Development of a flexible liver phantom for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment planning: a useful tool for training & education

Revolutionizing hepatobiliary surgery: Impact of three-dimensional imaging and virtual surgical planning on precision, complications, and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hepatobiliary surgery is complex and requires a thorough understanding of the liver’s anatomy, biliary system, and vasculature. Traditional imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although helpful, fail to provide three-dimensional (3D) relationships of these structures, which are critical for planning and executing complicated surgeries.

AIM

To explore the use of 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) technologies to improve surgical accuracy, reduce complications, and enhance patient recovery in hepatobiliary surgeries.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of studies published between 2017 and 2024 was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Studies selected focused on 3D imaging and VSP applications in hepatobiliary surgery, assessing surgical precision, complications, and patient outcomes. Thirty studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case reports, were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Various 3D imaging modalities, including multidetector CT, MRI, and 3D rotational angiography, provide high-resolution views of the liver’s vascular and biliary anatomy. VSP allows surgeons to simulate complex surgeries, improving preoperative planning and reducing complications like bleeding and bile leaks. Several studies have demonstrated improved surgical precision, reduced complications, and faster recovery times when 3D imaging and VSP were used in complex surgeries.

CONCLUSION

3D imaging and VSP technologies significantly enhance the accuracy and outcomes of hepatobiliary surgeries by providing individualized preoperative planning. While promising, further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, is needed to standardize protocols and evaluate long-term efficacy.

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization vs conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in adult patients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis of observational studies

Study design

Systematic review and update meta-analysis.

Purpose

The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the two approaches for HCC in adult patients (DEB-TACE vs cTACE).

Overview of literature

The TACE procedure is indicated for the treatment of HCC with intermediate (BCLC B) and early (BCLC A). Conflicting data obtained from earlier meta-analyses comparing DEB-TACE with cTACE prompted the updated meta-analysis.

Methods

The study included adult patients over the age of 18 with HCC. MEDLINE conducted a literature search using Pubmed and Google Scholar up to May 2024. The following parameters were evaluated: the effectiveness of the tumor response to treatment according to the mRECIST criteria (CR, PR, SD, PD), overall survival, progression-free survival, and complication rate. 32 retro- and prospective studies were analyzed.

Results

The study included 4,367 patients. The radiological response of the tumor in all four CR, PR, SD, and PD parameters in the DEB-TACE group showed the best response. The overall survival rate during the DEB-TACE procedure was higher by 3.54 months (p <0.00001), and progression-free survival (PFS) by 3.07 months (p <0.0001), respectively. The incidence of complications was comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

The results of the meta-analysis revealed clinically significant advantages of DEB-TACE in comparison with cTACE. Being comparable in terms of the frequency of complications, DEB-TACE demonstrated the best result in the radiological response of the tumor to the therapy, in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.