Antinucleosome Antibodies in Patients with Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

European evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: the SHARE initiative

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is a rare, multisystem and potentially life-threatening autoimmune disorder with significant associated morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is often based on clinical expertise. SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe) was launched to optimise and disseminate management regimens for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases like cSLE. Here, we provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of cSLE. In view of extent and complexity of cSLE and its various manifestations, recommendations for lupus nephritis and antiphospholipid syndrome will be published separately. Recommendations were generated using the EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) standard operating procedure. An expert committee consisting of paediatric rheumatologists and representation of paediatric nephrology from across Europe discussed evidence-based recommendations during two consensus meetings. Recommendations were accepted if >80% agreement was reached. A total of 25 recommendations regarding key approaches to diagnosis and treatment of cSLE were made. The recommendations include 11 on diagnosis, 9 on disease monitoring and 5 on general treatment. Topics included: appropriate use of SLE classification criteria, disease activity and damage indices; adequate assessment of autoantibody profiles; secondary macrophage activation syndrome; use of hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroid-sparing regimens; and the importance of addressing poor adherence. Ten recommendations were accepted regarding general diagnostic strategies and treatment indications of neuropsychiatric cSLE. The SHARE recommendations for cSLE and neuropsychiatric manifestations of cSLE have been formulated by an evidence-based consensus process to support uniform, high-quality standards of care for children with cSLE.

Novel biomarkers for the assessment of paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis

The discovery of serum biomarkers specific for paediatric lupus nephritis (pLN) will facilitate the non-invasive diagnosis, follow-up and more appropriate use of treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the role of serum high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, antibodies against nucleosomes (anti-NCS), complement factor C1q (anti-C1q) and glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) in pLN. Serum samples of 42 patients with paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) (22 with pLN and 20 without renal involvement), 15 patients with other autoimmune nephritis (AN) and 26 healthy controls (HCs) were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The activity of both pSLE and pLN was assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) tool. The levels of all four biomarkers were significantly higher in pLN compared to AN and to HCs. The anti-NCS, anti-GBM and HMGB1 serum levels were significantly higher in pLN than in pSLE without renal involvement. The anti-C1q and the HMGB1 serum levels were correlated positively with pSLE activity. The HMGB1 serum levels were also correlated positively with pLN activity. These findings suggest that serum anti-NCS, anti-GBM and HMGB1 may serve as biomarkers specific for the presence of nephritis in pSLE. HMGB1 emerged as a useful biomarker for the assessment of pLN and pSLE activity, whereas anti-C1q only of pSLE activity.

Autoantibodies in lupus nephritis patients requiring renal transplantation

The goal of this nested case-control study was to compare autoantibody profiles in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with lupus nephritis (LN), lupus nephritis patients requiring renal transplantation (LNTP) and a SLE control group without nephritis (CON). Sera were assayed for a variety of autoantibodies by addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and to dsDNA by Crithidia luciliae assay. The frequency of nucleosome autoantibodies was significantly greater in the LNTP group (79%) compared to the LN (18%) and CON (9%) groups ( P < 0.0005). The frequency of other autoantibodies, including anti-dsDNA, did not differ significantly between groups. Among patients with LN, the odds of progressing to renal transplantation was 16-fold higher (OR 16.5 [95% CI 2.5, 125.7], P = 0.0005) in patients testing positive for anti-nucleosome antibodies compared to those who tested negative. Furthermore, the level of anti-nucleosome antibodies was significantly ( P < 0.00005) higher in the LNTP group (3.69 ± 2.79) than the LN (0.51 ± 0.51) and CON (0.34 ± 0.44) groups. Review of 48 renal biopsies from 29 patients indicated that there was no difference in renal histological classification among patients with anti-nucleosome antibodies compared to those who tested negative. Our observations suggest that nucleosome autoantibodies are a biomarker for more severe SLE renal disease requiring transplantation. Lupus (2007) 16, 394—400.

