Association of the ward pharmacy service with active implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring for vancomycin and teicoplanin-an epidemiological surveillance study using Japanese large health insurance claims database

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship program-driven educational intervention for vancomycin loading dose on mortality

BACKGROUND

Although the loading dose (LD) of vancomycin (VCM) contributes to its efficacy, it may not be conducted adequately. Herein, the objective was to evaluate the effect of LD on patient prognosis using therapeutic drug monitoring by pharmacists and elucidate the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP)-driven educational intervention on the LD implementation rate and patient prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, a retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 121 adult patients administered with VCM and compared with 28-day mortality in LD and non-LD groups. To avoid confounding, the propensity score method was employed. Second, post-training with ASP-driven lectures, a questionnaire survey was conducted for healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. The rates of VCM LD implementation and 28-day mortality were compared during a period of one year and 9 months between the pre-ASP (n = 38) and post-ASP (n = 33) groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality in the LD group was significantly improved, suggesting that the early increase in blood levels of VCM due to an LD is an important factor influencing patient prognosis. After the lecture, a questionnaire survey revealed that the understanding rates of "well" and "slightly well" for educational lectures exceeded 80% of all healthcare workers. The rate of LD implementation significantly increased to 63.6% (21/33) in the post-ASP group compared with 31.6% (12/38) in the pre-ASP group (p = 0.007), and the 28-day mortality declined from 23.7% (9/38) to 6.1% (2/33) (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

This method of ASP-driven educational intervention would facilitate LD implementation, improving patient prognosis.

Trends in teicoplanin loading dose implementation from 2010 to 2019 and evaluation of safety and efficacy factors: a retrospective cohort study based on a Japanese administrative claims database

BACKGROUND

The loading dose of teicoplanin (TEIC) is recommended for implementation. However, there is significant discrepancy between the dose settings in the package insert and, in the guidelines, and the actual status of loading doses in Japan is unclear. Furthermore, TEIC causes liver injury as side effect. Although the risk of developing liver injury has not been reported to be increased following a loading dose based on the guidelines, there is a lack of reports in large populations. Therefore, we evaluated the trend in the loading dose and factors affecting the efficacy and safety of TEIC administration.

METHODS

A Japanese administrative claims database was used in this study. Trends in loading doses were evaluated in target populations administered TEIC between 2010 and 2019. Patient characteristics were adjusted by propensity score matching based on the guideline group (total dose of 3 days > 1,600 mg) and non-guideline group (≤ 1,600 mg) of the loading dose. Finally, univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting 30-day mortality and liver injury.

RESULTS

A total of 10,030 patients were selected based on these criteria. The proportion of loading doses based on the recommended guidelines showed an increase over time, regardless of the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but especially so in cases where TDM was implemented, the loading doses were administered in accordance with the recommendations of the guidelines. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed a relationship between drug management and guidance fees (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36‒0.55), a reimbursement indicating pharmacist intervention, and a reduction in 30-day mortality. In addition, loading doses based on the recommended guidelines had no influence on liver injury, and other factors were not significantly associated with increased incidence of liver injury.

CONCLUSION

Thus, this study implies the benefits of pharmacological management as indicated by drug management and guidance fee and supports the implementation of loading doses based on the guideline on TEIC administration.

The Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) Service for Vancomycin-A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, pharmacists in Australia have been able to expand their scope to include the provision of a range of services. Although evidence has demonstrated the benefits of pharmacist-managed TDM services, recent studies have shown that these services are not prominent within Australia and that the current TDM workflow may not be optimal.

METHODS

An interventional pilot study was conducted of a pharmacist-managed TDM program for vancomycin at a tertiary hospital in Australia.

RESULTS

In total, 15 pharmacists participated in the program. They performed 50.5% of the medication-related pathology over the intervention period. Pharmacist involvement in the TDM process was more likely to lead to appropriate TDM sample collection (OR 87.1; 95% CI = 11.5, 661.1) and to an appropriate dose adjustment (OR 19.1; 95% CI = 1.7, 213.5). Pharmacists demonstrated increased confidence after the education and credentialling package was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that a credentialling package for pharmacists can improve knowledge, skills, and confidence around the provision of pharmacist-managed TDM services for vancomycin. This may lead to the evolution of different roles and workflows enabling pharmacists to contribute more efficiently to improving medication safety and use.

