Effect of intravitreal aflibercept on recalcitrant diabetic macular edema

Real-World Outcomes After Switch From Aflibercept to Faricimab in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess the anatomic and functional outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) switched from intravitreal aflibercept to faricimab in a real-world setting.

Methods

Retrospective, interventional consecutive case series. Patients with DME were switched from aflibercept to faricimab and categorized based on central subfield thickness (CST) 4 weeks after last aflibercept injection into responding DME (rDME, CST reduction >20% or CST ≤ 250 µm) and nonresponding DME (nrDME, CST unchanged or increased). Patients received a loading dose of two monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Differences in response between rDME and nrDME were analyzed based on injection interval, change in CST, and visual acuity (VA) 12 weeks postswitch.

Results

Fifty-two eyes of 40 patients met inclusion criteria (rDME: n = 26, nrDME: n = 26). Baseline and week 12: VA (logMAR) rDME 0.29 ± 0.23 and 0.22 ± 0.28, nrDME 0.42 ± 0.32 and 0.36 ± 0.29; CST (µm) rDME 370 ± 99 and 288 ± 80, nrDME 384 ± 85 and 380 ± 129. After 12 weeks, 54% rDME and 25% nrDME eyes showed a CST decrease of >20% or CST ≤ 250 µm. Forty-six percent rDME and 50% nrDME eyes had a ±20% CST change, 25% of nrDME eyes had a >20% CST increase, and 73% of rDME eyes and 47% of nrDME eyes reached an extended interval of 8 weeks or longer after 12 weeks.

Conclusions

Most DME eyes previously responding or not responding to aflibercept experienced a reduction or stabilization of DME after 12 weeks of faricimab treatment. rDME showed a better anatomic response, and treatment intervals could be extended earlier and longer than nrDME.

Brolucizumab versus aflibercept for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema in Indian real-world scenario - The BRADIR study

Purpose

To compare the safety and efficacy of aflibercept with brolucizumab for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME).

Observations

At week 52, no significant visual improvement was noted in the eyes treated with either brolucizumab (P = 0.527) or aflibercept (P = 0.393). The CMT decreased significantly after brolucizumab therapy (P = 0.012), but not with aflibercept (P = 0.284) at 52 weeks. The proportion of patients with IRF and SRF reduced significantly in both arms. The mean number of brolucizumab injections was significantly lower (3.93[±1.28]) than aflibercept (4.75[±1.62]) (P = 0.037) over the 52 weeks. At 52 weeks, 76.67 % of eyes treated with brolucizumab attained full macular dryness (CMT<300 μm with absence of SRF and IRF) compared to 50 % of eyes treated with aflibercept (P = 0.036). Subconjunctival hemorrhage was the only adverse event observed in the study (P = 0.701); no other systemic or ocular adverse events, such as intraocular inflammation, were reported.

Conclusion and importance

The BRADIR study suggests that brolucizumab might have an edge over aflibercept in visual and anatomical outcomes that lasted 52 weeks with reduced injection frequency in case of recalcitrant DME.

Switch to faricimab after initial treatment with aflibercept in eyes with diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of a switch to faricimab in individuals affected by DME and previously treated with aflibercept.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, DME patients previously treated with at least 3 injections of aflibercept then switched to faricimab were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline, at the time of the switch and at 6 months follow-up. At transition to faricimab, patients were categorized as "good visual responders" (≥ 5 letters from baseline) or "poor visual responders" (< 5 letters), and as "good anatomical responders" (any reduction in edema compared to baseline) or "poor anatomical responders" (no reduction or worsening of edema). Changes in BCVA and CST were recorded at 6 months after the switch to faricimab.

RESULTS

100 eyes of 100 patients (61 female, 61%) were switched to faricimab after a mean of 6.8 ± 3.3 aflibercept injections. At the 6 months follow-up, only "poor visual responders" (N = 62) demonstrated a meaningful increase in BCVA (Δswitch-6M =  + 5 letters; P = 0.007), coupled with a reduction in CST (Δswitch-6M = - 67.9 µm; P = 0.004); participants with "poor anatomical response" upon transitioning exhibited a significant functional gain (Δswitch-6M =  + 4.5 letters; p = 0.05) but limited CST enhancements (Δswitch-6M = - 95.1 µm; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Faricimab shows a positive impact on anatomical and functional metrics in DME cases refractory to aflibercept.