The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease

Autoantibodies directed to chromatin components date back to the discovery of the LE cell and the LE cell phenomenon circa 1950, and subsequent evidence that major components of that reaction were chromatin components and histones in particular. Over time, immunoassays ranging from ELISA and line immunoassays to more modern bead-based assays incorporated histone and DNA mixtures, purified histones, and purified nucleosomes leading to a more thorough understanding of the genesis and pathogenetic relationships of antibodies to chromatin components in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune conditions. More recently, interest has focussed on other components of chromatin such as high mobility group (HMG) proteins both as targets of B cell responses and pro-inflammatory mediators. This review will focus on immunoassays that utilize chromatin components, their clinical relationships, and newer evidence implicating HMG proteins and DNA neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as important players in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Urine biomarkers in juvenile-onset SLE nephritis

Over 80 % of patients with juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus will have renal involvement compared to 40 % with adult-onset disease. Up to 44 % of children who do have lupus nephritis (LN) progress to renal failure in early adulthood. Improved methods of detecting onset of LN would allow earlier treatment, which may prevent irreversible renal scarring and a decline in renal function. Current conventional markers of disease activity fail to adequately predict renal lupus flares and include proteinuria, complement levels, anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and serum creatinine concentrations. Standardized histological classification is currently the gold standard for diagnosing and classifying LN, but its invasive nature limits routine use for monitoring, especially in a childhood population. Novel biomarkers need to be sensitive and specific-and preferably non-invasive and cost-effective. The most promising biomarkers in juvenile-onset LN include urinary neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and transforming growth factor-beta, although many others have been identified and are under investigation. No one biomarker yet discovered is unique to LN, indicating an overlap in disease pathophysiology. It is likely that a combination of biomarkers will be required for assessing disease flare detection, response to treatment and prognostic information. Potential biomarkers require longitudinal validation in large paediatric, prospective cohorts to assess their ability to act as clinically useful adjuncts.

Taxonomy for systemic lupus erythematosus with onset before adulthood

OBJECTIVE

To propose a common nomenclature to refer to individuals who fulfill the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during childhood or adolescence.

METHODS

The medical literature was reviewed for studies conducted in the target population between 1960 and December 2011 to obtain information about the terms used to refer to such children and adolescents. We reviewed the threshold ages used and disease features considered to discriminate these individuals from patients with onset of SLE during adulthood. Furthermore, the nomenclature used in other chronic diseases with onset during both childhood and adulthood was assessed.

RESULTS

There was an astonishing variability in the age cutoffs used to define SLE onset prior to adulthood, ranging from 14-21 years, but most studies used age 18 years. The principal synonyms in the medical literature were SLE without reference to the age at onset of disease, childhood-onset SLE, juvenile SLE, and pediatric (or paediatric) SLE.

CONCLUSION

Based on the definition of childhood, in analogy with other complex chronic diseases commencing prior to adulthood, and given the current absence of definite genetic variations that discriminate adults from children, the term childhood-onset SLE is proposed when referring to individuals with onset of SLE prior to age 18 years.

Are anti-nucleosome antibodies a better diagnostic marker than anti-dsDNA antibodies for systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and a study of metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Methods to detect anti-nucleosome antibodies (ANuA) have been available for more than 10 years and the test has demonstrated its good sensitivity and high specificity in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite these data produced through clinical and laboratory research, the test is little used.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the diagnostic performance of methods for measuring ANuA and to compare them with those for anti-dsDNA antibodies.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE and EMBASE with the search terms "nucleosome", "chromatin", "anti-nucleosome antibodies" and "anti-chromatin antibodies". Additional studies were identified checking reference lists in the selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected studies reporting on anti-nucleosome tests performed by quantitative immunoassays, on patients with SLE as the index disease (sensitivity) and a control group (specificity). A total of 610 titles were initially identified with the search strategy described. 548 publications were subsequently excluded based on abstract and title. Full-text review was undertaken as the next step on 62 publications providing data on anti-nucleosome testing; 25 articles were then excluded because they did not include either SLE patients or a control group, and 37 articles were selected for the metanalysis. Finally, a sub-metanalysis study was conducted on the 26 articles providing data on both ANuA and anti-dsDNA antibody assays in the same series of patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

Extraction of data from selected articles was performed by two authors independently, using predefined criteria: the number of patients with SLE as the index case, and the number of healthy or diseased controls; specification of the analytical method used to detect anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies; the cut-off used in the study; and the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Demographic and clinical data on the population investigated (adults or children; lupus patients with or without nephritis; patients with active or inactive disease) were also recorded and analyzed in a separate evaluation.

