Anatomical repair of a bilateral Tessier No. 3 cleft by midfacial advancement

Challenges in nasal reconstruction for facial clefts Tessier 3 bilateral and Tessier 0: a staged surgical approach case report

BACKGROUND

Craniofacial anomalies, particularly Tessier facial clefts, present significant surgical and functional challenges. Bilateral Tessier 3 and Tessier 0 clefts are extremely rare, often requiring complex reconstructive strategies. These clefts result in severe nasal deformities, including absent nasal septum, hypertelorism, and malpositioned alae nasi, affecting both appearance and function. Due to the lack of standardized approaches in such cases, this report highlights a staged surgical reconstruction aimed at restoring nasal structure and improving facial harmony, with a 12-month follow-up showing stable nasal contour and functional airway restoration.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 16-year-old female presented with bilateral Tessier 3 and Tessier 0 clefts, exhibiting hypertelorism, a wide nasal dorsum, cranial displacement of the alae nasi, and an absent nasal septum. The patient underwent staged reconstruction. The first stage repositioned the alae nasi and created a functional nasal airway. In the second stage, costal cartilage was used to construct an L-shaped septal extension graft and dorsal onlay graft to restore nasal contour and stability. A subsequent procedure refined the nasal dorsum and approximated the alae nasi. Although orbital box osteotomy was planned to correct hypertelorism, the patient declined further intervention.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the effectiveness of a staged reconstructive approach in addressing rare craniofacial anomalies. Twelve-month postoperative follow-up confirmed the stability of nasal contour, functional airway patency, and satisfactory facial symmetry. The decision to forgo orbital box osteotomy emphasizes the role of patient-centered care in craniofacial surgery. This case provides valuable insights for optimizing reconstructive techniques in complex facial clefts.

Tessier Number 3 and 4 Clefts: Clinical Presentation and Associated Clefts in a South African Population

INTRODUCTION

The defects found in Tessier clefts number 3 and number 4 come in various forms in different patients. These variations have to a great extent affected not only documentation of these craniofacial defects but invariably their treatment and communication amongst craniofacial researchers. This study has not only documented the clinical presentation of these clefts in a South African population but has also incorporated the clinical presentation of Tessier clefts number 3 and 4 from different regions of the world.

METHODS

The records of 8 patients, who had been treated for either Tessier clefts number 3 or 4, were reviewed and compared with 16 studies pulled from the literature systematically. The defects recorded as well as associated clefts and other congenital malformations were documented, and findings were compared.

RESULTS

The anatomical and clinical presentation of the patients was compared to the reviewed literature and the different parameters were documented. In addition, associated clefts were also recorded in the study-it was noted that the association pattern recorded in Tessier cleft number 4 in this study did not conform to its traditional counterpart.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that the clinical presentations of these clefts, however variable, seem to have a similar presentation worldwide. Additionally, associated clefts do not conform to the original Tessier classification system and therefore it is imperative for these patterns to be clearly mapped out.

Distribution, side involvement, phenotype and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts from single university hospitalbased data obtained during 1998-2018

Objective

To investigate the distribution, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts (CFC).

Methods

The samples consisted of 38 CFC patients, who were treated at Seoul National University Dental Hospital during 1998-2018. The Tessier cleft type, sex, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies were investigated using nonparametric statistical analysis.

Results

The three most common types were #7 cleft, followed by #0 cleft and #14 cleft. There was no difference between the frequency of male and female. Patients with #0 cleft exhibited nasal deformity, bony defect, and missing teeth in the premaxilla, midline cleft lip, and eye problems. A patient with #3 cleft (unilateral type) exhibited bilateral cleft lip and alveolus. All patients with #4 cleft were the bilateral type, including a combination of #3 and #4 clefts, and had multiple missing teeth. A patient with #5 cleft (unilateral type) had a posterior openbite. In patients with #7 cleft, the unilateral type was more prevalent than the bilateral type (87.0% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001). Sixteen patients showed hemifacial microsomia (HFM), Goldenhar syndrome, and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). There was a significant match in the side involvement of #7 cleft and HFM (87.5%, p < 0.01). Patients with #14 cleft had plagiocephaly, UCLP, or hyperterorbitism. A patient with #30 cleft exhibited tongue tie and missing tooth.

Conclusions

Due to the diverse associated craniofacial anomalies in patients with CFC, a multidisciplinary approach involving a well-experienced cooperative team is mandatory for these patients.

Distribution, side involvement, phenotype and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts from single university hospitalbased data obtained during 1998-2018

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the distribution, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts (CFC).

METHODS

The samples consisted of 38 CFC patients, who were treated at Seoul National University Dental Hospital during 1998-2018. The Tessier cleft type, sex, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies were investigated using nonparametric statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The three most common types were #7 cleft, followed by #0 cleft and #14 cleft. There was no difference between the frequency of male and female. Patients with #0 cleft exhibited nasal deformity, bony defect, and missing teeth in the premaxilla, midline cleft lip, and eye problems. A patient with #3 cleft (unilateral type) exhibited bilateral cleft lip and alveolus. All patients with #4 cleft were the bilateral type, including a combination of #3 and #4 clefts, and had multiple missing teeth. A patient with #5 cleft (unilateral type) had a posterior openbite. In patients with #7 cleft, the unilateral type was more prevalent than the bilateral type (87.0% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001). Sixteen patients showed hemifacial microsomia (HFM), Goldenhar syndrome, and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). There was a significant match in the side involvement of #7 cleft and HFM (87.5%, p < 0.01). Patients with #14 cleft had plagiocephaly, UCLP, or hyperterorbitism. A patient with #30 cleft exhibited tongue tie and missing tooth.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the diverse associated craniofacial anomalies in patients with CFC, a multidisciplinary approach involving a well-experienced cooperative team is mandatory for these patients.