited sensitivity and technical variability are matters of concern. Quantitative PCR-based methods to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP-qPCR) are more sensitive, but their informativity and quantitative accuracy are highly variable. For accurate and sensitive chimerism analysis, a set of KMR kits (GenDx, Utrecht, Netherlands), based on detection of insertions/deletions (indels) by qPCR, have been developed. Here, we investigated informativity and validated the accuracy of KMR kits in Japanese donor/recipient pairs and virtual samples of DNA mixtures representative of Japanese genetic diversity. We found that at least one recipient-specific marker among 39 KMR-kit markers was informative in all of 65 Japanese donor/recipient pairs. Moreover, the percentage of recipient chimerism estimated by KMRtrack correlated well with ratios of mixed DNA in virtual samples and with the percentage of chimerism in HSCT recipients estimated by STR-PCR/in-house SNP-qPCR. Moreover, KMRtrack showed better sensitivity with high specificity when compared to STR-PCR to detect recipient chimerism. Chimerism analysis with KMR kits can be a standardized, sensitive, and highly informative method to evaluate the graft status of HSCT recipients.

A possible role of low regulatory T cells in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody positive myasthenia gravis after bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) appears several months following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is clinically analogous to autoimmune disorder. Polymyositis is a common neuromuscular disorder in chronic GVHD, but myasthenia gravis (MG) is extremely rare. Hence, its pathophysiology and treatment have not been elucidated.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old man with a history of chronic GVHD presented with ptosis, dropped head, and dyspnea on exertion, which had worsened over the previous several months. He showed progressive decrement of compound muscle action potential in the deltoid muscle evoked by 3-Hz repetitive nerve stimulation, a positive edrophonium test, and elevated levels of serum anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, which suggested a diagnosis of generalized MG. No thymoma was found. Flow cytometric analysis revealed a remarkable depletion of peripheral Tregs (CD4⁺CD25^highFOXP3⁺ cells, 0.24% of the total lymphocytes). Administration of prednisolone and tacrolimus was insufficient to alleviate his symptoms; however, the use of rituximab successfully improved his condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Myasthenic symptoms appeared in the process of tapering prednisolone for the treatment of chronic GVHD, supporting the diagnosis of MG associated with chronic GVHD. The present case proposes a possibility that reduction of Tregs might contribute to the pathogenesis of MG underlying chronic GVHD. Immunotherapy with rituximab is beneficial for treatment of refractory MG and GVHD.

Prospective randomized and crossover comparison of two apheresis machines for peripheral blood stem cell collection: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Improving apheresis technology may lead to an efficient and safe peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. Recently, the Spectra Optia (Optia, Terumo BCT) was introduced as an automated apheresis instrument, but comparisons with other instruments have been few. This is the first randomized multicenter and crossover comparison of the Optia with the automated program of the established apheresis instrument, the Spectra (Spectra-Auto, Terumo BCT).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 233 apheresis procedures performed in 46 autologous patients and 108 allogeneic donors were investigated. Apheresis performed in the first day for all subjects using the Spectra-Auto (n = 79) and the Optia (n = 75) were evaluated as first-day analysis. Seventy-nine subjects, who required another session on the second day, underwent apheresis using the other instrument than the first-day instrument and were compared with each other in a paired crossover analysis.

RESULTS

The two instruments processed similar volumes with comparable run times and volumes of acid-citrate-dextrose used. The volumes of collected products were greater in the Optia. Yields of mononuclear cells and CD34+ cells were not different, but collection efficiencies were higher in the Optia (p = 0.008 in CE1 of crossover analysis). Spectra-Auto-collected products contained more contaminating red blood cells (RBCs), whereas there was a trend of more contaminating platelets (PLTs) in the Optia-collected products. Slight reductions were noted in the RBC or PLT counts of subjects who underwent apheresis with the Spectra-Auto or the Optia, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Optia is safe and more efficient in the PBSC collection compared with the Spectra-Auto.