Apheresis for lupus erythematosus: state of the art

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome is a rapidly progressive life-threatening disease that causes multiple organ thromboses and dysfunction in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. A high index of clinical suspicion and careful investigation are required to make an early diagnosis so that treatment with anticoagulation and corticosteroids can be initiated; plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins can be added if the life-threatening condition persists. Despite aggressive treatment and intensive care unit management, patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome have a 48% mortality rate, primarily attributable to cardiopulmonary failure. This article reviews the current information on the etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.

Current and novel therapeutics in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with significant clinical heterogeneity. Recent advances in our understanding of the genetic, molecular, and cellular bases of autoimmune diseases and especially SLE have led to the application of novel and targeted treatments. Although many treatment modalities are effective in lupus-prone mice, the situation is more complex in human subjects. This article reviews the general approach to the therapy of SLE, focusing on current approved therapies and novel approaches that might be used in the future.

[Systemic lupus erythematosus: news and therapeutic perspectives]

Lupus treatment has evolved considerably with spectacular advances that can be summarized in 10 points. Hydroxychloroquine and cyclophosphamide are still standard drugs, provided their use is optimized. Contraception and postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy have finally been tested in randomized studies with fairly reassuring results, although prudence remains essential in patients with severe lupus and above all in those with thrombotic complications (antiphospholipid syndrome). Mycophenolic acid has been shown to be useful in the treatment of lupus nephropathies, but its specific place in the therapeutic strategy remains to be defined. Other drugs (sirolimus, abatacept) are currently being evaluated. Anti-lymphocyte B therapies are growing in popularity. Rituximab and other drugs (anti-BAFF, TACI-Fc) are also being evaluated and their results appear very interesting. Interferon alpha (type I) inhibition is an attractive therapeutic approach in lupus but its use in humans is still premature. Peptide vaccination with fragments of autoantibodies or autoantigens is an elegant strategy, and preliminary results justify further studies. Anti-TNF molecules may be beneficial in lupus. Complement inhibition can be useful in lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome but drugs usable in humans (anti-C5) must be developed. Atheromatosis in lupus is the principal cause of morbidity and mortality and must be managed. Smoking cessation is essential, but other approaches (statins) should also be discussed. Many futuristic types of immune manipulation may be envisioned (proteasome inhibition, modulation of Fc gammaRIIB, and modulation of cell signaling (PI3kgamma)). Hence the perspectives are numerous. We will soon be able to optimize the treatment of our patients. Nevertheless, rigorous evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of new drugs and of their most appropriate place in the therapeutic strategy against systemic lupus is indispensable.

Plasma exchange for systemic lupus erythematosus

Efficacy of plasma exchange in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has not been supported by the results of the first non-controlled and retrospective studies. Nonetheless, they remain relevant for some selected patients with life-threatening manifestations and/or severe therapy-resistant manifestations. They can be used as an adjuvant therapy in combination with corticosteroids and, when required, other immunosuppressant(s) for refractory renal disease, alveolar hemorrhage, some neuropsychiatric manifestations, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, hyperviscosity syndrome or symptomatic cryoglobulinemia. The use of newer technologies, like immunoadsorption, possibly in combination with recent biologics, might, in the future, offer some new perspectives for extracorporeal therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus in 2006

After many barren years, conceptual advances and the introduction of new biotherapies are yielding improvements in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The result is a radical change in the management strategy. The main therapeutic advances rest on new discoveries (or rediscoveries), some of which are original. They can be summarized under 12 headlines. Smoking is inadvisable, as it promotes not only atheroma but also lupus flares. Hydroxychloroquine and conventional drugs (cyclophosphamide) are helpful provided they are used appropriately. Combined oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy may be less hazardous than previously thought, although caution remains in order. Drugs used in transplant recipients, such as mycophenolic acid, are generating optimism as treatments for SLE. Rituximab and new anti-B-cell drugs hold promise for the treatment of severe SLE. Efforts to develop an "etiologic" treatment for SLE based on type 1 (alpha/beta) interferon blockade still face a number of obstacles. Peptide vaccines, whose main effect is stimulation of regulator T cells, hold promise-but confirmation is needed. Whether TNF antagonists can be used in lupus with skin and joint manifestations or in SLE is generating debate. Complement blockade for treating SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome is an attractive avenue of research. Numerous new immunotherapy modalities based on modulating intracellular signaling are being evaluated. In the most severe forms of SLE, autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation deserves consideration. A key component of the treatment of SLE is control of atheroma, which is among the most severe complications. This rich harvest of new treatment possibilities can be expected to radically modify the prognosis of SLE, whose more aggressive forms remain severe.

