Low-dose pulse methylprednisolone is an effective therapy for severe SLE flares

Steroids in Lupus: Enemies or Allies

Glucocorticoids are the gold standard treatment for reducing immune activation and inflammation in a wide range of inflammatory and systemic autoimmune diseases. Glucocorticoids have potent and fast actions that quickly relieve some symptoms and lower mortality in some life-threatening conditions, but they also have side effects that limit the duration of treatment and the dose used. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the involvement of numerous organs and systems and the production of autoantibodies. Most current treatments include the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications. Glucocorticoids in SLE have been classically used not only to induce remission or treat an acute situation but also as maintenance therapy. During the last decades, new approaches to managing SLE have emerged, but corticosteroids continue to be part of all therapeutic regimes. There is more and more evidence about the side effects related to the use (or abuse) of steroids and their relationship with the accrual damage. In this manuscript, we try to make a critical review of the published literature about the benefit and side effects/damage that can be attributed to the use of glucocorticoids.

Glucocorticoids in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ten Questions and Some Issues

Since the discovery of glucocorticoids (GCs), their important anti-inflammatory effect, rapid mechanism of action, low cost, and accessibility have made them one of the mainstays of treatment for Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although their use has allowed controlling the disease and reducing acute mortality in severe conditions, the implementation of a scheme based on high doses for long periods has inevitably been accompanied by an increase in adverse effects and infections, including long-term damage. The objective of this review is to answer some important questions that may arise from its use in daily clinical practice, and to propose a paradigm based on the use of methylprednisolone pulses followed by medium-low doses and a rapid decrease of prednisone.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment options

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) accounts for up to 20% of all SLE patients. Key differences between juvenile- and adult-onset (aSLE) disease include higher disease activity, earlier development of damage, and increased use of immunosuppressive treatment in jSLE suggesting (at least partial) infectivity secondary to variable pathomechanisms. While the exact pathophysiology of jSLE remains unclear, genetic factors, immune complex deposition, complement activation, hormonal factors and immune cell dysregulation are involved to variable extents, promising future patient stratification based on immune phenotypes. Though less effective and potentially toxic, jSLE patients are treated based upon evidence from studies in aSLE cohorts. Here, age-specific clinical features of jSLE, underlying pathomechanisms, treatment options and disease outcomes will be addressed. Future directions to improve the care of jSLE patients, including implementation of the Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) recommendations, biomarkers, treat to target and personalized medicine approaches are discussed.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based presentation of renal, neurologic, and hematologic emergencies

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder with systemic manifestations and multiorgan involvement. Although primarily diagnosed, and managed in the outpatient setting, it can occasionally present with life-threatening complications that require rapid assessment and urgent aggressive therapy. Areas covered: In our review, we explore three organ systems that are often affected in SLE, but have the potential to present as medical emergencies; these are the kidney, the central nervous system, and the hematologic system. We take a case-based approach to each clinical scenario, with information given sequentially in order to reflect "real-life" situations where management decisions need to be made with limited information. We review the acute management, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and treatment along with a review of the literature, for lupus nephritis presenting as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, acute lupus transverse myelitis, and refractory antiphospholipid syndrome. Expert commentary: At the conclusion of each section, we provide an expert commentary regarding each issue, relating to diagnosis, early management, and current evidence behind treatment recommendations.

Glucocorticoid use and factors associated with variability in this use in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Inception Cohort

Objectives

To describe glucocorticoid (GC) use in the SLICC inception cohort and to explore factors associated with GC use. In particular we aimed to assess temporal trends in GC use and to what extent physician-related factors may influence use.

Methods

Patients were recruited within 15 months of diagnosis of SLE from 33 centres between 1999 and 2011 and continue to be reviewed annually. Descriptive statistics were used to detail oral and parenteral GC use. Cross sectional and longitudinal analyses were performed to explore factors associated with GC use at enrolment and over time.

Results

We studied 1700 patients with a mean (s.d.) follow-up duration of 7.26 (3.82) years. Over the entire study period, 1365 (81.3%) patients received oral GCs and 447 (26.3%) received parenteral GCs at some point. GC use was strongly associated with treatment centre, age, race/ethnicity, sex, disease duration and disease activity. There was no change in the proportion of patients on GCs or the average doses of GC used over time according to year of diagnosis.

