1
|
Griffiths JL, Foye U, Stuart R, Jarvis R, Chipp B, Griffiths R, Jeynes T, Mitchell L, Parker J, Rowan Olive R, Quirke K, Baker J, Brennan G, Lamph G, McKeown M, Lloyd-Evans B, Trevillion K, Simpson A. Quantitative Evidence for Relational Care Approaches to Assessing and Managing Self-Harm and Suicide Risk in Inpatient Mental Health and Emergency Department Settings: A Scoping Review. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2025:1-94. [PMID: 40324102 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2025.2488335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
There is an over-reliance on structured risk assessments and restrictive practices for managing self-harm and suicidality in inpatient mental health and emergency department (ED) settings, despite a lack of supporting evidence. Alternative "relational care" approaches prioritising interpersonal relationships are needed. We present a definition of "relational care," co-produced with academic and lived experience researchers and clinicians, and conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines. We aimed to examine quantitative evidence for the impact of "relational care" in non-forensic inpatient mental health and ED settings on self-harm and suicide. We identified 29 relevant reviews, covering 62 relational care approaches, reported in 87 primary papers. Evidence suggests some individual-, group-, ward- and organisation-level relational care approaches can reduce self-harm and suicide in inpatient mental health and ED settings, although there is a lack of high-quality research overall. Further co-produced research is needed to clarify the meaning of "relational care," its core components, and develop a clear framework for its application and evaluation. Further high-quality research is needed evaluating its effectiveness, how it is experienced by patients, carers, and staff, and exploring what works best for whom, under what circumstances, and why.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Griffiths
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Una Foye
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth Stuart
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruby Jarvis
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Beverley Chipp
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Raza Griffiths
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tamar Jeynes
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lizzie Mitchell
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennie Parker
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Psychologically Informed Consultation and Training Team, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Rachel Rowan Olive
- Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Kieran Quirke
- Nursing for Mental Health, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Geoff Brennan
- Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Mental Health Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gary Lamph
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Research and Innovation Department, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK
| | - Mick McKeown
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Lancashire, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kylee Trevillion
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU), Department of Health Service and Population Research (HSPR), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steadman J, Saunders R, Freestone M, Stewart R. Subtyping Service Receipt in Personality Disorder Services in South London: Observational Validation Study Using Latent Profile Analysis. Interact J Med Res 2025; 14:e55348. [PMID: 40233345 PMCID: PMC12041827 DOI: 10.2196/55348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personality disorders (PDs) are typically associated with higher mental health service use; however, individual patterns of engagement among patients with complex needs are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to identify subgroups of individuals based on patterns of service receipt in secondary mental health services and examine how routinely collected information is associated with these subgroups. METHODS A sample of 3941 patients diagnosed with a personality disorder and receiving care from secondary services in South London was identified using health care records covering an 11-year period from 2007 to 2018. Basic demographic information, service use, and treatment data were included in the analysis. Service use measures included the number of contacts with clinical teams and instances of did-not-attend. RESULTS Using a large sample of 3941 patients with a diagnosis of PD, latent profile analysis identified 2 subgroups characterized by low and high service receipt, denoted as profile 1 (n=2879, 73.05%) and profile 2 (n=1062, 26.95%), respectively. A 2-profile solution (P<.01) was preferred over a 3-profile solution, which was nonsignificant. In unconditional (t3941,3939=19.53; P<.001; B=7.27; 95% CI 6.54-8) and conditional (t3941,3937=-3.31; P<.001; B=-74.94; 95% CI -119.34 to -30.56) models, cluster membership was significantly related to receipt of nursing contacts, over and above other team contacts. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that routinely collected data may be used to classify likely engagement subtypes among patients with complex needs. The algorithm identified factors associated with service use and has the potential to inform clinical decision-making to improve treatment for individuals with complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Steadman
- Unit for Psychological Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Freestone
