The role of leukotriene modifying agent treatment in neuropsychiatric events of elderly asthma patients: a nested case control study

Neuropsychiatric Events Related to Montelukast and Pranlukast in Adults With Asthma and Rhinitis: A 10-Year Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies of neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) associated with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) have yielded inconsistent results. Recent studies have demonstrated strong temporal relationships between LTRA prescription and NPE occurrence, indicating a need for further investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential LTRA-related NPEs and associated risk factors.

METHODS

Adults with asthma or rhinitis were enrolled from the Korean claims database. The temporal relationship between the first NPE diagnosis and the last LTRA prescription before NPE was evaluated. Nested case-control studies for NPEs and suicide were conducted. Cases (those with NPEs) were matched to controls for age and sex to compare the frequency of LTRA prescription in the lag time before NPE diagnosis. The risk factors for LTRA-related NPEs (developed within 6 months of LTRA prescription) were assessed in people on LTRAs by comparing those with LTRA-related NPEs to those on LTRAs who did not have NPEs.

RESULTS

Montelukast and pranlukast were more frequently prescribed within 6 months before NPEs (odds ratio, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.21-1.41, and odds ratio, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.15-1.35). Older adults, low income, high comorbidity burden, and asthma exhibited stronger associations with LTRA-related NPEs than with general NPEs. Sleep disturbances appeared more prevalent in LTRA-related NPEs than in other NPEs. An LTRA prescription within 6 months was associated with suicide in univariate but not in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased neuropsychiatric risk was observed within 6 months after LTRA prescription. LTRA may lower the threshold for NPEs in those at risk for NPEs, irrespective of sex.

Neuropsychiatric events associated with montelukast in patients with asthma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning on the mental health adverse effects of montelukast in 2020. Age-related effects on the risk of developing specific neuropsychiatric events in montelukast users remain largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the risk of neuropsychiatric events associated with montelukast in adults and children with asthma.

METHODS

A systematic search of all studies investigating neuropsychiatric events in montelukast users was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase from inception to 7 September 2022. Animal studies and conference abstracts were excluded.

RESULTS

59 studies (21 pharmacovigilance studies, four reviews from 172 randomised controlled trials, 20 observational studies, 10 case reports and four case series) evaluating neuropsychiatric events in patients with asthma on montelukast were reviewed. No significant association was shown between montelukast and suicide-related events in six of the observational studies. No association was found for depression as defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes in three observational studies and a review of randomised clinical trials. However, findings from four studies using antidepressant prescriptions as the outcome identified significant associations. Consistent with nine pharmacovigilance studies, two large-scale observational studies revealed possible associations of montelukast with anxiety and sleeping disorders in adult patients with asthma, respectively. However, the results were not replicated in two observational studies on children.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast is not associated with suicide- and depression-related events in asthma patients. Older adults may be particularly susceptible to anxiety and sleeping disorders.

Evaluating the Association of Montelukast Use on Neuropsychiatry-Related Healthcare Utilization and Depression in COVID-19-Hospitalized Veterans: A Nationwide VA Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Montelukast's new boxed warning for neuropsychiatric events questions its use in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to increased risk for new-onset psychiatric diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the impact of using montelukast in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 on neuropsychiatry-related healthcare utilization and depression.

METHODS

This retrospective nationwide observational cohort study using the Veterans Health Administration database included patients from January 1, 2020, through July 1, 2021. The treatment cohorts consisted of patients with and without montelukast use prior to COVID-19 hospitalization and matched using propensity score (PS) to two control cohorts: patients with COVID-19-related hospitalization without prior montelukast use and patients with prior montelukast use who were hospitalized for reasons other than COVID-19. The primary outcome of psychiatric hospitalizations at 90 days and 180 days and mental health visits at 180 days were compared using Poisson or negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes of new-onset depression and new use of antidepressants were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

After PS matching, a total of 415 patients were included in COVID-19 with and without montelukast matched cohort and 409 patients in montelukast with and without COVID-19-related hospitalization matched cohorts. For the primary outcomes, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization at 90 days [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 95% CI 1.79 (1.36-2.36)] and 180 days [IRR 95% CI 1.79 (1.32-2.25)] and mental health visits at 180 days [IRR 95% CI 1.72 (1.45-2.03)] were significantly higher in the montelukast with COVID-19 hospitalization group compared with those hospitalized without COVID-19. No difference in primary outcomes were noted in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with and without use of montelukast. No significant difference was found in the secondary outcomes between either comparator group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior montelukast use who were hospitalized with COVID-19 appeared to have increased rate of neuropsychiatry-related healthcare utilization.

Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists and Risk of Neuropsychiatric Entities: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are commonly prescribed to patients with allergic diseases. Several case reports and pharmacovigilance studies have indicated that LTRAs might increase the risk of neuropsychiatric (NP) entities. However, the results are mixed in observational studies. Thus, the association between LTRAs and NP entities remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively evaluate the NP risk with LTRAs based on current observational studies to provide a reference for clinical practice.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsycINFO. A meta-analysis of observational studies that investigated the association between LTRA use and the risk of NP entities was performed. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the effect; heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared (I²) statistics. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess bias.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included in the primary analysis. No significant association was found between LTRA use and NP entities (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.24, I² = 93.7%). In patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), a mildly increased NP risk was found (OR: 1.099, 95% CI: 1.004-1.202). The association between LTRA use and NP entities was not significant in patients with asthma (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.90-1.26). LTRAs increased the risk of NP entities in a single study using data from an asthma clinic (OR: 9.00, 95% CI: 1.20-69.50), but not in studies from databases (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.93-1.23).

CONCLUSION

At the population level, LTRAs and NP entities were unrelated. However, the association may exist in particular groups (eg, patients with AR or NP history). Subject-specific studies are required to further examine the relationship between LTRAs and NP entities and identify the underlying mechanisms.

Montelukast induces beneficial behavioral outcomes and reduces inflammation in male and female rats

Background

Accumulative data links inflammation and immune dysregulation to the pathophysiology of mental disorders; little is known regarding leukotrienes’ (LTs) involvement in this process. Circumstantial evidence suggests that treatment with leukotriene modifying agents (LTMAs) such as montelukast (MTK) may induce adverse neuropsychiatric events. Further methodic evaluation is warranted.

Objective

This study aims to examine behavioral effects, as well as inflammatory mediator levels of chronic MTK treatment in male and female rats.

Methods

Depression-like phenotypes were induced by exposing male and female rats to a chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) protocol for four weeks. Thereafter, rats were treated (intraperitoneally) once daily, for two weeks, with either vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide 0.2 ml/rat) or 20 mg/kg MTK. Following treatment protocols, behavioral tests were conducted and brain regions were evaluated for inflammatory mediators including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and prostaglandin (PG) E2.

Results

Overall, MTK did not invoke negative behavioral phenotypes (except for an aggression-inducing effect in males). Numerous positive behavioral outcomes were observed, including reduction in aggressive behavior in females and reduced manic/hyperactive-like behavior and increased sucrose consumption (suggestive of antidepressant-like effect) in males. Furthermore, in control males, MTK increased IL-6 levels in the hypothalamus and TNF-α in the frontal cortex, while in control females it generated a robust anti-inflammatory effect. In females that were subjected to CUMS, MTK caused a prominent reduction in TNF-α and IL-6 in brain regions, whereas in CUMS-subjected males its effects were inconsistent.

Conclusion

Contrary to prior postulations, MTK may be associated with select beneficial behavioral outcomes. Additionally, MTK differentially affects male vs. female rats in respect to brain inflammatory mediators, plausibly explaining the dissimilar behavioral phenotypes of sexes under MTK treatment.