Second-generation antipsychotics and metabolic side-effects: Canadian population-based study

A review on side effect management of second-generation antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia: a drug safety perspective

INTRODUCTION

Effective side effects management present a challenge in antipsychotic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). In recent years, most of the commonly used SGAs, except for clozapine, have been shown to differ only slightly in their effectiveness, but considerably regarding perceived side effects, safety profiles, and compatibility to preexisting medical conditions.

AREAS COVERED

The current state of available evidence on side-effect management in SGA treatment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is reviewed. In addition, current guideline recommendations are summarized, highlighting evidence gaps.

EXPERT OPINION

SGA safety and side effects needs to be considered in treatment planning. Shared decision-making assistants (SDMA) can support patients, practitioners and relatives to orient their decisions toward avoiding side effects relevant to patients' adherence. Alongside general measures like psychosocial and psychotherapeutic care, switching to better tolerated SGAs can be considered a relatively safe strategy. By contrast, novel meta-analytical evidence emphasizes that dose reduction of SGAs can statistically increase the risk of relapse and other unfavorable outcomes. Further, depending on the type and severity of SGA-related side effects, specific treatments can be used to alleviate induced side effects (e.g. add-on metformin to reduce weight-gain). Finally, discontinuation should be reserved for acute emergencies.

Racial disparities in utilization of first-generation versus second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies report racial disparities in antipsychotic prescription patterns. This study assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with the utilization of first-generation (FG) versus second-generation (SG) long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort analysis used claims data from the IBM MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid database. The study included adults with an LAI claim between 01-January-2009 and 31-December-2018, an ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM diagnosis of schizophrenia, race recorded as Black or White, and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment before the index LAI. Descriptive analysis detailed the relationship between race and FG or SG LAI initiation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess potential associations with FG vs. SG LAI initiation, including clinical and demographic factors, comorbidities, and index year.

RESULTS

A total of 10,773 patients were included: 6659 (62 %) Black and 4114 (38 %) White. Black patients had a higher utilization of FG LAIs than White patients (46.8 % vs. 38.9 %) over the 10 years analyzed. Black patients were more likely to utilize FG LAIs than White patients (odds ratio: 1.47; 95 % CI: 1.34, 1.62) after controlling for index year and covariates (race, age, gender, insurance plan type, Quan-Charlson Comorbidity index score, comorbidities, prior medications). Significant predictors of FG LAI utilization were older age, type of baseline oral antipsychotic (FG vs SG), type of coverage (managed care vs fee for service), and greater comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of FG LAIs was greater in Black compared to White Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia over a 10-year period. These findings suggest that racial disparities exist in LAI initiation, with implications for differential quality of schizophrenia treatment.

Pharmaco-genetic analysis of CYP1A1 and RGS4 variants and its impact on response to olanzapine and risperidone in Indian schizophrenic cohort

OBJECTIVES

Genetic variations contribute significantly to inter-individual responses to drugs and side effects. Pharmacogenomics has the potential to be utilized as a tool in disorders like schizophrenia with a high degree of genetic inheritance, although data on pharmacogenomics of schizophrenia are limited. Olanzapine and risperidone are the frequently used anti-psychotic drugs used in clinics. Studies have observed the variability in the response of both drugs in schizophrenic individuals. Considering the pharmacogenomics importance of both drugs, we aim to examine the cytochrome P 4501A1 (CYP1A1) and regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4) variants and their metabolizing status in 94 schizophrenic individuals of Indian descent.

METHODS

The present study is retrospective observational study. The metabolizing status of schizophrenic individuals was examined using Axiom Precision Medicine Diversity Array (PMDA) and the data were analyzed with the help of SNP Axiom Analysis Suite v5.1 (Affymetrix). The pharmacogenomics annotation was performed using PharmGKB.

RESULTS

Genotype and allele frequencies were observed. The results reveal the high frequency of poor metabolizers of olanzapine and risperidone in the studied cohort. In lieu of the high distribution of poor metabolizers, we compare observed allele frequencies with global populations' data to understand the variability of the genetic pool attained by Indian schizophrenic individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Interestingly, the Indian schizophrenic cohort forms a different cluster compared to global populations, suggesting that pharmacogenomics testing might play an important role in clinical decision making for schizophrenia drug management.

Risperidone induced hypotension: A case report and literature review

Risperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic agent used in psychiatric management, acutely and chronically. A rare adverse effect has been described with its use in the form of orthostatic hypotension especially in pharmaceutical clinical trials. However, there remains a lack of literature on the replication or prevalence of this adverse effect among patients in clinical settings. Hence, we present an incidental case of orthostatic hypotension following Risperidone therapy.