- Unit for Psychological Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hudson E, Pariseau-Legault P, Cassivi C, Chouinard C, Goulet MH. Mental Health Crisis: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:1908-1920. [PMID: 39210690 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The term 'mental health crisis' is a widely used concept in clinical practice and research, appearing prominently in mental health literature across healthcare and social science disciplines. Within these contexts, the term is frequently either left undefined or defined rather narrowly, confined to clinical observations or guidelines targeted at healthcare providers and negating the multifaceted nature of crisis as described by those with lived experience. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explore the characteristics of and provide a conceptual definition for the concept of 'mental health crisis'. Rodgers' method of evolutionary concept analysis was employed and 34 articles, ranging from 1994 to 2021 and a variety of disciplines, were analysed. The results highlighted the contrast between clinically oriented surrogate terms and related concepts and those used by individuals with lived crisis experience. Antecedents of crisis included underlying vulnerabilities, relational dysfunction, collapse of life structure and struggles with activities of daily living. The concept's attributes encompassed the temporality of crisis, signs and symptoms of crisis, functional decline and crisis in family and caregivers. Finally, the consequences comprised looking inward for help, looking outward for help, and opportunities and dangers. This concept analysis serves as a foundational step in understanding 'mental health crisis' and its various dimensions, facilitating more nuanced discussions and interventions in the realm of mental healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Hudson
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Christine Cassivi
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad Chouinard
- Peer Support Worker, Société Québécoise de la Schizophrénie et des Psychoses Apparentées, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clibbens N, Close A, Poxton J, Davies C, Geary L, Dickens G. Psychosocial Care Delivery in Intensive Home Treatment During a Mental Health Crisis: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:2257-2266. [PMID: 39034435 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Community-based intensive home treatment (IHT) is delivered as an alternative to psychiatric hospital admission as part of crisis resolution services. People receiving IHT present with complex mental health issues and are acutely distressed. Home treatment options are often preferred and there is evidence of service fidelity, although less is known about psychosocial care in this setting. Underpinned by a critical realist epistemology, this study aimed to explore psychosocial care in the context of home treatment from the perspectives of staff, service users and family carers. Data were collected using individual interviews and focus groups in two NHS organisations in England. An inductive qualitative thematic analysis resulted in five themes focused on (1) the staffing model and effective care provision, (2) the organisation of work and effective care provision, (3) skills and training and service user need, (4) opportunities for involvement and personal choice, and (5) effective communication. Findings suggest that co-production may improve congruence between IHT service design, what service users and carers want and staff ideals about optimal care. Service designs that optimise continuity of care and effective communication were advocated. Staff training in therapeutic interventions was limited by not being tailored to the home treatment context. Evidence gaps remain regarding the most effective psychosocial care and related training and supervision required. There is also a lack of clarity about how carers and family members ought to be supported given their often-crucial role in supporting the person between staff visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Clibbens
- Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Adrianne Close
- Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Julie Poxton
- Leeds and York Partnership Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Carly Davies
- Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Lesley Geary
- Leeds and York Partnership Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Geoffrey Dickens
- Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Staples H, Cadorna G, Nyikavaranda P, Maconick L, Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S. A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:1319. [PMID: 39478622 PMCID: PMC11526642 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11662-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis cafés (also known as crisis sanctuaries or havens) are community-based services which support people in mental health crises, aiming to provide an informal, non-clinical and accessible setting. This model is increasingly popular in the UK; however, we are aware of no peer-reviewed literature focused on this model. We aimed to investigate the aims of crisis cafés, how they operate in practice and the factors that affect access to these services and implementation of the intended model. METHODS A qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 managers of crisis cafés across England. These interviews explored managers' views on the implementation of their services, and the factors that help and hinder successful implementation. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach. RESULTS We identified five main perceived aims for crisis cafés: providing an alternative to Emergency Departments; improving access to crisis care; providing people in acute distress with someone to talk to in a safe and comfortable space; triaging effectively; and improving crisis planning and people's coping skills. Factors seen as influencing the effectiveness of crisis cafés included accessibility, being able to deliver person-centred care, relationships with other services, and staffing. These factors could both help and hinder access to care and the implementation of the intended model. There were a number of trade-offs that services had to consider when designing and running a crisis café: (1) Balancing an open-door policy with managing demand for the service through referral routes, (2) Balancing risk management procedures with the remit of offering a non-clinical environment and (3) Increasing awareness of the service in the community whilst avoiding stigmatising perceptions of it. CONCLUSIONS Findings illustrate the aims of the crisis café model of care and factors which are influential in its implementation in current practice. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of these services in relation to their aims. Crisis café service users' views, and views of stakeholders from the wider crisis care system should also be ascertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Staples
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, W1T 7BN, London, UK
| | - Gianna Cadorna
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, W1T 7BN, London, UK
| | - Patrick Nyikavaranda
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Lucy Maconick
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, W1T 7BN, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, W1T 7BN, London, UK.