Conclusion

GCs remain a cornerstone in SLE management and there have been no significant changes in their use over the past 10-15 years. While patient and disease factors contribute to the variation in GC use, between-centre differences suggest that physician-related factors also contribute. Evidence-based treatment algorithms are needed to inform a more standardized approach to GC use in SLE.

High dose methylprednisolone therapy for the treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus

The pharmacological armamentarium for the treatment of SLE is expanding and a number of novel therapies are currently under investigation. In spite of this, steroid therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment and intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is still widely used in clinical practice. There is however surprisingly little evidence on which to define its precise role. The objective of this review was to consider the published evidence relating to the use of IVMP in SLE patients and also to identify open questions that still need to be answered with regard to its use.

In acute flares, IVMP induces rapid suppression of acute inflammation. There is not however a strong evidence base to support the use of high doses compared to low IVMP doses or oral prednisolone. In maintenance regimes, secondary analyses suggest that IVMP may confer additional long-term renal survival over oral steroids as part of a cyclophosphamide regime. Therefore, in addition to the evaluation of novel therapies for SLE, better evidence to define the precise role of IVMP in SLE is still required. ( Lupus (2007) 16, 387—393)

Comparison of high versus low-medium prednisone doses for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients with high activity at diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of high vs. low-moderate oral doses of prednisone to treat patients with highly active lupus at diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the Lupus-Cruces cohort with an SLEDAI score ≥6 at diagnosis and treated with regimes containing low-medium prednisone doses (≤30 mg/day) were identified (group M). They were matched by sex and SLEDAI score with historical patients treated with high doses (>30 mg/day) at diagnosis (group H). Patients with proliferative nephritis were excluded. The difference in SLEDAI scores between baseline (SLEDAI-0) and year one (SLEDAI-1) was the efficacy variable. Damage at 5 years was calculated using the SLICC damage index (SDI) and regarded as the safety variable. Glucocorticoid related damage was considered in the presence of cataracts, osteonecrosis, osteoporotic fractures and/or diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

30 patients were included in each group. Patients in group H received 5-fold higher doses of prednisone, less hydroxychloroquine and less methyl-prednisolone pulses. SLEDAI improvement was similar in both groups. Patients in group H were more likely to accrue new damage (adjusted HR 3.85 (95% CI 1.03-14.2)). No patients in group M suffered glucocorticoid-related damage, vs. 5 patients in group H (p=0.02). The average daily prednisone dose during the first year predicted accrual of new damage (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.07, p=0.056) and accrual of glucocorticoid-related damage (adjusted HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.13, p=0.03). Likewise, average doses of prednisone >7.5mg/day were an independent predictor of new damage (adjusted HR 4.8, 95% CI 1.2-19.1).

CONCLUSION

Prednisone doses ≤30 mg/day are similarly effective and safer than higher doses for treating active lupus.

Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

The available evidence was systematically reviewed using the PubMed database. A modified Delphi method was used to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus.

RESULTS

Immunosuppressive treatment should be guided by renal biopsy, and aiming for complete renal response (proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h with normal or near-normal renal function). Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with LN. Because of a more favourable efficacy/toxicity ratio, as initial treatment for patients with class III-IV(A) or (A/C) (±V) LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with glucocorticoids is recommended. In patients with adverse clinical or histological features, CY can be prescribed at higher doses, while azathioprine is an alternative for milder cases. For pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, MPA in combination with oral glucocorticoids is recommended as initial treatment. In patients improving after initial treatment, subsequent immunosuppression with MPA or azathioprine is recommended for at least 3 years; in such cases, initial treatment with MPA should be followed by MPA. For MPA or CY failures, switching to the other agent, or to rituximab, is the suggested course of action. In anticipation of pregnancy, patients should be switched to appropriate medications without reducing the intensity of treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that management of LN should differ in children versus adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for the management of LN were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.

Glucocorticoid use and abuse in SLE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. They act by two different mechanisms: the genomic and the non-genomic pathways. The genomic pathway is considered responsible for many adverse effects of GCs, most of them are time and dose dependent. Observational studies support a relationship between GCs and damage in SLE. GCs have been associated with the development of osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, cataracts, hyperglycaemia, coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment, among others. Although no clinical trial has compared high vs low doses of GCs, some studies have shown the efficacy of medium doses in severe forms of SLE. The dose below which treatment can be considered safe has not been defined, but daily doses <7.5 mg of prednisone seem to minimize adverse effects. Combination therapy with HCQ and the judicious use of immunosuppressive drugs help to keep prednisone therapy within those limits.