Switching to Conbercept in Diabetic Macular Edema After Unsatisfactory Response to Previous Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab

Objective

To assess the functional and anatomical effects of transitioning to conbercept intravitreal injection (IVC) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who had inadequate responses to prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.

Methods

We retrospectively included eyes with persistent DME after at least 3 injections of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). The analysis included the assessment of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during 6 months after the switch.

Results

A total of 30 patients (30 eyes) were included. CMT dropped sharply from 437.8±40.67μm at baseline to 363.59±45.09,312.52 ± 39.15, 278.51 ± 37.92, and 292.59 ± 38.09 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of IVC, respectively (p <0.001). BCVA in log MAR units was significantly improved from 0.73±0.15 at baseline to 0.50±0.09,0.46±0.72, 0.40±0.06 and 0.48±0.04 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months, respectively (p <0.001).

Conclusion

Switching to Conbercept effectively improved visual and anatomical structure in DME patients who had not responded satisfactorily to previous anti-VEGF injections.

Do published trial results influence physician prescribing patterns? Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor usage by the United States Ophthalmologists before and after Protocol T study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical trial publications may influence physician prescribing patterns. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol T study, published in 2015, examined outcomes of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). This study investigates if the Protocol T 1-year results were associated with changes in prescribing patterns.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anti-VEGF agents have revolutionized treatment of DME by blocking angiogenesis signalled by VEGF. Three commonly used anti-VEGF agents are on-label aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron) and ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) and off-label bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech).

SUMMARY

From 2013 to 2018, there was a significant positive trend in the average number of aflibercept injections for any indication ( P  < 0.002). There was no significant trend in the average number of bevacizumab ( P  = 0.09) and ranibizumab ( P  = 0.43) for any indication. The mean proportion of aflibercept injections per provider per year was 0.181, 0.217, 0.311, 0.403, 0.419 and 0.427; each year-by-year comparison was significant (all P  < 0.001), and the largest increase was in 2015, the year of publication of Protocol T 1-year results. These results imply and reinforce that clinical trial publications may have significant effects on ophthalmologist prescribing patterns.

Persistent diabetic macular edema: Definition, incidence, biomarkers, and treatment methods

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic retinopathy: what we have learned and what should we learn further?

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most frequent microvascular complications of diabetes that can lead to blindness. Laser treatment has been the gold standard treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) for many years. Recently, the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been established in the pathogenesis of DR, and the use of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has gained popularity for the management of DR.

AREAS COVERED

This review includes a brief overview of the efficacy and safety of currently available (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) and potential future (brolucizumab, faricimab, and KSI-301) anti-VEGF agents in patients with DR based mainly on publicly available data from phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept injections demonstrated favorable functional and anatomical outcomes in patients with DME. Moreover, the use of these anti-VEGF agents showed a significant improvement in the severity of DR. Recent clinical research for future anti-VEGF molecules aims to provide higher target-protein binding affinity and prolonged therapeutic effect. Brolucizumab, faricimab, and KSI-301 are three novel anti-VEGF agents that demonstrate promising data for the management of DME and potentially DR.

Brolucizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the available data supporting the use of brolucizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

RECENT FINDINGS

Brolucizumab is a humanized single- chain variable antibody fragment (scFv), the smallest functional subunit of an antibody approved for intravitreal use. Three phase III studies demonstrate that at 52 weeks, brolucizumab has statistically superior anatomical outcomes of reducing retinal thickness (54.0-57.5% of brolucizumab treated eyes achieved central subfield thickness <280 μm compared to 40.1 - 41.4% of aflibercept treated eyes) and retinal fluid (present in 54.2-60.3% of brolucizumab treated eyes compared to 72.9-78.2% of aflibercept treated eyes). Brolucizumab also demonstrated a prolonged durability up to 16 weeks, thus reducing treatment burden. The visual outcomes appear noninferior to current anti-VEGF agents with an increased risk for intraocular inflammatory events (0.3-4.7% compared to 0.6-1.7%).

SUMMARY

Results from recent phase III trials showing the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab presents an additional therapeutic option in the DME treatment landscape. It can reduce treatment burden in DME with increased inter-treatment intervals while conferring efficacy in both functional and anatomical outcomes. Caution should be taken regarding the risks of intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis, and retinal vascular occlusion.