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haslam M, Lamph G, Jones E, Wright K. Care giving and receiving for people with complex emotional needs within a crisis resolution/home treatment setting: A qualitative evidence synthesis. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2024; 31:788-802. [PMID: 38344951 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: The term 'complex emotional needs' (CEN) is used here to describe people with difficulties and needs that are often associated with the diagnostic label of 'personality disorder'. People with CEN might use out of hours services such as emergency departments and Crisis Resolution/Home Treatment (CRHT) teams more often when experiencing a mental health crisis. Very little is understood about the experiences of both those receiving, and those delivering care, for people with CEN within CRHT settings. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: There are differences between priorities for those delivering and those receiving care within CRHT settings. CRHT staff members are likely to focus more upon those aspects of their role relating to risk issues. managing resources, anxieties and the expectations of others. Service users, meanwhile, focus upon the caring relationship, wanting staff to listen to them, and to feel supported and reassured. In the papers reviewed, service users experiencing CEN did not always feel 'listened to' or 'taken seriously' especially in relation to risk issues and decision-making. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Relating the findings to mental health nursing and CEN within the context of CRHT, to better understand the person experiencing a mental health crisis, mental health nurses need to focus more upon the person and when making decisions around their care and must be aware of the potential for power imbalances. Collaborative 'sense-making' in relation to a person's risk behaviours may help. ABSTRACT: Background A growing body of qualitative evidence focusing upon the experiences of care within Crisis Resolution/Home Treatment (CRHT) is emerging; however, a firm evidence base regarding both the giving and receiving of care for those with complex emotional needs (CEN) in this context is yet to be established. Objective A qualitative evidence synthesis was used to develop a comprehensive understanding of how crisis care for people with CEN is experienced by both those giving and receiving care, within the context of CRHT. Method Findings from 19 research papers considering both clinician and service users' experiential accounts of CRHT were synthesised using meta-ethnography. Findings Both the giving and receiving of care within a CRHT context was experienced across four related meta-themes: 'contextual', 'functional', 'relational' and 'decisional'. Discussion Service user accounts focused upon relational aspects, highlighting a significance to their experience of care. Meanwhile, clinicians focused more upon contextual issues linked to the management of organisational anxieties and resources. For those with CEN, a clinician's focus upon risk alone highlighted power differentials in the caring relationship. Conclusions There is a need for nurses to connect with the experience of the person in crisis, ensuring a better balance between contextual issues and relational working.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Haslam
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Lamph
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Jones
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Wright
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roennfeldt H, Hamilton BE, Hill N, Castles C, Glover H, Byrne L, Roper C. Our Wished-for Responses: Recommendations for Creating a Lived and Embodied Sense of Safety During Mental Health Crisis. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14122. [PMID: 38898606 PMCID: PMC11186845 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical interventions have a place in crisis support; however, narrow biomedical and risk-driven responses negatively impact people seeking crisis care. With increasing shifts towards involving people with lived experience (service users) in designing services, foregrounding people's desired responses is critical. Accordingly, the aim of the study was to explore the wished-for crisis responses from the perspective of people who have experienced crisis and accessed crisis care. METHOD Using a hermeneutical phenomenological approach, in-depth interviews were conducted to determine the desired crisis responses of 31 people who self-reported experiencing mental health crises and accessed crisis services at ED, phone lines and/or crisis alternatives. RESULTS The findings identified wished-for responses that gave a felt and embodied sense of their own safety influenced by a human-to-human response, emotional holding, a place of safety and choice within holistic care. For such responses to be possible, participants identified organising principles, including recognising crisis as meaningful and part of our shared human experience, understanding risk as fluid and a whole-of-community responsibility for responding to crises. CONCLUSION This paper proposes how insights from people who have experienced crises can be translated into more beneficial crisis care. PATIENT OR CONSUMER CONTRIBUTION Most authors are in identified lived experience roles. The first author engaged with participants during the recruitment and interviews and was explicit regarding their lived experience. Service users were involved as advisors, providing input throughout the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Roennfeldt
