Dynamic LED light versus static LED light for depressed inpatients: results from a randomized feasibility trial

35 years of light treatment for mental disorders in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Light therapy (LT) for Seasonal Affective Disorders (SAD) has been a well-known and effective treatment for 40 years. The psychiatric university clinic of Groningen, the Netherlands was an early adopter and started research and treatment of SAD in 1987. Research projects on mechanisms, the role of the circadian system, treatment optimization, and investigating new areas for the effects of light treatment have been carried out ever since, leading to a widespread interest across the country.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview and description of the historical development of LT for mental disorders in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A non-systematic, review of research on light treatment for mental problems in the Netherlands, published since 1987 was conducted.

RESULTS

The fields of LT and chronotherapy are strongly based in the scientific interests of both chrono-biologists and therapists in the Netherlands. LT has shown effectiveness in treating mood disorders. Likewise, results for other mental disorders have shown some promise, but so far, the outcomes are not always unequivocal and have not always been based on robust data. Ongoing research is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

LT, and in addition exposure to the right light at the right time is an important issue in mental health. Over the past 3 decades research on light and LT in the Netherlands has become well established and is still growing.

The effect of circadian-adjusted LED-based lighting on sleep, daytime sleepiness and biomarkers of inflammation in a randomized controlled cross-over trial by pragmatic design in elderly care home dwellers

AIM

Elderly multimorbid care home dwellers are a heterogenic group of frail individuals that exhibit sleep disturbances and a range of co-morbidities. The project aimed to study the possible effect of indoor circadian-adjusted LED-lighting (CaLED) in the elderly residents' care home on their sleeping patterns and systemic biomarkers associated with inflammation.

METHODS

A 16-week trial study was performed to follow the intervention and control groups using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to monitor sleep and daytime sleepiness, and biomarkers IL-6, TNF-α and suPAR, to estimate the levels of inflammation.

RESULTS

There was no significant impact on sleep improvement after the short intervention time when analyzing the PSQI and ESS results. However, we found several challenges using these tools for this specific group of individuals. Thus, important knowledge was gained for future studies in elderly care home dwellers. The inflammation state throughout the entire study period was stable for most of the elderly and no significant change was detected from before to after the intervention. This study represents a first-to-date attempt to ameliorate the adverse effects of sleep disturbances that characterize a randomly chosen group of elderly multimorbid subjects, by using circadian-adjusted LED-lighting in a natural care home environment.

CONCLUSION

In this pragmatic randomized study of home dwelling individuals we were not able to demonstrate an improved sleep pattern as judged by PSQI, ESS or a change in inflammatory state.