Switching between anti-VEGF agents in the management of refractory diabetic macular edema: A systematic review

Refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) to monthly intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy has a prevalence of approximately 40% in landmark clinical trials. Options for these patients include use of intravitreal steroids, focal laser, or switching to an alternative anti-VEGF agent. We summarize the key conclusions from studies analyzing the efficacy of switching anti-VEGF agents for refractory DME. Twenty-four studies were included in analysis. The most common definitions of refractory in the included studies were a central retinal thickness (CRT) greater than 300μm or a reduction in CRT less than 10% after at least 3-6 prior anti-VEGF injections. Switching to intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) from either intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or bevacizumab (IVB) is associated with moderate to significant improvement in central subfield thickness and may be an appropriate choice for patients with refractory DME. The improvement in retinal thickness and edema is typically seen after the first 3 injections of IVA post-switch. Switching to IVR has also demonstrated improvement in CRT at 3-6 months post-switch in large sample population studies. Future studies are required to elucidate the ideal time point for a switch in anti-VEGF agent or which patients would benefit from this change.

Functional and structural characteristics in patients with diabetic macular oedema after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept treatment. Three year results in real world settings

Background

Our aim was to examine the long term anatomical and functional outcomes in patients with refractory diabetic macular oedema (DMO) undergoing treatment switch from ranibizumab to aflibercept.

Methods

Retrospective review of patients with DMO undergoing treatment switch from ranibizumab to aflibercept at a single centre between 2015 and 2017. Primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT).

Results

57 eyes from 44 patients were included. Following switch to aflibercept, median (IQR) BCVA improved to 73 (64–77) letters at 3 months (p = 0.0006), to 73 (61–78) letters at 6 months (p = 0.0042), to 73 (65–77) at 9 months (p = 0.0006), and to 73 (63–75) letters at 18 months (p = 0.0444). At 36 months following switch, 12 eyes had gained > 10 letters, 5 eyes had gained 5–9 letters, 25 remained stable (± 5 letters), 7 eyes lost 5–9 letters and 8 eyes lost > 10 letters. A significant reduction in CMT at all trimesters following treatment switch was found except at month 24.

Conclusions

We provide real world data suggesting a sustained anatomical and functional benefit of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept in the treatment of refractory DMO.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-022-00373-5.

Off-label intravitreal brolucizumab for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema: A real-world case series

Purpose

To report the efficacy of intravitreal injection (IVI) of brolucizumab for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) in a real-world setting.

Observations

This was a single-center, prospective uncontrolled non-randomized case series. Three eyes with recalcitrant DME, who have received a minimum of ten intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, underwent IVI brolucizumab and were followed-up for minimum of 16 weeks. Patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmic examination, and optical coherence tomography at baseline and all the scheduled follow-up visits (Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16). All three patients demonstrated notable improvement in BCVA and reduction in the fluid on SD-OCT lasting up to week 12. At week 16, all three eyes maintained the visual acuity gains. However, early increase in fluid was noted in all the three cases, for which second dose of IVI brolucizumab was planned. No ocular or systemic adverse events were noted in any of the cases.

Conclusions and Importance

In this real-world case series, treatment with IVI brolucizumab exhibited excellent visual acuity outcomes lasting up to 16 weeks for the treatment of recalcitrant DME. Single dose IVI brolucizumab achieves good anatomical improvement based on SD-OCT persisting up to 12 weeks, followed by early recurrence of fluid at week 16. The results did not show any ocular or systemic safety concerns for IVI brolucizumab.

Aflibercept versus Ranibizumab as a Second Line Therapy After Bevacizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of aflibercept versus ranibizumab as a second line treatment for persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after initial bevacizumab injections.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with center-involved DME of ≥ 300 μm thickness after bevacizumab intravitreal injections in 2015–2019 were included. Those treated with ranibizumab (R) and aflibercept (A) were grouped as group R and group A, respectively. The change in central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) before and after three-monthly anti-VEGF injections (anti-VEGF) in group R and group A were compared and reviewed.

Results

There were 80 eyes of 75 patients in group R and 80 eyes of 72 patients in group A. The initial bevacizumab injections in group R and group A varied significantly (p = 0.01). The median change of the CMT after the three injections was not significantly different in group R (80 μm) and group A (81.5μm) (p = 0.7). The improvement of BCVA in group R and group A was not significant (p = 0.5). Dry macula was noted in 1 vs 14 eyes in group R vs group A.