Associations between off-label low-dose olanzapine or quetiapine and cardiometabolic mortality

Olanzapine and quetiapine are routinely used off-label at lower doses, though it remains unclear whether treatment is associated with mortality. Here, we examined the associations between low-dose olanzapine/quetiapine, defined as 5 mg/day of olanzapine equivalents (OE) with cardiometabolic mortality in a population-based, longitudinal cohort of individuals who sought specialized psychiatric services. Through cross-linked Swedish registries, 428,525 individuals without psychotic, bipolar, or cardiometabolic disorders, or previous treatment with antipsychotics or cardiometabolic-related drugs were followed for up to 10.5 years. Extended stratified Cox proportional hazards regressions were employed to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of cardiometabolic mortality as a function of cumulative OE exposures, adjusted for age, sex, inpatient care, and time-dependent psychiatric diagnoses and treatments. Individuals were followed for a total of 2.1 million person-years. Treatment with olanzapine/quetiapine occurred in 18,317 of the cohort. In total, 2606 cardiometabolic-related deaths occurred. Treatment status (treated vs. untreated) was not significantly associated with cardiometabolic mortality (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.15, P = 0.307). However, compared to no treatment, treatment for <6 months was significantly associated with a reduced risk (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.87, P = 0.010) whereas treatment for 6-12 months was significantly associated with an increased risk (adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.22-2.92, P = 0.004), but not significantly beyond 12 months. Among those treated, each year exposed to an average 5 mg/day was significantly associated with increased cardiometabolic mortality (adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.06-1.99, P = 0.019). Overall, low-dose olanzapine/quetiapine treatment was weakly associated with cardiometabolic mortality. Clinicians should consider potential cardiometabolic sequelae at lower doses.

Clozapine Management in Schizophrenia Inpatients: A 5-Year Prospective Observational Study of Its Safety and Tolerability Profile

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is well known for its efficacy and clinical superiority compared to other antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, it is frequently underutilized worldwide because of its acute adverse events, as well as for its long-term cardiometabolic and hematological consequences.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-year safety in chronic TRS inpatients with continuous clozapine use.

METHODS

Patients with TRS and clozapine treatment were evaluated for 5 years. All participants were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale for Clozapine (GASS-C), Social Performance Scale (PSP) and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). Clinical, cardiometabolic and hematological data were collected periodically. General linear models (GLM) repeated measures controlling for CLZ dose were utilized to determine differences in variables across the time.

RESULTS

Overall, 189 inpatients were screened for study participation. The final sample included twenty-one TRS patients (16 males, 76%) with an average age of 57.6 years, all with 5-year continuous use of clozapine (mean dose 266 mg/day). There was not a significant effect of time on BPRS (p=0.774), PSP (p=0.855) and SPMSQ (p=0.066); differences remained not significant after controlling for CLZ dose (p=0.585, p=0.467 and p=0.105, respectively). No changes were found in blood and clinical parameters except for red blood cell count, which decreased over time (p=0.024; η2= 0.952). Patients reported a significant BMI decrease (-8.98 kg, p=0.008) between baseline and 5 years last observation.

CONCLUSION

The findings show how the application of a structured dietary, clinical and therapeutic monitoring program in psychiatric care facilities could allow the safe and effective long-term cardiometabolic and hematological management of clozapine. The unique role that clozapine plays in the current treatment of patients with TRS requires greater clinical awareness. Although its acute and chronic side effects are notorious, its safety management is feasible and broadens its potential practical application.

Long-Term Metabolic Monitoring of Youths Treated with Second-Generation Antipsychotics 5 Years after Publication of the CAMESA Guidelines Are We Making Progress? Surveillance Métabolique à Long Terme des Jeunes Traités par Antipsychotiques de Deuxième Génération, Cinq ans Après la publication des Lignes Directrices Camesa: Faisons-Nous des Progrès?

OBJECTIVE

The potential metabolic adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) need to be monitored. The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics (CAMESA) offers guidelines for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the long-term rates of youths receiving monitoring in mental health clinics and document the factors that may influence them.