Influence of pharmacists and infection control teams or antimicrobial stewardship teams on the safety and efficacy of vancomycin: A Japanese administrative claims database study

Introduction

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has a high mortality and requires effective treatment with anti-MRSA agents such as vancomycin (VCM). Management of the efficacy and safety of VCM has been implemented with the assignment of pharmacists in hospital wards and the establishment of teams related to infectious diseases. However, there are no reports evaluating the association between these factors and the efficacy and safety of VCM in large populations.

Methods

This study used the Japanese administrative claims database accumulated from 2010 to 2019. The population was divided into two groups, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) group and non-TDM group, and adjusted by propensity score matching. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the influence of pharmacists and infection control teams or antimicrobial stewardship teams on acute kidney injury (AKI) and 30-day mortality.

Results

The total number of patients was 73 478 (TDM group, n = 55 269; non-TDM group, n = 18 209). After propensity score matching, 18 196 patients were matched in each group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pharmacological management for each patient contributed to the reduction of AKI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.812, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.723‒0.912) and 30-day mortality (OR: 0.538, 95% CI: 0.503‒0.575). However, the establishment of infectious disease associated team in facilities and the assignment of pharmacists in the hospital wards had no effect on AKI and 30-day mortality. In addition, TDM did not affect the reduction in AKI (OR: 1.061, 95% CI: 0.948‒1.187), but reduced 30-day mortality (OR: 0.873, 95% CI: 0.821‒0.929).

Conclusion

Pharmacologic management for individual patients, rather than assignment systems at facilities, is effective to reduce AKI and 30-day mortality with VCM administration.

Using Japanese big data to investigate novel factors and their high-risk combinations that affect vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity

AIMS

Several factors related to vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) have not yet been clarified. In the present study, we used Japanese big data to investigate novel factors and their high-risk combinations that influence VIN.

METHODS

We employed a large Japanese electronic medical record database and included patients who had been administered intravenous vancomycin between June 2000 and December 2020. VIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL or 1.5-fold higher than the baseline. The outcomes were: (1) factors affecting VIN that were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis, and (2) combinations of factors that affect the risk of VIN according to a decision tree analysis, which is a typical machine learning method.

RESULTS

Of the 7,306 patients that were enrolled, VIN occurred in 14.2% of them (1,035). A multivariate analysis extracted 22 variables as independent factors. Concomitant ramelteon use (odds ratio; 0.701, 95% confidence interval; 0.512-0.959), ward pharmacy service (0.741, 0.638-0.861), duration of VCM <7 days (0.748, 0.623-0.899) and trough concentrations 10-15 mg/L (0.668, 0.556-0.802) reduce the risk of VIN. Meanwhile, concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam use (2.056, 1.754-2.409) and piperacillin use (2.868, 1.298-6.338) increase the risk. The decision tree analysis showed that a combination of vancomycin trough concentrations ≥20 mg/L and concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam use was associated with the highest risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed that the concomitant ramelteon use and ward pharmacy service may decrease the risk of VIN, while the concomitant use of not only piperacillin-tazobactam but also piperacillin may increase the risk.

Implementation Status of Liver Function Tests for Monitoring Benzbromarone-Induced Hepatotoxicity: An Epidemiological Survey Using the Japanese Claims Database

A major adverse effect of benzbromarone is hepatotoxicity. Therefore, periodic liver function tests are required at least for the first 6 months of benzbromarone administration. However, it is not clear whether the relevant blood tests are implemented appropriately. Here, we performed a cross-sectional survey of the implementation status of liver function tests in patients who were newly prescribed benzbromarone, using the Japanese large claims database. Male patients who were newly prescribed benzbromarone from January 2010 to December 2016 were included. We targeted patients who continued benzbromarone during the observation period (up to 180 d from the start of administration). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in whom periodic liver function tests were implemented. A periodic liver function test was defined as one or more liver function tests performed during both 1-90 and 91-180 d of initial benzbromarone administration. We labeled the tests as a "periodic test" or "non-periodic test" based on whether periodic liver function tests were performed or not, respectively. Furthermore, factors influencing non-periodic test were analyzed. Periodic testing was implemented only in 28.7% of patients. Additionally, factors such as number of hospital beds ≤19 (compared to 100-199 beds) and duration of the first prescription of benzbromarone were associated with non-periodic testing. Our study revealed that periodic liver function tests are not performed sufficiently in Japan. Thus, clinicians prescribing benzbromarone should be educated about the test. Our blood-test-based approach should be applied to other drugs and countries in future research.