RESULTS

The systematic review and metanalysis showed that the overall sensitivity of the ANuA assay is 61% (confidence interval-CI, 60-62) and the specificity 94% (CI, 94-95). The overall positive likelihood ratio is 13.81 (CI, 9.05-21.09) and the negative likelihood ratio 0.38 (CI, 0.33-0.44). The odds ratio for having SLE in ANuA-positive patients is 40.7. The comparative analysis on anti-dsDNA antibodies conducted on the 26 studies which provided data for both antibodies showed that ANuA have greater diagnostic sensitivity (59.9% vs 52.4%) and a specificity rating only slightly higher (94.9% vs 94.2%). The probability that a subject with positive ANuA have SLE is 41 times greater than a subject with negative ANuA, while for anti-dsDNA the probability is 28 times greater. These figures are even more impressive in children, in whom ANuA have an odds ratio for the diagnosis of SLE of 146, compared to 51 for anti-dsDNA antibodies. In selected studies, ANuA (p<0.0001) but not anti-dsDNA antibodies (p=0.256) were significantly associated with disease activity measured by the international score systems. However, neither antibody appears to correlate with kidney involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the metanalysis have shown that ANuA have equal specificity but higher sensitivity and prognostic value than anti-dsDNA antibodies in the diagnosis of SLE. Despite a certain heterogeneity among the various studies, the use of ANuA appears more efficacious than anti-dsDNA.

Measurement of autoantibodies in pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and their relationship with disease-associated manifestations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an autoantibody profile in pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients to determine clinical and statistical associations with disease-associated manifestations.

METHODS

Sera from 53 SLE patients and 22 healthy individuals were collected. Antibodies to C1q, histone, chromatin, ribosomal P, dsDNA, and high-avidity dsDNA were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Patient records were evaluated for clinical and laboratory associations.

RESULTS

The most prevalent autoantibodies found in the SLE cohort were anti-C1q antibodies (n = 32, 60%), which correlated significantly with proteinuria and decreased complement levels (P < 0.05). Anti-C1q and antihistone antibodies were significantly elevated in patients with class III/IV nephritis compared with class I/II/V nephritis (P = 0.041). SLE patients with active nephritis at the time of sample collection demonstrated significantly elevated levels of anti-C1q antibodies compared with those without active nephritis, also exhibiting 100% sensitivity for active nephritis, proteinuria, and urinary casts. Antibodies to C1q, dsDNA, histone, and chromatin were significantly elevated in patients with active disease (P < 0.01). Chart-documented anti-dsDNA antibodies were positive in 28 SLE patients, INOVA anti-dsDNA antibodies in 25 patients, and high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies in 8 patients. Antihistone correlated significantly with leukopenia and hemolytic anemia (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates the importance of measuring anti-C1q antibodies in pediatric-onset SLE patients because elevated anti-C1q antibodies may be more indicative of renal disease activity, showing significant correlation with proteinuria, urinary casts, and active nephritis. Antibodies to C1q, histone, chromatin, and dsDNA exhibited the strongest association with clinical features, indicating the importance of measuring all of these antibodies in pediatric-onset SLE patients.

Antinucleosome antibodies as a potential biomarker for the evaluation of renal pathological activity in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis

The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between antinucleosome antibodies and renal pathological activity in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). We evaluated 36 patients with proliferative LN, 14 non-renal lupus patients and 10 healthy volunteers. Lupus activity was assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG 2004) index, serum anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels, serum complement levels and daily urinary protein levels. All 36 lupus nephritis patients received renal biopsy. Antinucleosome antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Our results showed that levels of serum antinucleosome antibodies were significantly higher in LN patients (median 90.35 units/ml, interquartile range [IQR] 37.38–135.23) than in non-renal SLE patients (median 5.45 units/ml, IQR 2.6–28.93, p <0.05) and in healthy volunteers (median 3.35 units/ml, IQR 2.95–5.23, p <0.001). Serum levels of antinucleosome antibodies were positively correlated with BILAG index (Spearman’s r = 0.645, p <0.001) and serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels ( rs = 0.644, p <0.01), while serum levels of antinucleosome antibodies were negatively correlated with serum levels of C3 ( rs = -0.400, p <0.01) and C4 ( rs = -0.300, p <0.05). Serum levels of antinucleosome antibodies were positively correlated with the histological activity index of LN ( rs = 0.368, p <0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between serum levels of antinucleosome antibodies and the histological chronicity index. In conclusion, the serum level of antinucleosome antibodies is a potential biomarker for early recognition of renal involvement and evaluation of disease activity in SLE. Our preliminary results suggested that serum levels of antinucleosome antibodies might be a potential biomarker in evaluating pathological activity of LN.

Pediatric lupus--are there differences in presentation, genetics, response to therapy, and damage accrual compared with adult lupus?