METHOD

The charts of 180 patients (13.3 ± 3.1 years, 54.4% males) receiving SGA treatment for the first time between January 2016 and June 2018 were reviewed. Monitoring was divided into baseline and 1- to 6-month and 9- to 24-month periods. Population under study was stratified into children (4 to 12 years) and adolescents (13 to 18 years). Sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnosis and comorbidities, prescribed SGAs and comedications, anthropometric measures (AM), blood pressure (BP), blood tests (BT), electrocardiogram, and the psychiatrist's years of practice were collected. Cross tables were used to present the monitoring rates. Categories were compared by covariate analysis. Rates of patients monitored across categories were compared using Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Monitoring rates for AM, BT, and BP were 55%, 47.8%, and 46.7% at baseline; 50%, 41.7%, and 45.2% at 1 to 6 months; and 47.2%, 41.5%, and 40.6% at 9 to 24 months, respectively. Higher monitoring rates were significantly associated with adolescent status (baseline, 1 to 6 months), a diagnosis of psychotic and/or affective disorder (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months), having ≤1 psychiatric comorbidities (1 to 6 months), high SGA dose (baseline, 1 to 6 months), and clinician's experience (baseline, 9 to 24 months). Significantly lower monitoring rates were associated with the psychostimulant/atomoxetine comedication (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months).

CONCLUSION

Five years after publication of the CAMESA guidelines, metabolic monitoring is conducted for less than half of patients. In our sample, age, diagnostic category, psychiatric comorbidities, SGA dose, clinician's experience, and comedications influenced the monitoring rates. Major progress still needs to be made before reaching a satisfactory level of monitoring.

Mixed States: Modelling and Management

Our current conceptualisation of mixed states, defined as co-occurring manic and depressive symptoms, is unlikely to advance our knowledge or inform clinical practice. Episodes of mixed states can no longer be coded in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and the 'mixed features specifier' fails to capture the most common mixed state presentations. This reflects a lack of understanding of both the importance of mixed states and their underlying pathophysiology. Indeed, research into the nature of mixed states is scarce and uninformative, and most clinical practice guidelines fail to provide advice regarding their management. In this paper, we proffer a reconceptualisation of mixed states that provides a framework for informing clinical practice and research. It is based on the ACE model, which deconstructs mood disorders into three domains of symptoms: activity, cognition, and emotion. Symptoms within each domain vary independently over time and in different directions (towards either excitation or inhibition). By deconstructing mood disorders into component domains, mixed states can be explained as the product of different domains varying 'out of sync'. In most cases, the aetiology of mixed states is unknown. Alongside such idiopathic mixed states, we describe three potential causes of mixed states that are important to consider when formulating management: transitions, ultradian cycling, and treatment-emergent affective switches. In addition to providing guidance on the identification of various kinds of mixed states, we discuss practical strategies for their management, including the monitoring of ACE domains and functioning, to inform the use of psychoeducation and lifestyle changes, psychotherapy, pharmacology, and electroconvulsive therapy.

Treating depression with adjunctive antipsychotics

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Studies published since the last Cochrane review conducted in 2010 were identified via a literature search of recognised databases, using the keywords "adjunct*", "augment*", "antipsychotic" and "depression", and systematically evaluated. A targeted review of relevant guidelines was undertaken.

RESULTS

Adjunctive antipsychotics produce a small but significant improvement in depressive symptoms in most studies. Most of the studies focussed on patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants rather than patients with treatment resistant depression. Treatment guidelines were variable but generally supported the use of adjunctive antipsychotics while cautioning about the risk of side effects. Most were non-specific about the length of time adjunctive antipsychotics should be prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies do not support the routine use of adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants. They may be beneficial when used short-term in patients with treatment resistant depression who have specific symptoms (severe ruminations, melancholia, major sleep disturbance) that appear to respond well to adjunctive antipsychotics. There is no support for long-term use. Research should focus on specifying which symptom profiles are responsive and how adjunctive antipsychotics compare to other strategies in treatment resistant depression.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics as maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder-A critical review of the evidence

OBJECTIVES

The maintenance phase of bipolar disorder is arguably the most important. The aim of management during this time is to maintain wellness and prevent future episodes of illness. Medication is often the mainstay of treatment during this phase, but adherence to treatment is a significant problem. In recent years, long-acting injectable (LAI) solutions have been proposed, but these too have limitations. This paper discusses the options that are currently available and critically appraises the effectiveness of this strategy.

METHOD

The authors reviewed the small number of open-label and randomised studies on LAI medications in bipolar disorder and evaluated the efficacy and safety of these medications.

RESULTS

The studies reviewed show benefit of LAIs for the management of bipolar disorder but have several key limitations to the generalisability of findings to routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS

LAIs have an emerging role in the management of bipolar disorder and, although it is not without limitations, this strategy addresses some issues of long-term treatment and medication. Patients with bipolar disorder that are non-adherent or have an unstable illness with a predilection towards mania are possibly better suited to the use of LAIs, though more research is required to fully assess the effectiveness of this approach.