1
|
Bell JS, La Caze A, Steeper M, Haines TP, Hilmer SN, Troeung L, Quirke L, Wesson J, Pond CD, Buys L, Ghahreman-Falconer N, Lawless MT, Shrestha S, Martini A, Ochieng N, Glamorgan F, Lagasca C, Walton R, Cenin D, Kitson A, Jung M, Bennett A, Cross AJ. Evidence-based Medication knowledge Brokers in Residential Aged CarE (EMBRACE): protocol for a helix-counterbalanced randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2024; 19:24. [PMID: 38438918 PMCID: PMC10913248 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01353-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical practice guidelines recommend against the routine use of psychotropic medications in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Knowledge brokers are individuals or groups who facilitate the transfer of knowledge into practice. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using knowledge brokers to translate Australia's new Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Psychotropic Medications in People Living with Dementia and in Residential Aged Care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Evidence-based Medication knowledge Brokers in Residential Aged CarE (EMBRACE) trial is a helix-counterbalanced randomised controlled trial. The 12-month trial will be conducted in up to 19 RACFs operated by four Australian aged care provider organisations in Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland. RACFs will be randomised to receive three levels of implementation strategies (knowledge broker service, pharmacist-led quality use of medications education activities and distribution of the Guidelines and supporting materials) across three medication contexts (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants). Implementation strategies will be delivered by an embedded on-site aged care pharmacist working at a system level across each participating RACF. All RACFs will receive all implementation strategies simultaneously but for different medication contexts. The primary outcome will be a composite dichotomous measure of 6-month RACF-level concordance with Guideline recommendations and good practice statements among people using antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants for changed behaviours. Secondary outcomes will include proportion of residents with Guideline concordant use of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants measured at the RACF-level and proportion of residents with psychotropic medication use, hospitalisation, falls, falls with injury, polypharmacy, quality of life, activities of daily living, medication incidents and behavioural incidents measured at the RACF-level. DISCUSSION The EMBRACE trial investigates a novel guideline implementation strategy to improve the safe and effective use of psychotropic medications in RACFs. We anticipate that the findings will provide new information on the potential role of knowledge brokers for successful and cost-effective guideline implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12623001141639. Registered 6 November 2023 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Adam La Caze
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
| | - Michelle Steeper
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Terry P Haines
- Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- New South Wales Therapeutic Advisory Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lakkhina Troeung
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | | | - Jacqueline Wesson
- Ageing and Health Research Unit, Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Constance Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Teaching Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Laurie Buys
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nazanin Ghahreman-Falconer
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shakti Shrestha
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
| | - Angelita Martini
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Nancy Ochieng
- Lifeview Corporate Lifeview Pty Ltd., Carnegie, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Carmela Lagasca
- Anglicare Southern Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Rebecca Walton
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Dayna Cenin
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monica Jung
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | | | - Amanda J Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Connor CM, Poulos CJ, Kurrle S, Anstey KJ. Bridging the gap: Study protocol for development of an implementation strategy for evidence-informed reablement and rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 108:104943. [PMID: 36701945 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive research supports the use of goal-directed reablement and rehabilitation interventions to address a range of physical, functional, cognitive and behavioural needs of people living with dementia. Despite this, evidence-informed multidisciplinary reablement and rehabilitation interventions are not being offered in usual dementia care across Australia. An examination is needed of how best to implement reablement and rehabilitation interventions within the community-based dementia care sector. METHODS Drawing on implementation science, this study uses a four-phase mixed-methods retrospective and prospective approach: (1) clinical audit to evaluate current clinical practice, and through focus groups with practitioners, identify practitioner-led goals and targets for practice change; (2) Delphi survey to converge opinions from the diverse stakeholders involved in reablement in dementia, to reach national consensus around an implementation strategy; (3) hybrid pragmatic effectiveness-implementation pilot will facilitate testing of the implementation strategy in parallel with exploring effectiveness of the reablement intervention specifically within a real-world Australian community aged care context; (4) implementation capacity building. DISCUSSION This study will result in a freely available, nationally relevant implementation protocol, designed and tailored via input from key stakeholders over a series of iterative project activities. By testing this protocol via a pilot implementation-effectiveness study, we will generate national information about effectiveness of evidence-informed reablement programs for people living with dementia across various community aged care settings. Outcomes have potential to influence policy and drive widespread practice change, increasing access to evidence-informed reablement and rehabilitation for people living with dementia across Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Mc O'Connor
- University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; HammondCare, Centre for Positive Ageing, Sydney, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Ageing Futures Institute, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Christopher J Poulos
- HammondCare, Centre for Positive Ageing, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, School of Population Health, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Kaarin J Anstey
- University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Ageing Futures Institute, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cross AJ, Haines TP, Ooi CE, La Caze A, Karavesovska S, Lee EJ, Siu S, Sareen S, Jones C, Steeper M, Bell JS. Roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers for translating clinical practice guidelines in health-related settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2023; 32:286-295. [PMID: 36746617 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor translation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) into clinical practice is a barrier to the provision of consistent and high-quality evidence-based care. The objective was to systematically review the roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers (KBs) for translating CPGs in health-related settings. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL Plus were searched from 2014 to June 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled and uncontrolled preintervention and postintervention studies involving KBs, either alone or as part of a multicomponent intervention, that reported quantitative postintervention changes in guideline implementation in a healthcare setting were included. A KB was defined as an intermediary who facilitated knowledge translation by acting in at least two of the following core roles: knowledge manager, linkage agent or capacity builder. Specific activities undertaken by KBs were deductively coded to the three core roles, then common activities were inductively grouped. Screening, data extraction, quality assessment and coding were performed independently by two authors. RESULTS 16 studies comprising 6 RCTs, 8 uncontrolled precomparisons-postcomparisons, 1 controlled precomparison-postcomparison and 1 interrupted time series were included. 14 studies (88%) were conducted in hospital settings. Knowledge manager roles included creating and distributing guideline material. Linkage agent roles involved engaging with internal and external stakeholders. Capacity builder roles involved audit and feedback and educating staff. KBs improved guideline adherence in 10 studies (63%), had mixed impact in 2 studies (13%) and no impact in 4 studies (25%). Half of the RCTs showed KBs had no impact on guideline adherence. KBs acted as knowledge managers in 15 (94%) studies, linkage agents in 11 (69%) studies and capacity builders in all studies. CONCLUSION Knowledge manager and capacity builder roles were more frequently studied than linkage agent roles. KBs had mixed impact on translating CPGs into practice. Further RCTs, including those in non-hospital settings, are required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022340365.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terry P Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Choon Ean Ooi
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam La Caze
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sara Karavesovska
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eu Jin Lee
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel Siu
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagar Sareen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carlos Jones
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Steeper
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lech S, O'Sullivan JL, Drewelies J, Herrmann W, Spang RP, Voigt-Antons JN, Nordheim J, Gellert P. Dementia care and the role of guideline adherence in primary care: cross-sectional findings from the DemTab study. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:717. [PMID: 34922486 PMCID: PMC8683809 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02650-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the care of people with dementia (PwD). However, the role of the German Dementia Guideline in primary care remains unclear. The main objective of the present study was to examine the role of guideline-based dementia care in general practices. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the DemTab study was conducted. Descriptive analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics for GPs (N = 28) and PwD (N = 91) were conducted. Adherence to the German Dementia Guideline of GPs was measured at the level of PwD. Linear Mixed Models were used to analyze the associations between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and GP factors at individual (age, years of experience as a GP, frequency of utilization of guideline, perceived usefulness of guideline) and structural (type of practice, total number of patients seen by a participating GP, and total number of PwD seen by a participating GP) levels as well as between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and PwD’s quality of life. Results Self-reported overall adherence of GPs was on average 71% (SD = 19.4, range: 25–100). Adherence to specific recommendations varied widely (from 19.2 to 95.3%) and the majority of GPs (79.1%) reported the guideline as only partially or somewhat helpful. Further, we found lower adherence to be significantly associated with higher numbers of patients (γ10 = − 5.58, CI = − 10.97, − 0.19, p = .04). No association between adherence to the guideline and PwD’s quality of life was found (γ10 = −.86, CI = − 4.18, 2.47, p = .61). Conclusion The present study examined the role of adherence to the German Dementia Guideline recommendations in primary care. Overall, GPs reported high levels of adherence. However, major differences across guideline recommendations were found. Findings highlight the importance of guidelines for the provision of care. Dementia guidelines for GPs need to be better tailored and addressed. Further, structural changes such as more time for PwD may contribute to a sustainable change of dementia care in primary care. Trial registration The DemTab trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02650-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Lech
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Neuruppin, Germany.
| | - Julie L O'Sullivan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Drewelies
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfram Herrmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert P Spang
- Technische Universität Berlin, Quality and Usability Lab, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
- Technische Universität Berlin, Quality and Usability Lab, Berlin, Germany.,Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH (DFKI), Speech and Language Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Nordheim
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de la Perrelle L, Cations M, Barbery G, Radisic G, Kaambwa B, Crotty M, Fitzgerald JA, Kurrle S, Cameron I, Whitehead C, Thompson J, Laver K. How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:bmjoq-2020-001147. [PMID: 33990392 PMCID: PMC8127967 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In increasingly constrained health and aged care services, strategies are needed to improve quality and translate evidence into practice. In dementia care, recent failures in quality and safety have led the WHO to prioritise the translation of known evidence into practice. While quality improvement collaboratives have been widely used in healthcare, there are few examples in dementia care. We describe a recent quality improvement collaborative to improve dementia care across Australia and assess the implementation outcomes of acceptability and feasibility of this strategy to translate known evidence into practice. A realist-informed process evaluation was used to analyse how, why and under what circumstances a quality improvement collaborative built knowledge and skills in clinicians working in dementia care. This realist-informed process evaluation developed, tested and refined the programme theory of a quality improvement collaborative. Data were collected pre-intervention and post-intervention using surveys and interviews with participants (n=28). A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process integrated three frameworks to examine the context and mechanisms of knowledge and skill building in participant clinicians. A refined program theory showed how and why clinicians built knowledge and skills in quality improvement in dementia care. Six mechanisms were identified: motivation, accountability, identity, collective learning, credibility and reflective practice. These mechanisms, in combination, operated to overcome constraints, role boundaries and pessimism about improved practice in dementia care. A quality improvement collaborative designed for clinicians in different contexts and roles was acceptable and feasible in building knowledge, skills and confidence of clinicians to improve dementia care. Supportive reflective practice and a credible, flexible and collaborative process optimised quality improvement knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia. Trial registration number ACTRN12618000268246.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenore de la Perrelle
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monica Cations
- College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gaery Barbery
- Health Services Management School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gorjana Radisic
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Billingsley Kaambwa
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Janna Anneke Fitzgerald
- Business Strategy and Innovation, Griffith University Faculty of Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Cameron
- Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Thompson
- NNIDR Consumer Involvement Reference Group, NHMRC CDPC, Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Laver
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|