Indications for plasma exchange in systemic lupus erythematosus in 2005

Plasma exchange can remove putative pathogenic autoantibodies and circulating immune complexes from the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, their efficacy has only been supported by noncontrolled and/or retrospective studies. Nonetheless, PE may still be of relevance in some selected SLE patients and as adjunctive therapy, in combination with corticosteroids (CS) and other immunosuppressant(s). We review herein the principal historical steps of the use of plasma exchange to treat SLE, based upon the main trials and case reports that have highlighted its most pertinent indications. Acute life-threatening manifestations and severe therapy-resistant manifestations, like refractory SLE renal disease, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, neuropsychiatric SLE, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, hyperviscosity syndrome and cryoglobulinemia, are the indications for which plasma exchange might have a beneficial therapeutic role. Although few SLE patients undergo plasma exchange each year nowadays (10-20 per year in France), adverse events are very rare and recent advances in plasma exchange technologies, like immunoadsorption, might, in the future, counterbalance their cost and broaden their place in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE.

New Treatments for Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Challenges in new drug development for APS include the controversy about the strength of association between aPL and thrombotic events, and unknown mechanism of aPL-induced thrombosis. In the long-term management of patients who have APS, controlled studies with warfarin alternatives (such as antiplatelet agents), the new anticoagulant agents (such as direct and indirect thrombin inhibitors), and newer therapeutic agents are vital. It is highly possible that the current "antithrombotic" approach to patients who are aPL-positive will be replaced by a "more specifically targeted, anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory" approach in the future.

IgG immunoadsorption reduces systemic lupus erythematosus activity and proteinuria: a long term observational study

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the effects of rigorous immunoglobulin removal by immunoadsorption (IAS) on proteinuria (primary outcome variable), disease activity (SIS, SLEDAI, ECLAM), and autoantibodies to double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

16 patients with severe SLE and renal disease, in whom cyclophosphamide was contraindicated or failed to halt disease progression, were treated with IAS for 3 months. Patients achieving at least 20% improvement in two or more of the outcome measures were considered responders and offered a 9 months' extension period.

RESULTS

Within 3 months, 14 patients responded and 11 opted for an extension. Proteinuria decreased from 6.7 (4.6) g/day (mean (SD)) at baseline to 4.3 (3.5) g/day at 3 months and 2.9 (2.4) g/day at 12 months (p<0.001). From baseline to 3 and 12 months, disease activity improved independently of scoring by SIS (15 (5) to 5 (2) and to 5 (2), p<0.0001), SLEDAI (21 (7) to 5 (4) and to 5 (4), p<0.0001), or ECLAM (7 (2) to 2 (1) and to 3 (1), p<0.0001). Anti-dsDNA fell from 391 (647) IU/ml to 146 (218) and to 53 (50) IU/ml at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Steroids could be tapered from 117 (159) mg/day at baseline to 29 (17) mg/day at 3 months and 9 (2) mg/day at 12 months. IAS was not associated with an excess of infections. However, one patient died of septicaemia after 1 month of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this negatively selected cohort of patients with SLE, IAS was associated with a significant response shown by reduced proteinuria, improved global disease activity, decreased anti-dsDNA, and lower glucocorticoid dosages, suggesting therapeutic benefit.

Cyclophosphamide and Immunoadsorption Apheresis Treatment of Lupus Nephritis Nonresponsive to Drug Therapy Alone

In this report we present a 28-year-old male patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that was treated with immunoadsorption apheresis (IA) and cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis (proliferative glomerulonephritis, class IV-B) after proving nonresponsive to drug therapy alone. Before starting the therapeutic cycle with IA, the patient was administered prednisone 25 mg/d, hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice/d, ACE inhibitors 5 mg/d, aspirin 100 mg/d, furosemide 50 mg/d, and intravenous (IV) albumin (20%) 50 mL. Deteriorating clinical conditions necessitated a renal biopsy, and thereafter an increase in medication. The patient was given a bolus of IV cyclophosphamide 1 g/d for 1 day and IV methylprednisone 500 mg/d for 3 days. This was not followed by any improvement and the renal functions worsened. Thus, 3 weeks after the more aggressive pharmacologic treatment with cyclophosphamide, which had been prescribed to improve renal function, and given the young age of the patient, the decision was made to administer IA (Selesorb). IA selectively removes IgG and IgM immune complexes from the plasma, thereby reducing the complications induced by the pathogenic autoimmune reaction. The treatment was administrated twice a week for the first 15 days, once a week for a further 5 weeks, and biweekly in the last month with a bolus of cyclophosphamide (average 250-100 mg) after each session. After twelve sessions of IA over 3 months, renal function was completely restored and the patient discharged. Although it is not proven, the concomitant use of cyclophosphamide could presumably improve the final clinical outcome.

