Tumor size assessment of invasive breast cancers: which pathological features affect MRI-pathology agreement?

Tumor size and focality in breast carcinoma: Analysis of concordance between radiological imaging modalities and pathological examination at a cancer center

CONTEXT

Accurate assessment of clinical and pathological tumor stage is crucial for patient treatment and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between the tumor size and focality between radiological studies and pathology and to evaluate the impact of discrepancies on staging.

DESIGN

Patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast carcinoma from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, were identified.

RESULTS

Three imaging modalities (mammogram, ultrasound and MRI) were compared with gross examination and final pathology. 1152 preoperative radiological studies were evaluated for focality and 1019 were evaluated for tumor size. For all 3 radiographic modalities, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean tumor size on radiology and the final pathology report (mammogram, P < .001; ultrasound, P = .004; MRI, P < .001). In 29% of radiology studies, there was a discrepancy in stage. The error rate for determining focality was 28% for mammograms, 27% for ultrasounds, and 29% for MRIs. Tumor size from gross examination correlated with microscopic tumor size in 57% of cases, but gross examination had 88% concordance with the final pathology report in determining focality.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed statistically significant differences in mean tumor size reported across all 3 imaging modalities when compared to the final pathology report. MRI had the highest error rate, with a tendency to overestimate tumor size and number of foci. Among all diagnoses, cases of invasive carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component were most prone to discrepancies with imaging.

Influence of different post-contrast time points on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI T staging in breast cancer

PURPOSE

to assess whether MRI T stage of breast cancer lesions (BCLs) is affected by maximum diameter (MD) measured at different post-contrast time points (TPs) on different acquisition planes on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequence.

METHODS

53 DCE-MRI examinations of patients with BCLs were retrospectively selected. MD of BCLs was measured on axial, coronal and sagittal planes on DCE images at five different post-contrast TPs. Friedman test followed by Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon-signed rank test for post-hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences among the five measurements. Reliability of the measurements was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient analysis. Differences between pathological and MRI T stage assessed at each TP on each acquisition plane were assessed using the Wilcoxon-sign rank test; p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

on axial, coronal and sagittal planes, MD measured at TP1 was significantly different (p < 0.0001) compared to those obtained at the subsequent TPs. No significant differences were found between MD measured at TPs 3, 4 and 5. Intra and inter-observer reliability resulted as very good, with ICC ranging between 0.915-0.992 and 0.845-0.911, respectively. MRI T stage assessed at TP1 on axial and sagittal plane as well as at all TPs on coronal plane was significantly different from pathological T stage.

CONCLUSION

MRI T stage definition of BCLs is significantly affected by the TP used for lesions' MD measurement. TPs 3, 4 and 5 are the preferred TPs for the assessment of MRI T stage of BCLs on both axial and sagittal planes.