Some complement deficiencies predispose to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) early in life. Currently, there are no known unique physiologic or genetic pathways that can explain the variability in disease phenotypes. Children present with more acute illness and have more frequent renal, hematologic, and central nervous system involvement compared to adults with SLE. Almost all children require corticosteroids during the course of their disease; many are treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Mortality rates remain higher with pediatric SLE. Children and adolescents accrue more damage, especially in the renal, ocular and musculoskeletal organ systems. Conversely, cardiovascular mortality is more prevalent in adults with SLE.

Laboratory tests in the diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric rheumatic diseases: an update

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed the literature to evaluate the role of common laboratory tests and to examine the recent progress in the laboratory diagnosis of pediatric rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We used the PubMed database (1950-2008) to search for the keywords "laboratory," "erythrocyte sedimentation rate" (ESR), "C-reactive protein" (CRP), "blood cytology," "procalcitonin" (PCT), "complement system," "ferritin," "antistreptolysin O titer" (ASO), "autoantibodies," "genetic studies," in conjunction with "rheumatic disease in children" and "pediatric autoimmune diseases." All relevant original and review articles in English were reviewed as well as textbooks of pediatric rheumatology.

RESULTS

Laboratory tests (ESR, CRP, blood cytology, complement system, ferritin, ASO titer) play an important role in confirming a diagnosis and in the follow-up of rheumatic diseases in the pediatric age group. The ESR is probably the most widely measured index of the acute phase response. Measurement of CRP is very useful in the rapid diagnosis of infection as a progressive increase can be shown in the first 48 hours. Also, the subsequent fall in serum CRP concentration on resolution of inflammation is useful for monitoring the efficacy of treatment. In chronic diseases, a combination of CRP and ESR may provide the most useful information. Cytopenia and different forms of anemia can be encountered in many rheumatic diseases: they can be related to disease activity or to therapeutic side effects. Determination of complement levels (C3 and/or C4) is useful in the follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Ferritin is a laboratory hallmark of primary and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. ASO titer should be obtained to confirm a diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever; other important antibody markers of streptococcal infection include antihyaluronidase, antideoxyribonuclease B, and antistreptokinase antibodies. We also found that, in the pediatric age, the main indication for synovial fluid analysis is suspected joint infection. Antinuclear antibodies, anti-Smith antigen, and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies are important in the diagnosis of SLE, are useful prognostic markers, and facilitate clinical and treatment follow-up. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La antibodies are associated with Sjögren's syndrome and congenital heart block, while the anti-U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies show high specificity for mixed connective tissue disease. Repetitive spontaneous abortions, thrombocytopenia, and many types of venous or arterial thrombosis are associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. The presence of cytoplasmic antineutrophil antibodies is essential in the diagnosis of Wegener granulomatosis. The discovery of underlying single causative gene defects led to the identification of several autoinflammatory diseases, a group of genetic disorders characterized by recurrent attacks of inflammation (hereditary periodic fever syndromes). These include familial Mediterranean fever due to mutations in the Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene, hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome due to mutations in the MK gene for mevalonate kinase, cryopyrinopathies such as Muckle-Wells syndrome or neonatal-onset multisystemic inflammatory disease (neonatal-onset multisystemic inflammatory disease or chronic infantile neurological cutaneous and articular (CINCA)) associated with cold-induced autoinflammatory syndrome 1 gene mutations, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome due to mutation of TNF receptor I gene.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory investigations play an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in children. A good history and a complete physical examination are the best screening tests. Routine laboratory tests are useful to confirm a suspected diagnosis, to assess disease activity, and to measure the response and toxicity to treatment. Only a few tests represent diagnostic criteria such as antinuclear antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA in SLE or cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in Wegener's granulomatosis. Recent advances in molecular genetics have impacted diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment in genetic fever syndromes.

Anti-chromatin (anti-nucleosome) antibodies: diagnostic and clinical value

Anti-chromatin (nucleosome) autoantibodies were one of the first autoantibodies ever detected since they make up the majority of antibodies causing LE Cell formation. The prevalence of anti-chromatin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) varies from 50% to 100%, being similar to that of the classical positive LE cell. The presence of these antibodies can be used, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, to help in the diagnosis of SLE and drug-induced lupus. Anti-chromatin antibodies have also been found in a lesser percentage of other autoimmune disorders such as primary Sjögren's syndrome and primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The presence of anti-chromatin antibodies has also been linked to glomerulonephritis and disease activity in SLE patients. Recent studies demonstrated the induction of anti-chromatin (anti-nucleosome) antibodies after an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agent treatment.