Efficacy and risk of mRNA vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Effectiveness and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine in immunosuppressed systemic autoimmune disease patients: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) are a vulnerable population for severe COVID-19 and worse response to vaccination, prompting the need of a booster vaccine. Data regarding its response is limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and immunogenicity of the third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in immunosuppressed SARD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in immunosuppressed SARD Portuguese patients, who received a SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine, from October 2021 to August 2022. We evaluated COVID-19 incidence in the following 6 months, as well as vaccine immunogenicity through anti-Spike IgG titers and T-cell reactivity to the Spike protein.

RESULTS

We included 131 patients with a mean age of 54.9±12.2 years. Almost 40% (n=52) developed COVID-19 within 6 months after the booster, but 51 (98.1%) were mild infections. Median post-booster antibody levels and antibody variation were 9540.7 (14,724) and 8937.9 (11,561.3)AU/mL, respectively, and 73.3% (n=96) of the patients showed post-booster T-cell reactivity. Antibody variation was significantly lower in the COVID group (p=0.015). Although post-booster antibody levels and T-cell reactivity were statistically significantly lower in the patients under biologic DMARD, there was not a significant increase in COVID-19 incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a booster vaccine elicits strong immunogenicity and reduces COVID-19 severity, highlighting its importance in immunosuppressed SARD patients. Larger and more homogeneous cohorts are needed to guide periodic booster administration in this susceptible population.

Impact of Antiphospholipid Syndrome on Reproductive Outcomes: Current Insights and Management Approaches

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, thrombosis, and obstetric complications. While patients with APS can have successful pregnancies, many important considerations exist. APS can also cooccur with other systemic autoimmune diseases which can affect pregnancy, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus. This article reviews specific considerations for pregnancy and reproductive health in patients with APS. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, stable or quiescent disease and planning with a rheumatologist and obstetrician prior to conception are vital components of a successful pregnancy. Pregnancy management for patients with aPL antibodies or diagnosis of APS with aspirin and/or anticoagulation depending on disease profile is discussed, as well as the effects of physiologic changes during pregnancy in maternal and fetal outcomes for this population. Given the reproductive span lasts beyond conception through delivery, we include discussions on safe contraception options, the use of assistive reproductive technology, pregnancy termination, menopause, and male fertility. While APS is a relatively rare condition, the effects this disease can have on maternal and fetal outcomes even with available therapies demonstrates the need for more high-quality, evidence-based research.

Dual-response of multi-functional microsphere system to ultrasound and microenvironment for enhanced bone defect treatment

Using bone tissue engineering strategies to achieve bone defect repair is a promising modality. However, the repair process outcomes are often unsatisfactory. Here we properly designed a multi-functional microsphere system, which could deliver bioactive proteins under the dual response of ultrasound and microenvironment, release microenvironment-responsive products on demand, reverse bone injury microenvironment, regulate the immune microenvironment, and achieve excellent bone defect treatment outcomes. In particular, the MnO2 introduced into the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres during synthesis could consume the acid produced by the degradation of PLGA to protect bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). More importantly, MnO2 could consume reactive oxygen species (ROS) and produce Mn2+ and oxygen (O2), further promoting the repair of bone defects while reversing the microenvironment. Moreover, the reversal of the bone injury microenvironment and the depletion of ROS promoted the polarization of M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages, and the immune microenvironment was regulated. Notably, the ultrasound (US) irradiation used during treatment also allowed the on-demand release of microenvironment-responsive products. The multi-functional microsphere system combines the effects of on-demand delivery, reversal of bone injury microenvironment, and regulation of the immune microenvironment, providing new horizons for the clinical application of protein delivery and bone defect repair.

Anti-Idiotypic mRNA Vaccine to Treat Autoimmune Disorders

The 80+ existing autoimmune disorders (ADs) affect billions with little prevention or treatment options, except for temporary symptomatic management, leading to enormous human suffering and a monumental financial burden. The autoantibodies formed in most ADs have been identified, allowing the development of novel anti-idiotypic antibodies to mute the autoantibodies using vaccines. Nucleoside vaccines have been successfully tested as antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASI), with mRNA technology offering multi-epitope targeting to mute multiple autoantibodies. This paper proposes using mRNA technology to produce anti-idiotypic antibodies with broad effectiveness in preventing and treating them. This paper delves into the state-of-the-art mRNA design strategies used to develop novel ASIs by selecting appropriate T cell and B cell epitopes to generate anti-idiotypic antibodies. The low cost and fast development of mRNA vaccines make this technology the most affordable for the global control of ADs.

Approaches to pandemic prevention - the chromatin vaccine

Developing effective vaccines against viral infections have significant impacts on development, prosperity and well-being of human populations. Thus, successful vaccines such as smallpox and polio vaccines, have promoted global societal well-being. In contrast, ineffective vaccines may fuel arguments that retard scientific progress. We aim to stimulate a multilevel discussion on how to develop effective vaccines against recent and future pandemics by focusing on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), coronavirus disease (COVID) and other viral infections. We appeal to harnessing recent achievements in this field specifically towards a cure for current pandemics and prevention of the next pandemics. Among these, we propose to apply the HIV DNA in chromatin format - an end product of aborted HIV integration in episomal forms, i.e., the chromatin vaccines (cVacc), to elicit the epigenetic silencing and memory that prevent viral replication and infection.

Effects of COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination on Rheumatic Diseases: Results From a Survey of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Vaccination

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and disease flares after vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs).

METHODS

Between November 2021 and March 2022, a survey was conducted among patients with ARD who received COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations. The questionnaire included 11 mandatory and closed-ended questions, and the following items were collected: medical history, immunization history, type of vaccine, patient-reported AEs, flare-up of the underlying disease after vaccination, and a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 or influenza. We compared the occurrence of vaccine-related adverse reactions to the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines based on the survey results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting AEs or disease flares and to compare the post-vaccine response to mixed and matched vaccines.

RESULTS

We analyzed 601 adults with ARD who received the COVID-19 vaccine, with a mean age of 49.6 years (80.5% female). A total of 255 participants (42.4%) received a complete course of primary vaccination, 342 (56.9%) completed the booster dose, and 132 (38.6%) received a mixed vaccine. The frequencies of AEs (188 [52.2%] vs. 21 [5.8%]; P < 0.001) and disease flares (58 [16.2%] vs. 5 [1.4%]; P < 0.001) after COVID-19 vaccination were significantly higher than those after influenza vaccination. In the risk factor analysis, previous allergic reaction to other vaccines (odds ratio, 1.95; confidence interval, 1.07-3.70; P = 0.034) was the only factor associated with the occurrence of AEs. There was no difference in the post-vaccine responses between the mixed and matched vaccines.

CONCLUSION

The results of the survey of patients with ARD revealed that patient-reported AEs and underlying disease flares after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine were significantly higher than those after the influenza vaccine.