- Centre for Mental Health Nursing, Department of NursingUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | | | - Nicole Hill
- Department of Social WorkUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Calista Castles
- Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Helen Glover
- Centre for Disability Research and Policy (CDRP)University of SydneyMelbourneAustralia
| | - Louise Byrne
- School of ManagementRMIT UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of PsychiatryYale School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Cath Roper
- Centre for Mental Health Nursing, Department of NursingUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah N, O'Keeffe S, Hayward S, Suzuki M, McCabe R. Re-imagining crisis care: experiences of delivering and receiving the Assured brief psychological intervention for people presenting to Emergency Departments with self-harm. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1271674. [PMID: 38600980 PMCID: PMC11004764 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1271674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Risk of suicide is increased immediately following emergency department (ED) attendance for self-harm. Evidence suggests that brief psychological interventions delivered in EDs are effective for self-harm. The Assured intervention comprises an enhanced biopsychosocial assessment in the ED, collaborative safety planning and three rapid solution focused follow-up sessions. Aim We addressed the following research questions: What were ED mental health liaison practitioners' and patients' experiences of the Assured intervention? What were the barriers and facilitators? What might the mechanisms be for improving experiences and outcomes? Methods We conducted a feasibility study of the Assured intervention in four EDs in Southeast England. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 practitioners and 27 patients. Interviews were transcribed, coded line-by-line in Nvivo and thematically analysed using an inductive approach. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with a kappa coefficient of 0.744.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Shah
- School of Health and Psychological Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally O'Keeffe
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Hayward
- School of Health and Psychological Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mimi Suzuki
- School of Health and Psychological Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rose McCabe
- School of Health and Psychological Science, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fleury MJ, Cao Z, Grenier G. Characteristics for Low, High and Very High Emergency Department Use for Mental Health Diagnoses from Health Records and Structured Interviews. West J Emerg Med 2024; 25:144-154. [PMID: 38596910 PMCID: PMC11000562 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with mental health diagnoses (MHD) are among the most frequent emergency department (ED) users, suggesting the importance of identifying additional factors associated with their ED use frequency. In this study we assessed various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and service use associated with low ED users (1-3 visits/year), compared to high (4-7) and very high (8+) ED users with MHD. Methods Our study was conducted in four large Quebec (Canada) ED networks. A total of 299 patients with MHD were randomly recruited from these ED in 2021-2022. Structured interviews complemented data from network health records, providing extensive data on participant profiles and their quality of care. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to compare low ED use to high and very high ED use. Results Over a 12-month period, 39% of patients were low ED users, 37% high, and 24% very high ED users. Compared with low ED users, those at greater probability for high or very high ED use exhibited more violent/disturbed behaviors or social problems, chronic physical illnesses, and barriers to unmet needs. Patients previously hospitalized 1-2 times had lower risk of high or very high ED use than those not previously hospitalized. Compared with low ED users, high and very high ED users showed higher prevalence of personality disorders and suicidal behaviors, respectively. Women had greater probability of high ED use than men. Patients living in rental housing had greater probability of being very high ED users than those living in private housing. Using at least 5+ primary care services and being recurrent ED users two years prior to the last year of ED use had increased probability of very high ED use. Conclusion Frequency of ED use was associated with complex issues and higher perceived barriers to unmet needs among patients. Very high ED users had more severe recurrent conditions, such as isolation and suicidal behaviors, despite using more primary care services. Results suggested substantial reduction of barriers to care and improvement on both access and continuity of care for these vulnerable patients, integrating crisis resolution and supported housing services. Limited hospitalizations may sometimes be indicated, protecting against ED use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Josée Fleury