Non-genomic rapid inhibition of Na+/H+-exchange 1 and apoptotic immunosuppression in human T cells by glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been employed as immunosuppressive agents for many years. However, it is still unclear how GCs instantly uncouple T cells from acute stressful inflammatory. In terms of time scale, the genomic activity of the classic GC receptor cannot fulfill this role under crisis; but a rapid non-genomic response can. In a previous study, intracellular acidification was found to be due to a rapid non-genomic inhibition of Na(+)/H(+)-exchange 1 (NHE1) and this event led to the immunosuppression of T cell proliferation by progesterone. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a rapid acidification response caused by an inhibition of NHE1 activity and to explore the differential non-genomic effect on immunosuppression of hydrocortisone and dexamethasone. The IC(50) values for NHE1-dependent pH(i) recovery by hydrocortisone and dexamethasone are 250 and 1 nM, respectively. Co-stimulation of GCs with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) is able to inhibit PHA-induced IL-2 secretion, IL-4 secretion, and T-cell proliferation. Furthermore, apoptosis in PHA-activated T cells is not induced by hydrocortisone but by dexamethasone. The mechanism of immunosuppression on proliferation by dexamethasone was found to be different of hydrocortisone and seems to involve cytotoxicity against T cells. Moreover, apoptosis induced by dexamethasone and impermeable dexamethasone-bovine serum albumin suggests that the apoptotic immunosuppression occurs through both the plasma membrane and cytoplasmic sites. The rapid inhibitory responses triggered by GCs would seem to release T cells instantly when an acute stress-related response is needed. Nonetheless, the apoptotic immunosuppression by dexamethasone is attributable to its severe cytotoxicity.

Wogonin Prevents Immunosuppressive Action but Not Anti-Inflammatory Effect Induced by Glucocorticoid

Glucocorticoid, such as dexamethasone, has anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive action as major pharmacological effects. The latter action caused by lymphocyte apoptosis is not only a therapeutic effect but also an adverse reaction. Wogonin, a plant flavone found in Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, inhibited dexamethasone-induced apoptotic changes, such as DNA fragmentation, nuclear condensation, phosphatidylserine translocation, and caspase activation in rat thymocytes. Since wogonin inhibited dexamethasone-induced DNA fragmentation in a noncompetitive manner, a target of this flavone is unlikely to be an antagonist of glucocorticoid receptor. Wogonin did not only act as an inhibitor of caspases, but also protected apoptosis induced by other glucocorticoids. Since wogonin reduced one of the major pharmacological effects of dexamethasone, we examined whether this flavone diminishes the anti-inflammatory action, another pharmacological effect. The anti-inflammatory action of dexamethasone was evaluated by carrageenan-induced paw edema model. Although dexamethasone significantly suppressed paw edema induced by carrageenan, wogonin had no effect on the anti-inflammatory action of dexamethasone. These results suggest that wogonin may be a useful compound to reduce the immunosuppressive side effect of glucocorticoid.

Wogonin Prevents Glucocorticoid-Induced Thymocyte Apoptosis Without Diminishing Its Anti-inflammatory Action

The effect of wogonin, a flavone highly purified from the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis, on apoptotic cell death was re-evaluated in rat thymocytes. This flavone inhibited glucocorticoid-induced apoptotic changes such as DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine translocation, and nuclear condensation in rat thymocytes. Similar inhibition was also observed in apoptosis induced by other inducers such as etoposide. No significant changes of these apoptotic features were observed in rat thymocytes treated with wogonin alone, suggesting that this flavone protects against glucocorticoid-mediated immunosuppression caused by thymocyte apoptosis. Wogonin was reported to possess anti-inflammatory action in some previous studies, but this flavone had no effect on carrageenan-induced paw edema in this study. The simultaneous treatment of wogonin and glucocorticoid neither enhanced nor reduced the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoid. These results indicate that wogonin is likely to prevent the immunosuppression of glucocorticoid without diminishing its drug efficacy as an anti-inflammatory agent.