Ramadan A, Gowaily I, Saleh O, Abuelazm M, Ahmad U, Elzeftawy MA, Nathan Ezie K, Abdelazeem B. The safety and efficacy of Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024;
86:6673-6685. [PMID:
39525758 PMCID:
PMC11543213 DOI:
10.1097/ms9.0000000000002548]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective
Baricitinib is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor approved for treating active rheumatoid arthritis and atopic dermatitis. Therefore, the authors aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily oral Baricitinib 2 mg or 4 mg versus placebo in active SLE patients receiving standard care.
Methods
The authors synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until 20 March 2023. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO.
Results
Three RCTs with 1849 participants were included. The Baricitinib group had a significant SRI-4 response [RR: 1.11 with 95% CI (1.03, 1.21), P=0.008] and greater than or equal to 4-point SLEDAI-2K domain improvement [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (1.02, 1.25), P=0.02] compared to the placebo group; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, regarding the secondary endpoints. For safety outcomes, Baricitinib was significantly associated with a higher incidence of Any serious adverse event [RR: 1.48 with 95% CI (1.07, 2.05), P=0.02].
Conclusion
Baricitinib is associated with significant outcomes of SRI-4 response, greater than or equal to 4-point improvement SLEDAI-2K score, and Joint Indices. Regarding safety, there was no difference in the outcomes other than the serious adverse events.
Collapse