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, Canada
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Zhirong Cao
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Guy Grenier
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bartsch DR, McLeod Everitt C, Bednarz J, Ludbrook C, Cammell P. A State-Wide Initiative to Improve Health System Responses to People With Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms in Crisis: A Retrospective Audit. J Pers Disord 2024; 38:87-108. [PMID: 38324250 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.1.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Gold Card SA is a four-session structured psychological intervention offered soon after an acute crisis presentation to people with symptoms characteristic of borderline personality disorder. This study describes individual and system-level outcomes from a large-scale health-care improvement initiative to implement Gold Card SA across South Australia. An uncontrolled pre-post study design was utilized examining service user (n = 332) patient-reported outcome measures and hospital service utilization records (6 months before and after Gold Card SA). Mixed-effects negative binomial regression analysis revealed a significant decrease in rates of service utilization across emergency department presentations (63%), mental health-related inpatient admissions (65%), and bed days (82%). Linear mixed-effect regression indicated large reductions in borderline symptoms and nonspecific psychological distress, and small to moderate improvements in psychosocial functioning. People presenting with or experiencing borderline personality disorder symptoms may benefit from a brief crisis intervention embedded within a stepped care model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna R Bartsch
- Borderline Personality Disorder Collaborative, Barossa Hills Fleurieu Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Cathy McLeod Everitt
- Borderline Personality Disorder Collaborative, Barossa Hills Fleurieu Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jana Bednarz
- SAHMRI Women and Kids Theme, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Cathy Ludbrook
- Borderline Personality Disorder Collaborative, Barossa Hills Fleurieu Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul Cammell
- Borderline Personality Disorder Collaborative, Barossa Hills Fleurieu Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brennan G, Miell A, Grassie J, Goodall K, Robinson S. What are the barriers and enablers to trauma-informed emergency departments? A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076370. [PMID: 38253456 PMCID: PMC10806777 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a high prevalence of psychological trauma among the population. Such people are more likely to have poorer health outcomes and these factors may contribute to increased use of the emergency department. There has been some attempt to implement a trauma-informed approach across public services, especially in health and social care. However, it is unclear how this concept applies to the challenging and high-demand emergency department context. The review aims to locate, examine and describe the literature on trauma-informed care in the unique and challenging healthcare delivery context that is the emergency department. The review aims to identify the barriers and enablers that may facilitate trauma-informed care in the emergency department context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Systematic searches of relevant databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Knowledge Network and Web of Science) will be conducted. Empirical studies of any methodological approach, published in English between January 2001 and September 2023 will be included. The 'grey' literature will also be accessed. Two reviewers will independently screen all studies. Data will be extracted, collated and charted to summarise all the relevant methods, outcomes and key findings in the articles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Formal ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and condensed summaries for key stakeholders in the field. The data generated will be used to inform a programme of work related to trauma-informed care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gearoid Brennan
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Miell
- EMERGE Research Group, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jane Grassie
- Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Karen Goodall
- School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sara Robinson
