Standard care informed by the result of a placental growth factor blood test versus standard care alone in women with reduced fetal movement at or after 36+0 weeks' gestation: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Reduced Fetal Movement: An IPD Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Women experiencing reduced fetal movements (RFM) have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO). This study aimed to identify factors most associated with APO in RFM pregnancies.

DESIGN

Individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA).

SETTING

Multiple maternity units across the UK.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

1175 singleton pregnancies with RFM between 28+0 and 41+0 weeks' gestation from four prospective cohorts and two randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Factors associated with APO were assessed using two-stage IPD-MA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A composite adverse pregnancy outcome, including: adjusted Odds Ratio, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction (FGR, birthweight ≤ 3rd centile) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

MAIN RESULTS

APO occurred in 7.7% of RFM pregnancies, with FGR being the most common complication (4.6%). The strongest associations with APO were observed for abnormal fetal heart rate (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 3.65, 95% CI: 1.84-7.23), cigarette smoking (aOR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.36-6.44) and maternal past medical history (aOR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.14-4.82). Lower estimated fetal weight (EFW) centile was also significantly associated with APO (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99), though substantial heterogeneity was present between studies (I2 = 80.74%, Q-statistic: p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IPD-MA enabled the synthesis of individual-level data across studies, allowing for more accurate and reliable associations by accounting for heterogeneity. Further work is required to investigate the model's generalisability across diverse populations.

Profiling neuroactive steroids in pregnancy. A non-derivatised liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitation of allopregnanolone and four related isomers in maternal serum

Neuroactive steroids are metabolites of progesterone, synthesised during pregnancy by the placenta. Here, we describe development of a novel liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for quantitation of allopregnanolone, pregnanolone, isopregnanolone, epipregnanolone and allopregnan-20α-ol-3-one in maternal serum. Following addition of deuterated internal standards, 200 μL of serum was subjected to solid phase extraction. Chromatography was performed using a pentafluorophenyl column, and LC-MS/MS on a Sciex 6500+. Sample injection volume was 20 μL, and injection-to-injection time 10.0 min. The assay was validated according to published guidelines; assay linearity and lower limit of quantification were suitable for analysis of each steroid in maternal serum, for all analytes mean recoveries were 100 % ± 15 %, intra- and inter-assay imprecision <15 %, and matrix effects negligible, and specificity experiments confirmed nil interference from a wide range of endogenous metabolites of progesterone. The method was applied to human serum samples obtained from a large cohort of third trimester pregnancies which were subsequently characterised by normal fetal and maternal outcomes, and relationships between maternal neuroactive steroid concentrations and fetal gestational age assessed. Positive correlations between maternal serum concentration and fetal gestational age were observed for isopregnanolone, allopregnanolone and allopregnan-20α-ol-3-one. The LC-MS/MS method offers significant advantages over previously published approaches for quantitation of neuroactive steroids in human maternal serum, notably obviating the need for derivatisation, whilst achieving exceptional specificity. Characterisation of normal maternal neuroactive steroid concentrations will aid future research as dysregulated placental progesterone metabolism is observed in pregnancies with poor outcomes.

Effect of encouraging awareness of reduced fetal movement and subsequent clinical management on pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Reduced fetal movement, defined as a decrease in the frequency or strength of fetal movements as perceived by the mother, is a common reason for presentation to maternity care. Observational studies have demonstrated an association between reduced fetal movement and stillbirth and fetal growth restriction related to placental insufficiency. However, individual intervention studies have described varying results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether interventions aimed at encouraging awareness of reduced fetal movement and/or improving its subsequent clinical management reduce the frequency of stillbirth or other important secondary outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Guidelines, trial registries, and gray literature were also searched. Databases were searched from inception to January 20, 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials and controlled nonrandomized studies were eligible if they assessed interventions aimed at encouraging awareness of fetal movement or fetal movement counting and/or improving the subsequent clinical management of reduced fetal movement. Eligible populations were singleton pregnancies after 24 completed weeks of gestation. The primary review outcome was stillbirth; a number of secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were specified in the review.

METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies I tools for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies, respectively. Variation caused by heterogeneity was assessed using I². Data from studies employing similar interventions were combined using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1609 citations were identified; 190 full-text articles were evaluated against the inclusion criteria, 18 studies (16 randomized controlled trials and 2 nonrandomized studies) were included. The evidence is uncertain about the effect of encouraging awareness of fetal movement on stillbirth when compared with standard care (2 studies, n=330,084) with a pooled adjusted odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.47). Interventions for encouraging awareness of fetal movement may be associated with a reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admissions and Apgar scores of <7 at 5 minutes of age and may not be associated with increases in cesarean deliveries or induction of labor. The evidence is uncertain about the effect of encouraging fetal movement counting on stillbirth when compared with standard care with a pooled odds ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-2.65) based on data from 3 randomized controlled trials (n=70,584). Counting fetal movements may increase maternal-fetal attachment and decrease anxiety when compared with standard care. When comparing combined interventions of fetal movement awareness and subsequent clinical management with standard care (1 study, n=393,857), the evidence is uncertain about the effect on stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.05).

CONCLUSION

The effect of interventions for encouraging awareness of reduced fetal movement alone or in combination with subsequent clinical management on stillbirth is uncertain. Encouraging awareness of fetal movement may be associated with reduced adverse neonatal outcomes without an increase in interventions in labor. The meta-analysis was hampered by variations in interventions, outcome reporting, and definitions. Individual studies are frequently underpowered to detect a reduction in severe, rare outcomes and no studies were included from high-burden settings. Studies from such settings are needed to determine whether interventions can reduce stillbirth.

The PLANES study: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of the placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test-informed care versus standard care alone for women with a small for gestational age fetus at or after 32 + 0 weeks' gestation

Background

Stillbirth remains a major concern across the globe and in some high-resource countries, such as the UK; efforts to reduce the rate have achieved only modest reductions. One third of stillborn babies are small for gestational age (SGA), and these pregnancies are also at risk of neonatal adverse outcomes and lifelong health problems, especially when delivered preterm. Current UK clinical guidance advocates regular monitoring and early term delivery of the SGA fetus; however, the most appropriate regimen for surveillance of these babies remains unclear and often leads to increased intervention for a large number of these women. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility of a large-scale trial refining the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in SGA pregnancies using biomarkers of placental function sFlt-1/PlGF, identifying and intervening in only those deemed at highest risk of stillbirth.

Methods

PLANES is a randomised controlled feasibility study of women with an SGA fetus that will be conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in the UK. Once identified on ultrasound, women will be randomised into two groups in a 3:1 ratio in favour of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio led management vs standard care. Women with an SGA fetus and a normal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio will have a repeat ultrasound and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio every 2 weeks with planned birth delayed until 40 weeks. In those women with an SGA fetus and an abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, we will offer birth from 37 weeks or sooner if there are other concerning features on ultrasound. Women assigned to standard care will have an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio taken, but the results will be concealed from the clinical team, and the woman’s pregnancy will be managed as per the local NHS hospital policy. This integrated mixed method study will also involve a health economic analysis and a perspective work package exploring trial feasibility through interviews and questionnaires with participants, their partners, and clinicians.

Discussion

Our aim is to determine feasibility through the assessment of our ability to recruit and retain participants to the study. Results from this pilot study will inform the design of a future large randomised controlled trial that will be adequately powered for adverse pregnancy outcome. Such a study would provide the evidence needed to guide future management of the SGA fetus.

Trial registration

ISRCTN58254381. Registered on 4 July 2019