Early psychological reactions in a group of individuals with pre-existing and enduring mental health difficulties following a major coach accident

Disaster Care for Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities

There is growing concern that the management of persons with psychiatric disabilities after disaster has been inadequate. Unfortunately, the literature is extremely limited, and empirical evidence on the best practices for addressing the needs of persons with psychiatric disabilities after disasters is sparse. A literature search of articles published in 3 widely used databases revealed only 12 articles on the topic. The 12 reviewed articles included persons with psychiatric disabilities after both natural disasters and acts of terrorism, both in close proximity to the disaster site and far away and in 3 different treatment modalities. All of the studies used clinically based samples. The available literature indicated that many persons with psychiatric disabilities demonstrate an ability to handle the stress of a disaster without decompensation from their primary illness. However, the literature also revealed that persons with severe mental illness (SMI) can experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and illness exacerbation after disaster. There is evidence that persons with SMI can be resilient in the short term when they are enrolled in an assertive community treatment program prior to the disaster; however, the outcomes for people with severe mental illness in other treatment modalities are unclear. Well-designed studies with clinical and population-based samples on disaster reactions of persons with psychiatric disabilities are needed for disaster psychiatrists and emergency planners to develop empirically based treatment guidelines for this population.

Differences in vulnerability to traumatic stress among patients with psychiatric disorders: One-year follow-up study after the Great East Japan Earthquake

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in vulnerability to traumatic stress and the 1-year course of post-traumatic stress symptoms among patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorders after the Great East Japan Earthquake.

METHODS

The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) was used to assess post-traumatic stress symptoms in 612 patients with schizophrenic (ICD-10 F2; n = 163), mood (F3; n = 299), or neurotic disorders (F4; n = 150) at 1-4 months and again at 13-16 months after the disaster (retention rate: 68%).

RESULTS

The mean IES-R total score for all diagnostic groups was 18.6 at index and 13.4 at follow up. The mean IES-R total score for patients with neurotic disorders (22.5) was significantly higher than that of patients with mood disorders (18.1) and schizophrenic disorders (15.9). At follow up, these scores decreased for all groups and inter-group differences were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Vulnerability to traumatic stress after a disaster was most severe in patients with neurotic disorders, followed by mood disorders, and, lastly, schizophrenic disorders. This difference among the three diagnostic groups was not found 1 year after the disaster.

Preexisting mental illness and risk for developing a new disorder after hurricane Katrina

To investigate predisaster mental illness as a risk factor of poor postdisaster mental health outcomes, veterans with (n = 249) and without (n = 250) preexisting mental illness residing in the Gulf Coast during Hurricane Katrina were surveyed after Katrina and screened for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic. Logistic regression examined the association between preexisting mental disorders and positive screens after the hurricane, adjusting for demographics and exposure to hurricane-related stressors. The odds of screening positive for any new mental disorder were 6.8 times greater for those with preexisting mental illness compared with those without preexisting mental illness. Among those with preexisting PTSD, the odds of screening positive for any new mental illness were 11.9 times greater; among those with schizophrenia, 9.1 times greater; and among those with affective disorders, 4.4 times greater. Persons with preexisting mental illnesses, particularly PTSD, should be considered a high-risk group for poor outcomes after a disaster.

Hospitalized psychiatric patients view the World Trade Center disaster

There is conflicting literature describing how psychiatric patients, particularly those with schizophrenia, respond to overwhelming environmental disasters, with some reports describing marked improvement in their symptoms. This view is contrary to the notion that those individuals who are most vulnerable (i.e. people with serious psychiatric illness) are at high risk for further increase in psychiatric symptoms subsequent to stressful events. Since the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, was such a catastrophic event, the following project was undertaken to examine its consequences on a population of hospitalized and thus severely ill psychiatric patients. Medical records for 156 New York City psychiatric inpatients were examined to evaluate their psychiatric condition during the time prior to and subsequent to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. We failed to find any difference between the patients who had the opportunity to directly view the disaster through windows and those who did not. However, significantly more patients with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis showed evidence of worsening in their symptoms than those with affective disorder or other diagnoses in response to the events of September 11.

Reactions of psychiatric inpatients to the threat of biological and chemical warfare in Israel

In the months before the Second Gulf War, the threat of biological and chemical warfare led many Israelis to experience significant stress and mood changes. In this study, we investigated whether this threat affected the subjective mood and behavior of inpatients with schizophrenia and compared the results with effects noted in their clinical staff. Subjects were evaluated at two points in time-2 months before the war and on day 1 of the war-with a specially designed questionnaire and with the Spielberger Scale for Trait Anxiety. Although the responses of the two groups did not differ radically before the war, on the first day of war, significant differences were noted, with patients demonstrating increases in anxiety and level of concern. Both groups reported similar effects on their mood. Patients were more concerned about the potential for the outbreak of World War III, whereas staff were more concerned about economic effects. Female subjects in both groups demonstrated greater anxiety and mood changes after the outbreak of war compared with before the war. Effects observed on the patients may be related to the decreased coping threshold resulting from their illness, which renders psychotic patients more vulnerable to any acute stressor; however, effects on the staff members should not be ignored.

Research on psychiatric outcomes and interventions subsequent to disasters: a review of the literature

Tragic events such as those of September 11, 2001, underscore the increasingly prominent role that psychiatrists play in aiding survivors, emergency workers, and broader communities to cope with disaster. The present review was undertaken to identify whether there exists a scientific basis for the practice of psychiatry in the aftermath of disasters. Most of the extensive literature over the past 30 years suggests that disasters have psychopathological consequences as well as medical and social ones. Pre-existing mood and anxiety disorders, although surprisingly not psychotic illness, appear to be risk factors for further psychopathology after a disaster. Thus, both acute psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions at disaster sites may prevent long-term sequelae, although their efficacy remains uncertain. Future controlled treatment trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms related to psychosis and acute involuntary hospitalization in schizophrenic and delusional patients

The aims of this study were: a) to assess the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after an acute psychotic episode in schizophrenic and delusional patients, b) to explore which psychotic symptoms and aspects of treatment were associated with traumatization, and c) to compare the extent of the traumatic impact of psychosis and involuntary hospitalization. Forty-six schizophrenic and delusional patients were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) at weeks 1 and 8 after acute psychiatric admission. Traumatic symptoms related to psychosis and coercive measures were scored separately. The prevalence of PTSD was found to be 11%. Sixty-nine percent of traumatic symptoms were related to psychosis and 24% to hospitalization. High PANSS score at week 8 was the strongest risk factor for the development of PTSD. Particularly positive and depressive/anxious symptomatology were associated with psychosis-related traumatic symptoms at both weeks 1 and 8. These data suggest that, in general, schizophrenic and delusional symptoms are more traumatic than the coercive measures used to control them.