Retrospective study of plasma exchange in children with systemic lupus erythematosus

A retrospective review of patients was conducted to evaluate the short-term effect of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in children with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Between April 1984 and March 2003, 22 children underwent 112 TPE sessions. The median number of daily, double-volume sessions was 6 (range 1-16). Plasma exchange was performed by centrifugation, using 4.5% albumin with fresh-frozen plasma as required. All children were receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy. The predominant clinical features that led to TPE were categorised into systems and outcome was evaluated according to clinical improvement or lack of it. There was benefit for central nervous system and pulmonary manifestations (10 cases, 11 episodes). Of 8 children treated for renal manifestations, 6 achieved good outcomes. Two children became dialysis dependent despite treatment; however, both had been successfully treated with TPE before. Five children received more than one course of TPE. No child died during the procedure and major complications were few. Our data show that TPE can be used as adjunctive therapy in childhood SLE with few complications. Outcome is difficult to measure but in our experience, during the acute phase of illness, TPE appears to be of benefit.

Stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous, multisystem disease responsive to treatment with corticosteroids and immune suppressives. Many patients fail to achieve treatment-free remissions, and their long-term outcomes remain poor owing to the development of vital organ failure, cumulative drug toxicity and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and malignancy. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the potential to improve long-term outcome in those with a poor prognosis. Preliminary phase II and registry studies have usually employed non-myeloablative conditioning with positive CD34 cell selection. They have highlighted the potential efficacy and dangers of HSCT. Patient selection is important but complex, and the influence of HSCT on long-term outcome is unknown. Disease relapse occurs in up to one-third of patients after HSCT, but the consequences of relapse and the role of remission-maintenance strategies are unknown. With the availability of other alternative therapies in refractory disease, there needs to be a clear demonstration of the benefits of HSCT from current randomized trials.

Synchronised therapy and high-dose cyclophosphamide in proliferative lupus nephritis

The aim of this open study was to compare the outcomes and side effects of plasmapheresis (PP) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis treated with cyclophosphamide (Cyc) boluses. The study involved 28 consecutive patients. All of the patients met the ACR modified criteria for SLE and underwent a qualifying renal biopsy. In group I, patients were treated with synchronised therapy (PP, 50 ml/kg, followed by pulse Cyc, 750 mg/m(2), repeated monthly for 6 months), whereas in group II, they were given only intermittent Cyc boluses (at the same dosage). The data were collected in the patients' records according to a standardised protocol. Patients were followed-up for a mean of 4 years. The disease-free survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves ([S(t)]). At the end of the 6-month treatment period, a statistically significant number of patients in group I (75%) was in complete remission in comparison to group II (31%) (P < 0.02), whereas at long-term follow-up, these percentages were similar (41% vs. 50%, P = n.s.). The main functional and immunological parameters showed a normalisation in both groups. The risk of a poor renal outcome significantly correlated with high serum creatinine levels at the onset of nephritis (P < 0.05). We documented a higher rate of infectious complications in group I. This study reports that synchronised therapy is useful in inducing a faster remission in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. However, it is not superior to conventional therapy at long term follow-up analysis. Positive results should be reinforced by a long-term maintenance therapy.

The role of plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe central nervous system neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus

Twenty-six patients, who received plasmapheresis (PP) either alone or synchronized with cyclophosphamide (IV-CYC/PP), are retrospectively reviewed from Medline searches and personal experience from 1976 to 2002. Patients with central nervous system neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (CNS-NPSLE) were evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) case definitions of 1999. Eleven of the patients were under the age of 21 years (range 7-21 years), highlighting the need for an aggressive treatment option for young patients who are refractory to other treatments. After treatment with PP or IV-CYC/PP, 74% of patients improved, 13% stabilized, and 13% progressed. Major side-effects occurred from central line placement rather than immunomodulation from PP itself Step-down therapies are needed to supplement IV-CYC/PP once improvement has reached a plateau. Newer combinations of PP and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), human stem cell transplant (HSCT) and rituximab (RTX) should be considered in the future. In the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCT), experienced clinicians must weigh risk, benefit, and cost profiles in considering the treatment of severe CNS-NPSLE with PP.

The use of apheresis in immune renal disorders

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is often associated with the presence of autoantibodies. Included in this group are the glomerulonephritides associated with anti-GBM antibody (Goodpasture's syndrome). IgA mesangial deposition (the renal component of Henoch-Schönlein purpura), lupus erythematosus, cryoglobulinemia and the antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated pauci-immune group. In each of these cases, apheresis may provide a therapeutically useful option. Apheresis has also been found useful in certain types of antibody-mediated transplant rejection and in lowering the levels of preformed cytotoxic antibodies which may preclude transplantation. Finally, there are renal diseases in which the immune component is less clearly involved with pathogenesis but for which apheresis may offer a clear benefit, such as in the renal failure associated with 'cast nephropathy' (multiple myeloma) or the recurrence of FSGS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis) in transplanted kidneys. It is the purpose of this paper to review the evidence supporting the use of apheresis in immune-related diseases.

