Resuscitation skills and doctors working in psychiatry

Wilderness First Responder: Are Skills Soon Forgotten?

Wilderness first responders are trained to provide competent medical care in wilderness settings or until evacuation for more advanced treatment can be obtained. In light of the isolated environments in which they are called upon to respond to illnesses and injuries, their ability to effectively apply their training is crucial. Despite the responsibility assigned to them, there is an absence of research assessing the skill and knowledge retention of wilderness first responders, creating a gap in understanding whether a deficit in their ability to perform exists between certifications. Without such research, it is important to review knowledge and skill retention in related responder groups. The literature over the past 4 decades documents the loss over time of skills and knowledge across an array of trained responders, both professional and laypeople. Although the findings reviewed suggest that WFRs will exhibit a similar pattern of increasing skill loss beginning shortly after certification and a slower, but concurrent, decrease in knowledge, research is needed to document or refute this assumption.

Rapid tranquillisation: a questionnaire survey of practice

A postal survey of the drug treatment of behavioural emergencies by senior registrars and consultants in psychiatry revealed that 90% would initially use a non-depot antipsychotic (including 24% who would combine it with a benzodiazepine if the situation warranted), and 10% the short-acting depot, zuclopenthixol acetate, with another antipsychotic or a benzodiazepine, or both. The choice was made from a restricted range of drugs, with haloperidol being the most popular antipsychotic and diazepam the most popular benzodiazepine. Half of respondents did not considerBritish National Formularymaximum dose recommendations to be useful for rapid tranquillisation and many would exceed them. A substantial minority did not consider that adequate resuscitation was available at their unit and deficiencies were revealed in the training of junior doctors and in the audit of rapid tranquillisation. Very few psychiatrists reported that their units had written guidelines.