- Medical Education Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maconick L, Ikhtabi S, Broeckelmann E, Pitman A, Barnicot K, Billings J, Osborn D, Johnson S. Crisis and acute mental health care for people who have been given a diagnosis of a 'personality disorder': a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:720. [PMID: 37798701 PMCID: PMC10552436 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05119-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who have been given a diagnosis of a 'personality disorder' need access to good quality mental healthcare when in crisis, but the evidence underpinning crisis services for this group is limited. We synthesised quantitative studies reporting outcomes for people with a 'personality disorder' diagnosis using crisis and acute mental health services. METHODS We searched OVID Medline, PsycInfo, PsycExtra, Web of Science, HMIC, CINAHL Plus, Clinical Trials and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported at least one clinical or social outcome following use of crisis and acute care for people given a 'personality disorder' diagnosis. We performed a narrative synthesis of evidence for each model of care found. RESULTS We screened 16,953 records resulting in 35 studies included in the review. Studies were published between 1987-2022 and conducted in 13 countries. Six studies were RCTs, the remainder were non randomised controlled studies or cohort studies reporting change over time. Studies were found reporting outcomes for crisis teams, acute hospital admission, acute day units, brief admission, crisis-focused psychotherapies in a number of settings, Mother and Baby units, an early intervention service and joint crisis planning. The evidence for all models of care except brief admission and outpatient-based psychotherapies was assessed as low or very low certainty. CONCLUSION The literature found was sparse and of low quality. There were no high-quality studies that investigated outcomes following use of crisis team or hospital admission for this group. Studies investigating crisis-focused psychological interventions showed potentially promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Maconick
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK.
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK.
| | - Sarah Ikhtabi
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
| | - Eva Broeckelmann
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
| | - Alexandra Pitman
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| | - Kirsten Barnicot
- Department of Health Services Research & Management, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Jo Billings
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7BN, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saunders KRK, McGuinness E, Barnett P, Foye U, Sears J, Carlisle S, Allman F, Tzouvara V, Schlief M, Vera San Juan N, Stuart R, Griffiths J, Appleton R, McCrone P, Rowan Olive R, Nyikavaranda P, Jeynes T, K T, Mitchell L, Simpson A, Johnson S, Trevillion K. A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency, and residential mental health care. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:567. [PMID: 37550650 PMCID: PMC10405430 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05016-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Experiences of trauma in childhood and adulthood are highly prevalent among service users accessing acute, crisis, emergency, and residential mental health services. These settings, and restraint and seclusion practices used, can be extremely traumatic, leading to a growing awareness for the need for trauma informed care (TIC). The aim of TIC is to acknowledge the prevalence and impact of trauma and create a safe environment to prevent re-traumatisation. This scoping review maps the TIC approaches delivered in these settings and reports related service user and staff experiences and attitudes, staff wellbeing, and service use outcomes.We searched seven databases (EMBASE; PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Web of Science; Social Policy and Practice; Maternity and Infant Care Database; Cochrane Library Trials Register) between 24/02/2022-10/03/2022, used backwards and forwards citation tracking, and consulted academic and lived experience experts, identifying 4244 potentially relevant studies. Thirty-one studies were included.Most studies (n = 23) were conducted in the USA and were based in acute mental health services (n = 16). We identified few trials, limiting inferences that can be drawn from the findings. The Six Core Strategies (n = 7) and the Sanctuary Model (n = 6) were the most commonly reported approaches. Rates of restraint and seclusion reportedly decreased. Some service users reported feeling trusted and cared for, while staff reported feeling empathy for service users and having a greater understanding of trauma. Staff reported needing training to deliver TIC effectively.TIC principles should be at the core of all mental health service delivery. Implementing TIC approaches may integrate best practice into mental health care, although significant time and financial resources are required to implement organisational change at scale. Most evidence is preliminary in nature, and confined to acute and residential services, with little evidence on community crisis or emergency services. Clinical and research developments should prioritise lived experience expertise in addressing these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R K Saunders
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK.