Conclusion

After treating refractory DME with initial bevacizumab injections, 3 injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab had similar anatomic and functional outcomes. Aflibercept achieved dry macula in more eyes with refractory DME compared to ranibizumab.

Twenty-Four-Month OCTA Assessment in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Fixed-Interval Intravitreal Aflibercept Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Evaluate capillary perfusion density (CPD) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) undergoing fixed intravit-real aflibercept injections (IAI) through 24 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, interventional, single-arm study enrolling 20 patients with persistent DME. Patients received IAI every 4 weeks until DME resolution followed by extension to every 8 weeks. Optical coherence tomography angiography was obtained at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 20 eyes completed the study. Baseline mean central subfield thickness was 420 µm, which improved to 251 µm (P < .001). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by 5.5 letters (P = .042). The whole superficial CPD decreased by 5.3% (P = .001) and the deep CPD decreased by 4.4% (P = .009). Better BCVA correlated with less CPD loss within the superficial parafovea (r = +0.66 [0.23, 0.88]; P = .006) and whole (r = +0.60 [0.12, 0.85]; P = .017) areas.

CONCLUSION

Superficial and deep CPD decreased despite fixed IAI through 24 months. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:448-455.].

Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group

The management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has evolved considerably over the past decade, with the availability of new technologies (diagnostic and therapeutic). As such, the existing Royal College of Ophthalmologists DR Guidelines (2013) are outdated, and to the best of our knowledge are not under revision at present. Furthermore, there are no other UK guidelines covering all available treatments, and there seems to be significant variation around the UK in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This manuscript provides a summary of reviews the pathogenesis of DR and DMO, including role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and non-VEGF cytokines, clinical grading/classification of DMO vis a vis current terminology (of centre-involving [CI-DMO], or non-centre involving [nCI-DMO], systemic risks and their management). The excellent UK DR Screening (DRS) service has continued to evolve and remains world-leading. However, challenges remain, as there are significant variations in equipment used, and reproducible standards of DMO screening nationally. The interphase between DRS and the hospital eye service can only be strengthened with further improvements. The role of modern technology including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and wide-field imaging, and working practices including virtual clinics and their potential in increasing clinic capacity and improving patient experiences and outcomes are discussed. Similarly, potential roles of home monitoring in diabetic eyes in the future are explored. The role of pharmacological (intravitreal injections [IVT] of anti-VEGFs and steroids) and laser therapies are summarised. Generally, IVT anti-VEGF are offered as first line pharmacologic therapy. As requirements of diabetic patients in particular patient groups may vary, including pregnant women, children, and persons with learning difficulties, it is important that DR management is personalised in such particular patient groups. First choice therapy needs to be individualised in these cases and may be intravitreal steroids rather than the standard choice of anti-VEGF agents. Some of these, but not all, are discussed in this document.

One-year outcomes of Aflibercept for refractory diabetic macular edema in Bevacizumab nonresponders

Purpose

A sub-population of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) responds less effectively to off-label use of Bevacizumab. Approval of Aflibercept for DME has offered Bevacizumab nonresponders an alternative therapeutic option. Herein, we investigate the anatomical and functional changes associated with Aflibercept treatment in Bevacizumab nonresponders with chronic DME in a Canadian setting.

Methods

A retrospective study of eyes with persistent DME that were switched to Aflibercept due to nonresponse following ≥6 consecutive monthly Bevacizumab injections was performed. Anatomical and functional changes and the predictors of response were assessed using patients' characteristics prior to receiving their first (baseline) and seventh consecutive Aflibercept injections (follow-up).

Results

Twenty-four eyes were included, with a mean age of 63.9 ± 10.7 years, an average of 16.8 ± 8.5 Bevacizumab injections prior to switching to Aflibercept, and mean follow-up duration of 11.8 ± 1.7 months following switching to Aflibercept. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 0.49 ± 0.13 to 0.41 ± 0.11 logMAR (P < 0.001) and central subfield thickness (CST) decreased by 119.4 μm from 409.4 ± 85.8 μm to 290.0 ± 64.5 μm (P < 0.001), with 50% of eyes showing complete anatomical response. Worse BCVA and higher CST at baseline predicted greater vision improvements (P = 0.001 and P = 0.035, respectively) while a larger decrease in CST was associated with greater baseline CST (P = 0.001) and better glycemic control (P = 0.039).

