Are serum protein biomarkers effective in detecting ovarian cancer in its early stages?

Monomeric myeloperoxidase is a specific biomarker for early-stage ovarian cancer

Background: Ovarian cancer cells are known to express myeloperoxidase (MPO), an oxidant-producing enzyme with a 150 kDa homodimer, consisting of two identical monomers connected by a disulfide bond. Here, we aim to validate monomeric MPO (mMPO) as a biomarker for the early detection of ovarian cancer.Methods: Human ovarian cancer cells, sera from patients at various stages, sera from non-cancer inflammatory gynecological diseases, and healthy volunteers were used. Monomeric and dimeric MPO were measured by ELISA. Receiver operating curves were used to compare the predictive powers of serum dimeric and monomeric MPO to discriminate between samples.Results: The expression of MPO was unique to ovarian cancer cells. Specifically, mMPO was found to be the only form of MPO in all ovarian cancer cell lines. Intriguingly, mMPO was detected in the sera from all patients with ovarian cancer at various stages, but not from healthy individuals. Serum mMPO discriminated between early-stage ovarian cancer, healthy controls, and benign inflammatory gynecologic disorders. In addition, mMPO discriminated between the early and late stages of the disease.Conclusion: This work highlights mMPO as a potential biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer, which is critically needed.

Prognostic Significance of Survivin Expression in Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Survivin belongs to the protein family of inhibitors of apoptosis (IAP) and is a regulator of the cell cycle and apoptosis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and prognostic significance of expression survivin in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: We systematically searched for articles in PubMed, the American Chemical Society (Publications), Medline, the Royal Society of Chemistry, Scopus and the Web of Science. Patient clinical data, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and survivin expression were extracted from individual studies. We performed statistical analysis using the STATA 16 package. Eighteen publications containing data from 2233 patients with ovarian cancer were included in this meta-analysis. Results: We found an adverse effect of survivin expression on OS (risk ratio (HR): 1.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–1.93, p = 0.00) but this was not observed on DFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.55–2.05, p = 0.87). The analysis of clinicopathological parameters showed that survivin expression was associated with the histological grades (G1–2 vs. G3) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34–0.83, p = 0.01) and: International Federation Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (I–II vs. III–IV) (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09–0.55, p = 0.00), but it was not significantly correlated with the histological subtype (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.83–1.58, p = 0.42). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that survivin expression may be a marker of poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. Survivin expression was associated with parameters of greater aggressiveness of ovarian cancer. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our results indicating that survivin expression can be used as an ovarian cancer biomarker.

The Role of Angiogenesis in the Persistence of Chemoresistance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Chemoresistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. As part of a survival mechanism, tumor cells have been shown to release proangiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), through a mechanism that involves the upregulation of hypoxia-induced factor (HIF)-1α. The objective of this study was to compare the expression of VEGF and its receptors (R1 and R2) as well as HIF-1α in chemoresistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells to their chemosensitive counterparts and determine their impact on angiogenesis.

METHODS

Two human EOC cell lines, MDAH-2774 and SKOV-3, and their cisplatin- or taxotere-resistant counterparts were used. Total RNA and protein were subjected to real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, immunoprecipitation/Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to evaluate the expression of VEGF, VEGF receptors (R1 and R2), and HIF-1α. Angiogenesis was assessed with an in vitro angiogenesis assay. Data were analyzed using independent Student t tests and chi-square.

RESULTS

Both taxotere- and cisplatin-resistant MDAH-2774 and SKOV-3 EOC cell lines manifested a significant decrease in VEGF, VEGF receptors, HIF-1α messenger RNA, and protein levels as compared to their chemosensitive counterparts. There was a significant decrease in the number and thickness of polygon blood vessel formation in chemoresistant EOC cells compared to chemosensitive counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin- and taxotere-resistant EOC cells are characterized by lower VEGF, VEGF receptors, and HIF-1α, and decreased angiogenesis. These findings may indicate a decrease in drug delivery at the tumor site, hence allowing the persistence of chemoresistant EOC cells.