| | - Elizabeth McGuinness
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational, & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Una Foye
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| | - Jessica Sears
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sophie Carlisle
- Section of Women's Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Felicity Allman
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- School of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Vasiliki Tzouvara
- Care for Long Term Conditions Research Division, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Merle Schlief
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Norha Vera San Juan
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| | - Ruth Stuart
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| | - Jessica Griffiths
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Appleton
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Rachel Rowan Olive
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Patrick Nyikavaranda
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Tamar Jeynes
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - T K
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lizzie Mitchell
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
- School of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kylee Trevillion
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhan Yuen Wong N, Barnett P, Sheridan Rains L, Johnson S, Billings J. Evaluation of international guidance for the community treatment of 'personality disorders': A systematic review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0264239. [PMID: 36913403 PMCID: PMC10010515 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for the treatment and management of 'personality disorders' have been introduced to provide guidance on best practice based on evidence and views of key stakeholders. However, guidance varies and there is yet to be an overall, internationally recognised consensus on the best mental health care for people with 'personality disorders'. AIMS We aimed to identify and synthesise recommendations made by different mental health organisations from across the world on community treatment for people with 'personality disorders'. METHODS This systematic review consisted of three stages: 1. systematic literature and guideline search, 2. quality appraisal, and 3. data synthesis. We combined a search strategy involving both systematic searching of bibliographic databases and supplementary search methods of grey literature. Key informants were also contacted to further identify relevant guidelines. Codebook thematic analysis was then conducted. The quality of all included guidelines was assessed and considered alongside results. RESULTS After synthesising 29 guidelines from 11 countries and 1 international organisation, we identified four main domains, with a total of 27 themes. Important key principles on which there was consensus included continuity of care, equity of access, accessibility of services, availability of specialist care, taking a whole systems approach, trauma informed approaches, and collaborative care planning and decision making. CONCLUSIONS Existing international guidelines shared consensus on a set of principles for the community treatment of 'personality disorders'. However, half of the guidelines were of lower methodological quality, with many recommendations not backed by evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational, & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Billings
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wood L, Newlove L. Crisis-focused psychosocial interventions for borderline personality disorder: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e94. [PMID: 35579039 PMCID: PMC9169498 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health crisis presentations are common in those who have a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), and psychosocial interventions should be provided. However, there is limited evidence outlining what a crisis-focused psychosocial intervention for this population should include. AIMS To conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of crisis-focused psychosocial interventions for people diagnosed with BPD. METHOD Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo) were searched for eligible studies. Studies were included if they were quantitative studies comparing a crisis-focused intervention with any control group and they included adults (18+ years of age) who were diagnosed with BPD (or with equivalent experiences). A narrative synthesis was undertaken to analyse results. RESULTS A total of 3711 papers were initially identified, 95 full texts were screened and 5 studies were included in the review. Two of five studies reported on the same trial, so four individual trials were included. Overall moderate risk of bias across studies was identified. The review tentatively demonstrated that crisis-focused psychosocial interventions are feasible and acceptable to people with BPD and that they have potential impacts on outcomes such as self-harm and number of days spent in hospital. There is limited consensus on what outcome measures should be used to assess the impact of interventions. CONCLUSIONS There is presently insufficient data to recommend any specific psychosocial crisis intervention for people with BPD. Given the relationship between BPD and the high frequency of crises experienced by this group, further large-scale trials examining crisis-focused psychosocial interventions are required. STATEMENT ON LANGUAGE We acknowledge that the term personality disorder can be controversial and stigmatising. As the term borderline personality disorder has been retained in DSM-5 and is used in the research evidence base we have decided to use this term throughout this review. However, we recognise that this term may not be acceptable to all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Wood
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Acute and Rehabilitation Directorate, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Liberty Newlove
- Acute and Rehabilitation Directorate, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|