Conclusion

Our data from a real-world clinical setting highlight the efficacy of Aflibercept as an alternative therapeutic option for DME recalcitrant to Bevacizumab, with potential additional benefit to those with worse vision, greater CST, and better glycemic control at baseline.

Anti-VEGF-Resistant Retinal Diseases: A Review of the Latest Treatment Options

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy currently plays a central role in the treatment of numerous retinal diseases, most notably exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusions. While offering significant functional and anatomic benefits in most patients, there exists a subset of 15–40% of eyes that fail to respond or only partially respond. For these cases, various treatment options have been explored with a range of outcomes. These options include steroid injections, laser treatment (both thermal therapy for retinal vascular diseases and photodynamic therapy for eAMD), abbreviated anti-VEGF treatment intervals, switching anti-VEGF agents and topical medications. In this article, we review the effectiveness of these treatment options along with a discussion of the current research into future directions for anti-VEGF-resistant eyes.

A 12-month prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of using the treat-and-extend regimen with intravitreal aflibercept as a Second-Line Treatment for Diabetic Macular Oedema (the TADI Study)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept as a second-line therapy in eyes with persistent diabetic macular oedema (DMO) despite receiving initial bevacizumab treatment.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre study was conducted in nine academic clinics in Israel. Starting from the first follow-up visit, a treat-and-extend regimen was applied in which the treatment intervals were extended by 2 weeks based on macular thickness using SD-OCT. The primary outcome was central subfield thickness (CST) at week 52.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (n = 48 eyes) were recruited to the study, and 43 eyes completed 52 weeks of follow-up. Patients received a mean (±SD) of 7.9 ± 3.5 bevacizumab injections before enrolment. The mean (±SD) CST under aflibercept therapy decreased from 468 ± 131 μm at baseline to 303 ± 67 μm at 52 weeks (p = 0.002), and best corrected visual acuity improved from 64 ± 15 ETDRS letters at baseline to 75 ± 8 letters at week 52 (p = 0.001). Twenty (46%) eyes met the treat-and-extend criteria and received a mean (±SD) of 10.9 ± 2 aflibercept injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with persistent DMO following initial bevacizumab therapy had a marked reduction in macular thickness and improved visual acuity following 1 year of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept. Less than half of the patients met eligibility criteria for extension of the treatment interval; for these patients, the treat-and-extend regimen resulted in a maximum treatment interval of 10 weeks during the first year.

Efficacy of switching therapy to aflibercept for patients with persistent diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate functional and anatomical consequences of switching anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy from bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injection for the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Analysis of switching treatment in patients with persistent DME was performed using a literature search across multiple databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) prior to May 2019. Therapeutic effect parameters, including mean change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), were extracted from baseline to different follow-up times post initial injections. The quality of studies was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist. Data pertaining to ocular and systemic safety adverse events (SAEs) were collected as well as subgroup analysis stratified by pre-switch anti-VEGF reagents. All results were analyzed and pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 489 eyes met the inclusion criteria. The mean differences in BCVA were significantly improved at 1, 2 and 3 months with -0.11 logMAR (P=0.016), -0.22 logMAR (P<0.001) and -0.24 logMAR (P<0.01), respectively. Vision gain was also assessed following the aflibercept injection with a mean change of -0.10 logMAR (P<0.001) at 6 months and -0.08 logMAR (P=0.01) at 12 months. CMT reduction was significant from baseline with a mean decrease of 80.52 µm (P<0.001) at 1 month, 89.6 µm (P<0.013) at 2 months, 113.88 µm (P<0.001) at 3 months and 125.12 µm (P<0.001) at 6 months. Mean CMT continued to decline by 75.70 µm (P<0.001) at 12 months as well.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated the comparable efficacy and safety of a conversion treatment to aflibercept in cases of unsatisfactory responses to other anti-VEGF drugs. Switching treatment produces significant advantage for vision acuity recovery and macular edema improvement among persistent DME patients.

