Informed consent in India

Desire for Information and Preference for Participation in Treatment Decisions in Patients With Cancer Presenting to the Department of General Surgery in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India

PURPOSE

Providing appropriate information to patients about their illness helps them to cope with the diagnosis. Shared decision making is a key concept in managing patients with cancer. There are no data available about the desire for information and preference for participation in treatment decisions among Indian patients with cancer. The objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of patients who have information needs and to study the patient preference for participation in treatment decisions and the factors associated with them.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients with cancer older than 18 years. They were interviewed with a questionnaire after signing an informed consent. The association of sex, educational level, residence, diagnosis (type of cancer), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and treatment status with information needs and decision-making preference was analyzed using χ² test.

RESULTS

Approximately 81% of patients said that they had an absolute need to know if the illness was cancer, and > 70% of patients either had an absolute need to know or would like to know about the prognosis, treatment options, and adverse effects. Regarding the decision-making preferences, 97% wanted their treating physicians to make the decision regarding their treatment, and 66% preferred to share decision making with their family.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the patients with cancer expressed a need for knowing whether they had cancer. When it comes to treatment decisions, most of them preferred a passive role, and the majority wanted to involve their families in the decision-making process. We recommend that the treating physician should elicit the patient's preference in participating in treatment decisions and their preference about involving their family in making treatment decisions.

Perspectives of patients and relatives about electroconvulsive therapy: a qualitative study from Vellore, India

BACKGROUND

There has been little systematic study from developing countries on the perspectives of patients and their relatives about electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This study attempted to ascertain the views of patients and their relatives on the possible benefits and adverse effects of ECT.

METHOD

Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews, with the Short Explanatory Model Interview as the basis, was used to interview 52 patients who received ECT and their relatives before and after a course of the treatment. The most eloquent 10 among them were chosen for further in-depth interviews. Professional perception of efficacy and cognitive adverse effects were obtained from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

More than half of the recipients were not aware of the details of ECT even at the end of the course but were not unhappy about receiving ECT. Most relatives believed in the disease model, considered the illness serious, felt that enough information about the treatment was provided, knew about its benefits and memory problems, and felt that they were offered an alternative choice of treatment, but also admitted to perceiving coercion. All relatives had signed the consent for treatment, and most were not unhappy with ECT. There were significant differences in perception between patients and relatives and between the perceptions of patients admitted to the hospital involuntarily and of those who agreed for admission. The difference between the clinicians' and the relatives' perceptions of benefits and cognitive adverse effects was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study highlight the complex issues and contradictions in the process of providing information and obtaining consent for ECT.