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single center retrospective study in Taiwan

This study is to describe our clinical experience of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Taiwan. From July 1994 to June 2001, eight patients of DAH among 1541 different SLE patients (0.52%) admitted to the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were included for chart review. Dyspnea (100%) and fever (87.5%) were the most common symptoms instead of hemoptysis (62.5%). The most common extrapulmonary presentation was renal involvement (100%), which included clinical nephritis, nephrotic syndrome or acute renal failure. The overall mortality rate was 50%. Two pregnant patients were successfully treated with combined plasmapheresis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration in addition to high dose corticosteroid. Analysis of the prognostic factors showed that the higher APACHE II (Acute physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation) and organ system failure (OSF) scores, but not the SLE activity index (SLEDAI), were associated with the greater mortality. The higher serum creatinine level or the need of hemodialysis did not adversely affect the survival. In conclusion, DAH in SLE patients are often accompanied with multiple organ failure, aggressive immunosuppressive therapy and multiple modalities of extracorporeal organ support should be started early for a favorable outcome.

New therapies: plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and monoclonal antibodies

Rheumatologic emergencies may pose a serious threat to life, and the treatment of patients with these illnesses continues to be challenging. In the last decade extensive animal and human research has led to development of new therapies. Considerable progress has been made in the therapy for RA. Newly developed biologic therapies have shown promising results in clinical studies, and two agents have already been approved by the FDA. These drugs are currently available for therapy and are under close postmarketing scrutiny to assess long-term efficacy and safety. Similar therapies are under investigation for SLE. Plasmapheresis, once used for many diseases, is now restricted mostly to conditions for which its use has been shown to be beneficial in randomized, controlled studies. Immunoadsorption is used to target specific disease-producing pathogens for removal during extracorporeal therapy. Evidence is accumulating for the use of IVIGs in several immune-mediated conditions. The outlook for some emergencies continues be grim, however, and various therapies are used based on evidence from anecdotal case reports and case series. The new therapies are relatively safe, but careful monitoring is needed, because there is potential for serious adverse events.

Management of lupus erythematosus: recent insights

This article reviews and cites only publications relating to the management of lupus that have appeared since 1999. The data in these publications demonstrate that preventive and proactive strategies are as important as medication in improving the quality of life and life span of the patient with lupus. The use of lasers and thalidomide represents major advances in cutaneous lupus. The first major study over 25 years using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to manage lupus suggests benefits. Further evidence was presented showing that dehydroepiandrosterone, leflunomide, and methotrexate are effective in treating mild to moderate disease. Various iterations and modifications of traditional cyclophosphamide therapy with or without mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and azathioprine continue to be studied for treating organ-threatening disease. Intravenous gamma globulin and selective apheresis are niche therapies appropriate in a few, highly selected patients. Immunoablative doses of cyclophosphamide appear to be as effective as stem cell transplantation for serious disease resistant to conventional doses of cyclophosphamide. Twelve biologic agents have been studied in lupus since 1999, with only LJP-394 showing clear-cut, convincing efficacy.

New therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus

A new understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, the mechanisms of action of older drugs, the advent of target-specific biological therapies and pharmacogenomics has created multiple treatment options for the patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. These include topical therapies, more selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, hormonal interventions and a new generation of immune suppressives. Currently available strategies also include the use of intravenous gamma globulin, apheresis, stem-cell transplantation and antileprosy preparations alone or in combination with immune suppressives. A handful of biologicals have been studied in clinical trials. After two decades without new options for lupus patients practitioners now have a full menu of improved therapeutic options.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care setting

The potential to treat life-threatening conditions with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is limited to a few situations. In severe pulmonary hemorrhage as a complication of several immune disorders (e.g., antiglomerular basement membrane antibody disease, Wegener's granulomatosus, lupus erythematosus), TPE should only be considered after conventional measures (mostly pulses of methylprednisolone) have been applied. Idiopathic familial and nonfamilial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura as well as the subset of the hemolytic uremic syndrome not associated with diarrhea are clear indications for TPE using fresh frozen plasma as replacement fluid. Patients with myasthenic crisis will also benefit from TPE and will improve within 1 day. Acute pancreatitis as a complication of the chylomicronemia syndrome has a poor prognosis and should be treated with TPE without any delay. In the case of drug overdose or intoxication, the efficiency of TPE to remove the offending drug is usually overestimated. In this situation, TPE is useful only when the plasma protein binding of the substance is high (>80%) and the volume of distribution is low (<0.2 L/kg body weight). TPE is not without risks and hazards (e.g., vascular access, bleeding, allergy), which should also be considered when discussing this extracorporeal therapy in otherwise refractory clinical conditions.