Efficacy of Conversion to Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Refractory to Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab: A Meta-analysis of High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies

Background: Aflibercept has been widely used in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the effect of aflibercept in treating DME refractory to bevacizumab or ranibizumab has not been well established. Objective: To assess the therapeutic effect of switching from bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept in the treatment of refractory DME. Methods: Relevant studies were searched from 3 databases: the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science. Data on changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and adverse events within the follow-up period were collected and pooled using weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% CIs in a random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was tested using the χ² test and the I2 statistic, and funnel plots were used to evaluate the publication bias. Results: A total of 11 nonrandomized trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Our studies showed significant improvements in the BCVA (WMD = 100.55; 95% CI = 68.46 to 132.63; P < 0.01) and reduction in CMT (WMD = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.14; P < 0.01) after switching to aflibercept. Although a large amount of heterogeneity was detected in the CMT results among these studies, the sensitivity analyses showed the reliability and stability of our results. Conclusion and Relevance: There were significant improvements in both visual and anatomical outcomes after switching from bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept, without risk of adverse events. Thus, switching therapy may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with refractory DME.

Predictive factors of outcome of selective retina therapy for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive factors of clinical outcome of selective retina therapy (SRT) for diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 eyes of 22 patients (15 males and 7 females), who were treated with SRT for DME at the Department of Ophthalmology of Osaka City University Hospital and observed at least 6 months after the treatment. The mean age was 64 years (range 40-81). Thirteen of the 22 eyes (59%) had a treatment history other than SRT before. SRT laser (527 nm, 1.7 µs, 100 Hz) was used for treatment. Changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR) and central macular thickness (CMT) in optical coherence tomography were examined at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Factors associated with the rate of change in CMT at 3 and 6 months after SRT were examined.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA (logMAR) was 0.26 ± 0.31, 0.22 ± 0.27 and 0.23 ± 0.29 at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, respectively (p = 0.15 at 3 months, 0.40 at 6 months; compared to baseline). The mean CMT was 502 ± 163, 493 ± 204, and 416 ± 185 μm at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively (p = 0.69 at 3 months, 0.01 at 6 months; compared to baseline). The multivariate analysis found a significant negative association with previous macular photocoagulation (p = 0.03) at 3 months and a positive association with a history of insulin use (p = 0.02) and previous panretinal photocoagulation (p = 0.03) at 6 months after SRT.

CONCLUSION

The CMT was significantly decreased at 6 months after SRT in DME. The history of insulin use and panretinal photocoagulation may positively and the history of macular photocoagulation may negatively affect the outcome of SRT, which must be considered when determining the therapeutic indications for SRT.

Diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection after treatment with other anti-VEGF agents (SWAP-TWO study): 6-month interim analysis

Background

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is an important cause of vision loss and despite the anatomical and functional improvement achieved with treatment, there are reports of persistent DME regardless of continuous anti-VEGF therapy. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of patients with DME previously treated with other anti-VEGF agents who are transitioned to intravitreal aflibercept (IAI) on a fixed dosing regimen.

Methods

This prospective study included 20 patients presenting with DME with a history of previous anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab or bevacizumab. Patients received a 2 mg (0.05 mL) IAI every 4 weeks until no evidence of fluid by optical coherence tomography (OCT) followed by a fixed dosing schedule of 2 mg IAI once every 8 weeks through 24 months. There was a pre-planned interim analysis of the mean absolute change from baseline central foveal thickness at month 6 as measured by OCT. Secondary outcomes included mean change from baseline in ETDRS visual acuity and anatomic parameters. Optical Coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) capillary perfusion density (CPD) after transitioning to IAI therapy were also reported.

Results

Average central subfield thickness on OCT at baseline was 419.7 ± 92.0 and improved to 303.8 ± 73.1 at 6-months (p < 0.001). At 6 months after IAI treatment, BCVA increased + 1.5 letters from baseline (p = 0.38). OCTA CPD analysis revealed significant increase from baseline in the foveal avascular zone in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy group (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Patients with prior anti-VEGF therapy who were transitioned to IAI therapy revealed significant anatomic improvements through 6 months.

Trial registration Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Aflibercept in Subjects Previously Treated With Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab (SwapTwo), Trial registration number: NCT02559180. Date of registration: September 24, 2015.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02559180

The role of placental growth factor (PlGF) and its receptor system in retinal vascular diseases

Placental growth factor (PlGF) is a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family. Upon binding to VEGF- and neuropilin-receptor sub-types, PlGF modulates a range of neural, glial and vascular cell responses that are distinct from VEGF-A. As PlGF expression is selectively associated with pathological angiogenesis and inflammation, its blockade does not affect the healthy vasculature. PlGF actions have been extensively described in tumor biology but more recently there has been accumulating preclinical evidence that indicates that this growth factor could have an important role in retinal diseases. High levels of PlGF have been found in aqueous humor, vitreous and/or retina of patients exhibiting retinopathies, especially those with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Expression of this growth factor seems to correlate closely with many of the key pathogenic features of early and late retinopathy in preclinical models. For example, studies using genetic modification and/or pharmacological treatment to block PlGF in the laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model, oxygen-induced retinopathy model, as well as various murine diabetic models, have shown that PlGF deletion or inhibition can reduce neovascularization, retinal leakage, inflammation and gliosis, without affecting vascular development or inducing neuronal degeneration. Moreover, an inhibitory effect of PlGF blockade on retinal scarring in the mouse CNV model has also been recently demonstrated and was found to be unique for PlGF inhibition, as compared to various VEGF inhibition strategies. Together, these preclinical results suggest that anti-PlGF therapy might have advantages over anti-VEGF treatment, and that it may have clinical applications as a standalone treatment or in combination with anti-VEGF. Additional clinical studies are clearly needed to further elucidate the role of PlGF and its potential as a therapeutic target in ocular diseases.

Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients' naïve or non-naïve status.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 5060 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient's initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies.

CONCLUSION

Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.

Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab following Initial Treatment with Ranibizumab in Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) who switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept with those who continued with previous ranibizumab therapy.

Methods

In this retrospective comparative study, medical records of consecutive patients with center-involved DME ≥ 350 μm who had at least three recent consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections followed by as-needed therapy with either aflibercept or ranibizumab were reviewed. Data were collected at presentation (preinjection), at the intermediary visit, and at the last visit (at the end of the follow-up period).

Results

Forty-three eyes of 43 patients were divided into two groups: the switch group (n = 20) and the ranibizumab group (n = 23). Though no significant improvement was found in the mean BCVA from the intermediary visit to the last visit, there was a difference in the mean CMT in the switch group and the ranibizumab group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, resp.). The mean CMT decreased after the intermediary visit by 188.6 ± 120.5 μm in the switch group and by 60.3 ± 117.1 μm in the ranibizumab group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Both aflibercept and ranibizumab decreased CMT in patients with persistent DME who showed a poor response to ranibizumab injections. However, switching to aflibercept provided only morphologic improvement.

Switching Anti-VEGF Drugs in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Since their introduction in the late 2000s, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have become the first-line choice for center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). Even with its proven effectiveness, there are still cases that do not respond satisfactorily. In those cases, a treatment option is to change to another anti-VEGF drug. In this paper, the authors review studies on switching between different anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of persistent DME. An extensive bibliographic review was done using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Fourteen studies published from March 2010 to April 2017 reporting switching from anti-VEGF drugs in DME treatment were included. All reported good anatomical results after conversion; however, visual acuity outcomes showed great variability between publications. Therefore, switching to other anti-VEGFs in patients with DME not responding to previous anti-VEGF therapy may be an option, but the results are still not well-known due to a lack of randomized clinical trials. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:748-754.].

Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema: recent clinically relevant findings from DRCR.net Protocol T

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to provide clinically relevant findings from the DRCR.net Protocol T, a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing intravitreous aflibercept, repackaged (compounded) bevacizumab and ranibizumab for vision-impairing centre-involved diabetic macular oedema (DME).

RECENT FINDINGS

At 1 year, all three antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, on average, improved visual acuity. There was no difference among drugs in mean change in visual acuity from baseline among eyes with baseline Snellen equivalent visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/40, whereas aflibercept yielded superior vision outcomes among eyes with baseline visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/320. At 2 years, aflibercept remained superior, on average, to bevacizumab, but not ranibizumab, among eyes with baseline visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/320. Over 2 years, in post-hoc area-under-the-curve analysis, aflibercept vision outcomes were superior to bevacizumab or ranibizumab among these eyes. All three drugs had comparable ocular and systemic safety profiles. The substantial cost differential between aflibercept and bevacizumab raises challenges when safety and efficacy are at odds with cost-effectiveness results.

SUMMARY

When initial visual acuity loss is mild, there are no apparent differences, on average, among aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab for treating DME. When visual acuity loss is moderate or worse, aflibercept is more likely to improve visual acuity.